It's not a BAD attitude. He's not like...picking a fight with you or anything.

I'm not sure what you want me to elaborate on. Are you asking me how I intend to win? I don't know man, just by lasting longer in the game than everyone. Just like everyone else. I'm just not sure what you're asking me.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 05:59 GMT

#121

Oats I'm just going to do what I do. If you want strategy advice, heed Kush's. This isn't forum Mafia, you don't need to be after people for "content", just chillax, do your thing, and get along with everyone.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 06:00 GMT

#122

We're not out for blood here, we're all just trying to keep playing the game.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 06:03 GMT

#124

No, I'm not saying don't post. I'm saying you don't have to be consistently asking people questions trying to get information. You're not trying to figure out anyone's alignment. You're just chiggity chattin and voting me for Head of Household.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 06:06 GMT

#127

It's your funeral pal.

Like, unless you intend to run yourself or have someone else in mind, that just reads as spite to me. Spite, much like toxicity, will not be tolerated. You have been warned.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 06:20 GMT

#129

And...you think Oats is a threat to you winning?

I'm looking at you funny, but you can't tell from there.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 06:24 GMT

#131

I have no authority yet, but I see what you're getting at. I just don't think he's an issue that requires immediate eviction. He's already proven that he's going to be more active than half the game just by being here. I'm okay with him sticking around if he's gonna play the game.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 12:25 GMT

#157

I'm not trying to be anyone's enemy, nor was I trying to say what you guys would do before you posted. Oats asked me a question and I answered it. Honestly. I don't see what the problem is.

Now Rayn wants to remove my whole room? I see I was right about Rayn at least.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 12:58 GMT

#161

On December 12 2013 18:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Apparently Room A is full.

I have a suggestion for everyone who's not in Room A:

Look at those people's posts. It's clear they have formed an alliance and trying to shit over everyone who is not there. But, we have power in numbers. It's 6-4. Let's vote Oatsmaster for HoH and get rid of those people who otherwise have the vote majority and therefore can control the vote unless we work together.

Here's the proposition in full. We vote Oats together for HoH. Oats nominates 2 people from room A. Repeat until all of those guys are evicted. They clearly have an agenda and that is for all of them to trust each other and get rid of other people.

I say we counter it right now.

##Vote Oatsmaster

That's not what this says. So yeah, a. Vote for be is a vote to remove Raynor presently.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 13:03 GMT

#164

I'm reading just fine. You literally said remove everyone in room A. Literally.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 13:04 GMT

#165

If everyone votes for me I have to Oats.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 13:09 GMT

#168

I want to remove Rayn. I'll likely choose Rayn plus lurker to remove. Unless Rayn or lurker vote for me then no.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 13:10 GMT

#169

I don't care what your backtrack says Rayn.you made you intentions quite clear the first time. Stay packing your things. Our don't bother unpacking. Whichever applicable.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 13:29 GMT

#176

Well I'm not voting for Oats as long as the

On December 12 2013 19:22 Oatsmaster wrote:
YEAHHH I AGREE WITH YOUR PLAN RAYN!!!!!

PLAN is to remove Room A. I won't vote for anyone who plays the game by instilling doubt and fear.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 13:32 GMT

#180

Nothing Van has said indicated that he's playing with nefarious intentions. Rean....maybe.

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

December 12 2013 13:38 GMT

#181

On December 12 2013 22:32 Oatsmaster wrote:
VE, you get voted in today, lets say a lurker gets evicted.
Tmr, you will vote for one of your Room A buddies right? And that person will evict outside Room A, rinse and repeat. Am I wrong here?

There are no plans outside of D1. Yes I have promised not to remove anyone in Room A...but think for a second. Everyone in Room A it's actively playing the game and is in direct contact with me. Why WOULD I remove any of those dudes? Unless they start flaming or lurking I have no reason to remove them.