EPTI still think sidesprang is scum
II Titanic Mini Mafia - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
I still think sidesprang is scum | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
##VOTE:VayneAuthority | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
I'm just reading his filter and incredibly confused | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On December 17 2013 03:59 Blazinghand wrote: what do you think of xigxag? you have made no posts about him, nor about my current case, other than a (joking?) post about seeing his analysis. Xigxag doesn't post and doesn't say anything and made a horrible case. Anyone can see that | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
Consolidated Night action post Night 1 SK KP - Kills Bum Blazinghand (Corazon) Shoots Holyflare Mafia KP is blocked Night 2 SK KP - Kills Kushm4sta Mafia KP is blocked | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On December 14 2013 04:12 purpletrator wrote: Gee, I wonder who Holyflare (Holyflare the Medic has been shot by an ass-bullet!) decided to protect. Hmmmmmmmm lets all think really really hard about this now guys. I wonder. Who could it be? Consolidated Night action post Night 1 SK KP - Kills Bum Blazinghand (Corazon) Shoots Holyflare Mafia KP - Shot to Plutarch and blocked by Holyflare Night 2 SK KP - Kills Kushm4sta Mafia KP is blocked[/QUOTE] | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
Artanis- I'm gonna pin down Artanis as not maifa for right now. The main reasoning is his case on Xatalos is not bullshit, and it's the only half-decent case I have seen atm. Not to say that it is good, there are many points in which is disagre on, however more on that later. Xatalos- Horrible horrible day one play. I'm going to flag his as red atm for this and this alone. The main reasoning stands from in part, my reversal of this stance On December 10 2013 07:36 LSB wrote: In my opinion natural scum play is to stay low, especially on day 1, the town tends to self destruct anyways day 1. This whole entire "starting shit" strat is actually pretty good, even though it is counterintuitive to the idea of trying to not draw attention. Thus I assumed this strat is not very obvious, especially since I personally never considered it. This is all pure speculation. Something more grounded is that Xatalos is definably acting very different from before, and in my eyes less of a townie I am going to first off start off by retracting part of this analysis. After hosting some voice mafia I'm going to say the easiest way to play scum is the powerplay. Be super active and ask lots of question, pouncing on anything that anyone can deem scummily. Compared to GoT where Xatalos was town, Xatalos is far less conservative in his red reads. His hyperaggressiveness certainly has not helped the town which has suffered heavily from all of the flame. + Show Spoiler + You may ask. "Why LSB didn't you bother lynching him day 2 for it, now you are just bandwagoning" and I will reply "I waz busy and didn't read". And then you ask "But LSB you never read don't you" and I will ask "Can you link me the game we are playing so I can read and then awnser your question" Alakaslam On December 15 2013 05:58 Alakaslam wrote: Dude no ##un []%## vote xigxag So why did he do this? On December 15 2013 06:37 Alakaslam wrote: I switched to xigxag and had been defending you all day, how do you arrive at that conclusion? You are emo tunneled like jarjardrinks was emo tunneling you. So apparently Alakaslam thinks that both XigXag and purpletrator are mafia, so he switches his vote off of purpletrator onto XigXag minutes before the deadline so VayneAuthority the person who he has a green read on, will be lynched. Alakaslam is clearly lying and tried a last minute save of his teammate Current Scum Team Reads willing to bandwagon anyone in this list who is put up to the lynch: Xatalos/SideSprang/Alakaslam/ ##Unvote ##Vote: Xatalos | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
My play revolves around identifying who I think is scum and then going after them. If I doubt that they are scum, I remove them off of my list and no longer go after them. I do not relish the concept of lynching someone who I think is town, and unless I am consolidating my vote to a major candidate I will no push someone who I think may be town. Alakaslam is safer because we caught him lying, while Xatalos is more of a read based on day 1 play. I still think both of them are scum and would be willing to lynch either. Nor do I want you to forget SideSprang. | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On December 17 2013 09:38 Alakaslam wrote: Then I opted out of the discourse because I got suspicious of Rayne's snap wagon. As scum. I "knew" the bus was going down when I initially voted purple. You guys take me for a fool scum? You're kidding me, grab dat towncred with both hands. No way I'm giving up being part of a bus, to defend a teammate who is clearly getting suspicious enough for the snapwagon to happen anyway. If I was as knowledgable about the implications of the switch as you all imply with my "lie" then I would have known it didn't save purple and would not have done it. I take this as an insult to my scum play. This is the full explanation So apparently Alakaslam thinks that both XigXag and purpletrator are mafia, so he switches his vote off of purpletrator onto XigXag minutes before the deadline so VayneAuthority the person who he has a green read on, will be lynched. Alakaslam is clearly lying and tried a last minute save of his teammate | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On December 17 2013 09:54 Blazinghand wrote: I like your explanation for why alak is scum, I just think that it still applies even if Xata is town. Like let me phrase it this way Imagine all possible worlds in which Alak is town. In some of those worlds, Xata is also scum, but it not ALL of those possible worlds. Xata's scumminess seems to be (at least via your thought process; I could be wrong) a function of alak's scumminess, which means it's less likely Xat is scum than Alak Both of my cases are independent of each other. So it doesn't apply in this case But yes, should one of my cases be dependent on the other being scum (A is scum if B is scum) (ie PYP mafia day 3) I am more willing to lynch B first, and then A. I'd prefer we stop this discussion simply because it has little relevance to what is actually going on in this game. I am more than happy to take it to PMs or postgame if you want to chat about optimal mafia play. Should you wish to defend Xata I am all ears | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
On December 17 2013 09:58 Alakaslam wrote: This assumes I believed vayne would wind up being the target. That is the fallacy. I don't think I knew that at the time. Either I knew it wouldn't change anything or I thought it had a chance or neither, I simply panicked. You did it 2 minutes before the deadline... and at the same time as Purpletrator... Next game, do it 1 minute before the deadline and you might be able to pull it off | ||
|
LSB
United States5171 Posts
| ||
| ||
