|
On November 30 2013 20:02 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 20:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Have you read anything i have written Oats? you said sandro is scum for xxx reasons. Which is kinda wrong because sandro wont even post more than once or twice if hes scum. Whats wrong with SS's vet plan?
So you have not read anything. check.
The problem with assigning vets to top picks is that we should assign townies to top picks. Anything else is idiotic.
|
|
|
I feel like both of marv & Oats are scum tbh. :p
|
On November 30 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 20:02 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 30 2013 20:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Have you read anything i have written Oats? you said sandro is scum for xxx reasons. Which is kinda wrong because sandro wont even post more than once or twice if hes scum. Whats wrong with SS's vet plan? So you have not read anything. check. The problem with assigning vets to top picks is that we should assign townies to top picks. Anything else is idiotic.
So you dont think you can read the vets well enough?
And what exactly am I not reading Rayn?
|
##Vote: Yorick
i laughed a little, when you delurked, marv.
|
On November 30 2013 20:06 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:On November 30 2013 20:02 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 30 2013 20:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Have you read anything i have written Oats? you said sandro is scum for xxx reasons. Which is kinda wrong because sandro wont even post more than once or twice if hes scum. Whats wrong with SS's vet plan? So you have not read anything. check. The problem with assigning vets to top picks is that we should assign townies to top picks. Anything else is idiotic. So you dont think you can read the vets well enough? And what exactly am I not reading Rayn?
Of course i can. Read again. I am tired of arguing with you already because you are not making any sense.
|
On November 30 2013 20:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 20:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 30 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:On November 30 2013 20:02 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 30 2013 20:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Have you read anything i have written Oats? you said sandro is scum for xxx reasons. Which is kinda wrong because sandro wont even post more than once or twice if hes scum. Whats wrong with SS's vet plan? So you have not read anything. check. The problem with assigning vets to top picks is that we should assign townies to top picks. Anything else is idiotic. So you dont think you can read the vets well enough? And what exactly am I not reading Rayn? Of course i can. Read again. I am tired of arguing with you already because you are not making any sense.
you both didnt read well, since it was OBVIOUSLY an example and not an exact plan.
|
On November 30 2013 20:10 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 20:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:On November 30 2013 20:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 30 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:On November 30 2013 20:02 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 30 2013 20:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Have you read anything i have written Oats? you said sandro is scum for xxx reasons. Which is kinda wrong because sandro wont even post more than once or twice if hes scum. Whats wrong with SS's vet plan? So you have not read anything. check. The problem with assigning vets to top picks is that we should assign townies to top picks. Anything else is idiotic. So you dont think you can read the vets well enough? And what exactly am I not reading Rayn? Of course i can. Read again. I am tired of arguing with you already because you are not making any sense. you both didnt read well, since it was OBVIOUSLY an example and not an exact plan.
Okay i misunderstood that then.
Doesn't change the fact that Oats is horrible as if and when we both misread he is making zero sense by saying the following:
"rayn does not trust his ability to read the vets and therefore does not want them to be in top of the draft" when i am saying:
"we should assign drafts by who is towniest and not by who are vets"
that has nothing to do with my ability/inability to read vets.
|
supersoft, about your post about banning Talon; Why do you want to ban that role over other anti-town roles? Especially considering this was pro-town:
Out of these the 3 I want to face the least are Yorick, because hiding alignment is too powerful and can cause a lot of confusion; Graves because eliminating alignment reversal can make a red check reliable; Tryndamere because of possibility of mass killing.
No Talon here in top 3..
|
On November 30 2013 20:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:supersoft, about your post about banning Talon; Why do you want to ban that role over other anti-town roles? Especially considering this was pro-town: Show nested quote +Out of these the 3 I want to face the least are Yorick, because hiding alignment is too powerful and can cause a lot of confusion; Graves because eliminating alignment reversal can make a red check reliable; Tryndamere because of possibility of mass killing. No Talon here in top 3..
On November 30 2013 12:33 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 12:26 Rean wrote:On November 30 2013 12:19 supersoft wrote:
My draftnumbers will be 1 and 30. I want a hero with KP... Or some kind of protection lol.
I dare you to take my numbers.
If no other townie picks my numbers, i'll either be firstpick, or if some scummer "sacrifices" himself on my numbers, we will both be lastpick.
Can we somehow organize this? I mean next one could be Mig with 2 and 30, then BC 3 and 30, then sandroba 4 and 30 etc.
Does that make sense? Technically I suppose you could, numbers are made public I believe. But good luck getting people to agree it. ##Vote: GravesHis ability serves no purpose to town at all. Is it encouraged to roleplay as the player we were assigned? same applies for talon. I guess we should just ban out these obvious antitown heros, because lowranked scum will want to take them
again. Talon was an example.
Graves yorick are definetely more dangerous than talon
tryndamere is pretty antitown, too. Probably more than talon.
|
lol, Tryndamere is is like a scumclaim if used. If someone wants to claim scum be my guest.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On November 30 2013 18:09 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
VE is always insecure. Like literally always. You may be right about sandro being scum but if there's one thing I can tell you in a game of mafia is when VE is town.
Don't really buy this, one of my only memories of you pushing a case on someone was you mislynching a town VE (as town yourself) in LV.
|
why would anyone take him and claim that he used him?
|
On November 30 2013 20:30 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 18:09 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
VE is always insecure. Like literally always. You may be right about sandro being scum but if there's one thing I can tell you in a game of mafia is when VE is town.
Don't really buy this, one of my only memories of you pushing a case on someone was you mislynching a town VE (as town yourself) in LV.
i disagree more on the sandroba part tbh.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On November 30 2013 19:17 supersoft wrote:Yeah sure, you're calling sandroba scum! Do you realize, that he's the one who came up with the most reasonable and protown post so far? nvm. That's not how you play as town. You just flood the thread again right?
Pretty sure BC in LXIII had the most reasonable and pro-town posts according to you as well 
|
On November 30 2013 20:33 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 19:17 supersoft wrote:On November 30 2013 18:00 raynpelikoneet wrote:I'm actually keeping notes this game at least early on. Here they are atm: + Show Spoiler + Yeah sure, you're calling sandroba scum! Do you realize, that he's the one who came up with the most reasonable and protown post so far? nvm. That's not how you play as town. You just flood the thread again right? Pretty sure BC in LXIII had the most reasonable and pro-town posts according to you as well
it's not allowed to talk about ongoing games, marv. you should know that. You're the host of that game
no seriously. I can read sandroba much better than BC.
|
On November 30 2013 20:30 supersoft wrote:
why would anyone take him and claim that he used him?
Because it's not like you don't know they used it.
Someone moves up 5 spots on the list and people in that frame take damage = lynch. EZPZ.
|
On November 30 2013 20:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On November 30 2013 20:06 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 30 2013 20:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:On November 30 2013 20:02 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 30 2013 20:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Have you read anything i have written Oats? you said sandro is scum for xxx reasons. Which is kinda wrong because sandro wont even post more than once or twice if hes scum. Whats wrong with SS's vet plan? So you have not read anything. check. The problem with assigning vets to top picks is that we should assign townies to top picks. Anything else is idiotic. So you dont think you can read the vets well enough? And what exactly am I not reading Rayn? Of course i can. Read again. I am tired of arguing with you already because you are not making any sense.
Why do you not want to engage me if you think Im scum? Dont you care about what I think at all? You dont seem to be making any effort at all to have a back and forth conversation, instead preferring to snip at people and act all angry.
|
How do you have any sort of read on marv from 1 post Rayn?
|
EBWOP:
Oh it was "up to 5 spots". Anyways, we should probably agree to not pick any of the powers that allows moving or move other players in player list. In that way if the roles are picked we can narrow them donw to scum. The "is this role in the game" can then check those roles and we just lynch the players that are assinged with those roles. Quite simple. Scum feel free to pick those roles, it becomes an instant scumclaim if you are one of those roles.
It would be good to ban those roles but i think it's better to ban info-denying roles and handle those player-movers that way. Or if someone wants to deny those roles just pick it, claim it, and never use it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
