I have a sugestion for the invention. Make a checker that you choose a number and it returns the number of scum that first picked that number. That way you can use it to single check people or to confirm/check multiple people in the number clusters.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 14:11 GMT

#1287

Can't seem to find any games with tl search, can you link pls?
I did however read his filter again and I can't find anything in particular that would lead me to believe he is scum.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 14:12 GMT

#1288

@kurumi Indeed, and that's the point, since list checks are normally banned. If he can make a list checker, then by all means do it.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 14:19 GMT

#1291

@marv while I take my time and skim that, why don't you tell me what you think about austin this game

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 14:44 GMT

#1301

@marv took a look at gtrsrs and believe we should let him post freely here d1 before reaching any conclusions. I don't think his behavior on the pick phase points towards scum. My read on austin is purely based on meta and his posts and overall energy seem quite different from what I remember when he was town.
Btw I do agree with you that mocsta/mz exchange looks fake and overall mocsta's posts don't look natural to me.

@SS I mostly agree with your stuff on LSB, but his behavior has been so erratic that I think we should take a bit more time and see how things fare. I'm having a hard time wrapping my mind seeing the logic of it from a scum perspective too.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 14:51 GMT

#1304

@rayn I would expect bc to dissagree with w/e I proposed regardless of alignment

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 21:51 GMT

#1497

@jonny why don't you dig into rean/austin/mocsta/mz and tell me what you think

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 21:54 GMT

#1503

jay why don't you read those filters too? I don't like my vote on you quite as much right now.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 22:03 GMT

#1514

@lsb i did roleclaim, but i don't think anyone should be doing this yet. People who got vanilla role should tell us what they tried to get though. Role claiming at this point doesn't seem beneficial at all. Maybe when people actually do something and put forward some actual info role claims can be beneficial/necessary.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 22:04 GMT

#1515

okay that maybe explains why i thought he suddenly was pretty townie =)

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 22:20 GMT

#1521

On December 03 2013 07:17 SamuelLJackson wrote:

Show nested quote +

what useful info can you derive from people claiming their roles right now? When a bunch of dudes come foward with what they did at night and we can see the end result, we can try to sort it out if we think it's gonna lead us to finding mafia. Right now I don't see a benefit to town of knowing who has X or Y role. I.E if someone used their head and actually picked nocturne I wouldnt want him to be roleblocked/killed as it's the only info role left.

Sorry that was me, had the other browser open

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 22:32 GMT

#1530

Suspicion of rean is because he was around at the deadline, didn't comment on anything. Prior to that I asked him to make sure town got 3 effective bans and he was enthusiastic about it, but just dissapeared and didn't deliver. Also he didn't bother telling us what he tried to pick. Such delays are pretty common when you are scum, you try to get a suspicious role and is waiting for more people roleclaim so you can say you tried to get a pro town role. Nothing concrete yet, but some things adding up.

Austin is meta based and due to my expectations of his play. The fact that he hasn't shown up yet increases my suspicion.

Mocsta/MZ exactly because of that argument that seems fake as balls. A lot of their posts don't feel quite right to me, just seem fabricated.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 22:38 GMT

#1535

And jonny when I ask people to look at people's posts I don't want a summary of what they did. I expect you to dig deeper and find little things that you believe points toward one alignment or the other, so I get a feel of what perspective you are comming from. And if you can't find any just say nothing you've read makes you lean towards one alignment or the other.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 22:40 GMT

#1536

On December 03 2013 07:34 marvellosity wrote:
I'm ok with MZ right now. I don't think he did that much wrong in the Mocsta/MZ exchange. Mocsta just launched himself at MZ in a totally bizarre way.

Sure, but the way he acknowlodged it and responded to it without finding it bizarre himself is pretty weird too.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 22:51 GMT

#1547

On December 03 2013 07:42 VisceraEyes wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why are those two things mutually exclusive? Why could he not have noticed it but still responded to it? Like, he's not here and we don't know what he thinks of Mocsta based on the exchange.

Show nested quote +

Oh wait he did acknowledge that it was weird the way Mocsta was going about it.

Actually at the time this post was made I thought it was a pretty exagerated comment and unlike what I've seen of MZ. Then he gives pretty thorough responses like he has something to explain to mocsta at this point. And then they both drop it and vanish from the thread. I don't know, maybe I'm over reading this, but it doesnt feel quite right to me.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 23:11 GMT

#1565

On December 03 2013 07:55 geript wrote:
@Sandroba. Who are townreads for you right now and why?

Not going to bother giving/explaining town reads until i think it's necessary. I'm curious as to why you would ask me of all people that. I think it's pretty obvious that I'm town.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 02 2013 23:48 GMT

#1576

@LSB
MAN. You get no notifications this game. What happens is people will be informed they received X amounts of dmg and the results of their actions. Half the abilities of the heroes are unknown information. So you can't hold anyone accountable for anything. Please. Read the rules and think about your plan first.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 03 2013 11:34 GMT

#1847

On December 03 2013 11:55 LSB wrote:

Show nested quote +

Never said anything about SK, just said not town. Good enough for me to try to drop da hammer. My night action is gonna be to move 3 up. Though unless some friendly helper would like to give me more KP, it's gonna be more like a feather than a hammer

LSB, just noticed this inconcistency here. If your plan is to confirm you have tryn to the thread and that you do the damage you said you do (which is pretty useless as a)no one is even doubting you have what you claim b)nobody cares), then why would you call someone that would boost your damage a "friendly helper"?

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 03 2013 11:36 GMT

#1849

I also don't like this ticklishmusic either. And especially don't like LSB deciding to stop just bellow him.

sandroba

Canada4998 Posts

December 03 2013 11:41 GMT

#1851

I like your list, with exception of gtrs. The fact that he tried to take kasix and I believe mafia would have taken kasix pretty high is holding some weight for me. I would sub in ticklish for him.