EPTBack To The Basics Mini Mafia - Page 33
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
| ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
| ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 21 2013 23:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: Mocsta answer my case on you. Please. Where is it dear? | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On November 21 2013 23:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: ##UnvoteIf anyone thinks these posts come from a townie vote for me. Otherwise vote for Mocsta. ##Vote: Rayn | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On November 21 2013 23:54 raynpelikoneet wrote: I knew you would claim scum. <3 I don't even care if you lynch me but i suggest everyone looks at this post when i flip!!! I just proved you wrong. And you are going against what you suggested ~10min ago. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
Onegu had a read on rayn so I expect that to be 5 votes. We only need 2 more votes for a majority. C'mon jampidampi ! | ||
|
Bereft
United States1007 Posts
##Vote: Rayn I think its completely irrational for a townie to bust into the thread the way rayn is doing now flinging shit like an angry bull. there is no reason for him to be behaving this way as town. | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 21 2013 23:59 raynpelikoneet wrote: I just proved you wrong. And you are going against what you suggested ~10min ago. OK, guilty as charged. Apologies, I was confused - I thought you said you wrote a case? I didnt see anything about why this is indicative of a scum mindset. | ||
|
Bereft
United States1007 Posts
| ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On November 21 2013 23:52 Aquanim wrote: And, like I've already said, I didn't address you at all at the time because I wanted to see if you would elaboarate on your reads or indeed do anything else useful without being prompted. You may believe that that's an entirely unbelievable reason for me to leave you alone for some time - if you believe that, I have no answer other than "You're wrong". We're going in circles here and I don't see anything further to be gained by discussing this with you. You obviously believe that that one post and whatever other tired old arguments you've raised is sufficient justification for clinging to my wagon. Whether that means you're obstinate, tunneled or just scum is a question I intend to leave for another day. Forget about addressing my post back then because that clearly isn't what you were trying to do with that post. If we leave that out of your post the only thing left is your noncommital dirt throwing onto me. Which is scummy. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
you start by acting all high and mighty saying there's no way you'll consilidate onto the rean lynch and you KNOW rean will flip town.... while proposing lynches that nobody else wants and you KNOW nobody will go along with i asked your opinion on another lynch (jampi) and you deflected by saying you're gonna lynch me D2 if i don't stop calling you scum now you're trying to take complete control of the thread and force people to lynch one of two players (you/moc) that up until now nobody has even said anything about lynching, claiming you will ruin the game for everyone if they don't play along so many scum claims. even if you are town which I absolutely do not think is the case I don't want you in this game if this is how you're gonna be. this is supposed to be bootcamp mafia not raynspam mafia | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
| ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On November 21 2013 23:59 raynpelikoneet wrote: How is he going against what he suggested?I just proved you wrong. And you are going against what you suggested ~10min ago. He said "Do you honestly think you can say enough people for who-ever your counter wagon is? If not, the townie thing to do is secure a Rean lynch - whether you like it or not." He obviously can get a majority for you. All he was saying is that it isn't townie to let the lynch fizzle due to no majority. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
On November 22 2013 00:01 Mocsta wrote: OK, guilty as charged. Apologies, I was confused - I thought you said you wrote a case? I didnt see anything about why this is indicative of a scum mindset. Your first suggestion is scummy as hell. You are shutting down discussion because people "need to consolidate". The suggestion is also incorrect and that's what i wanted to show you. ##Unvote: I suggest, Mocsta, ifyou are town you never make those kinda bullshit suggestions in a game where i am playing. I also suggest you don't make bullshit cases based on why someone might have been replaced out of a game and how someone might not have read scum QT or other bullshit. I could make a case on you where i say "WILD THEORY; Mocsta has played so bad as scum lately so he needs to change his playstyle completely to survive even N1. Therefore he is scum hue hue." Do you see why your posts on the last page are terribad? Please stop if you are town. Now i do not want to lynch Rean. I think he has been genuine and cooperative and stated clearly who he wants to lynch on D1. That's more than 8 other players in this game have done. Now can we discuss the lynch? | ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 22 2013 00:03 jampidampi wrote: I need some time to make any sense of this rayn mess, give me a moment to reread. hmmmm <I am going to the QT to talk to Rayn about how to best perform damage control> but watevz For a guy that displayed shrewd analysis with the corazon read (i.e. immediately being able to identify emotional tunnel etc) its disconcerting how hard you are holding onto this Aquanim line of questioning. The original query to you was "fair game". You wrote he was leaning town (slightly) yet identified two quotes that you said had no substance. The message is unclear -- yet you keep trying to shit the thread with this. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
| ||
|
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On November 22 2013 00:06 raynpelikoneet wrote: LOL.. this ties in with my post to jampidampi so bad.Your first suggestion is scummy as hell. You are shutting down discussion because people "need to consolidate". The suggestion is also incorrect and that's what i wanted to show you. ##Unvote: I suggest, Mocsta, ifyou are town you never make those kinda bullshit suggestions in a game where i am playing. I also suggest you don't make bullshit cases based on why someone might have been replaced out of a game and how someone might not have read scum QT or other bullshit. I could make a case on you where i say "WILD THEORY; Mocsta has played so bad as scum lately so he needs to change his playstyle completely to survive even N1. Therefore he is scum hue hue." Do you see why your posts on the last page are terribad? Please stop if you are town. Now i do not want to lynch Rean. I think he has been genuine and cooperative and stated clearly who he wants to lynch on D1. That's more than 8 other players in this game have done. Now can we discuss the lynch? My vote remains. This is such a scummy backpedal. Yes Rayn, the martyr failed. P.S. The consolidation request on Corazon was very townie to ask. Im going to bed soon, and when I wake up 1 hr before the lynch. I want to go to bed knowing town is in a secure place. I know it is now with your lynch. /night | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43266 Posts
##Vote: Jampidampi | ||
|
jampidampi
Finland386 Posts
On November 22 2013 00:07 Mocsta wrote: hmmmm <I am going to the QT to talk to Rayn about how to best perform damage control> Rayn has some weird things as town in the past, though mostly related to fake claiming (Nuclear Winter for example). For a guy that displayed shrewd analysis with the corazon read (i.e. immediately being able to identify emotional tunnel etc) its disconcerting how hard you are holding onto this Aquanim line of questioning. The original query to you was "fair game". You wrote he was leaning town (slightly) yet identified two quotes that you said had no substance. The message is unclear -- yet you keep trying to shit the thread with this. Both you and Aquanim need to read more carefully. First of all, I highlighted one post that "didn't say anything with a substance". My point about Aqua is about the motive behind his post, and he seems to continue missunderstanding that. He has yet to refute my actual point, instead trying to make my point appear to be something which it isn't and refuting that. | ||
|
Bereft
United States1007 Posts
| ||
| ||
