I've played in two newbie mafia's so I should be good.
Newbie Mini Mafia LI
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I've played in two newbie mafia's so I should be good. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
/in and .. yeah :O Although I haven't played SC2 in monthsssss | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 02 2014 04:17 Crossfire99 wrote: Oh snap, it's suki. I remember the good ol' days when I mislynched her in LYLO. Oh, the memories. How have you been, suki? Hey Crossfire! :D Yeah the memory of that game is still fresh in my mind.. I told my boyfriend that I signed up for this mafia and he was like 'seriously? you were so stressed the whole time you played the last game' Haha. But I'm kinda glad that it ended the way it did, it makes for a really good story ![]() | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 03 2014 15:13 JonnyLaw wrote: So lynch balla day1 and suki day2. Balla wagoning scum partners all day long. And bigdad day3 apparently. Don't listen to Jonny, look what he's trying to do - get all the most active townies lynched and letting the game-delayers off scott-free. Obviously a scum ploy. ##vote JonnyLaw | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 06 2014 07:47 TheChyz wrote: Why so eager to have people help you achieve your goals? Maybe they don't agree with them. If onlywonderboy is right, then your rules help you if you are scum as well since you seem to be very active in which lynching lurkers would help your cause of staying alive. Also having people fight can cause confusion in the town. So I don't see a reason why people should just help you achieve your goals. Let me get this straight. TheChyz is implying that Balla, by promoting an active town and "lynching" lurkers, helps Balla if he's scum. What? I want to point out that nobody said anything about lynching lurkers at this point except TheChyz himself, who seems to be putting the words in Balla's mouth. Discouraging lurking is not scum play. It is a good idea to let everybody know from the start that lurking will be considered suspicious behaviour, because whether or not they are ultimately lynched for it, lurking is not helpful to town. I find TheChyz's logic flawed, and I really don't like the way he misrepresented what Balla said and then accused him of scum motivations for that misrepresentation. TheChyz please explain to us why discouraging (or even lynching) lurkers is beneficial to a scum Balla but not a townie Balla. ##vote TheChyz | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
You clogging up the thread by continuing to push every single person for a response is not a helpful way to create activity. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I'm going to hold off on any reads on OWB until he starts posting some analysis. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Just realize that clogging up the thread is not beneficial to town, that's all I wanted to say. I'll leave it at this for now, if that's alright with you. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 06 2014 10:21 Balla24 wrote: In the meantime, while waiting for something else to happen in regards to Chyz.. ##vote JonnyLaw I would have expected you to enter the thread already. If you're here, let's get the chemistry we had last game going. The game start time has been known for a while and i believe you're generally active during this time. If not, then get here! On January 06 2014 10:42 Balla24 wrote: What's up with people posting and dis-appearing right after? Having conversations in this game is the best way to get reads off people and move in a proper direction. Please make time to actually sit in the thread and talk to people. I don't want you to lower your activity, I just don't want to have to read these kinds of posts for the rest of the game. Fair enough? | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 06 2014 08:38 Balla24 wrote: Thread is dying fast... need backup ASAP. I also am not too fond of Asuna's entry, but there's nothing really scummy about it. I just feel you have opportunities to enlighten me about yourself and your opinions but you are hiding behind one liners for some reason. These kind of things don't need to be pointed out. The thread isn't 'dying', people just aren't on, and pointing out that people aren't on is just spamming the thread. Again, I don't want to fight with you over this, it's pointless and in the end it's a matter of playstyle preference. Other than these specific examples you have been actively promoting discussion which I find very good, so can we agree to just drop this? | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Newbie Mini Mafia XV Can I ask you for the same Balla? | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On January 06 2014 22:06 chinstrap wrote: [She] follows up with a lot of 1 liners and what can only be described as offtopic spam. Most worrying post: Followed by ominous silence On January 06 2014 15:19 JonnyLaw wrote: Suki - Balla's not clogging the thread at all. His posts have a purpose we have sub 100 posts in the first 8 hours. You're the person clogging the thread complaining about his actions. I made a single comment because I didn't like what I saw was a trend in Balla's posts. Balla then continued the discussion, and so I replied, trying to be succinct, and Balla asked for more clarification so I delivered. I never wanted to make it a big deal in the first place, but I won't ignore when someone's asking for explanation. Like I said, back to scumhunting. The rest of my posts will be about that and not trivial things like this. I really like the activity so far, this is a lot better than my previous game which had a few players that were replaced/modkilled for inactivity. There's some heat on Asuna, however I see his play as defensive townie rather than scummy. I like how direct Asuna's attack on Jonny is, although I don't agree with the reasoning. I see Jonny as town as well. TheDragoon and BigDad are popping up a lot of red flags for me right now. TheDragoon: On January 06 2014 14:45 theDragoon wrote: Acting scummy on purpose is a bit of a stupid plan for a townie, all it does is put a target on your back and force you to defend yourself early, you might get a little insight into how people are reacting to it but it's a really risky move. A risk that a regular townie with no powers should be willing to make. A mafia putting his name out there this early is a bad plan if enough people jump on the bandwagon. I'm conflicted, all TheChyz has done is create confusion. If enough people get off the bandwagon and he turns out to be a mafia, then he's won and the risk he took with putting his name out there would be totally worth it. Whether or not it's true that TheChyz was telling the truth about the whole act like a scum thing, all it's really done is create confusion among the town. ##Vote: TheChyz This post is really WIFOM-y. Not only that, but he doesn't even come to a solid conclusion about TheChyz, essentially saying 'TheChyz's play is confusing so I'm voting for him'. On January 06 2014 15:49 theDragoon wrote: That's enough of a reason to lynch Asuna? I don't see that as good enough to suspect Asuna of being mafia, unless you know more than what you've said there. Those 3 things you listed there is just a sign of an inexperienced player, it has nothing to do with being a scum. Here, Dragoon defends Asuna by hinting that Jonny knows more than what he's said. I think this is a possible scum slip, as only mafia are really ever thinking about hiding information. BigDad BigDad's initial posts really rubbed me the wrong way. Here are some things that stand out for me: As someone coming late to the thread it gives me an external perspective so bear with me on my reads so far. Im leaning towards Balla and TheChyz being townie. However I may be completely off on this one. I'm more skeptical of TheChyz, his loose play followed by claiming it to be "some trolly remark" is either a 180 freak out after he got voted OR its a great play drawing out the scum bandwagon. BigDad is being really wishy-washy here. He's stating reads but he isn't committing to them. This is typical scum behavior. The dragoon has an early point that seems to me to stifle conversation rather than nourish it then jumps on the aforementioned bandwagon. At this stage theDragoon has my suspicion. This attack is a twist of TheDragoon's words, and a weak one at that. He states TheDragoon has his suspicions, and yet in his next post he says: just because i'm suspicious doesn't mean i'm 100% sold theDragoon is scum. I admit that I don't have an ironclad filter however if you look at theDragoon's filter i feel like he is dodging a lot of questioning without actually adding anything to the debate: ie. With so many votes on TheChyz we really need to start determining whether he is scum or not, I know the probability of a mislynching is higher at the start of the game but i'd rather not lynch someone who is contributing a decent amount. So TheDragoon has his suspicions but he's not "100%" on it. Again, more wishy-washiness. Also note how he still hasn't decided what his opinion on TheChyz is. I don't buy his read on DayWalker, which amounts to "If TheDragoon is scum, then DayWalker is scummy because TheDragoon trusted him' I'd be happy to lynch either of them. For now, I'm going to ##vote BigDad BigDad, answer me this: Aside from Dragoon 'trusting' Daywalker, what else about DayWalker makes him look scummy to you? | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
TheChyz I think the casual tone of Chyz's self-defense is a plus in his favour, as I would expect a mafia to be much more defensive. If TheChyz is scum, I see the twisting of Balla's words as a scum slip (trying too hard to pin someone as scummy from the get-go), not an intentional move that he can later go "haha I was just testing you guys". I also agree with his analysis of Daywalker's list post. For the moment I will give him the benefit of the doubt and believe that he was deliberately trying to drum up conversation. ##unvote TheChyz - - - and just for clarity, my vote is currently on BigDad | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Can you share your thoughts on Dragoon/BigDad for me as well? | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
First and foremost I think it's prudent to address the person that strikes me as the number one scum in the game: theDragoon On January 06 2014 15:49 theDragoon wrote: That's enough of a reason to lynch Asuna? I don't see that as good enough to suspect Asuna of being mafia, unless you know more than what you've said there. Those 3 things you listed there is just a sign of an inexperienced player, it has nothing to do with being a scum. I said that because his reasoning to lynch Asuna was basically due to Asuna's inexperience, which I think is not a good enough reason to be lynched when there are a lot more suspicious people out there. I don't know if Jonny knows more about Asuna, I only thought that because I was not buying his reason to lynch Asuna. The more I read these posts the more I dislike them. He's basically stating that he knows Asuna's "excuses, bandwagoning and self doubt" are due to her inexperience, and he's not leaving any room to interpret them as scummy. How would a town Dragoon be so sure? I'm more and more confident that the 'knows more about Asuna' line really is a scum slip. Other things that scream scum to me: theDragoon's knee jerk reaction to vote OWB because of an incorrect timeline. - Attacking his attacker for a slight inconsistency. His statement that Balla is rising up on his suspicions list with Balla's 'immediate' jump to lynch him. - More of the same His flip-flopping on Derrida, first saying his suspicion is 'low' and then on his very next post saying Derrida is higher up. - Scummy enough, and he even admits that he's flip-flopping His top scum reads are Day_Walker because he doesn't like that Day_Walker has a town read on him (???), and me, because he thinks I'm too eager to scumhunt (also ???). And aside from his knee-jerk suspicions thrown at OWB, Balla and now Derrida he hasn't contributed any other reads. + Show Spoiler + His top 2 scum read post: I'm not good enough at this game to get scum reads from forum posts. If you REALLY want me to give my top 2 most suspicious people are: Day_Walker: If I don't buy his town read on me, why should I believe his other reads. I've got the most votes on me right now and I want to see if Day_Walker still thinks I'm a townie. suki: "Okay then, lets get back to scumhunting :D". A bit too eager to go scumhunting there, don't ya think? Not really a good reason to call him mafia. And finally under all this pressure then he says his play is due to him being new to the game and self-destructs. I feel a lot of frustration in Dragoon's most recent posts, and I kind of feel bad for him since he is new to Mafia and this is a really gut-wrenching game, but I really do think his inexperience is his downfall and that there's no way he's not mafia here. ##vote theDragoon More analysis on its way. If there's anything you want me to answer post it; I'll be here for a bit. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 06 2014 20:30 BigDad wrote: Day_Walker is a different story, he comes across as a narrator rather than a contributor. I read his filter out of context of the overall thread and it becomes apparent that his posts are very cautious. After re-reading Day_Walker's filter multiple times, I did come to the conclusion that his posts are really cautious.. But I'm not sure if I would say that anything is particularly scummy. I looked for past games to reference but it seems this is his first game. To DayWalker: Your filter is pretty short, and on the whole you seem to be agreeing with people a lot without posting your own suspicions. I definitely want to hear who you think is scum and why, the next time you're in the thread. BigDad: Before I left I asked BigDad to elaborate on Day_Walker and his response to me was: + Show Spoiler + On January 07 2014 07:46 BigDad wrote: @Suki Here's my analysis of Day_Walkers game so far which makes me mistrustful. He opens with a list of character reads (a common theme in this thread) which appears to contain a lot of content however if you strip out all the quoting he has done and put it in the context of his following posts it shows Day_Walker as a player who is appearing to contribute without saying too much. To back my doubt in Day_walker have a look here.. ..maybe im being an overly suspicious townie but I hate when people create an alibi for their style of play early in the game; it may be an attempt to misdirect any doubt on him. Also, scum tend to spend alot of time apologising for their actions and not trying to get anyones bad side. Suki, can you have a look at Day_Walkers feed and tell me if you can see where I am coming from? ##Vote Day_Walker I'd also like to hear JonnyLaws opinion on Day_Walker after the recent activity. Again, he's describing Day_Walker's cautious play, but I don't see it as particularly scummy. Also I don't agree that Day_Walker has been particularly apologetic. Jonny pointed out how BigDad has been asking towny people for their opinions, and yeah I got a weird vibe when I read 'Suki, can you have a look at Day_Walker's feed', as well as asking Jonny for his opinion. He explained that he was just trying to create conversation which is a meh answer for me. Next his comment on theDragoon: [B]On January 07 2014 08:58 BigDad wrote: @Balla24 I've already outlined several times that I think theDragoon is an easy scum pick. Look at his posts (and my previous posts on him). I'll state it again he tends to dodge questions and post fluff that we cannot use to hunt scum. His self-vote is confusing; it's either a desperate, last-ditch attempt by a scum player to make us doubt our actions. Or it's a newbie town that can't deal with the pressure on himself and he [b]needs to post more content to get the bandwagon off him. My position at the moment is that even a valiant fight on his behalf wont stop this bandwagon, this means that whatever he flips tomorrow we may be able to see his relationships with other players - unfortunately he seems to have given up the ghost and stopped posting. This means that should he flip Town he isn't helping us a whole bunch. Again with the wishy-washiness. He can't seem to decide if theDragoon is 'an easy scum slip' or 'a newbie town that can't deal with the pressure on himself'. I still don't get a really townie vibe from BigDad like some other people in the thread. He's just too much on the fence about things that he shouldn't be. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 07 2014 10:56 Day_Walker wrote: @Jonny Right now it sounds like you have both BigDad and theDragoon pegged as scum. I read BigDad's filter, his first four content posts all point suspicion at theDragoon. Based on that, I have a hard time believing they are both scum. Hmm... That's a good point, although BigDad's initial reasoning on why theDragoon was suspicious was really weak. I'd hardly call it a bus. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
dnyarri Ugghh his instant switch of target from TheChyz to theDragoon as soon as he was pressured is really really bad. Also I really don't like this comment he made: My opinions about suki are based on the simple reason that suki has suspected the same players as I have, TheChyz and TheDragoon. Suki also unvoted TheChyz, like I did. First, he didn't actually state what his opinion of my was, but I'm assuming it's positive because he just really seems like he's trying to buddy up with me. So he thinks I'm town just because we've voted on the same people? Derrida I have mixed feelings on his intro post. On the one hand, I don't agree with his reads and don't understand the reasoning behind them. On the other hand, I get the feeling he's trying to contribute. I can definitely tell that it's his first game, particularly the discussion around voting to punctuate one's reads. Balla's put him under a lot of pressure and he seems to be frank and open about his thoughts. I can't say whether he's overall town or scum. His suspicions are all over the place and it's hard to make a read, so I'm gonna put him at null right now and evaluate again when he's contributed more. - - - That's all I have for now. I'll be off and on for a few more hours. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
From that, your reason to lynch Asuna was basically due to his inexperience. Not a good enough reason to warrant being lynched. It was also something I can relate with as I myself am prone to making excuses, bandwagoning and having self doubt, if I don't want to be lynched because I have those traits, I certainly don't want others to be as well. This isn't good townie logic. Excuses, bandwagoning and self-doubt may be signs of newbie town, but they are also signs of mafia. You can't excuse someone for displaying mafia traits just because you display them. Again, it feels like you know that Asuna is a newbie town and that's what's suspicious here. Suki to me sounds like a scum trying to take advantage of this situation, to get a townie a guaranteed lynch. I'll have to warn the town about Suki, BigDad, Derrida and possibly Day_Walker (my so called scumbuddy). The pro-town thing to do in your spot is to post the best analysis you can on the scummiest people you can find. This just feels like a last-ditch attempt to try to throw suspicion on everyone who voted you under the pretense of a "defense post" and see if someone bites. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 07 2014 15:10 Balla24 wrote: I can't believe how some of you guys are so confident about how dragoon will flip scum. Suki, Jonny specifically.. I think I was pretty clear in my posts as to why I think Dragoon is scum. I feel that his defense of Asuna is a major scum slip and the more he tries to justify it the more I believe it. Dragoon has also not played a pro-town game at all. His only scum reads have been on those who are attacking him, and he hasn't even taken the time to properly form a case. Like, I still don't know why he thinks I'm scummy suki: "Okay then, lets get back to scumhunting :D". A bit too eager to go scumhunting there, don't ya think? Not really a good reason to call him mafia. I think that's the only reason he's given as to why I'm scum. Here is his defense post on me: @Suki I reacted to that inconsistency because he was trying to frame his argument based on the fact that I "changed my mind" about Day_Walker. He said something along the lines of me saying I changed my mind THEN... Day_Walker mentioned something. The only reason why I even mentioned Day_Walker at all is because Balla24 asked me what I thought, then people started putting words in my mouth saying I trusted him. New information pops up, you reread things you change your opinions. How's that scummy at all? Suki to me sounds like a scum trying to take advantage of this situation, to get a townie a guaranteed lynch. Everyone watch out for Suki, her true nature as a scum will be revealed when I get flipped. Where is the analysis? He's just blindly attacking me because hey, I straight up said he's the scummiest person in the game. Same with the other people he's called out. I'd be very surprised if he bleeds green because his play has not been pro-town at all. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
There is only one reason to lynch someone, and that is to catch scum. You do not lynch to get rid of lurkers. You do not lynch to "find information". You lynch to catch scum. I know Day_Walker has posted his reasons why he thinks dnyarri is his #1 scum pick. I'll be looking at that soon. Anyone else who has switched their vote to someone else at this stage of the game because they're scared of a 'mafia bandwagon' will also be looked at closely by me. Chinstrap I disagree with you that people who are defending theDragoon at this point are more likely to be innocent, because it could also be a mafia team going 'oh shit, this is getting serious'. The action of switching shouldn't be the issue, but rather the motivations of switching. Anyways, I'll read the thread and post some thoughts in a bit. This whole 'lynching for information' and thing is just so wrong I don't even know where to start. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I'm saying not saying the act of defending = innocence or guilt. I am saying that defending is a way to buy towncred at this point because it is inherently going against the tide Agreed. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
There are only two things that stand out to me in his filter: if Dragoon is scum, we can get him later. As stated in my above post, I do not agree with this line of thought at all. If the Dragoon is scum, then we lynch him. That said, you're arguing that Dragoon is not scum, so your line of thought is consistent. I don't mean that the lurking mafia led the bandwagon by making cases, I mean that they did the bandwagoning I saw two people that I suspect as scum, dnyarri and OWB, contribute early on in the Dragoon lynch (votes 1 and 3) for reasons that didn't look strong to me (again my take is different here, since I'm the only town who knows OWB's accusation was completely untrue). The Town was already suspicious of Dragoon, the lynch took off, and sidesprang capped it off with another scummy-feeling vote. Here you're saying that scum did the bandwagoning (getting on later in the votes), but you're also stipulating that since dnyarri and OWB contributed early on in Dragoon's lynch, that they started the bandwagon. My thoughts on this are that bandwagoning is a weak argument one way or another, and what's more important are the reasons for hopping on or off the bandwagon. TheChyz, I can't say I agree with your analysis of Day_Walker, and at the moment I read him as townie. I can see the argument for theDragoon being a frustrated townie, so I don't find his defense of theDragoon suspicious. I just really think theDragoon is going to flip scum, for all the reasons I mentioned in my previous posts. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 07 2014 17:49 Balla24 wrote: one thing about dynarri that i noticed in that big post: read suki as town because they were both doing a lot of the same stuff... feels weird that he specifically points out that last part... why does that matter...? FEELS ODD MAN I already pointed this out in a previous vote and mentioned that it looks like a possible attempt to buddy up with me. Day_Walker pointed something interesting out though: This most heavily rests on my scum read for dnyarri, and the fact that dnyarri placed the very first for Dragoon. Based on the vote, I think it unlikely that both dnyarri AND Dragoon are scum, and this turns my scum read for dnyarri into a town read for Dragoon. And for the reasons I just gave, this sounds a lot more plausible to me than to any other townie. This actually makes sense. At the time that dnyarri switched his vote, theDragoon was pretty much not under any pressure. An insta-switch to a bus on a mafia teammate seems highly highly unlikely. But that only means that it's extremely unlikely that both of them are scum. I really hate the fact that dnyarri only has three posts, and his play has been sending up red flags, but I just can't say he is more scummy to me than theDragoon. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 07 2014 18:36 BigDad wrote: My reads for suspicious player currently stand against Dnyarri and theDragoon with less doubt on Day_Walker for his pro-town stance on lynching those who aren't contributing. Lynch to catch scum. I think I've reiterated that enough. Also Day_Walker clearly stated he wanted to catch scummy lurkers, not just people who don't contribute. I'm going to have to go with either theDragoon or dnyarri. BigDad, given Day_Walker/my reasoning that dnyarri was the first to vote theDragoon, do you still think both of them are likely to be scum? If not, who do you think is more likely? | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Several recent quotes from Balla: + Show Spoiler + This is the most one sided lynch ever. I'm sorry but this should seriously be making you weary (suki/jonnylaw). The people who are not voting seem to also be tentatively saying that they are ok with the lynch if it were to happen now, besides Day_walker who probably is thinking along the same lines of this tbh. I'm searching for a new target. I really don't like how hard you lurked today sidesprang, so I'd lynch you just based on that, but other than that, I find Derrida pretty scummy. Ugh it's just so hard because I totally can see how scum would buss their teammate in this current situation. It's different than other one-sided lynches in the previous games because of how dragoon shut-down. Like I would totally buss him.. If I were scum, I would probably begin to buss him after he self-voted, so i'd look @ Derrida, suki and sidesprang (if im jsut looking at it chronologically, jonnylaw too) I mean, let's be honest, there is 100% for sure scum in the people who already voted him. Having them have a forced hand on what they think about him might be a good thing. It's gonna be a weight on EVERYONE's back, not just towns. I agree that the lynch on theDragoon is going smoothly, however that could just be mafia seeing the writing on the wall and deciding not to oppose. I agree that the smoothness of the lynch needs to be considered, however in the end we should still be lynching the scummiest person. Do you disagree? Also, you were the second person to vote for theDragoon, and your vote hasn't changed since then. I just want to clarify, do you still find theDragoon to be the most scummy? | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
After reading theDragoon's final post, I really feel that it's full of such sincere towniness that switching the vote to the next scummiest candidate was a good move, rather than lynching a townie. I think if dnyarri turns out to be scum, it pretty much clears the names of Jonny and OWB who switched at the last minute to prevent a mislynch. I don't agree that Balla looks scummy for "NO FUCK OFF YOU GUYS", because when I hopped in at the last minute and saw people were jumping off theDragoon that was my exact thought as well. I also agree with chinstrap's analysis that it doesn't make sense for Balla to say that if dnyarri and him are scumbuddies, as a switch was looking extremely likely at that point. Going forward I'm going to be looking in detail at the events of Day 1 and re-analyzing my reads. I've got a splitting headache so I don't know if I'll get it out tonight, and I really want to be thorough. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 08 2014 10:06 Balla24 wrote: if dragoon HAD BEEN SCUM it would have been so easy to save him. My problem with this idea is that if it really was a scum plan, he would have at least posted this an hour, and probably a few hours before the deadline. I think the fact that it was so last minute that there was no possible scum motive for posting that kind of goodbye post was what triggered Jonny and OWB to make the instant decision to switch. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
This explains why he voted dnyarri, but my impression is that the sincerity and timing of theDragoon's goodbye post had a lot of meaning as to why the decision to switch at the last minute was made. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
BigDad: I know most people have a town read on him, but after theDragoon's lynch I want to ask people to have a closer look at him because I still think his early wishy-washiness is a scum tell. Also of note is that he was one of the people that pushed the Day_Walker/theDragoon scum buddy theory. Here is the post, with parts bolded for emphasis: On January 06 2014 20:30 BigDad wrote: As secondary evidence, i find theDragoons trust in him to be slightly incriminating... I already have my doubts about theDragoon as expressed earlier, however in this reply he off-handedly indicates his trust towards Day_Walker and jumps on the initial theChyz bandwagon. I am wary of sly indicators of trust before a paragraph of 'fluff' or 'waffle' (read the quote, it makes little sense) as it is easy as a reader to think "That sounded solid, I trust that guy" without a second thought. Asuna seems to have good intentions. Day_Walker and theDragoon seem scummy. I never believed that Day_Walker and theDragoon were scumbuddies so I never gave the theory any thought, however looking at 'Day_Walker seems to have good intentions... I agree that theChyz is suspicious', I think it really is a stretch to call that a 'sly indicator of trust'. I've already outlined several times that I think theDragoon is an easy scum pick. Look at his posts (and my previous posts on him). I'll state it again he tends to dodge questions and post fluff that we cannot use to hunt scum. His self-vote is confusing; it's either a desperate, last-ditch attempt by a scum player to make us doubt our actions. Or it's a newbie town that can't deal with the pressure on himself and he needs to post more content to get the bandwagon off him. I called him out for being wishy-washy on this statement. If he's so sure that theDragoon is an easy scum pick, why does he have to include analysis on what it means if theDragoon is town? My reads for suspicious player currently stand against Dnyarri and theDragoon with less doubt on Day_Walker for his pro-town stance on lynching those who aren't contributing. My thoughts on BigDad's play is that he was supporting a Dragoon lynch, with the plan of following up by lynching Day_Walker. He eases off Day_Walker because he notices people are starting to agree that Day_Walker is looking suspicious. Maybe other people don't see it, and maybe I'm tunneling BigDad a bit too hard (I admit, he hasn't responded to my pressure at all which is more townie than scummy), but the way he flips back and forth in his first few posts really feels off to me. Couple that with our insight on the tD/DW scum buddy theory, makes me think people need to look at him a little closer. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
theDragoon posted this: Regarding: dynarri He did get the ball rolling on me with the help of BigDad's accusation of me trusting Day_Walker. As I mentioned multiple times before, and even debunked that I never placed my trust in Day_Walker. If I recall correctly, dnyarri, onlywonderboy and BigDad were the ones to use the DW and tD are scum buddies card because tD trusted him. They may have conspired together to fabricate that story and that makes them really suspicious. The only thing I can find in dnyarri's filter regarding both Day_Walker and theDragoon is: TheDragoon stated that Day_Walker seemed like innocent even though Day_Walker had only posted one list and nothing else. Day_Walker's only vote is against TheChyz which doesn't mean much since TheChyz is easy bandwagoning target. TheDragoon's post give me the impression that he wants to slow voting down by defending (random) people while going to TheChyz-bandwagon and attacking nobody else. So I don't think theDragoon's reasoning is valid. I find it really hard to read dnyarri. Yes, he was the first person to vote for theDragoon, but the only other possible thing that's standing out to me is the possible 'buddy up' attempt with me (he has refuted it but he would do that whether he's town or mafia, so it's a moot point). Again, his filter is so short I really really want to see more from him. One thing that bothers me is he seems to be the easy target right now and again, it feels 'too easy'. I think, even if people still want to lynch him Day 2, we should look for other possibilities and only lynch him if he still appears the most scummy. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I think the tD/DW scumbuddy theory was a bit farfetched, and even theDragoon felt it was pushed too far. As the third person on theDragoon's list of people who pursued that argument, I feel like it's prudent to look into OnlyWonderBoy. On the last minute switch: + Show Spoiler + First thing to note is that he did try to last-minute vote switch with Jonny onto dnyarri. I feel that this makes him a definite town, but thinking further this applies only if dnyarri flips red. If dnyarri flips green it makes no difference to him to switch and it could be a move to grab town cred. Again, you can't argue one way or another without knowing dnyarri's alignment so I won't consider any of this in my analysis. One thing that stands out to me is that OWB has talked about only three people: Derrida, Dragoon and Day_Walker His impression on Derrida seems to be neutral so far, and that he thinks Derrida's early Day 1 play seems influenced more by inexperience than scumminess. He was third to vote for theDragoon which I feel is a point in his favour, although his reasoning is based on the td/DW theory: On January 07 2014 05:27 onlywonderboy wrote: My main scum reads at the moment are Dragoon and Day_Walker. They seem to be interacting a decent amount, which isn't inherently scummy, but they go out of there way to distance themselves from each other. Dragoon says "For the record, I want to make it clear that I never said I completely trust Day_Walker," Then Day_Walker says: I understand wanting to get out ahead of these accusations, but that doesn't mean we should ignore it simply because he pushed Dragoon slightly. These just seem like they are trying to distance themselves early so if either if them go down we don't suspect them as a scum pair. I think he was the one to first throw out the idea that tD and DW were trying to distance themselves from each other. He doesn't state any other reasons to suspect either tD or DW. Just before the end of the day, he states: The more and more I think about it the more I start to doubt the Day_Walker/Dragoon pair. This mostly has to do with how things have played out since Dragoon got a large portion of the votes. I agree that Day_Walker has put forth way more effort into defending Dragoon after his doom seemed inevitable and decided to rally his cause around a lurker that it would be hard to gather support for. If Dragoon flips town DW looks clear, but he seems to have gone out of his way to make it actually look this way. If they were both scum it's unlikely he would be defending him so vehemently. He is doubting that tD and DW are a pair. He states "If Dragoon flips town DW looks clear", but he follows that up with "he seems to have gone out of his way to make it actually look this way" which implies that he finds the DW's hard defense of tD suspicious in itself. When he last-minute switches to dnyarri (following Jonny's lead), he says he "wanted DW over Dragoon anyway". Nothing stands out to me in OWB's filter as particularly scummy so I'm going to rate him as neutral at the moment, although I'm not liking the fact that the only analysis he's contributed against tD/DW is on the scum buddy theory. to OnlyWonderBoy: I really want to hear your thoughts on what went down. I also want to see more analysis on why you wanted Day_Walker over theDragoon in Day 1, and what your thoughts on him are after the flip. I want to hear your top scum picks because so far your only suspects have been theDragoon and Day_Walker. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Derrida: TheDragoon: null for me so far. Suspiciously null perhaps? Alert level: YELLOW @thedragoon, you just leaped from an /offtopic discussion to an /ontopic demagogy by your "You will all see when I get lynched tomorrow that this "distancing theory" is completely dumbfounded" line. This is somewhat suspicious. Fine, I will not further derail the thread about the value of voting, but I still think it's pointless. This just means that if the deadline was 2 minutes from now, I would vote like this. ## Vote TheDragoon Off to sleep, afk for 8ish hours. This is a pretty big leap. I don't care about vote order or the fact that he votes theDragoon explaining that 'if the vote was 2 minutes from now, I would vote [for him]'. What stands out to me is that he has theDragoon initially as 'suspiciously' yellow, and me and sidesprang as red, and yet he votes for theDragoon. I'm not liking the line 'This is somewhat suspicious' in the second quote. It feels too careful. When called out for his vote on theDragoon, he points out that the lynch is a win-win situation because if theDragoon flips town, then I look more suspicious. I still see your lynch as a win-win situation this morning, with the possible further upside of providing further information on Suki if you flip townie (who was RED ALERT status on my initial list). He follows up later on after theDragoon's final comment on me: "Quite the change of heart from bold "lynch me and you will see Suki as scum" to "I'm thinking she is town as well." I feel that Derrida's early game is just full of noise and can be explained by inexperience, but I'm not liking his more recent play and am inclined to read him as more scummy than neutral. to Derrida: Who are your top scum reads at this point? Am I even more red now, now that theDragoon has flipped? I'd like to hear your thoughts. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I think scum shooting Jonny was motivated simply by removing a strong town player, although it also could very well have been an attempt to get the heat off of Derrida. I think shooting chinstrap would have been too obvious, because if town had a doctor the save would have most likely been put on the IC. So then I think their choices would have been me, Balla or Jonny. At that point Jonny had started his pressure on Derrida, and he had also almost orchestrated a flip onto dnyarri (more on that in a second). If Derrida and dnyarri are both scum, taking out Jonny would be a very obvious move. On the other hand, I had only just started to really suspect Derrida (before his post-lynch post, I was on the fence/slightly leaning scum), and I was also neutral on dnyarri. Balla was really hammering down hard on Derrida, but he had stated only soft suspicions on dnyarri and also had the 'FUCK OFF GUYS' quote just before the switch from tD to dnyarri. NK's can be played really WIFOM-y so I'm hesitant to read too much into NK's, especially the first one, but Occam's razor points to dnyarri as scum. Looking at dnyarri's filter, again I don't agree with the 'lynch a lurker' mentality, however I do think there's enough circumstantial evidence to point to him. That is, Derrida's strange lack of comment on dnyarri and Jonny's last-minute vote switch attempt. I just thought of something: Day_Walker and Big_Dad had voted for dnyarri previous to that. Jonny had suspicions on Big_Dad, and Day_Walker was already being targetted by several others and was the second/third candidate for the day 1 lynch. With Jonny dead, scum may have thought it would be possible to lay low again in Day 2 and watch town rip itself apart - and they probably weren't expecting Derrida to get shot. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
##vote: dnyarri | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I have a few questions for Asuna: And oh, Jonny was town... well that's awkward. You said this in response to the NK. How is this more awkward than anyone else being killed? Who are your top scum reads now, and why? You were gone for the whole night phase, and have barely commented on it now that it's Day 2. You're borderline lurking here. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
OnlyWonderBoy I posted analysis on OWB after the lynch and came up on him as neutral. However, looking through everyone's filters I came upon his again and noticed that even though nothing looks particularly scummy to me, nothing looked particularly town as well. So I went diving. I brought up his two most recent games to try to get a feel for his play style. In one he was mafia, in the other he was vigilante. In both games, he didn't post a lot, and in both games he is somewhat cautious. As blue, OWB: Was more direct and assertive Sympathized with newbie play As mafia (his most recent game), OWB: made excuses a lot targetted lurkers followed the flow of the town rather than pushing his own reads OWB's play this game is somewhat in the middle of the two. However, what stands out to me is that he is really going along with the flow of the town. He hasn't been assertive, and hasn't pushed any reads. Rather, he seems cautious even when he says he is fine with lynching someone: In terms of other possible scum players, I'm of course suspicious of dnyarri like a lot of players now. Really hope he shows up so we get some sort of insight on his play. Don't have any other solid scum reads right now so I guess my main focus is on dnyarri and Day_Walker. If Dragoon flips town DW looks clear, but he seems to have gone out of his way to make it actually look this way. If they were both scum it's unlikely he would be defending him so vehemently. OWB has persistently been trying to push Derrida's play as bad townie over scummy. I didn't see anything particularly off about that, but given Derrida's flip there's an argument to be made that a scum OWB was hoping to be able to save Derrida from a Day 2 lynch. I almost let OWB get cleared in my mind for the day due to his last-minute switch antics, but thinking on it more, even if the switch went through and dnyarri was scum, scum OWB still could claim massive town cred from it. It could have been a calculated risk as there were only a few minutes before the end of the day and a good chance that not enough people were on to make it happen. So I'm going to say that the fact that he tried to switch is completely non-indicative of alignment regardless of what dnyarri is. I'm not seeing the directness of blue OWB's play in this game, and he seems to be more following the flow of the town than trying to contribute. Based on his previous games, I think he reads more scum than town to me at this point and should be looked at closer by everyone else. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
He won't know what people's alignments are but he will initially try to protect the scummiest looking players, while also playing cautious and not making waves so that he can avoid being lynched or NK'd. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
People if you're town you NEED to contribute, otherwise there's no chance that we can win. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
What I'm saying is that OWB's play has not been very pro-town, and if dnyarri flips red that shouldn't just give him a green pass for the rest of the game. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
While this is a negative statement against Derrida it's hardly pushing him very hard. Could easily be a weak read to just to build cred if Derrida ever flipped scum (although I doubt the scum team expected it to come so soon) I also don't think his main theory of Asuna/dnyarri/Derrida is super solid. It revolves heavily around the idea of Derrida leaving out Asuana and dnyarri from his initial reads. I just can't imagine a scum player purposely leaving BOTH of his partners off of a list. It's so suspicious and something people could easily find. If that's what actually happened that might be the worst mafia play I've seen in all my newb games. If we are less certain about dnyarri being scum I'm fine with finding a new target, but at this point even if we lynch him we find out a lot of information regardless of how he flips. This is OWB's most recent post after I posted my case on him. Again, going by my read on him, he's still not making strong statements and is being wishy-washy with his opinions. "If we are less certain about dnyarri being scum I'm fine with finding a new target" says to me, "I don't want to make a decision on who to lynch so I'll just follow what people think." I think it's really suspicious that up to now, OWB has not made a single strong case on anyone, and I feel this fits more with his scum meta than town meta. His defense on Derrida definitely reads like a scum trying to save his buddy from being lynched. He also did not respond to my post on him at all. I would have expected a townie OWB to respond to the accusations in some way, and there is definite scum motivation for trying to ignore pressure and hope it goes away. Instead, he just pushes some flimsy reads and calls it a day. If Derrida wasn't NK'd last night, they may have been planning to run a defensive line such as 'Why would scum make a case against Jonny and Balla and then shoot them? This doesn't make sense, therefore Derrida could not have known what the night shot was going to be - hence he is bad townie." Then if OWB+Derrida push a mislynch today, they are in a very good position on Day 3 with 4 town and 0 scum dead. ##unvote ##vote: OnlyWonderBoy | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Also, dnyarri: Please give us your opinion on OnlyWonderBoy. Asuna: Your thoughts on the dnyarri/OWB discussion as well. Also you need to vote someone. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
sidesprang and dnyarri's reasons to jump on OWB were basically a paraphrase of my argument with nothing added. Asuna used the 'compare to his previous games' argument as well as well as a simple criticism of his read on Derrida. To be honest I'm frustrated that so many people bandwagoned on my case, said 'yup sounds good' and left it at that. It makes it very hard to analyze their motives. Especially Asuna, who I thought was a better player than this and who I think is town (from my own impression and from the undisputed roleblock claim).. I expected more. Day_Walker provided his own reasoning and shows he put some thought into his decisions. I think even though everyone has been reading Day_Walker as scum, I still have to disagree. I think his posts show he's put a lot of thought into his decisions and he hasn't been afraid to go against the flow of the town based on his own reads, even if they mean he stands out. BigDad votes dnyarri, without much reason behind it. In Day 2 he postures a lot but doesn't add anything and eventually goes AWOL, completely missing the critical portion of the day when everyone is discussing OWB. His reason to vote dnyarri is also hardly explained. He's definitely on my scum list for Day 3. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Sorry about being away for the night, I have a busy Saturday day and evening and I'm just popping in to let everyone know that the first thing I'm going to do when I wake up tomorrow is spend a good hour or two on mafia. Heading out for now. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
The NightKill I think this is a simply motivated attack on a strong townie who is also pretty much confirmed due to his roleclaim. As the game is nearing its end scum has to target confirmed towns such as chinstrap and Balla or they'll be in a very bad position in the final days. I agree with theChyz's reasoning before the NK that if Balla somehow avoided being NK'd for the next night he would start to look very suspicious, however that didn't happen. TheChyz I had a townie read on him since Day 1, but have not been giving him any attention since then as he hasn't stuck out to me up to now. I like his responses to Balla's insane pressure. I liked his attack on the people who switched their vote just after Day 1 and still think it's very townie. And then there's this post followed by his accusations on Asuna: If they all belong to scum that means their powerroles are only 1 goon, 1 GF, and 1 SK. That means there is NO ROLEBLOCKER. This is really bad reasoning. Why would you think there is still a SK when he hasn’t shot in either N1 or N2 (In N1, Balla claimed one KP out of two, in N2 there is only 1 KP). Also, why would you assume that town has no other blue roles? Scenario 1: TheChyz is mafia and they have a roleblocker. That means his attack on Asuna is completely untrue from his perspective, and he knows that his proposed 1 goon 1GF 1SK setup is not the only setup. Therefore, his attack is weak but very easily taken apart. I really don't think mafia would screw up like this so late in the game and put themselves under heavy scrutiny. IE. This reasoning is so bad that it makes him look townie for it. Scenario 2: TheChyz is mafia and they have 1 goon and 1 GF (and therefore he is the GF). That means he's already confirmed that the set up has to be TTTTT V M. Plausible, but this also means Asuna is the serial killer and has claimed roleblock two nights in a row undisputed... Also, by this argument he would basically be divulging that he knows the setup, which again I think is a mistake that mafia is unlikely to make. Also... + Show Spoiler + If anyone is thinking "yeahhh well the SK could have been faking being role blocked twice in a row" or "she could be SK and a town roleblocker could have blocked her twice in a row" ... Just no. In short, Scenario 2 just makes no sense. Scenario 3: TheChyz is town and just made a wrong assumption, but stated it strongly because he really believed he solved the game and was pushing for a win. In short I think TheChyz is town because it would be a really really bad scum play. Asuna I had a town read on her before. Figured she was town when she claimed she was roleblocked on N1. Now she's claimed 1-shot cop which means the setup is: M V C TTTT . Two goons, one mafia roleblocker, which fits with her story of being roleblocked. Unless someone claims a different role, I am going to assume she is confirmed town. dnyarri Since D2 mislynch of OWB, dnyarri has stepped up his game and has been providing analysis. I think this alone makes him more townie because I think a scum dnyarri would just keep on trying to get by on lurking since it worked for him on Day 1 and 2. I like this post a lot. I think he brings up some good points, shows critical thinking, and get an overall town feel from it (although I don't agree Day_Walker is scum). dnyarri reads town to me. Day_Walker I've defended Day_Walker a lot and been the only one defending him I think. Balla's dying words listed him as super scummy... I still don't think he is scum, but if I'm wrong about who I think is the scum team then I will have to rethink my read. He hasn't been active in N2, but I hope he will be more active during Day 3. My read on the scum team is BigDad and sidesprang, which I will go through in my next post. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Basically read my cases on him up to this point. Other players have brought up cases against him. I don't feel like reiterating everything. One thing to note is he hasn't been around since basically the beginning of Day 2. sidesprang Before Night 2 I wasn't suspicious of sidesprang as I had my attention on other people. I also assumed he was more likely to be town because Derrida labeled sidesprang as 'Red' in his opening post. If we actually lynched dnyarri and he came up town, they kinda stuck their neck out for nothing. The way they changed vote without any explanation and kinda out of the blue would have been hard to explain. Especially with a green lynch on their vote swap. I don't think scum would have taken that risk. Looking at this again, this line on why he thinks theDragoon and OWB are green if dnyarri is green is suspicious. If he's scum, this line of thought also applies to him and he's basically explaining why he didn't vote switch. It would also be a perfect explanation because he would know that dnyarri is town (this is also another reason to think dnyarri is town). On the other hand, seeing how it went down. I can't fault others for not following, especially since I can only now read theDragoons post while knowing he is town. Its a bit hard for me to judge how much towny he looked before the vote. I don't like the bolded part. Why would it be hard to judge how townie he looked before the vote? His previous post posted his line of thought before the lynch and he felt that theDragoon was most likely to flip scum. So he obviously had a read. Saying he can't judge how townie he looked before the vote is inconsistent with his statement that theDragoon was scum. sidesprang also piggy-backed on my analysis of OWB. He made a big post and provided links but basically added nothing new. I'm not convinced the chance of OWB being scum is higher than dnyerri atm. I'll try to look into BigDad. sidesprang said this but hasn't posted anything on BigDad. BigDad also hasn't said anything about sidesprang. Makes sense if they're a scum team. I think BigDad/sidesprang scum team makes sense more than any other pairing. I think a BigDad lynch today and a sidesprang lynch tomorrow would win it for us. ##vote BigDad | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
As for bigdad he is the towniest of all 3. There are a few things that might seem scummy but overall I feel he has been contributing ok and that he is creating some useful conversation. Most importantly is that he sticks with dnyarri as his scum choice and doesn't join the owb bandwagon and adds more useful thought into his reasoning to lynch dnyarri. I think BigDad's reasoning to lynch dnyarri that he posted on Day 2 was weak and tunnel-y. Sticking with dnyarri as his scum choice and not following the flow of the thread is more townie than scum, but he was also away during the end of Day 2 so we don't really know if he would have stuck with dnyarri or changed to OWB. I feel that his Day 1 play had several scum tells in it (that other people have brushed off). Compared to the other players still in the game he looks the most scummy to me. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I'll have another look at TheChyz after I come back home tonight. Giving him the pass for 'obviously bad play' is sounding less and less like a valid idea. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I had a reread through TheChyz's filter and I think he's been slipping hard since Day 2 ended. Here is TheChyz's conversation with Balla during Night 2, bolded parts for emphasis: + Show Spoiler + On January 12 2014 03:52 TheChyz wrote: Anyways I still want to reread some peoples filters to make sure I didn't confuse things between people and I'll have my explanation before night ends, but can you post yours aswell Balla : "Day 3 is going to be fun if what i'm thinking is happening. Will post about it later." On January 12 2014 03:57 Balla24 wrote: Also: there's 3 hours left, if I were going to post it I would have plenty of time to post it. I lost faith in the theory anyways. On January 12 2014 04:03 TheChyz wrote: And Balla, thats a bullshit reason not to make your post. You said "Day 3 is going to be fun if what i'm thinking is happening. Will post about it later" and since you keep pestering others to explain their thoughts, I expect you to do the same. On January 12 2014 04:06 Balla24 wrote: NO fuck that that's so scummy. It's pretty obvious what I had to say was due to night actions. You're pretty silly if you can't see that. So why would I post it 3 HOURS before the night is over and let mafia plan around that. MOST IMPORTANTLY THOUGH: Why are you pushing me so hard for it? I'm clearly active. This is SO fricking scummy from you Chyz. Do you need it to make a decision on what to do with your scum buddy? On January 12 2014 04:22 TheChyz wrote: @Balla What is so scummy about it, your doing the exact same thing from everybody else and forcing them to explain things, what makes you such a special case that whenever you say something we should just let you pass cause your active? Jonny (i think) said that you are active both scum and town so I find no reason why you felt that posting that you will post your thoughts later and then now not wanting to is scummy from me. Seems like your being very defensive. And you don't have to post now, just before night ends (even if its 1 sec before) On January 12 2014 05:00 TheChyz wrote: I didn't skip it, it will be done before the night ends. still got time. First off, I feel that TheChyz's pressure on Balla is really off. He pressures Balla for not providing his reads, and Balla replies there's still three hours before the night is over. TheChyz calls bullshit on Balla's reasoning. Following that, Balla asks TheChyz for analysis, and TheChyz simply replies there's still time. This inconsistency stands out to me, and I think there's a very good reason for it if you assume TheChyz is mafia - He wants to know what Balla's reads are before he posts his own analysis. There is no reason to assume Balla is not 1-shot vig as he claimed, and yet TheChyz seems to be getting ready to throw suspicion at Balla. Perhaps if Balla had his reads completely wrong and had posted them early enough, scum may have kept Balla alive. TheChyz posts his analysis at 2:58, 2 minutes before the deadline. Balla posts his at 2:59. The day post is posted at 3:02. Asuna has also made a strong case against TheChyz, the most striking of which is: Would be pretty funny if that inconsistent choice of tense in your most recent statement was actually a slipup lol. "when I am scum the easiest thing for me to do was to lurk" Looking at his 'setup analysis' where he wrongly concludes that there is a SK, it may just have been a ploy to root out the remaining blue role, which he was successful at doing now that Asuna has role claimed. TheChyz tries to reason his way out by saying it was intentional or that it was due to his english, however I think there's enough evidence to strongly say that he screwed up in Night 2 and Day 3 and revealed himself through his actions and words. ##unvote ##vote TheChyz | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
At the beginning of the game BigDad stated a soft defense of TheChyz ("I'm leaning toward Balla and TheChyz being townie"), when TheChyz was under pressure for his antics, but ever since that post BigDad has put mild pressure against TheChyz until his full on bus today. The fact that BigDad has never closely analyzed TheChyz I think makes sense if both of them are scum. I think we've solved the game guys :D I'm getting jitters anticipating the flip. Unfortunately I have a dinner with my family so I'll miss the deadline but I'll pop back on as soon as I can. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I guess now we're in MYLO. The good thing is that I think there's no way we can miss scum in Day 4. The remaining players are: chinstrap, Asuna, dnyarri, BigDad, Day_Walker, sidesprang, suki. From my point of view, chinstrap, Asuna and I are confirmed town. dnyarri is also town to me for his recent contributions to town and his self-analysis post which I find sincere. That means, out of BigDad, Day_Walker and sidesprang two of them are scum. I think there's a good chance that I'll be killed tonight so I'll post my analysis for everyone to consider. I'd like to do the trick Balla did and post reads right before the deadline but I won't have the opportunity to, so this post will have to do. BigDad + Show Spoiler + I've been pushing BigDad for pretty much the whole game. At first I was convinced he slipped because of his wishy-washiness on Day 1. In this post here I pressed him for wishy-washiness, at first I didn't care for his response, but looking at it now I feel I may have been tunneling him too hard. BigDad also pushes the tD/DW scumbuddy theory, which was super flimsy and which I thought was a scummy move. The three people who pushed this theory (according to theDragoon) were BigDad, OWB and dnyarri. OWB has flipped town, dnyarri is town as well I believe (and in my analysis I showed he didn't really subscribe to that theory anyways). So basically this theory is non-indicative of alignment. BigDad became less suspicious of Day_Walker near the end of Day 1, subscribing to Day_Walker's idea of dnyarri scum and voting dnyarri. From there on BigDad's primary target has been dnyarri. Even up to Day 3, BigDad was still tunneling dnyarri, making a big post attacking dnyarri with weak points. dnyarri deflects the attack, but again, a lot of the arguments were strained and weak and I see plenty of scum motivation to do so. I think his continued tunneling of dnyarri is scummy, and I think his wishy-washiness earlier was scummy. However I was so sure that theChyz was going to flip scum and BigDad would be his scumbuddy and with TheChyz's reveal I'm not so sure anymore. Points in BigDad's favour: I liked BigDad's original analysis of Day_Walker where he states Day_Walker's play is cautious, but didn't agree with the verdict because at the time I was reading Day_Walker as cautious townie. This quote, Sweet! Good shot whoever the cop/vig is. Someone else commented that this makes BigDad look more townie.. And yeah.. In mafia QT they'd be talking about vig shots, and cop checks.. To make a simple mistake and think that both cops and vig's can shoot seems more like a townie blunder. Kind of a weak point on its own but something that caught my eye as a possible 'newbie town' slip. He is the last non-confirmed person that Jonny pressured in Day 1. Everyone else is now confirmed town (except dnyarri who I am assuming is town and Derrida who flipped scum Night 1). I like BigDad's 'voting pattern' argument against theChyz. It felt like he was contributing. TheChyz defended BigDad and saw him as least scummy of the three. BigDad has been less active recently, which makes it harder to read him than other players. I'm not confident in my scum read on him anymore. Day_Walker + Show Spoiler + I read Day_Walker as town in Day 1. I saw his posts as cautious, but nothing really scummy stood out to me. Since then, Balla, OWB and TheChyz have all placed Day_Walker on their scum list right before they were lynched. I always thought other people looked more scummy and reading Day_Walker's filter nothing ever stood out to me but now I'm looking deeper. Day 1, his opening post is a list post where his only scum choice is TheChyz.. Everyone saw this as scummy. I admitted it but thought his later play made up for it and dismissed it. Day_Walker avoids a vote on theDragoon and defends him because of his 'gut feeling'. He's inconsistent in one post where he explains that theDragoon's case was bandwagoned by mafia, not led by them, but at the end of the post thinks dnyarri looks scum because he led the votes on theDragoon. He also pushes this idea of lynching 'scummy lurkers', which he then sort of explained his way out of, but lynching lurkers does have scum motives. Day_Walker commented on OWB's case, saying TheChyz made a great case against OWB and that he would be fine with switching, but keeps his vote on dnyarri. In his next post he says he might be tunnel-visioning dnyarri and switches his vote to OWB without further explanation. Someone else pointed this out previously, but Day_Walker put Asuna as #2 scum, even though he admitted his reasoning on why he thought she was scum was incorrect and that he would be unhappy with an Asuna lynch. He jumps on BigDad after my case on BigDad without any explanation and hasn't contributed since. Day_Walker shows inconsistency in his reads and inconsistency in what he says and how he acts. He doesn't provide strong cases when he does act, either. I've read him as 'cautious', but because he didn't show any obvious scum slips he didn't stand out to me. I think the case against him is the strongest. My vote for him is at the end of this post. sidesprang + Show Spoiler + sidesprang hopped onto theDragoon after theDragoon self-destructed. So it would be an easy bandwagon. He pressures theDragoon a bit. He states that it's possible for Day_Walker to be scum, but that 'its way more likely for him to be scum if theDragoon is scum'. The rest of his analysis of Day_Walker is non-conclusive. After theDragoon's lynch, he says 'I think we should spend some more energy on looking at the votes. I'll try to see if I can find something.' He never ends up looking into the votes. sidesprang was eighth to vote for theDragoon. He soft-defended Day_Walker, and was fourth to vote against dnyarri. After TheChyz, chinstrap and I vote against OWB, he posted his analysis on OWB and switched to OWB. Sidesprang was fifth to vote for TheChyz on the pretense that he didn't see how theChyz's trapping plays could be explained from a townie perspective. Sidesprang has bandwagoned on every lynch this game. He provides a bit of analysis before he votes, but doesn't really explore any other options in the meantime. He spends a lot of time defending. I think he is second most likely to be scum. One thing I realized is that all the people that Jonny pressured in Day 1 before he got shot are now confirmed town, except BigDad. OWB, TheChyz, Asuna, theDragoon, dnyarri. BigDad was probably #1 on Jonny's list to shoot at the end of Day 1. In Night 1 Jonny called out Derrida and probably would have pushed a Derrida lynch and then both of them were shot. Also notice that Jonny did not mention sidesprang at all, and only mentioned Day_Walker once saying he wanted to see more from Day_Walker. Killing Jonny could have been a way to get rid of a strong player while also pointing town against everyone he pressured. Derrida was under heavy fire from me, Balla and Jonny so killing any of us would have worked, but they chose Jonny. In summary, as I stated in my analysis of Day_Walker: Day_Walker shows inconsistency in his reads and inconsistency in what he says and how he acts. He doesn't provide strong cases when he does act, either. I've read him as 'cautious', but because he didn't show any obvious scum slips he didn't stand out to me. I think the case against him is the strongest. ##vote Day_Walker sidesprang is my second choice for scum, with BigDad being third. I guess it's not just a coincidence that I'm coming up with the same read as TheChyz. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
##unvote Day_Walker Oops, I guess I can't vote until the day actually starts. Regardless, that's where I'll be putting it if I'm still alive. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Anyways, as discussed in my night post: ##vote Day_Walker I'll have a look at BigDad's analysis when he's posted all of it and anyone else's, when I wake up in the morning. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I want to hear BigDad's reads on dnyarri (??), and also on sidesprang. As for everyone else, what the hell? Did everyone just decide to lay over and die? Post some analysis and place your vote so we can discuss and make the best informed decision before the day is over. I don't know if everyone has just given up but I haven't and I still want to win =[ | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Sidesprang posted: Only way that post makes sense if Day_Walker is mafia is if thedragoon is mafia. With 9 votes on a player, why would you try to change the vote in any way if you were mafia, unless the person with the 9 votes were your mafia buddy. Atleast that is what pops to my head first when trying to see it from a mafia perspective. This can be seen as a soft defense of Day_Walker, knowing that sidesprang knows theDragoon is not mafia. Sidesprang posted: Day_Walker When I read his filter I see a possibility for him being scum, however I think its way more likely for him to be scum if theDragoon is scum I feel he gave him a weak townread in the start with his list. And when BigDad says he find Day_Walker and theDragon both became overly defensive about it. And also as chinstrap pointed out making a scumcase for the lurkers and a towncase for theDragoon, is something that very well can be done as scum regardless of theDragoon's allignment. And the more I think about it, I think it's more likely to be done if he is scum. If he makes a case for theDragoon is town then if he flips town he gets cred. If he flips scum then he tried to save his buddy. I do however feel this is very circumstantial and I would not feel comfortable lynching him, but this is what I read when I tried to view him as scum. Sidesprang flips back and forth on whether he thinks Day_Walker is scum, or not. His final verdict is he would not be comfortable lynching Day_Walker. Another defense. Aside from these two early non-scum reads on Day_Walker, sidesprang has not commented on Day_Walker. I think this supports the Day_Walker/sidesprang scum team theory, because Day_Walker has been in the spotlight for the last few days and sidesprang hasn't commented on him once. In Day_Walker's first post, he lists sidesprang as town (along with everyone else). Shortly after sidesprang bandwagoned onto theDragoon, Day_Walker posts his anti-lurker post where he votes dnyarri for being a scummy lurker. Sidesprang is in that list as well. Balla had already commented that sidesprang's vote looked like a bus, so it's a good move to include sidesprang in the list of lynch targets. Day_Walker doesn't actually say that sidesprang looks scummy though. In one of Day_Walker's more recent posts he proposes dnyarri+Asuna+Derrida scum team. He later backs down but doesn't propose a new team. There's a total absence of comment on sidesprang from Day_Walker. In addition, Day_Walker and sidesprang avoided voting on the same people in all three lynches so far. There's ample reason for Mafia to not vote together, especially when town is so confused. I feel that Day_Walker and sidesprang can be explained by their weak reads and lack of posts against each other, as well as their voting patterns. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
No matter what case I bring up, scum can always explain away the points (minus obvious scum slips, and I don't really see anything like that). So prove your towniness by making a case, and if there's flaws in it then you'll slip as scum anyways. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
My reads are all plainly laid out in my night post.. Nothing's happened at all since then so there's nothing for me to add... -_- | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Also, can we get the link to the obs QT? I'm dying to read it. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
![]() | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
The dual vote on Day_Walker was risky and I was biting my nails hoping it would go through. If town was just a little bit more active I would have pushed a Big_Dad lynch today instead of rushing for the win. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
My initial analysis of the roleclaim conversation was that theChyz was 'bad townie', but then I just went with the flow of the game and bandwagoned on theChyz.. In hindsight I probably didn't have to do that though. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 17 2014 07:16 Balla24 wrote: After I died though I knew instantly after Chyz did his weird "roleclaim" play... you went along with it for some reason im surprised nobody caught that . Basically this. Read my initial analysis on TheChyz here. If I was town I probably wouldn't have gone into such detail.. well, maybe I would have. But basically that play is so bad to try to pull off as mafia that theChyz couldn't be mafia lol. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Also I signed up for that shadow mafia thing cuz I saw you (Balla) and Jonny are in it.. But in the meantime are either of you playing in another game? | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Balla was throwing all sorts of pressure around, but he actually wasn't doing much analysis. If he pressured the wrong people I felt that would be in our benefit. In hindsight I don't know if it was the right move.. Seeing town confused over the Jonny NK was fun though. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
![]() Oh man, our next game we should totally play together.. If we end up on the same team it will be rad. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Asuna that is sick. I wanna know what your thought process was there :D | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I'd be the most obvious scum in the world if I had to react to everything live. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 17 2014 08:19 LoneMeow wrote: I can not, even if my life depended on it, hide emotions/excitement from my voice (and behaviour) so I just get caught on D1 every time as scum and that's boring. Yeahh.. this is me. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
I could tell you were putting in the effort in the latter part of the game and you definitely made things harder for mafia as a result. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
![]() I hate being on Mafia side when I play Mafia :< | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 17 2014 23:32 JonnyLaw wrote: prome fwiw I had the same feeling after reading a couple of his posts d1 and should look at it again to see what gave me that feeling. Hard to translate a feeling into a lynch. Honestly my day 1 case against BigDad was as honest as I could get. If I was town I think I would have made the exact same case even not knowing that BigDad was scum. There were just a few things that really really bugged me. If town was more active late game I would have called him definite scum for staying on dnyarri for so long and really pushed for his lynch. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
On January 18 2014 01:11 Balla24 wrote: It's just our posting style. I tend to make my cases in shorter posts during conversation, so they are naturally forgettable. For you, you tend to make longer cases but also post 3 or 4 consecutively so it's more information overload. With our powers combined...!!! | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
Actually I think one of the reasons why I played like this was because in my previous game as VT I tunneled extremely hard and ended up getting townies lynched because I pushed my reads like they were absolute truth. So, I toned it down for this game and I think being mafia, I went an extra step further than I would have if I were town. | ||
suki
Canada1159 Posts
| ||
| ||