|
On November 17 2013 01:29 Spaghetticus wrote:
@VE
I find it suspicious that you wouldn't even address my attack. This seems to me like someone micromanaging their image. I attacked you... a lot. You know that I've failed to gain traction, and that you feel comfortable in your current position, but a town should be willing to enter in discourse simply to provide info to the rest of town, and to dispel misgivings.
You do not consider me a threat, and as a scum you would want to veer away from explaining yourself for fear of being bogged into providing real information.
You also haven't come up with any real reasons for any of your lynch options. Your scumhunting has been zero.
I don't care. 
|
On November 17 2013 01:29 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:28 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 17 2013 01:24 yamato77 wrote:On November 17 2013 01:18 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 17 2013 01:14 yamato77 wrote:The biggest gripe I have have with Austin is how he approached this: On November 15 2013 12:50 austinmcc wrote:On November 15 2013 12:43 yamato77 wrote:On November 15 2013 12:40 austinmcc wrote:On November 15 2013 12:37 yamato77 wrote:On November 15 2013 09:16 hiro protagonist wrote:
Thats cool VE. but this was my plan before I got a role. I think its a good one ^__^ Obviously a claim. Ah. I don't read it that way, but I see where you at. I will say that, assuming a non-infinite amount of rock-lifting power, Hiro is not a rock I'm interested in looking under today. Are you going to run for mayor? If not, who would you elect? I think so, but am not entirely sure atm. I generally think of myself as someone able to show that he's townie early, to assuage any doubts, and I'm usually decent at the game. I feel like I'd make a good mayor. Right now, my focus is on getting a handle on a couple people in the game, solidifying D1 reads on them, and then moving towards a good lynch target. If I were to elect someone RIGHT NOW, it would actually be hiropro I think. I'm not going to vote for a person on the basis of their scumread right now, it's way too early in the game for that. So I'd have to vote one of my strongest townreads, and just trust that I can identify a townie to whom I can give a vest and bonus vote, currently looking at Hiro or Holy I think? Not only is hiro someone who has subsequently fallen off the map, but Austin went to AMAZING lengths to justify this super town read of hiro so early on. He's never really updated who he wants to be mayor at all. In fact, all Austin's done since this point in time is prod 2 players about things, Pandain and Onegu. He's responsive when questioned and appears pro-town, but Austin is capable of those things as mafia. What I want to know is, who does he want for mayor now, and why? If he were mayor, who would he lynch? I don't see much along these lines in his filter. He mentions the mayor talk "doesn't do much" for him, yet when he was town in LIX, he ran for mayor and actively participated in the campaigning D1. This game, Austin's firmly in the group of players right below the super townie active ones which is where he usually is as mafia. Perhaps I'm taking this a bit far, but he seems like mafia to me. I'd rather lynch BH over him, but he's second on the list at the moment. Wait, rehash the reasoning what BH is doing right now is non-town-BH again for me plz. Read his filter in Hogwarts. A BH who isn;t trying at all is a scum BH. He can be invovled, a la Thug Life, as town. There's no good excuse for how he's playing this game except that he's mafia. This statement isn't true at all - a BH who doesn't try is a BH. Not scum, not town. It's true that he HAS been scum and not tried, but he's been town and not tried too. I'm not going to kick and scream about a BH lynch - I'm just saying I think you're more certain than you should be. I'm not going to let him get away with doing nothing, and you shouldn't either.
I'm not going to let him get away with shit friend - but there are more players than BH and plenty who are better lynches than BH on D1. That's all I'm gonna say on the matter - BH DOES still need to get back with us, and I WOULD consider him for a lynch today if he rails against demands for contribution.
|
On November 17 2013 01:29 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:26 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 11:29 StorrZerg wrote:Now lets take a better look at mattchew I understand mattchew plays the game, by finding town and adding more town to his circle. And by that process he finds scum since they are not in his circle. How ever i am not so keen on him throwing town reads with no reason. (as he first starts out throwing one on VE) On November 15 2013 12:47 Mattchew wrote:
Yam and mocsta are town but i dont agree with Mocsta's case on Storr. I saw his conclusion, read storrs filter for myself, then read his case, and reconsidered but was not swayed into putting storr anywhere but neutral. Storr is going to play different, because he comes from a different type of mafia. Mocsta sometimes equivocates different to scum again Yam, random town read no real reason. I can "assume" he is getting a town read from mocsta because he believes mocsta is scum hunting. I shouldn't assume however.. I'd prefer matt to explain in a few more words why he feels this way. He seems a bit better with how he read the situation. (since i came to a similar conclusion mocsta town, im town) He changes his read on Alakaslam because of Alakaslam post responding to yamato. again, where are the reasons? After i said i was leaning scum on mattchew, On November 16 2013 09:33 Mattchew wrote:
mattchew is town
i lean town on storr too His read on myself has now changed. Why? again lack of reasoning. And most recent post On November 16 2013 09:33 Mattchew wrote:
BC can be lynched and im ok with that, same with koshi Not to sure why he is ok with these people, personally i am fine with a BC lynch since i feel he has not been looking for scum, just low hanging fruit. In the end, i have not found mattchew to have done anything yet in this game. His reads have had no reasoning what so ever save for 1 comment defending myself. I am putting him my scum circle for now. This one. I didn't like his initial post on austin, mainly because austin is a hard player to read anyway and Storr is generally not familiar with austin's playstyle. But then he went and looked at Mattchew. He recently played a game where he and Matt got pretty cozy in a mason QT together (or cozy SOMEWHERE, huehue). This is the type of read I'd expect a townStorr to try and make...one on someone he's more familiar with. The post itself is okay - no better or worse than any other PbPA posts, but the intent and motivation are what I liked about it. Personally I found this to be a summary post. As for mattchew mindset, I didnt think it added anything new to the discussion that occured a fair bit before storrzerg entered the fray.
It's fine - I was asked why I found it townie and that's my reasoning. I know you're suspicious of him and saw something totally different...I was asked about my read. 
|
On November 17 2013 01:33 Koshi wrote:
VisceraEyes
Is there a chance that you will lynch rayn?
Proooobably not.
|
On November 17 2013 01:34 yamato77 wrote:
VE, if you're going to be mayor, I would like you to state clearly who you're considering lynching and give precise reasons why.
Calm down dude. Though the game day draws to a close, the actual day is young. You shall have all you seek and more.
|
On November 17 2013 01:37 Skanjab1s wrote:
Also, there are many other people who have shown disinterest in the game, what are the differences between myself and them?
You're here, trying to put on a show of "interest in the game". They, incidentally, are not. That, friend, is the difference.
|
On November 17 2013 01:38 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:37 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 17 2013 01:34 yamato77 wrote:
VE, if you're going to be mayor, I would like you to state clearly who you're considering lynching and give precise reasons why. Calm down dude. Though the game day draws to a close, the actual day is young. You shall have all you seek and more. I don't have time to wait.
And I don't need your vote Yamato - you're my opponent. Look I'll give you the list, and you can either wait for the reasoning (which will be coming) or not, but at least that way you'll be informed.
Skanj4b, Pandain, hiro protagonist, Grackaroni, Oatsmaster
|
On November 17 2013 01:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
VE, Yamato, can I get any of you on board for a Mocsta lynch?
Prooobably not. What makes him a better lynch than, say, Skanjab?
|
On November 17 2013 01:39 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:36 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 17 2013 01:33 Koshi wrote:
VisceraEyes
Is there a chance that you will lynch rayn? Proooobably not. Well I am sad. %wise I am certain he is the best choice. I think he rolled scum and his plan is to play a passive game and see how far he can ride it. Maybe get more involved when he gets interested. Ah ffs...
Wait rayn...what has rayn done exactly? Has he done anything?
|
On November 17 2013 01:34 Skanjab1s wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:22 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 23:50 Skanjab1s wrote:On November 16 2013 13:55 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 13:49 Mig wrote:
VE do you still plan on lynching into the same group of 4 you listed earlier or has it changed?
It's changed, and incomplete. Right now I'm somewhere around [b] Skanjab, Pandain, SharrantAnd I'm torn on my last couple. I'm still not interested in lynching rayn or BC and I'm starting to come around on StorrZerg. His last round of posts, while not super enlightening, felt genuine enough. I'm still filtering, and still rereading. Sup? (1) Why am I, pandain, and sharrant scum? You have not given any reasoning at all for these reads. (2) Also, could you please quote which posts from StorrZerg made you drop your scumread of him? (3) Why do you no longer suspect Grack? 1) Your lack of interest in anything that happens in this game makes me think you're scum. Pandain is in a similar boat - it's like you guys are completely disinterested in trying to find scum at all. Sharrant is....probably not going to get lynched by me. I literally pulled that name off my previous list to make it look more impressive. 2) Maybe. Maybe not. I'll go take a look, but it was more of a feeling thing. Stay tuned. 3) I don't no longer suspect Grack. I actually forgot about Grack and the fact that he's done nothing noteworthy puts him up on my radar again. Thx bra. Well, (1) is just wrong, as I am interested in this game. Basically, you just want to policy lynch, why not say that?. And if you are so content with lynching people who are disinterested, why is Sharrant not going up for lynch anymore? He has only made a single post since you were last here. Finally, why do you just want to lynch inactive people? You are a self-professed mayoral god, having NEVER failed to lynch scum D1 as a mayor, why have you shown zero interest in trying to lynch a scum-read? A large portion of your mayoral campaign is how good you are at reading peeps, so why go after a group of people who haven't posted much instead of attempting to find scum in the people who have? (2) Do it pls.
I don't just want to lynch inactive people. I want to lynch people who are clearly not interested in helping me win the game. I'm going to lynch someone I think has the highest chance of flipping scum, period.
|
On November 17 2013 01:46 Koshi wrote:
##unvote
##vote: Koshi
I don't support your reads.
Skanj4b: nha
Pandain: nha just isn't playing
hiro protagonist: Did nothing at all so nha.
Grack: Disappeared. also nha. Not today.
Oatsmaster: where is the case? Why?
This is your right. I wish you luck in your future endeavors sir.
|
On November 17 2013 01:49 yamato77 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 16 2013 21:27 Clarity_nl wrote:Votecount: yamato77 (5): yamato77, OOHCHILD, Grackaroni, Pandain, Spaghetticus VisceraEyes (9): VisceraEyes, Hopeless1der, Koshi, Coagulation, Alakaslam, Risen, StorrZerg, LoneMeow, Artanis[Xp] OOHCHILD (0): Grackaroni, Pandainhiro protagonist (1): hiro protagonist
Mocsta (1): OOHCHILD, Mocsta
supersoft (2): supersoft, BloodyC0bbler
raynpelikoneet (1): raynpelikoneet
Bloodyc0bbler (1): Mr. Cheesecake
Blazinghand (2): Blazinghand, VayneAuthorityNot voting (9): Mattchew, Sharrant, Mig, Onegu, Skanjab1s, Stutters695, austinmcc, Holyflare, Oatsmaster Election is in . Voting is mandatory.
Currently VisceraEyes will be elected Mayor and yamato77 will be elected Pardoner!
If you see that a vote out of place please inform me or someone else on the hosting team so that we can correct it. All votes in italics should be scrutinized. CC in particular is someone I've overlooked.
Dang good call. What do you make of people not voting yet? I find them more scummy than off-voters to be honest.
|
On November 17 2013 01:52 Skanjab1s wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 01:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 17 2013 01:34 Skanjab1s wrote:On November 17 2013 01:22 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 23:50 Skanjab1s wrote:On November 16 2013 13:55 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 16 2013 13:49 Mig wrote:
VE do you still plan on lynching into the same group of 4 you listed earlier or has it changed?
It's changed, and incomplete. Right now I'm somewhere around [b] Skanjab, Pandain, SharrantAnd I'm torn on my last couple. I'm still not interested in lynching rayn or BC and I'm starting to come around on StorrZerg. His last round of posts, while not super enlightening, felt genuine enough. I'm still filtering, and still rereading. Sup? (1) Why am I, pandain, and sharrant scum? You have not given any reasoning at all for these reads. (2) Also, could you please quote which posts from StorrZerg made you drop your scumread of him? (3) Why do you no longer suspect Grack? 1) Your lack of interest in anything that happens in this game makes me think you're scum. Pandain is in a similar boat - it's like you guys are completely disinterested in trying to find scum at all. Sharrant is....probably not going to get lynched by me. I literally pulled that name off my previous list to make it look more impressive. 2) Maybe. Maybe not. I'll go take a look, but it was more of a feeling thing. Stay tuned. 3) I don't no longer suspect Grack. I actually forgot about Grack and the fact that he's done nothing noteworthy puts him up on my radar again. Thx bra. Well, (1) is just wrong, as I am interested in this game. Basically, you just want to policy lynch, why not say that?. And if you are so content with lynching people who are disinterested, why is Sharrant not going up for lynch anymore? He has only made a single post since you were last here. Finally, why do you just want to lynch inactive people? You are a self-professed mayoral god, having NEVER failed to lynch scum D1 as a mayor, why have you shown zero interest in trying to lynch a scum-read? A large portion of your mayoral campaign is how good you are at reading peeps, so why go after a group of people who haven't posted much instead of attempting to find scum in the people who have? (2) Do it pls. I don't just want to lynch inactive people. I want to lynch people who are clearly not interested in helping me win the game. I'm going to lynch someone I think has the highest chance of flipping scum, period. Well, your lynch list is incomplete then, and it also shows this to be untrue, unless you are trying to convince me that town-VE would be so dense as to believe that inactivity=scum.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything friend, in case you hadn't noticed you're on the chopping block and I'm about to become mayor. Obviously I don't have to convince you of shit. <3
|
But I'm not policy lynching that's the thing - so there's nothing to cover up! LOGIC!!
|
Wait so are you saying that I'm lynching you by a strict inactivity policy? And that I'm somehow trying to cover it up?
So like...how are you inactive if you're in here trying to smear shit on me? That's the question - if I'm talking about lynching you and you're not inactive, what's the policy exactly?
|
WELL NOW I HAVE THE ADDED REASONING OF MAKING SHIT UP AND SMEARING SHIT ON ME THAT DO ANYTHING FOR YA TWE3K?!
|
While I look uniformly sexy. Just staaaahp dude.
|
No, he doesn't. That's what's amazing about what he's doing - he's played enough games with me to know unquestioningly that I'm town. But he's representing that he doesn't. Scummily.
|
On November 17 2013 02:05 Skanjab1s wrote:Show nested quote +On November 17 2013 02:03 VisceraEyes wrote:
While I look uniformly sexy. Just staaaahp dude. You ain't this bad as town, I'll take solace in the graveyard and will be vomiting up a stream of "I told you so's" over alla mah peeps. So shall you all be covered in Skanjabile.
I lol'd
|
Teamplay'd.
See y'all in a little bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
