EPTTL Mafia LXIII: Time to Die - Page 8
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On November 18 2013 16:35 Blazinghand wrote: well look at grack's play, oats. I'm completely serious here. if you had a scummate playing like this (link) and you are a 2-shot vigi isn't a bus the most sensible play? The point I'm making is that scum Grack doesnt play like that. I dont even. What. What. Is this a scumslip? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Scumslips do exist. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Or do you insist on still being useless and voting for the easiest target. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On November 18 2013 20:23 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I can't help but notice that two of the three scumshots were people critical of VE (Yamato, Spaghetticus). StorrZerg doesn't count since it was the only shot Mocsta could make if he wanted to claim, and even he wasn't positive about VE. I'm not sure if it's a set up or if we should be looking into our mayor with a lot more scrutiny than before. Do you do this as scum? Or do you have evidence that VE does this as scum? Because Yamato and spag both didnt get much traction with their scumreads on VE. Everyone was like mehhhh MAYBE. I dont think thats a good enough reason tbh. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
BC BH VE Pandain I think you might have 1 or 2 wrong. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Also Marv 100% randoms his setups. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On November 18 2013 23:00 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Also I don't think Marv would put BH at the head of a scumteam due to his tendency to troll. what. This is the most bullshit thing ever. Please stop artanis. Pleas. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Thats wrong. Wrong. Wrong. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
So Mocsta normally types very carefully to his scummates. But he is very angry with Grack this game. Therefore Grack is scum? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On November 19 2013 01:26 BloodyC0bbler wrote: He types carefully in general and ignores his teammates. The interaction with grack this game from what I saw in both games filters is completely unique. Its only that reason that it stands out to me. SO HOW DOES IT MAKE GRACK SCUM???? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
But you have no reason. What is this BC. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
As opposed to Mocsta being angry at Grack because Grack was bussing him. Am I the only one that thinks its totally ludicrous? Thrawn, my read outside the mocsta stuff is that Grack is town. And that you are scummy for calling Grack scum. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Why is outing masons good for scum and bad for town? Yeah this is looking worse and worse for BC. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On November 19 2013 01:57 BloodyC0bbler wrote: How? this setup is completely different than normal. masons can also have roles according to the OP. We just lost 4 blues in one day. You are opening up to a) lose more and b) fuck the game over with clear the masons. eh what? Does being mason have a higher chance of having other roles? Or else IT DOESNT MATTER BC. Also its not like everyone is gonna go 'follow rayn' if his plan is shitty. The thing for me is that people masoned obviously have reads on each other. And if they dont share those reads, its harder for town to win the game. So mason people should share reads. Actually thrawn, dont you have a town read on BH? Do you not care that BH is currently leading the votecount? | ||
| ||
