On November 17 2013 10:38 VayneAuthority wrote:
Reconsider from a timeline standpoint. Masoning yamato looks great...until a mason randomly flips for the night kill. Logic

Can you explain this not following you.

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 01:45 GMT

#2140

Oh ok.

My opinion is that he used his powers early, in fact I was thinking(need to read OP's more, I'm actually genuinely sorry Marv) that you choose a mason partner at night like normal. Immediate doing yamato, and his later casting suspicion on yamato, just doesn't make me read scum at all.

Anyone who got masoned should claim so. Anyone disagree?

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 01:45 GMT

#2141

Actually I disagree with that nvm

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 01:52 GMT

#2144

Is that true?

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 02:00 GMT

#2157

Is that why you thought I was scum because you didn't think there were three masons?

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 02:01 GMT

#2158

Not that it's certain but I predict the scum mason to be one of you or the other guy. If he's suspicious you might want to consider just outting him now.

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 02:02 GMT

#2160

Or simply out the non-confirmed person if for example you were masoned by Yamato who was then masoned by Hopeless, then be like yo guys hopeless is also a mason, while keeping the 'confirmed' town person, who scum can't directly guess, secret to you.

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 02:04 GMT

#2164

On November 17 2013 11:02 VisceraEyes wrote:

Show nested quote +

He's not - to me - so I'm gonna wait.

Do you know the identity of the other guy? Is that guy equally not suspicious?

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 02:05 GMT

#2168

Didn't you think I was scum? Why were you never arguing for me?

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 02:06 GMT

#2170

On November 17 2013 11:05 VisceraEyes wrote:
Yes that guy is equally not suspicious. That's why I'm having a hard time here. I'll out them before the night is up I think. That's probably the best way.

I agree with that, though I'm interested in what's happening.

If they're really really not suspicious then I wouldn't out them honestly. No reason to give scum more information; reason I suggest it is because me and lone are already known, so the two remaining would only be one more role that scum would know vs possibly one more scum that we would find.

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 02:07 GMT

#2172

Also remember it's not certain that any of us are scum so there's that.

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 02:08 GMT

#2173

Alright, both could be scum.

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 02:16 GMT

#2175

Rayn do you have town games where you basically stop trying to argue a lynch because I don't consider occasional posts on Holyflare to Yamato to be legitimate especially when he was afk.

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 02:24 GMT

#2179

Stutters/Vayne*/BH/ are my reads. Vayne with an asterisk because I'm always wrong about him lolz.

Re-read Rayn way less confident but can't really back down I'm too invested. + Show Spoiler +

just kidding only somewhat suspicious actually I'm going to ignore rayn for now so if you're scum congratz

I think one of the two masons that VE is talking about *might* be scum. I think two of OOHChild/Oats/Mattchew/Coag scum.

That's my new pandain guess

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 02:25 GMT

#2180

Holy might be scum but that also conflicts with my emotional investment in rayn

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 02:27 GMT

#2182

The thing about Grack is he's acting genuinely depressed. I'm actually worried about him outside of game.

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 03:21 GMT

#2187

On November 17 2013 12:03 austinmcc wrote:
People who are counting masons should stop, we can poke around that later as some die off and we've got a smaller pool to work with. I have also been contacted by a mason. So the pool is sizeable.

VE, why skan in particular? I see not giving a shit about helping us win, but why skan out of the group of players not helping us win?

In light of this I heavily suggest VE not reveal who he is masoned with and we stick to analysis instead.

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 03:29 GMT

#2189

Nice Coag. Do you have any thoughts on the game?

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 03:45 GMT

#2191

Coag there's only so long you can go on being useless

Pandain

United States12989 Posts

November 17 2013 19:55 GMT

#2446

On November 18 2013 04:53 StorrZerg wrote:

Show nested quote +

isn't this kind of a bad idea if mafia have a Suicide Bomber

if your mafia, seems like a good play to get rid of a strong town, and get rid of docs and w/e else is on bc.

I can't see why you as town would make this kind of a call with a possible Suicide bomber in the game

Maybe this is some meta shit im not aware of, but it seems pretty silly to make this kind of a call..

No because it relies on mafia assuming medics follow supersofts advice which is far from certain.

And that assumption has to be strong enough to losing a mafia member in the hopes of getting two kills