TL Mafia LXIII: Time to Die - Page 3

On November 18 2013 07:00 StorrZerg wrote:
in short BH has only jumped on weak lynches, thown some town reads, changed his mind about myself with no real reason.

On November 18 2013 07:47 Blazinghand wrote:
I am gonna slap down a couple of scumreads before I get rolling

also if anyone has any ideas about who I should track tonight let me know

I agree with thrawn and VE re: grack's seriousness level. We should consider grack for a lynch tomorrow not because he is non-serious at times (link)(link) but rather what he chooses to be non-serious about. As VE notes, (link) Grack spends a lot of time talking about kush and pushing for a kush mayorship (link) to the exclusion of discussing other things. After being called out on it, he moves to other topics, but ultimately his decision to engage people in a non-serious attitude lets him say things that he can just ignore/backtrack later (examples like support for my RNG lynch : (link) or voting yamato to push BC when yamato ends up wanting to lynch me, and not unvoting yamato despite that (link)). Ultimately what we see isn't just someone trolling, but someone strategically opting out of the discourse by taking up trolling positions, admitting they're trolling (link) (link), and leaving his vote (or his case) wherever it is convenient for him. The point he makes re: BC isn't inherently bad, but he implies that BC trying to look productive is actually scummier than Grack not trying to; and this is false. Grack can back away from any position he takes, and has, and ducks under the radar for it. This is what scum do. How much do you really know about Grack's positions? very little-- he seems to constantly change his mind about things, and never takes a serious stance. A good play for a scum player.

On November 18 2013 07:44 StorrZerg wrote:



well want to be active now

Thoughts on yamato? BC?

On November 18 2013 08:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Because i do not think they are necessarily town.
And i do not think BH's claim makes him anything. I am not saying you are not allowed to call him scum, but you have focused on his claim for like latest 20 posts of yours. It's useless because his claim does not make him anything.

On November 18 2013 15:45 Grackaroni wrote:

I wouldn't really argue against vigging him, but the too bad to be scum does usually end up correct. (It could actually just be because there are more bad players than scum players.)

On November 18 2013 16:02 Oatsmaster wrote:
BH if you did that as town, I will shit on you every time you say you are a good player.

On November 18 2013 16:11 Oatsmaster wrote:
No, I wanted you to post like a townie in the limited time you have. There is no excuse for not playing the game if you are town.

On November 18 2013 16:13 Grackaroni wrote:
BH. Have you ever fake claimed as town before?