TL Mafia LXIII: Time to Die - Page 2

On November 15 2013 11:16 Mocsta wrote:

So classic chainsaw defending oats is back in town.

Gg too easy.

Nice attempt to belittle my case. Storrzerg is an experienced player. Far from lynch bait.

Want to have another go and explain why you disagree with my findings.

On November 15 2013 11:16 VisceraEyes wrote:

I'm saying if he's scum I don't want him as mayor and if he's town I can't trust him to be mayor. I haven't said anything about his alignment.

On November 15 2013 11:21 VisceraEyes wrote:
Mocsta: StorrZerg, while being an experienced player, I think is a little intimidated by the format change. I don't think saying "Give the new guy a chance" while he's running for mayor is admissible as "playing the newb card" anyway.

And please don't get into it with Oats dude - I'm barely restraining myself as it is.

Oats gets the "worst player of the game" award though for essentially claiming scum this last day when he could have instead easily set up a DBZ/Oats dichotomy for the last team by just shutting the hell up.

On November 15 2013 10:53 Alakaslam wrote:

I fixed this for you, retaining all of your true intent, adding some compatible intent in te form of an inside joke, and containing equally flawed logic.


Wouldn't it be convenient if this was the scum team? Highly unlikely, but then it is highly unlikely that any single player is scum- yet there is a guarantee of at least one. Therefore, you should elect players based on what they say, being WARY of those who have shown exceptional skill as well as those who have little or no skill. In fact, we want an absolute moderate with regard to meta until a veteran has sufficiently shown themselves to be town to earn our trust- in which case a veteran becomes ideal.

This point is why I usually talk about Svengali at some point. However, that is just an attempt to sound laughable- a meta I plan to give one last ditch effort to destroy here before turning wholly to co/hosting games with the very occasional /in. Therefore, I will from now on refer to it thus; "The Peid Piper Problem". The pied piper mislead a bunch of rats through skill; so also can forum vets who rolled scum.

I'm not an Assassin, therefore I'm not running for mayor. That was the only case in which I actually planned to run.

I am still catching up.

On November 15 2013 11:05 Alakaslam wrote:

I disagree.

Either: He is right, you are scum,
Or: He is wrong, you both interact poorly here
Or: He is not only wrong, but he is intentionally wrong and actually Pied-Pipering you.

Or: something else. But VE is far from idiocy, I can give you am example of idiocy in a heartbeat and in fact will do so.

Game: Newbie Mini Mafia XLVIII
Filter: Alakaslam

Game: Aperture Mafia 2: Part 2
Filter: Alakaslam

For alignment specific idiocy.

Do not insult needlessly.

On November 15 2013 11:46 Alakaslam wrote:
Caught up.

I don't trust VE but I don't think he is scum yet. I don't claim to be able to read him; this is just a pair of Lincoln coppers I used to own.

Coag, I will probably do that, in inside jokes dispersed here anBlazinghand d there, if you want to waste your tunnel on me over that know that it is a waste, therefore antitown unless there are reasons to think I would THE GREAT bloody cobbler as scum- so give reasons why that is a valid reason to tunnel me if that is an honest threat.

That being said, I'm moving on to the vote thread after a bit more deliberation

On November 15 2013 12:07 Alakaslam wrote:

The last one is the only one I could conceivably see as being similar

Did you even understand me before? Or do I still fail to get my thoughts across?

On November 15 2013 12:08 VisceraEyes wrote:

Well you were being bad! And you call me bad all the time wtf?! If it means more coming from me because you perceive me to be good then why do you call me bad? Why do you antagonize?

It's a game of give and take - and you can only take what you give. You give hardly anything Oats - keeping up and commenting is barely giving. It's more than people who don't post anything, but barely. The way you play, it's how scum generally play man. That's why you catch a lot of shit and why people call you bad. I give you a lot of shit because I've seen you play better and when you don't I get salty and call you bad.

On November 15 2013 12:11 VisceraEyes wrote:

Oh...well, I was calling you bad because I was representing that I thought you were town. It would have been preferable if you'd gone with me on Prom and ended the game more assuredly, but you opposing me wasn't strictly speaking "bad" play.

I certainly disagree that you were the best scum in the game I HAD THAT SHIT LOCKED DOWN. But no, I don't think you played that poorly at all in Resistance.

On November 15 2013 12:14 Alakaslam wrote:

So do you now? How the hell am I supposed to word things? I have stopped trolling and my head hurts with the assumption of -_- during my leisure time. It's like working a 16 hour day for kicks but I'm thinking it will pay off irl to become more serious here.

On November 15 2013 12:18 VisceraEyes wrote:
Yeah that was leftover rage - understand that that post directly followed the endgame post which directly followed the situation I'm referring to. Having gone over the situation I fully admit to a bit of bias where that bit is concerned. I'm sorry Oats, I didn't mean to upset you. You know I love you. Here, come lie beside me. I won't let anyone hurt you anymore.