|
On November 01 2013 18:56 Laughing Jack wrote: Oats how is what I do in the slightest relevant to what you do? SO I CAN HAVE A READ ON YOU.
Do you insist on being as infuriating as possible? Do you know how to play the game? At this point, I dont think so.
|
On November 01 2013 19:18 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 18:56 Laughing Jack wrote: Oats how is what I do in the slightest relevant to what you do? SO I CAN HAVE A READ ON YOU. Do you insist on being as infuriating as possible? Do you know how to play the game? At this point, I dont think so. Well here is the thing, I've asked you questions, and your response have been "I'm not going to answer those why don't YOU answer them yourself. And then I said that your behaviour was suspicious and you say, What about YOUR behaviour? See a pattern? Maybe you don't. You seem pretty slow since you think what you're making is actually legit arguments.
Your behaviour is suspicious and when I called you out for it, you just got mad and attacked my behaviour. I don't understand how you think that my play justifies yours? The only motivation I can conclude from that is that your goal is to blend in, and as a scum thinking you're blending in you actually don't understand why you look suspicious.
|
What questions? I dont see anything.
|
On November 01 2013 19:37 Oatsmaster wrote: What questions? I dont see anything.
On November 01 2013 16:12 Laughing Jack wrote: Your sacrifice is noted, What do you two think about the current votes?
On November 01 2013 16:18 Laughing Jack wrote: No, Are you happy with them? Do you think anyone's vote suck, do you think my vote suck? How would you like the votes to be, who do you want pressured?, is Pandain really your top scumread? Plenty to talk about.
|
Yeah I'm ok with getting rid of Laughing Jack.
|
But what really matters is that when the pressure on you decreased, and you didn't have to defend yourself. Despite being around you didn't use that opportunity to ask me or Grack (who were around) for opinions or made any attempt to drive a discussion forward.
On November 01 2013 18:05 Laughing Jack wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 17:52 Grackaroni wrote:On November 01 2013 17:52 Laughing Jack wrote:On November 01 2013 17:48 Grackaroni wrote:On November 01 2013 17:41 Laughing Jack wrote:On November 01 2013 16:22 Grackaroni wrote:On November 01 2013 16:18 Laughing Jack wrote: No, Are you happy with them? Do you think anyone's vote suck, do you think my vote suck? How would you like the votes to be, who do you want pressured?, is Pandain really your top scumread? Plenty to talk about. I don't really like your vote and I think you should vote Oats, who is coincidentally my top scum read. It's all in the filter. I wanted you to answer the questions that wasn't in your filter, the others were examples. Sorry I expected you to figure that out by yourself, should I assume you didn't because you're lazy or because you genuinely didn't figure it out? Can you get back to me on the other topics. Like if you had the power to select three people that everyone had to vote between, who would you pick? On November 01 2013 16:30 Pandain wrote:On November 01 2013 16:18 Laughing Jack wrote: No, Are you happy with them? Do you think anyone's vote suck, do you think my vote suck? How would you like the votes to be, who do you want pressured?, is Pandain really your top scumread? Plenty to talk about. Why don't you contribute I am contributing, I just shut down something that could had become ten or more pages of nothing concrete, you're welcome. And the very post you're commenting on is trying to generate discussion. You on the other hand. Your biggest impact on this game have been getting randomly generated to be lynched. And I'm starting to think Oats will be a good lynch for today. Oatsmaster/OdinofPergo/Laughing Jack Cool, and why would you want to see them spotlighted over others? I think Odin is a terrible pick really. Since he's not been around, why did you pick him? Because he's active in another game and still hasn't shown up in this one. Alright, well I'm starting to agree with you on Oats, I think it's a pretty bad sign, that after I came and broke up your attacks on him and asked him to talk about something else he didn't, but has just been hanging around doing nothing. Which indicates he's pretty content with doing nothing as long as he doesn't need to defend himself.
|
On November 01 2013 19:39 Grackaroni wrote: Yeah I'm ok with getting rid of Laughing Jack. This might be difficult for you but try to use your head. I'd love to hear what kind of backwards logic makes you want to lynch me.
|
ohhhh I thought you were asking those to Grack.
|
On November 01 2013 19:46 Laughing Jack wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 19:39 Grackaroni wrote: Yeah I'm ok with getting rid of Laughing Jack. This might be difficult for you but try to use your head. I'd love to hear what kind of backwards logic makes you want to lynch me. You can be useless or an ass but you just can't be both.
|
On November 01 2013 19:48 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 19:46 Laughing Jack wrote:On November 01 2013 19:39 Grackaroni wrote: Yeah I'm ok with getting rid of Laughing Jack. This might be difficult for you but try to use your head. I'd love to hear what kind of backwards logic makes you want to lynch me. You can be useless or an ass but you just can't be both. I'm not being an ass, I just don't have the patience to babytalk people who refuse to use their heads. But is that the reason you want to lynch me? Because then I think you just promoted yourself to worst player in the game.
|
On November 01 2013 19:51 Laughing Jack wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 19:48 Grackaroni wrote:On November 01 2013 19:46 Laughing Jack wrote:On November 01 2013 19:39 Grackaroni wrote: Yeah I'm ok with getting rid of Laughing Jack. This might be difficult for you but try to use your head. I'd love to hear what kind of backwards logic makes you want to lynch me. You can be useless or an ass but you just can't be both. I'm not being an ass, I just don't have the patience to babytalk people who refuse to use their heads. But is that the reason you want to lynch me? Because then I think you just promoted yourself to worst player in the game. I am ok with that.
|
Consider it an useless ass policy lynch. Trust me, that's going to be a thing!
|
On November 01 2013 19:47 Oatsmaster wrote: ohhhh I thought you were asking those to Grack.
On November 01 2013 16:12 Laughing Jack wrote: Your sacrifice is noted, What do you two think about the current votes? I can understand how you would think that since this is clearly directed to Grackaroni alone
But even if you missed it it doesn't matter too much to my point, because even if I hadn't asked you that question, you still didn't take the opportunity to do anything pro-town by yourself. And you're not a newbie so you know well that's what's pro-town to do, and that's what I expected from you when I made Grack back of.
There could had been reasons for why you didn't. Like you were tired of the game after the Spamfest with Grack and didn't feel like inquiring. or That you busy doing something else. But if that was the case I don't understand why you wouldn't had just said so which makes the conclusion that you were here but had no motive to further the town.
|
No, Are you happy with them? Do you think anyone's vote suck, do you think my vote suck? How would you like the votes to be, who do you want pressured?, is Pandain really your top scumread? Plenty to talk about. I definetely want Pandain to be pressured, yes Pandain is my top scumread for just popping in to say a few inconsequential things and leave. Thats really scummy cause he doesnt care about finding scum or even looking like town. He just wants to stay in the background.
|
On November 01 2013 20:00 Laughing Jack wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 19:47 Oatsmaster wrote: ohhhh I thought you were asking those to Grack.
Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 16:12 Laughing Jack wrote: Your sacrifice is noted, What do you two think about the current votes? I can understand how you would think that since this is clearly directed to Grackaroni alone But even if you missed it it doesn't matter too much to my point, because even if I hadn't asked you that question, you still didn't take the opportunity to do anything pro-town by yourself. And you're not a newbie so you know well that's what's pro-town to do, and that's what I expected from you when I made Grack back of. There could had been reasons for why you didn't. Like you were tired of the game after the Spamfest with Grack and didn't feel like inquiring.or That you busy doing something else.But if that was the case I don't understand why you wouldn't had just said so which makes the conclusion that you were here but had no motive to further the town. Did I post after you called Grack off me? Like one post maybe. Yeah maybe I couldnt post. Huh. Think about that.
You're probably syllo.
|
On November 01 2013 19:53 Grackaroni wrote: Consider it an useless ass policy lynch. Trust me, that's going to be a thing! You can call me an ass which might be true to some extent but if you think I'm useless your brain isn't working for you.
also it's kind of hypocritical to talk about others policy lynching when you're a candidate for one-line spam policy-lynch. Which unlike being an ass, is actually detrimental to town. I really hope you don't plan to keep one-liner posting all through the game. You will make the game near unreadable at some point.
|
|
Nah I'm in a game with syllo right now this isn't syllo.
|
On November 01 2013 20:04 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 20:00 Laughing Jack wrote:On November 01 2013 19:47 Oatsmaster wrote: ohhhh I thought you were asking those to Grack.
On November 01 2013 16:12 Laughing Jack wrote: Your sacrifice is noted, What do you two think about the current votes? I can understand how you would think that since this is clearly directed to Grackaroni alone But even if you missed it it doesn't matter too much to my point, because even if I hadn't asked you that question, you still didn't take the opportunity to do anything pro-town by yourself. And you're not a newbie so you know well that's what's pro-town to do, and that's what I expected from you when I made Grack back of. There could had been reasons for why you didn't. Like you were tired of the game after the Spamfest with Grack and didn't feel like inquiring.or That you busy doing something else.But if that was the case I don't understand why you wouldn't had just said so which makes the conclusion that you were here but had no motive to further the town. Did I post after you called Grack off me? Like one post maybe. Yeah maybe I couldnt post. Huh. Think about that. You're probably syllo. Even in your defence you're not even saying that you couldn't post, you're just wifoming that you might not had been able to post without actually claiming that you couldn't post? Seriously.
And yeah, you posted, (there was about a one hour gap (which is not a lot of time) and since then you've been around regularly.
|
On November 01 2013 20:12 Laughing Jack wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2013 20:04 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 01 2013 20:00 Laughing Jack wrote:On November 01 2013 19:47 Oatsmaster wrote: ohhhh I thought you were asking those to Grack.
On November 01 2013 16:12 Laughing Jack wrote: Your sacrifice is noted, What do you two think about the current votes? I can understand how you would think that since this is clearly directed to Grackaroni alone But even if you missed it it doesn't matter too much to my point, because even if I hadn't asked you that question, you still didn't take the opportunity to do anything pro-town by yourself. And you're not a newbie so you know well that's what's pro-town to do, and that's what I expected from you when I made Grack back of. There could had been reasons for why you didn't. Like you were tired of the game after the Spamfest with Grack and didn't feel like inquiring.or That you busy doing something else.But if that was the case I don't understand why you wouldn't had just said so which makes the conclusion that you were here but had no motive to further the town. Did I post after you called Grack off me? Like one post maybe. Yeah maybe I couldnt post. Huh. Think about that. You're probably syllo. Even in your defence you're not even saying that you couldn't post, you're just wifoming that you might not had been able to post without actually claiming that you couldn't post? Seriously. And yeah, you posted, (there was about a one hour gap (which is not a lot of time) and since then you've been around regularly.
No, Im saying I couldnt post. Also Ive been playing Dota, also I have eaten dinner, also I have done some homework. Whats the point?
|
|
|
|