|
On October 30 2013 01:10 Seuss wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2013 01:06 Promethelax wrote: Okay so I walked around the block and kicked puppies so I feel a little better now. Reread everything from page fifty and went into some filters.
Suess you should ##Yolo Promethelax I'm not as certain of you being town as I am marv and Oats. Also, didn't you get the ones you needed earlier? I thought you wanted people to stop after that.
I wrote that before SnB did it. But yes. I did. you should no longer Yolo me.
I also see that WoS is the hot lynch now without my help. So woo!
|
You being less sure of me than Oats is funny as fuck. Explain it.
|
I knew I liked Strong for a reason.
So SnB, what do you think about my WoS case?
|
On October 30 2013 01:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:Prome you say some stufdf that i can't understand. this: Show nested quote +In nine minutes WoS looked through all my games. Nine minutes for him to realize he was full of shit. Or he knew it from the beginning. WoS was full of shit from the beginning. WoS is scum ##logic Where did WoS say he looked into your games? I don't understand this argument given the quotes.And this: Show nested quote + I find this really weird, this is not the first time he was brought up 3p so far this game. I'd say he either is 3p or is aware of its existence.
Along with that his OOh 'placeholder' vote was the fourth vote on OOOh and he hadn't commented before at all. I don't like that particular vote. In fact, I rather like WoS as scum. Or 3p. Anti town any ways.
Aren't you basically doing the same thing you accuse WoS of here? as to the bold: look in his spoiler in that quote to the italics: yes I voted OOH as a pressure vote with a reason. WoS voted OOOH fourth as a placeholder. You don't see the difference?
|
do you individually believe anything?
|
On October 30 2013 01:33 marvellosity wrote: Your voting history is this, Seuss:
OOHCHILD (dude you said you didn't think was scum) Clarity (guy having a bitchfit) ---
Not... stellar.
The thing is the awful buddying that has been WoS ---> Suess I don't see that as a two scum interaction.
|
No one cares who you would lynch unless you are going to make a case and convince us.
|
|
On October 30 2013 01:38 OOHCHILD wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2013 01:37 Promethelax wrote: No one cares who you would lynch unless you are going to make a case and convince us. You should care because those are the people who I would vote for. If you are interesting in getting someone lynched, you should care.
The thing is I don't need your vote to secure a lynch. Which was my point. Unless you want to convince us to switch targets no one cares what you have to say.
|
I read it and found it unconvincing. Remember SnB's play in CC?
|
So WoS how is a double vote 'super pro town' and 'boring'?
|
On October 30 2013 01:47 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2013 01:43 marvellosity wrote: Sorry, dickmove analysis re: me, my reading fail. You don't think I'd use it as mafia, with you in the game and aware I'd not be using it though?? Seuss explanation would be nice. I do think you are capable of using it as mafia, but I think as mafia, knowing I am in the game you'd probably specifically label it as such or make reference to me somehow. You used it rather offhandedly which makes me feel that it was genuine. As far as Seuss, I REALLY don't like his play now. When i originally faked my role use on him i figured he'd come back with strong analysis and play like he did in his newbie and would prove himself a good choice for my power, but he has done basically the opposite: sheeping town sentiment, no reads, and no strong posts one way or another. It may be possible that Seuss is scum atm but I do not feel comfortable pushing anything with the limited time that I have, and would have to read closer which i frankly do not have time for especially if I need to be defending myself.
find scum > defend self, fool
|
|
On October 30 2013 01:50 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2013 01:49 Promethelax wrote:On October 30 2013 01:47 WaveofShadow wrote:On October 30 2013 01:43 marvellosity wrote: Sorry, dickmove analysis re: me, my reading fail. You don't think I'd use it as mafia, with you in the game and aware I'd not be using it though?? Seuss explanation would be nice. I do think you are capable of using it as mafia, but I think as mafia, knowing I am in the game you'd probably specifically label it as such or make reference to me somehow. You used it rather offhandedly which makes me feel that it was genuine. As far as Seuss, I REALLY don't like his play now. When i originally faked my role use on him i figured he'd come back with strong analysis and play like he did in his newbie and would prove himself a good choice for my power, but he has done basically the opposite: sheeping town sentiment, no reads, and no strong posts one way or another. It may be possible that Seuss is scum atm but I do not feel comfortable pushing anything with the limited time that I have, and would have to read closer which i frankly do not have time for especially if I need to be defending myself. find scum > defend self, fool Er, except you asked him repeatedly to answer your case. So... yeah. Stop talking Prome and let him find some mafia, should he wish to. better to reply to case than claim random shitty blue. Better to find scum than reply to case.
|
So marv, if WoS is scum is Suess scum? I don't see it, WoS has done some bullshit buddying that has been awful. But is it S-S awful or S-T awful or T-whatever awful? I have a hard time seeing a player hard buddy their scumbuddy as the player who knows that scumbuddy best because at this point if Suess flips red WoS is a policy lynch 100% no question. So since you have had some serious issues with Suess (ones his most recent post exacerbated) so can WoS also be scum? I don't see it.
|
That was nothing liked a balanced game though and that was a problem discussed in the post game. Though yes, that is not a very good role to use to 'prove' townieness since there have been town and scum double voters since the dawn of time.
WoS is very passive and I don't get it. Like he thought someone was scum at some time probably. But besides his terrible case on me I don't see it.
Don't you have a half a dozen people you'd happily lynch?
Rayn: see that 9 minute thing now? Thoughts?
|
On October 30 2013 02:03 Pandain wrote: There is no way I am catching up to this in time allotted(I have to study for test).
Recap please?
my day cop power showed you as scum. You are being lynched.
|
On October 30 2013 02:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2013 02:04 Promethelax wrote: That was nothing liked a balanced game though and that was a problem discussed in the post game. Though yes, that is not a very good role to use to 'prove' townieness since there have been town and scum double voters since the dawn of time.
WoS is very passive and I don't get it. Like he thought someone was scum at some time probably. But besides his terrible case on me I don't see it.
Don't you have a half a dozen people you'd happily lynch?
Rayn: see that 9 minute thing now? Thoughts? No i don't see anywhere where WoS says he will read your past games. Maybe i am just blind, but could you point it out to me with quotes? And the 3p thing was; You called WoS out of being a scum or 3p, and the reasoning was he called you 3p..??
It was spoiled he said he'd looked into my past games to try to find a place in which I had used meta on a player I had not played with before and failed to do so.
The 3p thing was a focus on anti town, it suggested to me that he might be 3p. Though 3p hunting is way easier as scum than scum hunting as well.
|
so pandain has the neg role suess has the 50/50 role WoS has the pos role
they could all be town based on the roles...
|
I'd say no more than one of them can be scum. I think. Or lylo is super duper fucked.
|
|
|
|