|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 23:45 Koshi wrote:
If we don't lynch Clarity today we are not lynching him ever again this game. We believe his sincerity or we don't.
Good post.
I'm going to take a little break and come back soon. Clarity makes a good point that OOHCHILD is unnaturally sure he's not mafia, but OOHCHILD makes a decent defence that he is indeed derailing the only counterwagon. This only makes sense if they're both mafia. And right now I'm hoping to god Clarity isn't mafia, so that's not working out for me so great.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 23:46 OOHCHILD wrote:
It is not townie bad logic for Marvel to move from Clarity to me. That is mafia bad logic.
There are other people who Marvel has expressed suspicion of. Like Pandain. Why is he so unwilling to even discuss lynching them at this point?
Your opinion on almost everything is bankrupt because it should be quite obvious I'm town at this stage.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 23:53 OOHCHILD wrote:
I have not just been asking questions. I have also been giving a lot of opinions and reasons behind those opinions. Read my recent filter. Until then you are on ignore.
The problem I have with you is that you totally misrepresented what my case was on Clarity, despite the fact it was extremely obvious given what was written in the thread.
Also, for some reason, you had to ask Prome which points about the Clarity case were mine, which again should be abundantly clear if you've read the thread.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 29 2013 23:56 OOHCHILD wrote:
I read some parts of the threads closer than others. Let's put it that way.
Then you probably shouldn't be raising suspicions based on stuff you evidently haven't read, should you?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 30 2013 00:00 OOHCHILD wrote:
I play the game on my on terms and if you can't deal with that then lynch away.
##Shun all of you baddies
Your own terms = you'll build a case based on stuff you haven't read and/or are misrepresenting?
Explain it to me, please. I'm listening.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
##Update Koshi
There you go, twinkletoes.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 30 2013 00:03 OOHCHILD wrote:
I built a case on what I had read. From what I read, you were heavy on clarity just for that stupid thing you couldn't reconcile. You added stuff later, which I didn't really know about. That's why I misrepresented you. I correctly represented you for what I had read.
Yet your case read "marv isn't doing anything else"
But you don't know if I'm doing anything else, because you haven't been reading.
Which is it to be?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 30 2013 00:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2013 00:05 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Oats looks a lot less dickish than the scum games I've played with him
This is so bad because he looks less dickish than he is in his town games aswell and he is less dickish as scum in general.
Could you push something please? Thanks. Don't like that you're kinda spectating all this.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Koshi, why isn't rayn offering an opinion on what Clarity did? Why has he just come in to make a small comment about Oats' meta? :/
Why is he posting about that rather than telling us that it makes Clarity mafia still or town because x,y?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 28 2013 23:10 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 28 2013 23:01 Promethelax wrote:
marv, that is kind of a subtle read. Not super subtle but like not a read I'd expect a newer player to have.
As soon as I typed this I realized WoS isn't actually all that new anymore, carry on.
Clarity. Explain what oats is doing here that is out of character for him. Unless he started making sense and not doing stupid shit/changing his mind all the time this is totally in line with his meta AND that meta applies to both alignments so even if he wasn't doing that (which he is) it wouldn't be alignment indicative. I'd get you the venn diagram but I think you get my point. So despite me harping on you for your meta read of me, you just realized this? Marv I actually had a townread on someone else this game for something very similar but that was very late last night and I can't remember who it was exactly. Not the arrogance but the quizzing and confidence that people 'see him as town and here's why.' I'll try to look back and figure out where it was I came up with that.Essentially your read to me makes sense, and I'm glad it is for reasons that didn't occur to me/are not related to my case since that gives me more to think about. I'm always a little bit wary of giving experienced players townreads based on mafia not being so upfront and arrogant though because there are definitely people very capable of that kind of play (ie Pandain). I guess in Prome's case it's mroe the mindset behind that type of play and his posting? I'll have a closer look.
Wave, I'd like to know who this was please.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I don't want to lynch Sentinel because I want to see his power >.<
I'm kinda interested in a Wave lynch. He's doing all kinds of nothing.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 30 2013 00:23 OOHCHILD wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2013 00:15 Oatsmaster wrote:On October 30 2013 00:13 OOHCHILD wrote:
I am a terrible lynch because I tried to clear the only alternative bandwagon. I am a terrible lynch because I have not been afraid to stick out. I am a terrible lynch because I have given plenty of opinions and also given reasons why I have those opinions. I dont understand the first point. The second point doesnt really make sense to me either, thinking marv is scum is so bad, its scummy. Your opinions and reasons are bad. Bad in a scummy way. Last post for real. There are two bandwagons, me and Clarity. If Clarity doesn't get lynched, it's very likely I will. As scum why would I try so hard to clear Clarity if it meant it would be more likely that I was going to be lynched? Scum wants to blend in. I did several unnecessary, weird things this game that made me stick out. It's bad to think marvel is scum? Get real and cut the wifom. If your read of Marv is anything other than null than it's you who is dumb.
No, it really is you.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
OOHCHILD, where do you get off on telling people they're dumb for their reads when you've not even read the thread properly?
What the fuck is that crap?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Honestly I don't really think OOHCHILD is mafia, but I'm still not averse to lynching him because he is actually that irritating.
I'll ##Unvote for now though.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 30 2013 00:28 Seuss wrote:I'm a little concerned at the moment that strongandbig has managed to fly under the radar due to all the Clarity_nl/OOHCHILD nonsense going on. When he's posted he's made cogent points, but that amounts to all of four or six posts thus far. Based on his posts alone I don't think he's scum, but he's depriving us of an important voice by lurking so hard. Show nested quote +On October 30 2013 00:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 30 2013 00:13 marvellosity wrote:On October 30 2013 00:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 30 2013 00:05 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Oats looks a lot less dickish than the scum games I've played with him
This is so bad because he looks less dickish than he is in his town games aswell and he is less dickish as scum in general. Could you push something please? Thanks. Don't like that you're kinda spectating all this. I am getting to that soon. I gotta eat first. But i want to lynch WoS or Sentinel, don't know which one yet. Dick move analysis say Clarity is town and i do not like OOHCHILD lynch at all. Based mainly on his self-suicidal behavior and the fact that when i said "i could lynch OOH just because" earlier on, suddenly some people voted for him with zero reasoning. Those votes would have been easy for scum to call out people for in case OOH was scum but nobody did do anything about it. OOHCHILD is reminding me a lot of istandwithmitt from my previous game. He's so controversial and antagonistic you can't believe any sensible scum/third party would make themselves a target like that. I'm less forgiving of Clarity_nl because July617 pulled a similar move Day 1 in my last game and he turned out to be the serial killer. I didn't think his initial post was as bad as Oatsmaster and others did, but Clarity's response has just been mind-boggling. ##Vote Clarity_nl
We're not lynching Clarity today, so you need to rethink this, I don't want you wasting your vote.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I just browsed July's filter, whatever you thought he did, it isn't similar.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 30 2013 00:31 HotCottonCandy wrote:
ninja'd it seems, have a hard time believing the troll is mafia if he's a smurf.
I've no real reason to disbelieve his story that he's played mafia before but not on this site.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I guess after all I want to lynch into WoS/Pandain today.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 30 2013 00:41 HotCottonCandy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 30 2013 00:35 marvellosity wrote:
I guess after all I want to lynch into WoS/Pandain today. What is the cases on them? Pandain has looked flaky but nothing too serious to warrant a lynch. WoS randomly boosted Seuss who I haven't looked into at all but that seems incredibly weird. I guess that's worth pursuing.
I haven't really made a case on WoS. It's more that all he's done is pursue Prome oddly for too long and then put a random vote on OOHCHILD. It's really unproductive. Plus that for some reason he's reading me as null which is really silly. He's just really really useless.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
rayn, your sense of timing is excellent. I'm going to go along with that.
##Vote: WaveofShadow
Problem for me atm is that if I accept OOH and Clarity aren't mafia, then some of my reads elsewhere are kinda off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
