Hogwarts Mafia - Page 3

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 15:08 GMT

#1057

On October 19 2013 00:02 Mocsta wrote:
Wtf Sno.

In the qt u wanted to policy lynch me based on palmar follow up.

I mentioned it because I'm not a huge fan of the other lynch options. Kinda decided against pushing for it because all my reasons would be "Well Palmar said so hope he's town this game".

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 15:15 GMT

#1064

On October 19 2013 00:14 raynpelikonoshi wrote:
Nobody should. Why not wait till day 3. BH being alive is a case on itself.

Methinks there are too many vets in this game for that argument to work. But i'm personally not voting BH yet he hasn't got a chance to play.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 15:17 GMT

#1067

Ur ignoring the part where i give my reasons for backing down on suspicions re: palmar.

And I discussed then rejected the "sheep palmar lynch mocsta" policy lynch. Whats your problem with that?

Sure I'm sheeping the cephiro lynch. Hows that scummy?

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 15:18 GMT

#1068

On October 19 2013 00:16 Skanjab1s wrote:

Show nested quote +

You're not a huge fan of the other lynch options, but you will sheep onto Cephiro anyway.

I could also just not vote and get modkilled I'm sure thats a legit strategy...

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 15:36 GMT

#1073

On October 19 2013 00:21 Skanjab1s wrote:

Show nested quote +

I didn't ignore that part, actually.

Yes you did otherwise why are you including it in your case rofl. If I say "well look this is a good counterargument to my and others suspicions of palmar" then hows it scummy for me to not think he's scum anymore? You can't just say "I didn't ignore it" and continute ignoring it.

On October 19 2013 00:21 Skanjab1s wrote:
You didn't discuss it, you ignored it until Mocsta questioned you on it.

False. I tossed it out there in the QT for opinions. Then I went to the thread, thought about stuff, and posted a list of lynches that soudned reasonable. Leaving out mocsta since he's got 0 votes and nobody in teh QT was discussing it with me (very short period of time here). THEN mocsta cried in the thread about the QT without even discussing anything in the QT itself, that was a wtf for me. I didn't ignore it I left it in the QT for discussion which eventually happened.

On October 19 2013 00:21 Skanjab1s wrote:
It is scummy because you have:
(A) Already stated twice that you dislike any of the current lynch options.
(B) Refuse to give any input of your own as to why Cephiro is scummy. Even previously you say "Huh Cephiro looked like a good lynch too oh well". Also not offering any original insight.

I never like lynch options day 1 because nobody's flipped.
So what happened to yamato? He's sheeping the same case with the same lack of reasons, why'd you drop your longstanding tunnel on him for no reason? There are also many far more egregious lurkers than me. You still lack any reasoning that makes me scum, you want to lynch me for laziness over your longstanding scumread yamato and over all the actual lurkers. What gives?

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 15:43 GMT

#1076

On October 19 2013 00:40 StorrZerg wrote:

Show nested quote +

wtf
we should just policy lynch you if your going to play this way.
Honestly this kind of crap pisses me off.

In the op it clearly states you should be trying to win this game to the best of your abilities. Threatening to not care and get mod killed is just wtf...

You are purposefully misreading me. I'm saying that I have to vote for somebody so I voted for somebody. Read what I said. Randomly tunnelling me all game without reasons is quite obnoxious to play with

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 16:41 GMT

#1099

So I have a problem with the current situation. If Cephiro is scum, its like very very likely that I get lynched today. That really isn't OK. And if he isn't scum then we are mislynching him, which is not really OK but less bad. So can we fix this by either getting more votes on cephiro, getting less on me, or coming up with something concrete on somebody? Something as simple as the 7 non-voters just placing their votes would be helpful.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 16:52 GMT

#1108

On October 19 2013 01:45 StorrZerg wrote:
On that note i have my view of Sn0
Sn0_Man

Rubbed me the wrong way at the start, decided to focus on him
I called him out and he did not respond, ignored me and posted something i felt was weird.
He finally starts to post and respond, after a few people have put votes on him, prior to that he had been pretty inactive.
It feels to me his current activity has been brought on by the pressure.
my gut still says to me he is the most scum

So to clarify,

You irrationally decided I was scum from second one.
After you presented irrational and joke reasons for me being scum, I ignored you. Then I made a post. This bothers you because I should be desperately concerned when people post joke reasons for me being scum.
I start posting, quite contrary to 5+ other people in the thread who still wont. This makes me scum.
My activity happened because people voted me, not because I'm a participant in this game. Despite the fact that low activity seems to be a town tell for you, this somehow means that my activity is not a valid point in discerning my alignment.
Since you can't come up with any real reasons, its back to "Gut" for why I'm scum.

Sound right?

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 16:59 GMT

#1116

Dear supersoft. Please say what you mean to say. I don't read minds and can't figure out what your posts are implying.

Dear Skanjab1s. Please stop tunnelling me for no reason. Also please stop misrepresenting me. I never said Cephiro isn't scum. If you can ever come up with anything scum motivated in my actions i'd love to hear it because so far all you can say is "well he hasn't caught scum yet". Which is incidentally true of every other player in the thread. I sure haven't caught scum, and I have no particular intention of doing so today. Mostly cuz I can't. Get back to me once you've done anything better.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 17:06 GMT

#1123

3 hours to deadline.

Not voting (7) : Cephiro, Holyflare, justanothertownie, Mocsta, Onegu, Palmar, Stutters695

This is so dumb. Can these people vote please.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 17:10 GMT

#1128

Well of course "now im posting" is a trash reason for me being town, but literally the only semi-reasonable reason for me being scum was "I'm not posting" so thats gone rofl.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 17:16 GMT

#1133

I still don't particularly "like" the Cephiro lynch. But I'm OK with it. Its uncommon for me to "like" day 1 lynches because as I've already stated nobody's flipped yet.

Can you quote some "scummy" stuff for me then? You think its scummy that I lurked. *shrug*. There's lots of other lurkers. You think its scummy that I'm voting Cephiro. *shrug* theres lots of others voting Cephiro many with no more reason than I. You think its scummy that my defense boils down to "I'm not scummier than anybody else". *shrug* its true I'm not scummier than anybody else. Its hard to defend against accusations that don't imply scum. The best I can do is point out that half the thread is guilty of anything you can come up with against me and that I'm not scum. I can't find scum today and somehow thats not OK for me but its fine for your prime scumread yamato and at least 5 other people. Getting RNG tunnelled is off-putting.

Just quit tunnelling its really obnoxious.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 17:21 GMT

#1136

On October 19 2013 02:15 supersoft wrote:

Show nested quote +

There is not much to say. You're playstyle at the start of the game made me suspicious of you and I still am.
You could tell me a story why you disappeared when a serious conversation started and you delurked when storrzergdude called you out. If the story is good, I might buy it.

Story: I wasn't available. My activity in mafia is 100% dictated by real life and has nothing to do with alignment, although when I don't feel like i have stuff to contribute I don't post much which looks like lurk sometimes. Delurk occurs when I finally finish reading the thread and have time to post. Weekends generally involve lots of lurk (I'm aware it wasn't a weekend but be aware for this weekend). Storrzerg tunnelled me for ignoring him then you are calling me scum for responding to him. Logic please.

PS: my "playstyle at the start of the game" please elaborate. I'm not sure what you are getting at.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 17:22 GMT

#1139

On October 19 2013 02:20 supersoft wrote:

Show nested quote +

Is this supposed to be a response to my allegation? What has yamato to do with all this?!

no its @skanjab

On October 19 2013 02:18 supersoft wrote:

Show nested quote +

don't worry, thats because sn0 and ceph are both scum. I already posted that in the ravencalw QT:
If both wagons are on scum, it's pretty hard for scum to push a thirdguy right away. You need to wait until the steam behind the stronger case runs low.

Then vote for Ceph if he's scum easy solution

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 17:26 GMT

#1141

On October 19 2013 02:22 raynpelikonoshi wrote:
Sn0_Man
Do you have any scumreads besides Vayne/Stutters or did those change over time?

Don't think I ever called vayne scum. Could lynch him for troll but I like that less after mulling it over since considering the game's I've played with him when he was scum he was much more conciliatory and "working together" with the thread, and when he was town he was really abrasive and never really felt the need to do cases or working together stuff.

Stutters is just afk. However, people who feel the need to elaborate everything in RL that is preventing them from posting flip scum most of the time in my experience. I dislike Skanjab and SuperSoft atm but thats mostly just omgus. I'm as happy with the Cephiro lynch as I think I would be with anybody else today barring something popping up so I'm on him.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 17:29 GMT

#1143

On October 19 2013 02:27 LastArgument wrote:
Do people really think 6/24 total votes with less than 3 hours to the lynch makes the Cephiro lynch "happening easily"?

Yo 6/24 is the number of scum. Game=solved.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 17:35 GMT

#1148

On October 19 2013 02:33 Stutters695 wrote:
##Vote: Cephiro

Well its better than nothing...

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 17:37 GMT

#1151

Nope it really isn't. If I thought I knew who scum was I'd be trying to get them lynched.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 17:43 GMT

#1156

On October 19 2013 02:42 raynpelikonoshi wrote:
I like you, LastArgument. Dnu if it is related to Grack saying you are marv.

Its related to him posting intelligently. Or at least, thats why I'm liking him.

Sn0_Man

Tebellong44238 Posts

October 18 2013 17:55 GMT

#1159

With Palmar its pretty easy. If he's still useless and alive D2 we lynch him then. If he's useful or dead, then no need. As I've said, not much differentiates this Day 1 with my only other Day 1 with a town-Palmar. Excepting that he called me scum that game and I was town

He died N1 so problem solved lol.

Prev 1 2 3 4 5 17 18 19 Next All

Please or register to reply.

Hogwarts Mafia - Page 3

Completed

Ongoing

Upcoming