EPTOn October 04 2013 01:59 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Fine i am sticking with my vote. Fuck you too BH.
Fine i am sticking with my vote. Fuck you too BH.
You sure showed him.
World Heavyweight Championship mafia - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
You sure showed him. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 04 2013 02:00 raynpelikoneet wrote: Well i do not think Sloosh is necessarily mafia. I do not think Risen is mafia. I think Dirkzor is mafia. I hope i am gonna be back before the deadline. cya fuckers! Erm. Like, is this rage? Because it doesn't look or feel like rage... Constructed post....? Anyone have any thoughts? This just doesn't feel right. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 04 2013 02:08 Blazinghand wrote: There is literally no possible situation in which my vote goes on sloosh A bit extreme? Can you point out exactly what makes you so unwilling? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 04 2013 02:21 Oatsmaster wrote: Well I assume he is gonna sheep marv, like I did and like clarity did so theres that. Can you expand on the part where sloosh knows too much HF? That's lame, I was on sloosh before marv  Not that I'm keeping track or anything.. I can answer that btw. His townread on dirk came at a point where he simply did not look townie in the slightest, but he had a "feel" that he was town. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Yes I got that from the "not voting him under any circumstance" but why? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 04 2013 02:34 Oatsmaster wrote: Everyone that wants to answer. What the fuck BH, Im saying that sloosh flips scum. Is Dirk scummier or townier because sloosh defended him? Its totally legitimate speculation It's kind of useless right now though, right? Or are you going somewhere with this? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Have you ever seen marv ignore a dumb comment as either alignment? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 04 2013 02:49 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok marv, so clearly you want to discuss this. Since Dirkzor cant be your scumbuddy, who is the most likely player in your interactions with him to be scum buddies with you? Like you act a certain way towards your scumbuddy right? So which person is your scumbuddy if you were scum marv? THAT IS WHAT YOU TOOK AWAY FROM THIS? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
In chronological order. Oats: Also how Marv is unwilling to put his vote on Dirkzor is how I imagine scum marv would avoid lynching a teammate but still have him be scummy. marv: that's dumb, if I were scum I wouldn't have pushed dirk so hard Oats: GARBLE GARBLE HOW CAN IT BE DUMB WHEN IT CANNOT EXIST RAWR I CLEVER marv: regardless of my alignment your point is dumb Oats: clearly you want to talk about this marv: I do not oats: GE;LREGPOWEVCWEPOVWGEPH sleep deprivation GL;EWGEOPBVEBVOEIBE | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 04 2013 03:31 Holyflare wrote: Why not contribute instead of pointing that out? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Like this brimming with confidence thing doesn't sit right with me. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
I have to make this case and then I'm leaving again. Like, it's been an hour. Surely if knew your case was going to convince everyone you would know what was going to be in it =/ | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
Filler is not always scummy, especially when it comes from rayn. | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 04 2013 05:33 slOosh wrote: Damn 20 pages since I've been gone. K, from what I've skimmed so far people don't like that I somehow switched onto clarity? That's what I said. Nothing that sticks out too much for me in Risen's case. If I see a weak case, then I'll call it weak. Doesn't matter what kinds of reads I have on Risen / clarity, a case's robustness is independent of that. The quotes I bring up are not in Risen's case. There's no contradiction here, just a failure (by readers) to consider context. Now why I find problem with this wiffle waffle, is that clarity doesn't have a good read on BH (and spends lots of words explaning how he isn't sure), but finds it pertinent to speak on behalf of BH to rayn. How does this pursue a better read on BH? Why would you speak up for someone who you want a better read of? So... that makes you feel good about your vote on me? The fact that the guy I don't really have a read on, who I don't want to lynch today, is not being pursued by me? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On October 04 2013 05:44 slOosh wrote: You aren't just waiting on the sidelines to see how he will act given more time. You spoke on his behalf instead of letting him being questioned. This being someone you would actually want a better read on. Why? Because I knew the answer to rayn's question. Because I asked blazing the same question. On October 04 2013 05:44 marvellosity wrote: I could take anyone's filter in the game (probably including my own) and make some ridiculous narrative out of it. It's just awful. =/ he's wearing his pants on his head, does that mean he's scum? | ||
| ||
