Blazinghand is a cool guy (meaning no lynchy lynchy todaysies despite no real read on him (sowwy))

Holyflare town, sloosh town (despite opening post making me tilt my head)

Risen is bleh, have to wait for him to have a scumread and have him explain it to see what colour his blood is.

Oats..... his OMGUS on BH looks pretty bad. But then again oats tends to look pretty bad early as town.
Did he, as scum, crack under the pressure of a single vote by BH? I dunno, sounds doubtful.
I liked his pressure on holyflare, because an opening post proclaiming newb should always be pressured. But sloosh came out looking town and oats hasn't retracted his vote yet, so let's see what he thinks when he's back.
I'm not convinced, anyway.

On October 02 2013 13:28 Oatsmaster wrote:
This feels so much like Mocsta in Newbie 47 or whatever.

Oats could you explain this?

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 06:14 GMT

#198

On October 02 2013 15:10 Blazinghand wrote:
Seriously though if the reason I've given for lynching him are normal oats behavior then that's like a policy lynch reason right there. We should do it, it would be awesome.

I know you like your game theory, and technically we have a 2/7 chance (since doc will claim), but the information we get off of people agreeing to a random lynch isn't that telling I don't think. Rather just spark discussion as usual and see what happens.
Despite,(according to database numbers) a random lynch being slightly more effective, if it hits town it probably gets less information than if there are a couple of lynch candidates and they are discussed and votes are moved around.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 06:23 GMT

#200

On October 02 2013 15:20 Blazinghand wrote:

Show nested quote +

That's a reasonable thing to say. That being said, the RNG led (and in general it seems, leads) to a good discussion. I don't think things would have played out as they did unless I RNGed this game, and I'm glad I did.

That's fine and I think we have some information that came out of it rather than lurker lynch policy talk which is a dead horse.
But do you plan on hanging on to your rng lynch today unless someone becomes obvious scum? Or do you feel that oats is no longer a random lynch now and you think he's most likely to flip scum at this time, and if that changes you'll change your vote?

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 06:24 GMT

#201

I retract my townread on sloosh btw, that was a bit hasty.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 06:41 GMT

#203

Blazing, since you're around, any first impression on sloosh?

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 06:46 GMT

#205

I'm not trying to imply that I put him as a townread as some kind of trap, I didn't, just wasn't thinking properly.
But did you not find it odd that I gave him a townread earlier?

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 06:50 GMT

#208

Fair enough. I'm pretty eager to play but there's not much meat to this game quite yet.
Anything you wanna talk about?

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 09:42 GMT

#213

On October 02 2013 18:34 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

What info in particular do you think was gained?

Just the usual really. I didn't mean anything in particular but it >felt< that the starting hours were more productive than usual due to BH's rng lynch suggestion. I can't really quantify it.

What do you think of oats?

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 09:58 GMT

#219

Did you really feel the need to drop a vote before reading marv, were you afraid someone might vote him before you? I don't really understand.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 10:05 GMT

#223

Yeah I'll go with that, actually

##Vote Dirkzor

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 10:13 GMT

#226

Would still like your thoughts on oats, marv.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 10:22 GMT

#234

On October 02 2013 19:17 Dirkzor wrote:

Show nested quote +

And i would like your thought on me instead of "Oh i'll take that ##Vote"

I could quote marvs posts if you'd like but they're right there. #Sheeple

You spend 4 paragraphs on a null read yet your scumread is hardly explained. Saying HF has done nothing means you haven't read the thread carefully enough. Reading him as most likely to be scum is bleh.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 12:21 GMT

#240

Man, slow game.

Marv, though I have no intention of moving my vote anytime soon, dirk did ask a decent question.
Why was his vote on Holyflare "opportunistic"? As opposed to just, you know, scummy.

Clarity_nl

Netherlands6826 Posts

October 02 2013 12:39 GMT

#242

On October 02 2013 21:23 marvellosity wrote:
Holyflare had come under a certain amount of flak this game, and he is a newbie.

As such it's a pretty convenient place to park your vote. An easy vote.

He did kinda but it all went away, by the time dirk entered the thread three people had called him town.