|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 04 2013 07:17 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 07:17 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2013 07:16 Blazinghand wrote:On October 04 2013 07:16 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2013 07:04 Blazinghand wrote: also like what, main scumread? I was voting for risen cause you guys don't want to lynch rayne or oats. I talked myself out of real lynches and voted just some guy, but i'm done with that. I vote who I want. On October 04 2013 07:15 Blazinghand wrote:On October 04 2013 07:14 marvellosity wrote:On October 04 2013 07:13 Blazinghand wrote:On October 04 2013 07:12 Clarity_nl wrote: Blazing, explain what your current read on risen is scummy, especially with his latest shitcase on rayne. probably didn't want it to be read. Looks like it took a lot of effort but honestly a real case is aimed at convincing people, not increasing word count. Not worth lynching today though I guess I'd rather him than me you just said that you made a case on Risen that was fake because you couldn't get your main scumreads lynched what is this bullshit? i didn't say my case was fake. and yeah I decided I didn't want to lynch him earlier but like if the alternative is me, fuck yeah let's lynch risen These 2 quotes are bullshit together. as in like top 2 scumreads christ There are two mafia and you're trying to lynch your 3rd scumread? Ok BH. Makes perfect sense. well YEAH if I can't get my top scumread lynched, this shit is majority, not plurality.
Your 3rd scumread is almost by definition mafia.
I literally cannot comprehend a townie settling for someone outside of his top 2 scumreads.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
|
On October 04 2013 07:16 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 07:15 Clarity_nl wrote:On October 04 2013 07:13 Blazinghand wrote:On October 04 2013 07:12 Clarity_nl wrote: Blazing, explain what your current read on risen is scummy, especially with his latest shitcase on rayne. probably didn't want it to be read. Looks like it took a lot of effort but honestly a real case is aimed at convincing people, not increasing word count. Not worth lynching today though I guess I'd rather him than me Then explain this better: On October 04 2013 07:04 marvellosity wrote: by the way guys
BlazingHand moved his vote to rayn because his main scumread who he was voting for (Risen) voted for rayn On October 04 2013 07:04 Blazinghand wrote:On October 04 2013 07:04 marvellosity wrote: by the way guys
BlazingHand moved his vote to rayn because his main scumread who he was voting for (Risen) voted for rayn yeah this was true hours ago i'm pointing out that HOURS AGO, I moved my vote to rayne, and you're only bringing it up now asshat
Chronological order as far as I'm aware:
You vote rayn Stuff Your vote is elsewhere now Stuff You vote Risen Risen votes rayn You do not change your Risen read, but vote for rayn
My memory sucks but that looks about right.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Any townies reading this:
If you have two main scumreads, would you make a random case on a 3rd person and vote for them?
If the answer is "no, i would never do that" then you should be voting BH. It's very simple.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
I'm not saying the chronology was wrong. I'm saying that I moved my vote hours ago and you're only bringing it up now
jesus what's wrong with you people
1) I vote for top reads oats/rayne 2) seems like it's not happening. risen time! 3) welp rayne is a better lynch i guess 4) wtf why are people voting me
|
marv, just because he has two top scumreads doesn't mean he cant have a third weaker scumread, that's a bad argument. Although yes, blazing didn't fight very hard to get his top scumreads lynched, so there's that.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On October 04 2013 07:19 marvellosity wrote: Any townies reading this:
If you have two main scumreads, would you make a random case on a 3rd person and vote for them?
If the answer is "no, BH as town would never do that" then you should be voting BH. It's very simple.
ftfy
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On October 04 2013 07:19 Clarity_nl wrote: marv, just because he has two top scumreads doesn't mean he cant have a third weaker scumread, that's a bad argument. Although yes, blazing didn't fight very hard to get his top scumreads lynched, so there's that.
I fought hard! maybe not effectively, but HARD
|
On October 04 2013 07:19 Blazinghand wrote: I'm not saying the chronology was wrong. I'm saying that I moved my vote hours ago and you're only bringing it up now
jesus what's wrong with you people
1) I vote for top reads oats/rayne 2) seems like it's not happening. risen time! 3) welp rayne is a better lynch i guess 4) wtf why are people voting me
So because it didn't get pointed out immediately it's no longer a valid point, or what? Are you not bothered that Risen, who you read as scum, is voting rayn, who you also read as scum?
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On October 04 2013 07:19 Clarity_nl wrote: marv, just because he has two top scumreads doesn't mean he cant have a third weaker scumread, that's a bad argument. Although yes, blazing didn't fight very hard to get his top scumreads lynched, so there's that.
Answer my question.
If you have two strong scumreads, do you vote for a 3rd person?
If the answer is no, you should be voting BH.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On October 04 2013 07:20 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 07:19 Blazinghand wrote: I'm not saying the chronology was wrong. I'm saying that I moved my vote hours ago and you're only bringing it up now
jesus what's wrong with you people
1) I vote for top reads oats/rayne 2) seems like it's not happening. risen time! 3) welp rayne is a better lynch i guess 4) wtf why are people voting me So because it didn't get pointed out immediately it's no longer a valid point, or what? Are you not bothered that Risen, who you read as scum, is voting rayn, who you also read as scum?
I don't draw associative tells between unflipped players. Seriously how many times I gotta say this
Man I'm not saying it's not a valid point, i'm just pointing out i swapped my vote hours ago
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On October 04 2013 07:21 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 07:19 Clarity_nl wrote: marv, just because he has two top scumreads doesn't mean he cant have a third weaker scumread, that's a bad argument. Although yes, blazing didn't fight very hard to get his top scumreads lynched, so there's that. Answer my question. If BH as town have two strong scumreads, can BH as town vote for a 3rd person? If the answer is no, you should be voting BH.
ftfy
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
there's a reason you're legendarily bad as scum.
it's because you make glaring mistakes like these.
|
On October 04 2013 07:21 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On October 04 2013 07:19 Clarity_nl wrote: marv, just because he has two top scumreads doesn't mean he cant have a third weaker scumread, that's a bad argument. Although yes, blazing didn't fight very hard to get his top scumreads lynched, so there's that. Answer my question. If you have two strong scumreads, do you vote for a 3rd person? If the answer is no, you should be voting BH.
Plenty of time, I'm looking. Trying to see how strong BH' reads were. You're getting all up in a frenzy and I'd rather just discuss it instead
|
BH where you get your town read of me??
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On October 04 2013 07:22 marvellosity wrote: there's a reason you're legendarily bad as scum.
it's because you make glaring mistakes like these.
I'm really not legendarily bad as scum.
you have 8 minutes left to unvote me
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
I'm not in a frenzy, I'm very calm.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
ok I'm kinda annoyed. but BH is still mafia.
|
|
|
|