EPT2) risen scummy
also 2) FT scummy
that being said, take all that with a grain of salt. most players haven't posted.
World Heavyweight Championship mafia - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
2) risen scummy also 2) FT scummy that being said, take all that with a grain of salt. most players haven't posted. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 02 2013 13:52 Oatsmaster wrote: Why do you think Holyflare might be town BH? YES THIS IS WAHT IM TALKING ABOUT So, I think there's a legitimate non-zero chance that he played the newb card because he is simply a newbie. It happens. The fact that he flailed around ineffectually at Risen and that when asked to analyzed Risen, he reached, are the two big things imo that contribute to my scummish read on HF. I think he might be town because the scummy evidence against him isn't strong enough to convince me he's scum. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 02 2013 13:54 Oatsmaster wrote: Let me rephrase this so we dont have any misunderstandings. Are there any reasons for you to think that Holyflare might be town? Well, he's literally a newb. Although his attempt to interact with me and get a read on risen was pretty bad and scummy, he did at least try. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
and yeah we're not lynching HF today, his new interactions are good | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
Also RNG. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 02 2013 15:14 Clarity_nl wrote: I know you like your game theory, and technically we have a 2/7 chance (since doc will claim), but the information we get off of people agreeing to a random lynch isn't that telling I don't think. Rather just spark discussion as usual and see what happens. Despite,(according to database numbers) a random lynch being slightly more effective, if it hits town it probably gets less information than if there are a couple of lynch candidates and they are discussed and votes are moved around. That's a reasonable thing to say. That being said, the RNG led (and in general it seems, leads) to a good discussion. I don't think things would have played out as they did unless I RNGed this game, and I'm glad I did. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 02 2013 15:23 Clarity_nl wrote: That's fine and I think we have some information that came out of it rather than lurker lynch policy talk which is a dead horse. But do you plan on hanging on to your rng lynch today unless someone becomes obvious scum? Or do you feel that oats is no longer a random lynch now and you think he's most likely to flip scum at this time, and if that changes you'll change your vote? I'm not planning to vote oats because of RNG. I like my vote on him. I have suspicions on risen. Although HF's most recent posts are nice I'd like to hear more from him once he's awake again (and sloosh remains null). In general, I think given my current info Oats is the optimal lynch for hittings lots of scum, removing potential liabilities at lylo (both as lynchbait and as a poor decisionmaker), and improving thread atmosphere. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=19888508 fluff question http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=19888710 reads, weak, not interrogative, no votes, no reasons http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=19888809 weak read http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=19888965 weird questions. not getting his point across directly Not much to go on, but he didn't do much. I'm not ready to lynch him yet but I am quite unimpressed. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
1) RNG then 2) oh hey oats is actually scummy then 3) wait, are you saying this is somehow normal oats behavior? Well, assuming that's true, we need to lynch him anyways since he's a liability. So either oats is objectively scummy or he's a guy who acts objectively scummy as town. The policy thing I mentioned was just to defuse the stupid meta argument that somehow oats shouldn't be lynched today because he's normally like this | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 03 2013 04:05 raynpelikoneet wrote: Wait what Clarity. why did you clarify BH's actions to me if you are not sure what he was doing? He's been all over my dick. Probably because I wasn't posting though so he wanted to... you know... be helpful? hue | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 03 2013 04:08 raynpelikoneet wrote: So BH, you don't know if Oats is scummy or not, you want to policy lynch him right? Or is it RNG? Or wtf is it. Is this not clear? Where do I say I don't know? Oats is objectively scummy. We lynch him. If for some reason you got hit by a stupid brick that makes you stupid, then I will spell it out real simple at first I vote oats because of RNG! then, after that, I talk to oats. Oats is scummy! I keep vote on oats because oats is scummy! the reason I do this is because I think oats is scum, because oats is scummy! i am voting oats for this reason, that he is scummy! Some people say oats scummy is what town oats does. If their argument is true (it isn't), then oats should be policy lynched anyways, so it's a dumb argument. Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy. Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy. Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy. Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy. Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy.Oats is scummy! I am voting oats because he is likely to flip scum. He is scummy. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
| ||
