|
On October 05 2013 13:06 VisceraEyes wrote:
Pandain townreads Cheesecake, but Cheesecake is one of the people perpetuating the "myth of SnB association with FT" during his rants.
Relevant?
I'd like someone who's not me to comment on this please.
|
Pandain looks totally town. I would lynch CC though. He is pretty tryharding this game.
Actually WoS, can you explain why this is VA's towniest game ever?
|
@WoS his early vote on Oats
On September 28 2013 00:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. what? If you were scum, I'd think you'd yell at me for making a terrible vote like that.
On September 28 2013 00:56 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. what? If you were scum, I'd think you'd yell at me for making a terrible vote like that. ok so im not scum. Cool. Thanks for taking your vote off me and putting it somewhere else. You so paranoid, I don't feel like taking the time to ##Unvote. Oh, there we go! It is interesting that you care about that 1 vote on you.
Oats has the correct reaction (not freaking out) but then CC finds a reason to go after him anyway?
Then at VE...who does what mafia are supposed to do and jumps on it.
On September 28 2013 00:55 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. This is a waste of time. Vote for me if you think I'm scum, otherwise shut up you're not making any sense.
And CC says:
On September 28 2013 00:58 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Palmar if you set up the Random lynch I'm down.
VE I still think you're town, but the vote was a reaction test for Oats.
So VE fails the test supposedly, is town.
Oats passes, but oops still mafia.
Its like he had his conclusions picked out before doing it...hence pretense.
|
On September 28 2013 01:27 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
WoS is looking townier by the minute folks.
Calling me town at a time nobody else did 'cause I was bein' all ragey. Did I ever bring this up? I remember noticing it before but I guess I didn't find it important.
Cheese if you read this, why did you give this read?
On October 03 2013 06:44 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Oats is sitting on the sidelines jabbing at people but never pushing lynches. Confirming himself town for predicting a town flip is also BS, but probably sarcasm.
This was a post I liked of his. Could mean they're opposite scumteams? lol
I dunno there's not a great deal to go on in his filter---early game he pushes hiro and has the same suspicions as basically everyone regarding FT/SP pretty much.
What bothers me a little is how he essentially mirrors a lot of my thoughts this game (aside from hiro)----and the reasons he gives are mirrors of mine only given earlier for each one---FT, Oats....I don't know.
I don't see anything in his filter that makes me think scum, but nothing overly townie either.
Null.
|
On October 05 2013 13:16 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2013 13:06 VisceraEyes wrote:
Pandain townreads Cheesecake, but Cheesecake is one of the people perpetuating the "myth of SnB association with FT" during his rants.
Relevant? I'd like someone who's not me to comment on this please.
Didn't I perpetuate this as well?
Do we know what Pandain's read of me is?
|
Wave, please try to take into account the fact that Im town when analysing other players please.
Lets say Im town right, Do you still like that CC post?
|
On October 05 2013 13:19 s0Lstice wrote:@WoS his early vote on Oats Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 00:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. what? If you were scum, I'd think you'd yell at me for making a terrible vote like that. Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 00:56 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. what? If you were scum, I'd think you'd yell at me for making a terrible vote like that. ok so im not scum. Cool. Thanks for taking your vote off me and putting it somewhere else. You so paranoid, I don't feel like taking the time to ##Unvote. Oh, there we go! It is interesting that you care about that 1 vote on you. Oats has the correct reaction (not freaking out) but then CC finds a reason to go after him anyway? Then at VE...who does what mafia are supposed to do and jumps on it. Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 00:55 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. This is a waste of time. Vote for me if you think I'm scum, otherwise shut up you're not making any sense. And CC says: Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 00:58 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Palmar if you set up the Random lynch I'm down.
VE I still think you're town, but the vote was a reaction test for Oats. So VE fails the test supposedly, is town. Oats passes, but oops still mafia. Its like he had his conclusions picked out before doing it...hence pretense.
But didn't he remove his vote from Oats?
|
yea I think it would depend on whether Pandain used that particular linkage as ammo against other people.
X is scum because he is trying to make this association...along those lines
|
On October 05 2013 13:24 Oatsmaster wrote:
Wave, please try to take into account the fact that Im town when analysing other players please.
Lets say Im town right, Do you still like that CC post?
Yes, because even if you are town it shows CC is thinking about players who are flying under the radar, something I find townies are more likely to do. I don't believe at the time this was brought up anyone was even talking about you.
|
On October 05 2013 13:24 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2013 13:19 s0Lstice wrote:@WoS his early vote on Oats On September 28 2013 00:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. what? If you were scum, I'd think you'd yell at me for making a terrible vote like that. On September 28 2013 00:56 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. what? If you were scum, I'd think you'd yell at me for making a terrible vote like that. ok so im not scum. Cool. Thanks for taking your vote off me and putting it somewhere else. You so paranoid, I don't feel like taking the time to ##Unvote. Oh, there we go! It is interesting that you care about that 1 vote on you. Oats has the correct reaction (not freaking out) but then CC finds a reason to go after him anyway? Then at VE...who does what mafia are supposed to do and jumps on it. On September 28 2013 00:55 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. This is a waste of time. Vote for me if you think I'm scum, otherwise shut up you're not making any sense. And CC says: On September 28 2013 00:58 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Palmar if you set up the Random lynch I'm down.
VE I still think you're town, but the vote was a reaction test for Oats. So VE fails the test supposedly, is town. Oats passes, but oops still mafia. Its like he had his conclusions picked out before doing it...hence pretense. But didn't he remove his vote from Oats?
He did, but he continued to soft that Oats was mafia in the very same post. Its like the test changed his opinion of Oats not at all.
|
Pretty sure I changed my read of CC and I consider the SnB FT connection to be more poor play then scum play.
I'm now suspicious of CC due to understanding of how he played in Noir as well as him being afk until almost lynch
|
On October 05 2013 13:29 Pandain wrote:
Pretty sure I changed my read of CC and I consider the SnB FT connection to be more poor play then scum play.
I'm now suspicious of CC due to understanding of how he played in Noir as well as him being afk until almost lynch
What do you understand about how he played in Noir?
|
On October 05 2013 13:26 s0Lstice wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2013 13:24 WaveofShadow wrote:On October 05 2013 13:19 s0Lstice wrote:@WoS his early vote on Oats On September 28 2013 00:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. what? If you were scum, I'd think you'd yell at me for making a terrible vote like that. On September 28 2013 00:56 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. what? If you were scum, I'd think you'd yell at me for making a terrible vote like that. ok so im not scum. Cool. Thanks for taking your vote off me and putting it somewhere else. You so paranoid, I don't feel like taking the time to ##Unvote. Oh, there we go! It is interesting that you care about that 1 vote on you. Oats has the correct reaction (not freaking out) but then CC finds a reason to go after him anyway? Then at VE...who does what mafia are supposed to do and jumps on it. On September 28 2013 00:55 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. This is a waste of time. Vote for me if you think I'm scum, otherwise shut up you're not making any sense. And CC says: On September 28 2013 00:58 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Palmar if you set up the Random lynch I'm down.
VE I still think you're town, but the vote was a reaction test for Oats. So VE fails the test supposedly, is town. Oats passes, but oops still mafia. Its like he had his conclusions picked out before doing it...hence pretense. But didn't he remove his vote from Oats? He did, but he continued to soft that Oats was mafia in the very same post. Its like the test changed his opinion of Oats not at all.
I dunno. It's a curiosity to be sure but it's not enough on its own to do anything. Could just be reluctance to retract a scumread. I want Cheese to come back and address this stuff though. Like that early townread on me.
|
I'd like to hear what you think of this austin
On October 05 2013 13:19 s0Lstice wrote:@WoS his early vote on Oats Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 00:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. what? If you were scum, I'd think you'd yell at me for making a terrible vote like that. Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 00:56 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. what? If you were scum, I'd think you'd yell at me for making a terrible vote like that. ok so im not scum. Cool. Thanks for taking your vote off me and putting it somewhere else. You so paranoid, I don't feel like taking the time to ##Unvote. Oh, there we go! It is interesting that you care about that 1 vote on you. Oats has the correct reaction (not freaking out) but then CC finds a reason to go after him anyway? Then at VE...who does what mafia are supposed to do and jumps on it. Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 00:55 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. This is a waste of time. Vote for me if you think I'm scum, otherwise shut up you're not making any sense. And CC says: Show nested quote +On September 28 2013 00:58 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Palmar if you set up the Random lynch I'm down.
VE I still think you're town, but the vote was a reaction test for Oats. So VE fails the test supposedly, is town. Oats passes, but oops still mafia. Its like he had his conclusions picked out before doing it...hence pretense.
|
On October 05 2013 13:26 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2013 13:24 Oatsmaster wrote:
Wave, please try to take into account the fact that Im town when analysing other players please.
Lets say Im town right, Do you still like that CC post? Yes, because even if you are town it shows CC is thinking about players who are flying under the radar, something I find townies are more likely to do. I don't believe at the time this was brought up anyone was even talking about you.
Isnt it totally null? I mean, CC is supposed to think im mildly scummy from the way he is posting so yeah, why wouldnt he as scum bring up something suspicious about a townie?
|
I woke up thinking that if bag of weed costs 0.5 kp I cant doc myself. So 2 options onle remain becausr that sounds possible.
|
|
|
On October 05 2013 13:13 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2013 13:11 austinmcc wrote:On October 05 2013 13:07 VisceraEyes wrote:
Because he demands actions speak for townies, but can't call me scum in spite of every action I take being anti-town. That's why. (You have a towncheck) My point is that obviously your premise is flawed when you start from the actions to judge someone's towniness because every action I've taken has been anti-town and if you believe Koshi, you know I'm town. Townies take anti-town action every page of every game. Sorry, yes. But townies also taking anti-town actions doesn't mean they don't matter at all. Still more likely to be from scum, and the particular way wave half-fought a Palmar lynch DOES matter imo. It's a sizeable entry on WoS's mafia christmas lynch.
On October 05 2013 13:45 s0Lstice wrote:I'd like to hear what you think of this austin Show nested quote +On October 05 2013 13:19 s0Lstice wrote:@WoS his early vote on Oats On September 28 2013 00:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. what? If you were scum, I'd think you'd yell at me for making a terrible vote like that. On September 28 2013 00:56 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:54 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:54 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. what? If you were scum, I'd think you'd yell at me for making a terrible vote like that. ok so im not scum. Cool. Thanks for taking your vote off me and putting it somewhere else. You so paranoid, I don't feel like taking the time to ##Unvote. Oh, there we go! It is interesting that you care about that 1 vote on you. Oats has the correct reaction (not freaking out) but then CC finds a reason to go after him anyway? Then at VE...who does what mafia are supposed to do and jumps on it. On September 28 2013 00:55 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:50 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:On September 28 2013 00:48 VisceraEyes wrote:On September 28 2013 00:46 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
VE are you mafia? I expected mafia to jump all over that vote on oats.
And look, you're jumping all over it. Are you retarded? You voted with no reasoning, what the fuck do you expect? Why is it exclusively scum that would call out a vote against someone with no reasoning provided? It's probably the easiest thing for scum to pick out. If you were town, you'd have realized that it was bait for somebody to call me out on it, and I figured if Oats was mafia he'd be like WOW obvious scum here. I get the best reads when people think I'm scum--Speaking of which, do check noir I want to know your read of me there. This is a waste of time. Vote for me if you think I'm scum, otherwise shut up you're not making any sense. And CC says: On September 28 2013 00:58 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Palmar if you set up the Random lynch I'm down.
VE I still think you're town, but the vote was a reaction test for Oats. So VE fails the test supposedly, is town. Oats passes, but oops still mafia. Its like he had his conclusions picked out before doing it...hence pretense. I think you're ... stretching that. When I first read CC's unvote, I thought you were going way overboard, he unvoted the guy, is having a little fun, etc. I can see that comment as EITHER a joke or a nefarious unvote while still being suspicious.
As far as the VE vs. oats thing goes, CC specifically says it was a test for Oats. I don't know that VE can fail a test that isn't for him. I do think that's worth noting that, even if CC is only concerned with Oat's reaction there, he doesn't appear to NOTICE that VE gets "caught" in the trap. If that makes sense. Not that VE fails and oats passes but the reads are wonky, but more that CC is tunneled in on what Oats does and doesn't notice if anyone else trips it. Not predetermined conclusions, but just...not a real test. Just a thing to do with Oats.
|
On September 27 2013 22:42 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2013 22:09 yamato77 wrote:On September 27 2013 15:28 VayneAuthority wrote:On September 27 2013 15:03 hiro protagonist wrote:
Hmm, VA, in case you dont get it, you need to contribute. you cant just sit there and 'watch'. Unless you give me a good reason for you to just chill back(hint: you cant), then you better start giving me reads. what do you think af the game so far? who is suspicious in your eyes? What might have slipped under the radar?
From this point on, your gonna carry your weight. got it? I have no interest in petty arguments or random bickering this game. The game is very aggressive and has little content right now, which is to be expected when there are pretty much 4 factions, 3 of which has very small numbers. You'll find out who I think is suspicious through my vote. Not sure what that last question is about. Bed time. I don't care much about this grack lynch anymore. It's too overtalked for my liking. Now we're lynching this dude for refusing to play the game. ##Unvote
##Vote VayneAuthority Given this: Shouldn't you at least show my points against FT the respect of offering input, anything? It seems very strange to not at least consider what my analysis means. I have never played with the guy so I wouldn't know if being awful is just what he does, how about you help out instead chasing policy lynches. If we policy lynch we can decide that much later in the day.
There's an argument to be made for this post showing Palmar steering scrutiny away from Vayne - though it could just as easily be Palmar trying to get a lynch on a townie.
Still reading
|
Oats is scum because:
On September 29 2013 05:22 Oatsmaster wrote:
I think Palmar is 3p actually. If they exist.
On September 27 2013 18:52 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah I agree with you palmar. hiro has been not pushing people with questions.
-Concerning Palmar making sense in a scummy way-
On September 27 2013 23:05 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2013 23:04 Oatsmaster wrote:
Leading on, rayn, how do you have these townreads on me and VE? Both of you are not making sense in a scumy way.
On September 27 2013 23:06 Oatsmaster wrote:
But Palmar is?
I dont understand man.
On September 27 2013 23:09 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2013 23:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 27 2013 23:06 Oatsmaster wrote:
But Palmar is?
I dont understand man.
It doesn't matter, you don't need to understand. I kinda wanna lynch WoS. I kinda do need to understand how you formulate reads to know if you are town or scum. For example, I think that your current reads on me and VE are not very well substantiated and you are avoiding giving Palmar a town read for no good reason.
On September 27 2013 23:17 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2013 23:15 Grackaroni wrote:On September 27 2013 23:09 Oatsmaster wrote:On September 27 2013 23:07 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 27 2013 23:06 Oatsmaster wrote:
But Palmar is?
I dont understand man.
It doesn't matter, you don't need to understand. I kinda wanna lynch WoS. I kinda do need to understand how you formulate reads to know if you are town or scum. For example, I think that your current reads on me and VE are not very well substantiated and you are avoiding giving Palmar a town read for no good reason. Lol reasons everyone has reasons townies have reasons, scum have reasons. I believe a great man once told me bad reasons/no reason are towny I believe that you are taking those great words out of context. Rayn ok, what makes Palmar scum.
On September 27 2013 23:25 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2013 23:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I don't know if Palmar is scum. What he says makes a lot of sense. I am probably going to sheep him on D1 in case i feel like he is really trying to lynch scum (regardless of his alignment).
Atm i wanna lynch WoS.
##Vote: WaveofShadow
The only thing i have found out that's really unlike to come from a townie is him shitting on town before the game hasn't even started fully. Another thing is that he is overly emo and i think he is faking it. Why would scum WoS fake emo?
Man you basically think Palmar is town FOR NOW.
You couldve said that earlier.
On September 27 2013 23:44 Oatsmaster wrote:
Isnt it nice how you are calling me and VE town for posting in a not scum manner and Palmar not town for posting town manner.
On September 28 2013 18:05 Oatsmaster wrote:
oh shit, I realised its Pandain not Palmar who posted the meta case on yamato
Hiro pro and everyone calling VE scummy, why?
OK PALMAR IS PROBABLY town.
My bad.
On September 28 2013 19:58 Oatsmaster wrote:
So Yamato, horrible town include palmar and VE and BH.
I see.
Rayn, how does point 3 make WoS mafia? All I see is that it makes him forgetful.
On September 29 2013 02:16 Oatsmaster wrote:
RNG lynch SnB.
lol dat distance
On September 29 2013 02:49 Oatsmaster wrote:
What the fuck is going on.
Why are people voting for Palmar, why hasnt SnB voted for anyone, why is Chairman Ray being noob mean that hes town?
On September 29 2013 03:02 Oatsmaster wrote:
fuck man rayn, you have to explain Palmar being scum more than you dont like his read on WoS.
On October 01 2013 00:27 Oatsmaster wrote:
sheep palmar.
On October 01 2013 23:23 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On October 01 2013 23:09 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 01 2013 23:07 Oatsmaster wrote:
So rayn, palmar's scum and town meta are the same? No they are not. It's the fact that in this game scum can also genuinely scumhunt. He is scumhunting to some extent, but not up to his normal town play. But you called me and VE town because we are playing to our town meta. I dont get all this nonsense about Palmar being totally townie but not town.
On October 03 2013 14:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
Fuck time to look townie and do retarded shit.
GUYS LYNCH PALMAR.
##vote Palmar
I could basically vote for anyone at this point other than Koshi/Pandain/solstice/WoS
unvotes... votes ft... later...
On October 04 2013 14:38 Oatsmaster wrote:
Palmar is totally town though.
Lol you are funny Pandain.
First quote, I decided that my feelings were wrong and that Yamato was scum.
2nd and 3rd quote make 0 sense if you are calling me mafia for it.
Explain why you think that the 2nd and 3rd quotes are scummy Please Pandain.
On October 04 2013 14:49 Oatsmaster wrote:
I think Vayne is playing stupid enough to be town, same with Palmar.
Palmar wanting to piss off rayn seems to be a townie thing to do.
Also he's done nothing this game to push lynches. 10 pages of filter that's done nothing. He's had suspicion on me the entire game but not tried to get me lynched or even cared that I was in this game.
Lynch Oats on the morrow.
|
|
|
|
|
|
9176
3106
56
EPT
