|
On September 17 2013 23:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2013 23:02 kushm4sta wrote:
No...sno just really thought bh was survivor. he made that very clear.. But obviously we had to lynch him. Everyone agreed on that.
Sn0 was curious aobut Oats claim, WHAT TOWN WOULDN"T BE?? you cant say hes scum for being curious. Especially since it possibly confirmed his belief that bh was a survivor The immediate response for a townie would be: "Why the fuck would you claim a cop/rolecop and defend a survivor?" That's not what Sno did.
Untrue. Untrue to the uber max. My response would have been the same as Sn0's in his shoes.
If i was cop I would defend a survivor in TWO SECONDS because it's a dumb lynch if he's a survivor.
|
I have to go. I probably will not get to post cases before I get nked. Just know that I am extremely certain about the scumteam, and bits and pieces of cases against them are scattered across my filter.
pandain grack debears
~~
Not giving a fuck is what townVayne does. It is common knowledge that he is LYNCHBAIT as town. People want to kill him every fucking game because his attitude is very superficially scummy.
|
On September 17 2013 23:05 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2013 23:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 17 2013 23:02 kushm4sta wrote:
No...sno just really thought bh was survivor. he made that very clear.. But obviously we had to lynch him. Everyone agreed on that.
Sn0 was curious aobut Oats claim, WHAT TOWN WOULDN"T BE?? you cant say hes scum for being curious. Especially since it possibly confirmed his belief that bh was a survivor The immediate response for a townie would be: "Why the fuck would you claim a cop/rolecop and defend a survivor?" That's not what Sno did. Untrue. Untrue to the uber max. My response would have been the same as Sn0's in his shoes. If i was cop I would defend a survivor in TWO SECONDS because it's a dumb lynch if he's a survivor.
Trust me kushmasta. I know how this shit works having played a ton of off thread comm games. I use the same kinda trap often. Example:
I am having a convo with someone who is scum, they have hit player X on night:
me: "okay so what happened during the night?"
them: "impossible to say, scum hit X, maybe vigi, maybe SK, i dunno"
me: "okay i know scum did not hit X"
This is what happens next:
town (immediately): "oh okay, so you are a vigi then? i doubt you would claim as SK. Or has someone claimed to you the hit?"
Mafia does not know what they should answer. They know i am lying. They do not know what i am after. Usually they do not think this kinda stuff through (what they should answer - beforehand) because who the fuck would fakeclaim a hit mafia did? They panic and fuck up, or go silent. Or if they are good they have run fake scenarios in their head. Townies do not panic or go silent because townies run these possible scenarios in their head beforehand.
|
stfu with your wifom. i don't care how many comm games you play, you are wrong hella often and this is one of those times.
scum might answer that way or they might stfu and not say anything or they might say zomg you are lying. There is a range of possible scum responses.
There is also a range of possible town responses. THEY OVERLAP. Sn0's repsonse was standard town. Your argument is pure wifom.
|
On September 17 2013 23:18 kushm4sta wrote:
stfu with your wifom. i don't care how many comm games you play, you are wrong hella often and this is one of those times.
scum might answer that way or they might stfu and not say anything or they might say zomg you are lying. There is a range of possible scum responses.
There is also a range of possible town responses. THEY OVERLAP. Sn0's repsonse was standard town. Your argument is pure wifom.
The point is not what Sno's answer was. The point is it took Sno 30 minutes to answer while before that he had been active in thread (he had 6 posts in last 30 minutes).
When he answered, he said "the meeting is now over". There is only one town motivation:
Sno had a meeting that started just when Oats asked the question. I am not buying it.
|
|
|
On September 17 2013 23:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2013 23:18 kushm4sta wrote:
stfu with your wifom. i don't care how many comm games you play, you are wrong hella often and this is one of those times.
scum might answer that way or they might stfu and not say anything or they might say zomg you are lying. There is a range of possible scum responses.
There is also a range of possible town responses. THEY OVERLAP. Sn0's repsonse was standard town. Your argument is pure wifom. The point is not what Sno's answer was. The point is it took Sno 30 minutes to answer while before that he had been active in thread (he had 6 posts in last 30 minutes). When he answered, he said "the meeting is now over". There is only one town motivation: Sno had a meeting that started just when Oats asked the question. I am not buying it.
A meeting?? OR he had to take a shit. or he was playing a video game, or he was DOING ANYTHING LOL. Your assumptions are WIFOM.
|
On September 17 2013 23:26 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2013 23:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:On September 17 2013 23:18 kushm4sta wrote:
stfu with your wifom. i don't care how many comm games you play, you are wrong hella often and this is one of those times.
scum might answer that way or they might stfu and not say anything or they might say zomg you are lying. There is a range of possible scum responses.
There is also a range of possible town responses. THEY OVERLAP. Sn0's repsonse was standard town. Your argument is pure wifom. The point is not what Sno's answer was. The point is it took Sno 30 minutes to answer while before that he had been active in thread (he had 6 posts in last 30 minutes). When he answered, he said "the meeting is now over". There is only one town motivation: Sno had a meeting that started just when Oats asked the question. I am not buying it. A meeting?? OR he had to take a shit. or he was playing a video game, or he was DOING ANYTHING LOL. Your assumptions are WIFOM.
HE FUCKING SAID HE HAD A MEETING!
On September 17 2013 05:21 Sn0_Man wrote:
Oh hi meeting done.
I don't think I'd believe you Oats since I've been immunized with too many fake-claims recently. Plus, reasonably if you were a rolecop and you copped OP its not worth revealing your role to save a 3p survivor (IMO) unless you have a certain scum lynch instead (which I don't see). Which makes it more likely that you would be fake-claiming. Etc.
Oats re "scumslip": I mentioned that Zealos would have to have been "dropped as a child" to post that as scum.
wtf is wrong with you kush?
|
k so why couldn't he have had a meeting?
|
Well, fuck you all. You are ruining the Awesome Town Team spirit!
|
its just you guys are really wrong and im really right and it's pissing me off but i have to go now bye. i swear to god if you lose this game after i get nk because you didn't listen to be I will be so pissed.
|
Or maybe he was posting from his phone during the meeting. I post from phone a lot during class. Anyway I don't think you can read anything into delayed responses in a thread game in general, I for one often don't refresh the thread for a while after I post.
That said, I just reread sno's filter and he spends a LOT of time talking about pandain during day 1, and very little talkin about blurb, but he's way too okay with blubb getting lynched IMO. Like, especially given how much I and others were calling for an actual case to be made on blubb.
On the other hand, I'm kind of doubting actual scum would have voted zealos and tried to get people to lynch him yesterday instead of bh... So I'm not liking him for lunch tmo.
|
On September 17 2013 23:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On September 17 2013 23:18 kushm4sta wrote:
stfu with your wifom. i don't care how many comm games you play, you are wrong hella often and this is one of those times.
scum might answer that way or they might stfu and not say anything or they might say zomg you are lying. There is a range of possible scum responses.
There is also a range of possible town responses. THEY OVERLAP. Sn0's repsonse was standard town. Your argument is pure wifom. The point is not what Sno's answer was. The point is it took Sno 30 minutes to answer while before that he had been active in thread (he had 6 posts in last 30 minutes). When he answered, he said "the meeting is now over". There is only one town motivation: Sno had a meeting that started just when Oats asked the question. I am not buying it.
This is extreme bullshit. Now we are calling people scum because you didnt like their IRL excuse?
Come on Rayn, you are better than that.
|
On September 17 2013 23:29 kushm4sta wrote:
k so why couldn't he have had a meeting?
Yes he could. I just don't buy the fact he suddenly had a meeting JUST when Oats asked him about BH. Maybe you buy it, i don't. Besides that there is nothing in his filter that tells me he is town. He was okay with lynching Zealos later on D2.
|
WHAT have grack and pandain done since d1 in terms of scumhunting??????????
|
ah i really have to do this shit so im stepping away now but i am in that mood where i am super convinced of my reads to the point of obsession
|
On September 17 2013 23:35 kushm4sta wrote:
WHAT have grack and pandain done since d1 in terms of scumhunting??????????
Nothing. You can add everyone besides me, you, Oats, Koshi and maybe debears to that list too.
|
I wanted to lynch zealos cuz its MORE FUN. And because I still though BH was survivor. Objectively the wrong play I admit, as I've admitted when I was doing it. Mafia is done for fun tho.
Still wanna lynch zealos though I think. Still too lazy to properly read the D1 votes again. When it comes time to consider those things I will, for now I'm waiting for night action resolution to understand more about this game.
How are we debating i dont even remember what happened yesterday afternoon. Rayn you are literally the only person on the planet deluded enough to think that not answering somebody's question half a second after they post it makes you scum. If you want I can go play-by-play that shit but what a waste of time. Oats blabbed some shit that wasn't even as interesting as your standard fakeclaims iunno why I'm supposed to just swallow it hook, line and sinker.
|
Here's a thought - what if the reason there was (probably) no scum nk last night is cause scum shot the serial killer? Would imply that serial killer was someone who looked quite townie day 1.
|
On September 17 2013 23:44 strongandbig wrote:
Here's a thought - what if the reason there was (probably) no scum nk last night is cause scum shot the serial killer? Would imply that serial killer was someone who looked quite townie day 1.
Great idea.
Let's lynch people that look townie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
