Desert Mini Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I'm going to have a joint and return tomorrow. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 16:42 yamato77 wrote: So many of you have no idea how to play D1 Putting a vote on me that you know I'll piss all over in amusement is "playing Day 1 properly"? You think it would 'spur me into action' or something? lol. I agree with what rayn said about Sn0 earlier at the start of the day, but without the attached total confidence of a town-read scibby's posts (especially at first) look weird and constructed as fuck to me but then again I thought the same in Ego and he was town, I guess I'll wait and see if he stays involved yamato is terrible I still like Tutenkhamun Glaring into the Hopeless/debears/Onegu/Sylencia/(Oats?)/(Hapa) crowd right now. debears' posts look a little silly on scrib to me, but i'm willing to hear his sober self out | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 10:31 FirmTofu wrote: Hi, I'm here. Reading now. I predict rayn is gonna call me out on this post and accuse me of being scum. Followed by some story about idiots? I'm not even sure whether this is scummy, but it's certainly not awesome. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 18:38 Oatsmaster wrote: Why is tutonkeonddude town marv? He sheeped some dudes policy vote and asked 'what policy'. Shows that he gives no fucks about who he wants to die. scib might be scum, but it might be because I dont like reading complicated posts. Because at the start of the day, mafia decide to say things like this to look super-awesome to the thread, right? No. I liked his two questions to Hopeless and I like how he sounds in general. Maybe just a natural affinity to someone with a brain? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
anyway i'm not gonna defend the dude for him, but i'm not really interested in talking about him either | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
what the fuck is wrong with you? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 18:45 yamato77 wrote: You're implying that there's something to catch. i'm implying i don't lecture town on how to play day 1 while playing day 1 terribly myself, dear. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
There's no questions or argument here, but there's nitpicking on stuff that doesn't even make sense. Do either of you want to actually discuss anything meaningful? I've already splurged like 10 posts and I was planning on not doing the splurging thing this game. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 18:48 Oatsmaster wrote: He doesnt sound like you sound unless you sound like totally uncommital, talking about useless shit and posting the most wishy washy post ever and generally playing like super scum. Im am completely confused at your insistence that he is totally town. Where did I insist he's totally town? And do you not read how *I* play on day 1s? Especially the last few months. "uncommittal and wishy washy" at this stage of the game is just a natural thought process. Noone can be fucking decisive 6 hours into the game or whenever it was | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Also "I like this guy" != "this guy is totally town". Reading comprehension fail right there. I won't be a dick if you learn to read properly, deal? I don't see the scum motivation in fucking around dumbly on a policy lynch. Especially coming from Tutenshitzen. Could maybe a super weak mafia player do that? Possibly, but Tuten doesn't sound like a dumbass to me so far, so I don't think he'd do so as mafia. That seems to be one of the primary reasons for voting him and it's not a very good one at all. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
as always, i'll tell you when i have a decent idea. Gonna leave the thread now because there's too many people I have no idea about, and arguing with you is neither good for my soul nor good for the thread | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Hapa, you don't buy debears being drunk? Or you do buy it but you don't think it excuses what he wrote? Strong enough for a vote even? Also On August 29 2013 19:09 Hapahauli wrote: So according to this, debears doesn't care whether Scib is dumb town or scum. He mentions both, then uses it as a justification to vote. That's pretty darrrrrn scummy. I read this as "it's retarded as both alignments, but has motivations for one alignment, ergo he's that alignment" no? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I'm itching to hear that one. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 19:21 Oatsmaster wrote: Generally scum are more careful with their posting because they dont want to stand out too much. Like they would think more about the appearance of their posting. Hapa wanna lynch marv? And yet you're voting Tutankhamen for making a spectacle of himself with the policy stuff? HOW DOES THIS MAKE SENSE OATS? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 19:31 Oatsmaster wrote: Only me and Hopeless thought it was bad initially...... Like why as town, vote for a dude and the question the lynch for that dude in the same post. Makes no sense to me. So, let's read this: On August 29 2013 19:21 Oatsmaster wrote: Generally scum are more careful with their posting because they dont want to stand out too much. Like they would think more about the appearance of their posting. So scum are careful and think about what they post. Yet he "vote(s) for a dude and the question the lynch for that dude in the same post." How is this careful and thinking about appearances? The two don't match Oats. What's going on? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I'm pretty suspicious of you for defending debears with one argument, and damning Tuten with the same argument. Still makes no sense. What did you expect to happen with a policy vote like that? For him to stick to it? Would that have been 'townie'? Your read smells like ass. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 20:19 Oatsmaster wrote: It didnt read to me as a joke AT all and he never mentions that its a joke. I said that mafia generally do not draw attention to themselves. Tuken was not proposing a policy lynch, he was just following yamato. So thats not too attention drawing. Also if I didnt push him and all that, we would not be talking about him at all. So he didnt draw attention to himself. On August 29 2013 19:31 Oatsmaster wrote: Only me and Hopeless thought it was bad initially...... Like why as town, vote for a dude and the question the lynch for that dude in the same post. Makes no sense to me. These things together still don't make sense to me. Don't think we're getting any further with it right now though. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 20:35 Oatsmaster wrote: man sciberbia is being super formal and stuff, like all of his shit reads really formally. Not sure if scum or town meta. Does anyone know? Reading is awesome On August 29 2013 18:31 marvellosity wrote: scibby's posts (especially at first) look weird and constructed as fuck to me but then again I thought the same in Ego and he was town, I guess I'll wait and see if he stays involved | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 20:45 raynpelikoneet wrote: marv what would you say Oats' alignment is atm? I dunno. I don't like how he's gone about / explained some of this Tuten stuff, but it's way easy to fall into the trap of Oats of contradictory stuff being scummy, when he just does it all the time. Him being in the thread and consistently arguing over it is somewhat of a towntell I think. TBD | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 20:49 raynpelikoneet wrote: I am pretty sure Oats is town. He is clearly not paying attention closely, that's why he forgets stuff. Given the players in this game (unless like you and Hapa are scum with him) i would expect him to be far more calreful with what he posts if he was mafia. Also him attacking you and Hapa (the strongest players) and not letting go of his arguments when "proven wrong" (or rather when pointed out the holes in his logic) is a strong towntell imo. I used to think this, but some game a while ago proved that wrong. Can't remember which though :/ Maybe you have a better metaread on him than I do, the way I usually try to tell is how involved he manages to stay. Pretty sure he can consistently push bad ideas as mafia too. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
If his thread-relevance to the thread drops off, I'm gonna be all over him like a rash. You have a point with how he's acted with regards to you, I don't think it's particularly alignment indicative though | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
awesome. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 20:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yeah i am not sure about Oats. I mean not convinced to say "Oats is town". There is a difference of him pushing targets as mafia or as town. I am pretty sure i can notice which this is when the game goes on. Anyways i think he is likely to be town atm. I assume you think Hapa is town? How easy is it for you to tell if he is town or not? I don't know. My tried and tested method of reading Hapa is "does his posting give me the heebie jeebies". He's not posted enough for me to have placed him on the heebie-jeebie-ometer yet. I like to think I'd be reasonably confident on his alignment by the end of Day 1, certainly. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On June 23 2013 20:53 marvellosity wrote: Unless something absolutely amazing comes up, there's not a chance we're lynching Hapa tomorrow | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 22:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: You have a point in FT, Sylencia. I have strong meta-reasons to believe he is scum. I still don't get the Sn0 part. I get why you think it's beneficial for him to unvote as mafia before leaving, but why would he make the vote on the first place? And why would he unvote in the manner he did as at that time i (and also marv) thought exactly the same thing about sciberbia's post Sno is talking about? Explain? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
If i'm saying the same thing in 24 hours time, then there'll be real problems | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
By "nah" do you mean "i can't really think of a good reason he's scum, but i thought i'd say shit for no reason anyway" ? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 22:59 raynpelikoneet wrote: I assume you mean Sno and debears. I was interested in knowing if you think there is anyone else besides them. Hopeless. The reason I said I liked Tutenkhamun earlier in the thread was because he quizzed Hopeless. In any case, he's not done anything and what he has done I don't like. To answer the million-dollar question someone asked earlier, I'd lynch him right now if I had to choose On August 29 2013 08:44 Hopeless1der wrote: K, ready to get all Jihad up in here. /sheep oats ##Vote: tutankoopa ok. On August 29 2013 08:55 Hopeless1der wrote: I dont think scum could be as stupid as rayn in this regard. Tutan was attempting to justify a sheep onto an unknown policy and has since changed his mind...I'm glad I sheeped Oats. Summarises action - doesn't explain why it's scummy (I think it's been clear from my posting that I don't think it was scummy). Just such an easy way to have a "suspect" and somewhere to have your vote On August 29 2013 09:14 Hopeless1der wrote: 1) Scum are more than capable of making Sn0's OP, which in and of itself is a stupid reason for rayn to come up with a town read. However, the part that I felt to be most stupid is that if Rayn is scum, he's revealed himself in all of 2 posts. 2) It doesn't matter what you were planning to do, I see your actions as scummy and I've voted accordingly. Your initial vote was not entirely damning. Dropping things off here + Show Spoiler + On August 29 2013 08:49 Tutankoopa wrote: actually nvm rayn ##unvote "Also") Was stupid the policy? Iuno... Scum are capable, but I agree (with you rayn) it's likelier to come from town. It's not a stupid reason at all to give a townread so early in the game, the only stupid thing would be sticking to it all game even if Sn0 was scummy as fuck. In 2), apparently the initial vote wasn't scummy, but the backtrack off it was? For similar reasons I attacked Oats, that's fishy as fuck. I also think (with any luck, correctly) that Hopeless has a better grasp of logic and isn't so all over the place that Oats is, but he's still pushing what I view as nonsense. He doesn't have Oats' interactivity with the thread to make up for these shortcomings either. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 23:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: That makes a lot of sense marv. I agree. Although i have a problem with Tutankoopa's posts regarding what i brought up earlier today (and that includes Hopeless). Also Hopeless was at least for me pretty scummy in LXI for the whole game and he was town. Anyways, I think you are right in what you say and he deserves a closer look. What do you think of Sylencia hopping to Sno and justifying it "via Hopeless' filter"? To the bolded, this is basically the primary reason my vote isn't on him :p I've found town-hopeless scummy on more than one occasion. Actually I was going to sit on those suspicions and see what happened, but I did that in...uh...Fruity and that didn't work out so well for me either. I'm kinda confused about where Syl went and came from, I need 15 minutes to sit and think and look at it. Maybe I'll grab that time while i'm at work, otherwise this evening when i'm home. Stop trying to get me sacked ^_^ P.S. you've been friendlier/more engaging today than usual, is there a reason? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 29 2013 23:30 Sn0_Man wrote: I clearly pleaded with the wrong based gods for no spam ![]() Can you answer rayn's question on Syl that he asked me? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Hapa - what do you think of debears' comments on the 'scumcity' post from Onegu? Also (and genuine question I'd like answered) how are you feeling in general about this game so far? rayn, I said to remind me to comment on that post of yours after Tutan came back, so anyways. It was about him mentioning Oats at the start of the post and rescinding it at the end of the post. You seemed to be quite suspicious of that but to me it seems like a natural flow of consciousness. I don't see how that can be seen as anything worse than null, and is probably a towntell. Hopeless, if you are indeed town then this tunnel is the worst thing in the history of the universe. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 06:13 Hopeless1der wrote: marv, you are the only one to come remotely close to commenting on my actual reasons for voting TK. Hapa has taken the same reason I call TK scum to call TK town. You essentially agree with Hapa. He is currently trying to round-about his way to explaining that to me, but i simply disagree with you two about the implications of changing your mind so suddenly. Tell me what 'town' TK would/should have done? Or why what he didn't couldn't come from town? Or both indeed :p | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 06:24 Hopeless1der wrote: Town anyone should have followed through with the questions to rayn instead of citing "this is stupid" and jumping ship with their vote in tow. If he'd have allowed for even one more post from rayn before unvoting I probably wouldnt be here, but I interpret his actions as being scared to have his vote parked, lest someone (me...) think he was serious about wanting to lynch rayn. That's a wholly scum motivated thought process based on thread context at the time of his unvote imo. ? you think the vote was serious enough in the first place to warrant needing more posts to unvote? Why make the vote in the first place if he was then going to be scared to leave it parked? Do you think the type of player who'll jump on to a silly policy vote is scared to remove his vote? Has his play seemed scared to you? I'm barraging you with questions because I want to know if you can understand the really obvious alternative. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 06:25 Hapahauli wrote: I don't think that post by debears (on Onegu) says much. I do like the fact that he was willing to substantiate some other of his reads while stuck in a mad-tunnel on Sciberia, but I think the content could come from scum or town debears. As far as his game goes, he seems aggressive right now, which is good. Looking back on his Sciberia tunnel, there seems to be a "madness" about it that I associate with a town mindset. He's constantly peppering scib with questions, and while he's stubborn as a mule about it, he's constantly trying to figure out scib's allignment and even gets pissed when scib ignores him. Not his game, this game, I was after your general feelings about how the game as a whole has gone so far. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 06:33 Hapahauli wrote: @ Marv Can you comment on this Hopeless thing? Also, comments on my Syl/Onegu/Yamato thoughts from above would be appreciated. In short, I'm more suspicious of Onegu than you (I agreed with debears that i wasn't a fan of that onegu post), but as others have mentioned he has lynchbait written all over him yamato we'll see, his big post on you/me was full of logic fail (hapa can read marv, hapa is reading marv differently than me, hapa is suspicious), but in a way it's egotistical enough to come from town. if he doesn't do much else he's gonna look worse super fast. Gonna look into syl now, i owed rayn a read of him earlier. still in process on hopeless as you should be able to tell??? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 06:52 Hapahauli wrote: Hell can anyone comment on my Syl case above? I'm starting to agree with myself more and more :3 I'm stuck in his filter currently, I think I'm being dumb because I'm finding it tremendously difficult to work out how he's hopped around, even with his own explanations I have written down that I think the post you quoted in your case looks worse as a standalone than in context - he was asked specifically to comment on those 3 players, and I can understand not being that decisive when talking about players you were asked to talk about | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 07:05 sciberbia wrote: I did notice his back-flip on the sn0_man read because he disagreed with me but then later stole my exact argument. I'm a little torn on whether this is more likely a town move or scum move. It would be a puzzling move for scum to so blatantly contradict themselves, but at the same time his explanation of it from a townie perspective is equally puzzling to me. basically this lol | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I didn't respond to your post, yamato, because everyone else had already told you it was shit and I didn't feel like it needed adding to at the time. What are you doing? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Bugs me that yamato is suspicious of Hapa for being able to read me better than yamato can. It's just dumb on so many levels | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
yes, and I'm interpreting how they actually sound and boil down to. You're suspicious of Hapa for his read on me despite readily admitting yourself Hapa would be able to read me better than you or anyone else. "red flags" and shit, and that hapa "would make this read as mafia" when you're not actually capable of knowing whether he would say the same about me as town. Basically everything you say is totally egocentric and related to your perceptions that don't really make much sense to me | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
And by always, I mean never. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
1) in your original long post you say hapa would best be able to catch me and knows me best 2) hapa gives a tone/attitude read on me 3) you disagree with the read and decide you know better 4) therefore hapa is suspicious, despite 1) all these things don't go together at all, really. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Stop being patronising when you're the one who can't actually fucking read. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 08:39 yamato77 wrote: 1) I quote how Hapa has TOLD ME (therefor giving me the knowledge he has) about your meta. 2) I quote Hapa's read 3) I show obvious examples of the very scum attitude-read he posted 4) therefor, Hapa isn't actually considering your real alignment He has a different view on your 3), obviously (as he has handily outlined just now). I know my alignment, and hapa is better than you, so you're finding him scummy for making a more nuanced read than you're capable of? Again, it boils down to the fact you're suspicious of him having a different read on me than you, despite the fact he knows my play better, and is indeed the only player to ever actually catch me as mafia. Brilliant! | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I do that kinda shit just because I enjoy being right. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Because it's bullshittery. Or would you just like to admit now it's bullshittery? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 08:44 yamato77 wrote: Is he really, though? It seems like he wants to use these back-and-forth exchanges more as an avenue to shit on my play and my reads than to actually get anything useful out of it. If I am right about him, there is plenty of motivation for scum-Marv to want to discredit me when town-Marv is usually more cooperative even when I am tunneling him, in the recent past. Why the change this game in his response, and his overall attitude as compared to his recent play? As yamato is ignoring me, I'm just gonna point this out to the thread. Unless my memory serves me incorrectly, the last time yamato tunnelled me was 6 months ago in an abortion of a game. So he's painting my reactions as scummy when compared to basically totally fictitious recent games that don't exist. me no gusta. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
##vote: yamato | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
why are you making things up?? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
##unvote | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Onegu, I don't understand this FT lynch in the slightest. You think the whole rest of the town has played sufficiently townie to punt the lynch on someone who's literally done nothing? I love me some lurker-lynching, but only when I have a little something to put my hat on | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
You really think his contributions don't look natural/sincere? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 19:03 raynpelikoneet wrote: No it's easy to look natural and sincere in case you know anything about how to play as mafia. It's also easy to accuse Hopeless at this point because he is being dumb. My problem with Tutankoopa is that there is nothing that suggests that he is here to find mafia. It's more that he is here to chat with people and give some half-arsed opinions & answers when being questioned. He already clarified he is a smurf, and you draw from that he would not play "this good" as scum? I disagree completely with the bolded. On Day 1 especially it's how I go about getting most of my townreads (and meta). There's approximately a 0.1% chance I'll lynch him today, if you come up with some mindbendingly good case. I'd lynch Oats way before i'd lynch Tuten today, for one | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
When Oats is mafia I just see him digging at people constantly and not providing any interesting analysis. As town he's consistently more active and perceptive Like most of the last page of his filter is attacking you for PoE, and what? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 19:18 raynpelikoneet wrote: Also on Hopeless. marv, don't you think it's alarming that everyone in the game wants to lynch him besides me? Unless he is mafia with Oats/Onegu/FT this makes zero sense. I do think Oats is town, i do think Onegu is town. It makes no sense to me. This had crossed my mind, but I didn't know where to go with it. If all these people are town, throw me 3 mafia for funsies? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 19:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: Can you give me an example (town/scum) that supports your argument? As town he attack people for stupid stuff, especially me. you hydrad with him and your slot was caught for constantly bitching and not moving anything forward he was caught in Ego for his activity dropping off and not actually providing analysis, and only bitching at people | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Coming from someone who loves himself a bit of meta, I think you're way overusing meta this game. Like asking people to go read through 2 whole games of FT's when FT basically hasn't posted here this game. It's really pointless. You're trying to excuse Oats using a meta-towntell that's arguable at best, and the meta-towntell that you're using is actually a mafia-oriented point. It's icky. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 19:46 Sylencia wrote: In regards to the players whom I've played with before, nothing really sticks out as being out of the ordinary from when they've been town. The only thing I'm concerned about going into D1 lynch is that we've spread ourselves thin on lynch targets for the day. It's fine that we're suspecting each other but if everyone suspects someone else then we're not going to be able to coordinate a proper lynch and scum can manipulate us rather easily. I doubt this would ever pass but considering we have 5 people with votes on them at the moment - would it be wrong to suggest that we stick to the 5 listed and consolidate on them instead? Note: This doesn't mean that we completely ignore the rest of the town, but considering there's only about 12 hours left in the day, those cases can be put forward N1 onwards. This will also help us prevent unwanted last minute bandwagons on someone completely irrelevant and we remain focused on the main suspects. Pretty sure I went off topic there, but it's something I was considering before. What are you interested in? eh, I'd been thinking the opposite, I was worried we were drifting toward a hopeless/sylencia dichotomy too soon | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Talk to Tuten without pitching a fit that he's not answering your questions how you'd like him to *thumbs up* | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:04 yamato77 wrote: I'm not thrilled with a Syl lynch. I've never seen him post his much, ever. Something tells me he wouldn't pick his scum game to start tryharding. Hopeless I still have yet to read, but honestly FT is not a terrible lynch. Do it please. FT isn't a terrible lynch in that we're not losing anything by killing him and he might well be mafia, but it's terribly, terribly coinflippy. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:16 yamato77 wrote: blegh Most of his filter is arguing about his read on TK which is based on TK's vote and unvote at the start of the game. Is he scum trying to fabricate a read out of something that I find completely meaningless or just a horribly misguided townie? There's a few places in his filter where I go "well that seems reasonable" so it's not like he jumped off the edge of the cliff. If we weren't nearing the end of this day I'd be content to sit on him as a lynch candidate and see what he does, but is he the best we can find? I'm going to reread Scib. Last time I remember, he +1'd some dumb thing you said in the middle of our argument. He's also been trying to tell me that I'm an asshole the whole game, and I don't like that. Towntell to me, he told you you were bad, and rayn, and me. In his scumgame that I remember he stayed totally aloof, I can't see him taking up needling as mafia just for shits and giggles | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
It seems blatantly obvious Tutan is trying to be rational and engage with you, and you're just nitpicking. stop. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
and Syl might start posting a lot more as mafia. What's your point? lol | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: marv look at my last post and tell me that his answer to me is reasonable and explain it to me please. I will instantly let go if you can do that. you need to let go of the nitpicking and read the tone and intent of his posts in the last couple of pages how do you not see really clearly that he's trying to engage you in a constructive way? it's totally, totally baffling to me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
by this argument nothing makes anyone mafia, dear. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:30 Tutankoopa wrote: Do people want me to keep talking to rayn? Not really. Got a casual read on Sn0 lying around? Apologies if I missed you talking about him previously | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:35 yamato77 wrote: 1) Hopeless is/was pushing a case this game 2) Hopeless doesn't usually push cases as towm 3) Therefor, Hopeless is scum idk about that conclusion that's not really what the case on him is though, is it dear. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Three of us have made consolidated posts on hopeless (hapa, scib, me) so if you've missed them / not read them, you're already being a liability. Please stahp. Open our filters and ctrl-f hopeless for god's sakes. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 23:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: So you are saying that scum team just decided to roll over and die from the beginning because "town too good"? Hard-bussing D1 is stupid, and you can always avoid it unless town is a perfection. At least you can try by not looking scummy for it. Do you, Oats, think Tutankoopa has put effort in finding mafia? Do you think his reads are reasonably explained? Has hopeless? Can you really compare their two filters and say Tutan has explained less than hopeless? this tunnel is getting really fishy, rayn. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 23:28 debears wrote: Eh marv I'd rather hope we have a vig to handle that. That, and I would expect scum to have some sort of thread presence. What part of terribly terribly coinflippy did you take to mean I thought he was a good lynch for today? ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 23:53 debears wrote: Yamato. Take a look at the filters of Onegu, Syl, Hopeless, and Oats. Give me a quick gut read on which is scum. Then build a case on that person. Start playing My ranking 1) Syl 2) Hopeless 3) Onegu/Oats @Hapa and Marv I can't remember. Doesn't yamato usually check out of games once he is considered town (when he is town)? This is a really tricky question. I know what you're asking and I know why you're asking it. yamato doesn't always give full effort when he's considered town, and I don't think what he's been doing today is outside the realms of how he might play town, although it is disconcerting. yamato can be pretty pragmatic - the post that you/others jumped on him regarding me/hapa kinda illustrates said pragmatism. Not sure if I'm explaining this superwell :/ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 30 2013 23:54 Sn0_Man wrote: I'm actually getting more interested in taking this approach, mostly to be fair to alakaslam since replacing in as the prime lynch candidate with 8 hours to lynch is horrendously unfair. Game's not about being fair though, it's about lynching mafia. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Question one: why is Firm asking about sciberbia's meta with regards to posting 'formally' and what have you when it's been talked about at least twice in the thread already? Secondly, remember when you talked, rayn, about how you just shout louder than the rest of people and get your lynch just by shouting? Well, hi there. Couple of things I agreed with as I read them, can't remember who said them now - I think Onegu is looking better than I thought earlier in the cycle, his posting seems more sincere and pointed than his first, quite wishy washy post. Also agree with... Hapa? on oats' 'half-heartedness'. Syl doesn't look great to me but he's posting too much for Syl to be a particularly good lynch today, I think I agree with yamato on that one. Slammy has posted but nothing of substance, I still think he's a pretty good lynch. Gonna check me out some Oats stuffs. Here for talkies as well. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: my case on Tutankhamon is totally valid and he is scum. Why are you ignoring commenting on it? because you're fucking awful and i'm bored of you. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay, idgaf, seriously. I am going to sauna. It's far more "productive" and relaxing than this shit. Do not lynch alaskaslam, he is gonna turn up town. i might or might not be back before the deadline...msda Final, sensible answer because I could do with not shit-fitting with you. Tutan's attempts to talk and rationalise with you look extremely townie to me. It reminds me a lot of Dr Who mafia, where I accused Sharrant of being mafia because of some terrible posts. We had some back and forth over several posts where Sharrant was very reasonable, and my scumread on him turned into a townread in the space of about half an hour. Tutan's attempts to engage with you feel very similar to me as that, except you're too blinded to step back and evaluate this, and you're stuck on your case which isn't a case. Ok? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:39 Hapahauli wrote: Idunno. I just tend to give replacements a lot of leeway to prove themselves. I tend to try to lynch mafia, and both parts of that slot have looked like mafia. anyway, to the Oats filter! | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:36 Hapahauli wrote: I'm not saying those are the reasons that Hopeless gave. I'm more suggesting that a scum would be more likely to stick it out (regardless of what RL things are happening), where as a town would be more demoralized and such suspicion would be the tipping point for a replacement. At this point, I'm more waiting on what slam has to say. But you're suggesting that Hopeless lied to get a replacement then? Because no host lets someone replace out because they're demoralised. Come on Hapa. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Hapa, I agree with you about the half-heartedness, in that he asked to lynch you, me, and sn0 pretty casually. There's no mega Oats tunnel. His contradiction at the beginning of the game is still meh. What i'm reading most into is this, so someone feel free to talk about this with me. Seems Hopeless came completely out of the blue. The problem is, Hopeless hadn't done anything new to warrant this, it was all old stuff. And relevantly, oats's first target was tutenkhamun, who was Hopeless' target, so he presumably agreed with him? Does it make sense him flipping from one to the other like that with basically nothing from hopeless in between? presumably he liked what hopeless had said about tuten as he agreed with his read? thoughts? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 05:57 Hapahauli wrote: Oats changing his mind is a plausible story. More the problem I have is how absurdly convenient all his reads are, and how little conviction he's had this game. Oats has been chillingly passive this game. The second half is connected to the first half though. I guess I'm not explaining so well. As in, the read change is both convenient and also heavily contradicts what he thought in the first half of the day. Like it doesn't seem normal to heavily agree with someone's scumread and then suddenly want to lynch them later. i'm sure this can't just be me ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Earlier I was worried I didn't want to lynch enough people, now I want to lynch too many :/ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:06 Oatsmaster wrote: which oats is more useful to the thread? the one who looks townier | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
what changed for you? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Just like last game. stop it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:38 Hapahauli wrote: ##Vote Sylencia I think that's our vote for today. He is a bit more active than usual, however there are things about his game that don't line up. In addition to the FT thing that Onegu pointed out, there was him completely dodging commenting on the Hopeless case, putting his vote on Onegu (who has had virtually no chance of getting lynched), then peacing out. Syl's just playing a lot different than I've seen him do in his past town-games. He lacks the articulation and confidence that I've seen him display in recent memory. I'd say he's our best chance at scum today. Hapa, can you elaborate on this? Is what Syl did with Onegu really out of character? His lynch makes me squirmy right now. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:44 Hapahauli wrote: I would say him not commenting on Hopeless (when Hopeless was clearly the main focus of the thread) to be completely out of character. Usually Syl does a better job of keeping up with the thread, even though he doesn't always end up on the main wagon. Who is your alternative to Syl though? I basically have no idea why we're not lynching one of Firm and Slam. Lurky players who when they post are posting tripe. Lynching someone posting more than usual seems really stupid to me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
##Vote: Alakaslam I'm choosing between him and Firm. Firm has just been *SO* shit that maybe he's not the best lynch. Hopeless and Alakslam both posted a reasonable amount, in hopeless' case terribly, and in alakaslam's case pointlessly. I think that tips the balance for me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:52 debears wrote: Answer me Marv What's there to answer? His filter is meh, the most egregious thing being his Onegu vote peace-out. hopeless + slam build up to considerably more than that. And I'd lynch Firm first too before Syl. Clear out the chaff. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 06:55 Sn0_Man wrote: rayn: I bet we have a blue role somewhere that could do some confirmation on the alignments of at least one member of your proposed scumteam. Assuming 3 scum, are you suggesting Koopa/Marv/Hapa in that order? why would you post this? arg. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
for future reference, avoid :p | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 07:05 raynpelikoneet wrote: wtf is this? give read as soon as possible if you are town. the only thing that matters right now is the lynch, not your silly powerplays. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 07:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: And yet you stayed silent for a total of 10 minutes? I apologise profusely for having a boyfriend that I enjoy talking to. My most humble of apologies. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
You go ahead and make a big deal out of a ten minute posting gap though. Christ rayn. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 07:17 raynpelikoneet wrote: haha :D i am actually soon (after PC) heading to bar, no tentacles, and when i get too frustrated with you i go downstairs and smoke a cig. ^^ which is right now. i also think you are scum. <3 and hapa can't see it, but it's ok. you have charmed him in some way.. protip: if you're frustrated with me, i'm probably not mafia D: just sayin' like scib - i've already pointed out to hapa multiple times how the demoralised thing just isn't a point at all. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 07:17 sciberbia wrote: -- He is apparently absurdly busy and I don't really mind his not contributing as much as you do. I'm sure it's hella hard to catch up on 40 pages and make intelligent posts as the deadline is winding down. also, how about any sense of urgency with the lynch approaching? i literally have no idea how people think this is ok?? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
This happens every day 1, players like Firm and Slam get off scott-free. you know what you were saying about alakaslam being readable day 2 onwards? how do Firm/Oats match up on this metric? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
##vote: firmtofu slam is here and that sounded kinda genuine, if terrible :/ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 07:34 Tutankoopa wrote: lol lets lynch scib what the fuck is this? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Why is there so much resistance to his lynch? Like... he was totally absent and that was kinda ok, but then he came back and just shit around, and there's so much resistance. Why?? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 07:42 raynpelikoneet wrote: HEY! So NOW you want to kill him? ROFL! I proposed this earlier. i even gave a fucking meta-read on him for you to read. YOU DID SHIT! No, kill Koop. that was before Firm came back to the thread with his awful posting, you enormous idiot | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 07:57 Sn0_Man wrote: Acquiescing to the lynch he disagrees with is very not rayn... lol, that's really not how it is though is it. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Did anyone want to talk about anything for a little bit? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On August 31 2013 22:24 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think Hapa is somehow off and it bothers me i don't fucking know what that means. I would think if he was mafia or had done something that he does as mafia marv would have pointed it out already. If you want to read 'off' Hapa, go check out Duel Mafia hosted by Hiro. It's like the perfect example. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Are you worried his me/you thing was just a stunt? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
marvellosity was signed in when posted 04-25-2013 12:12 PM ET (US) "Clarity is always inactive, and him being fixated on Sharrant is not alignment indicative. His case is objectively something that scum like to do, but in the context of the game, I can see a town Clarity who had a late start feeling the need to get his thoughts about the game on the table, even if they weren't about the main lynch candidates. The fact that he basically has no other reads in the game is a point in his favor, but just like VE, we can afford to play a waiting game with him, seeing as we have unlimited time." had a quick browse. found this funny. 1) clarity is usually active 2) him being fixated on sharrant is alignment indicative 3) the context of the game makes the case scummier, not less 4) having no proper reads is not a point in his favour so much fail in one paragraph The main reason it reminded me specifically of the you/me post is that what i quoted there was part of a larger post with all kinds of fail which yamato somehow comes up with a couple of times per game as town, whereas he doesn't as mafia. Anyways, i can't really disagree about how useful he's been, but do you really think he'd have gone balls out at BOTH of us like that? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 01 2013 06:55 Hapahauli wrote: Maybe? I mean Yamato is fully capable of being useful as town, and if he's not next cycle, he should probably die. this is giving me some weird deja vu shit with how the lynches happened in persona | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 01 2013 07:12 debears wrote: ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? my memory stands corrected, i was just going off his usual sleeping hours :/ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 01 2013 07:23 raynpelikoneet wrote: wtf is this.Why do people want to lynch yam? marv why are you so okay with my claim as you said you'd gonna kill me for it (nearly)? because in the cold light of day, it makes you dumb, not scum. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
jeez. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 01 2013 08:22 sciberbia wrote: debears claimed a roleblock which doesn't necessarily mean he was shot. lol can you not see the hints? I have next to zero idea what's going on right now. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=426387¤tpage=68#1352 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=426387¤tpage=68#1355 | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
rayn were you actually shot?? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 01 2013 08:28 Hapahauli wrote: Oh geezus waddafuq. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
answer the god-damn question? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 01 2013 08:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: you are not dumb. think for a chance.??? are you mafia? you make it extraordinarily difficult to set things logically when you lie constantly. which is why i want to know whether you're lying here. it's really fucking simple rayn. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 01 2013 08:39 debears wrote: At least this game just got a whole lot more interesting and fun for me :D yeah, i wanted to go to bed half an hour ago :/ might have to leave thinking about this until tomorrow tbh | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Hapa inject some sense for me while I'm gone, I want something I can pick through properly | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 02 2013 03:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: For the record. I never breadcrumb. Ever. I think it's useless. Pretty clearly not useless, debears' crumb leaves basically no doubt he's telling the truth. The evidence is right here in this game o.o | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 02 2013 05:36 raynpelikoneet wrote: Ehh.. why can't mafia "breadcrumb" some role and assuming a certain situation happens (like a no-kill in a game where doctor and their target is not informed of a save) claim "yeah dudes, look, i crumbed my role vet i am totes town, now you gotta believe me"?? It's not that hard, and i put zero value in breadcrumbs. Mainly because mafia have to waste a shot to claim vet. See Persona obsQT for relevant discussion ![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 01 2013 17:32 Alakaslam wrote: Ok. I have something to figure out. Either Raynepelikoneet or Oatsmaster is scum. It is 1:30 I must sleep. But I will say why and then go I am cannon fodder vt. Oats votes me Raynepelikoneet knows I'm town. Which is town more likely to do given the ambiguous target on my back? Paint me town or lead a mislynch on me? Or towncred vs mislynch what is more valuable to scum. See y'all tomorrow. First of all, this is like the 5th VT claim. I don't like it at all. Trying too hard. Slam, you need to explain this oats/rayn dichotomy asap. It feels like a significant contribution is always somehow just around the corner. Secondly, I got the distinct impression from your posts on Day 1 that you found Tutenkhamun suspicious, by your repeated mentions of "rayn is on the right track". Given this, where do you stand on Tuten now? Seems to have just disappeared into the ether? On September 01 2013 19:26 Oatsmaster wrote: Lol since when am I lazy as scum? Ok let me make up a reason for TK to be town that is insightful. Uhhh. TK is town because he has been giving good insight to the thread (QUOTED POST HERE) Yeah he is pushing dudes based on original thinking and like being useful and Caring about who dies. You know, caring about who dies is actually a very good towntell because scum only care that a town gets lynched. Oats, are you really arguing you're not lazier as scum than town? Come on. That's pushing the bounds of credibility here and you know it. On September 01 2013 20:36 Sylencia wrote: I see Oats as more lazy/sheep at the moment. I don't really understand the jump from scum Tutan to town Tutan that much, but if he is scum there's going to be a lot more holes we uncover in the future, since that's pretty sloppy scum play if it is. That's why I'm not really satisfied with him being the primary target of the lynch when we have Alakaslam and the rayn v debears unresolved situation. Rayn will come back tomorrow saying "Sorry I was drunk last night, ignore everything I said", which honestly doesn't help us with his read on him, and Alakaslam: Still on Oats... to the bolded, how many 'holes' do you need to call him scum? sciberbia has pointed out a few already, do you need 10? 20? Do holes = scum? To the underlined, doesn't that much more characterise his scumplay than his townplay? Answers on a postcard please. oh, and yamato, your breakdown of my post from months ago is totes adorbs btw. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 02 2013 05:42 raynpelikoneet wrote: They do not have to waste a shot. If they happen to shoot the person a doctor is protecting, then they can claim vet. The doctor would find that extremely fishy, for starters. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 02 2013 05:56 debears wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote Oatsmaster Scribs is my senseful other half this game now dibbers, how often have you played with Oats? Why is Slam townie to you? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 02 2013 06:06 debears wrote: I think a couple games. When did I say slam was townie? More the lack of attention you've given him today I guess. I asked about Oats, kinda because of what Hapa alluded to just up there. Because the thing is, scib's case is good, traditionally good, but it's Oats. If you don't know what I mean by that it's hard to explain :/ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Probably the biggest difference between them is i have playing experience with oats, not with slam :/ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 02 2013 07:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: marv, i basically think Alakaslam, Tutankoopa, Onegu, Sylencia. What do you make of the Tutan stuff on Onegu? Are you set on that being a bus then? That doesn't make any sense to me at this stage of the game. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 02 2013 21:16 yamato77 wrote: 6) I am being useful. I will be exponentially more useful soon. It is not illogical to find Hapa's weaksauce push of me suspicious because it is suspicious. It's like he's afraid to actually call me mafia and push for my lynch. Harkens back to Duel Mini where he was mafia and pussy footed around the issue the whole game. Going to compare the two and see if memory serves. So, after I get back from the store and read Hapa's filter in Duel (plus maybe RTP for a vice-versa comparison), I will let you all know what I think. But Hapa calling me mafia since last night and then defaulting to lynching Slam is fucking SUSPICIOUS. If he's mafia, why make a 'weaksauce' push on you? What exactly is he gaining? I don't understand the motivation. Relating to the last bold bit, presumably if you know you're townie you know your alignment, so him wanting to lynch someone not-you is surely better than wanting to lynch you? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 02 2013 23:46 yamato77 wrote: Hapa, if scum, would not want confrontation with me. HE KNOWS I CAN CATCH HIM. But he does have to have reads, so he makes up the idea that I'm possible scum because I'm "useless" or whatever. I don't get it though, he doesn't need to have *that* read on you. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Question for you Tutan - I very much get what you're on about in your case, but I'm not convinced that a town-Onegu couldn't play like that. Your case only falls into place for me though if Onegu is shielding Slam as mafia, no? I'm saying this because Onegu mentions both FT and Slam reasonably regularly, so it's not like he's forgotten either of them, so I don't get how else how it makes sense. As it stands I don't like his lynch anyways. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 03 2013 00:13 yamato77 wrote: I mean, does this post sound like a town-hapa mentality? Don't you remember RTP where you both were town and I was mafia? He went after me the WHOLE DAY. He certainly didn't just have this weak ass read and let it flop about like a dead fish. Have you considered the fact you were much scummier in that game? lol | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Although I'm in Oats' filter right now and wondering where the fuck he is today. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
And by that I mean I think Hapa is town. Or at least not mafia. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 03 2013 00:39 raynpelikoneet wrote: Wait wtf marv. The who do you think is scum? You seem to be thinking i am town, debears is town, Onegu aswell (?), and yamato (?). Do you think Sno is scum? Or are you feeling strong about Oats? I think both of those are town. I'm definitely missing one in one of my townreads I think, but I don't need to kill myself over that today. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 03 2013 00:40 yamato77 wrote: Why do you think Hapa is town? I guarantee I can deconstruct your townread of him with just posts from his filter in Duel. I was in Duel, and it didn't feel the same as this. I don't really know what else to say right now. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 03 2013 00:53 yamato77 wrote: It's not completely out of the question, is it? I mean, I fooled you for at least a little while in PMs in Sicilian, no? I had even less time in Sicilian than I do now though. 8 pages over 10 days in Duel, 9 pages over 5 days here. And I'm running out of time because I need to do work. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 03 2013 01:00 yamato77 wrote: Plus, only you or Hapa would be good enough scum to shoot + roleblock debears. Come on. And yet bad enough to miss his crumb that had an underline and a double e in the same sentence? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 03 2013 01:08 debears wrote: The double e was just a fail at typing.........lol LOL. Well, nonetheless it was an attention drawer. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
At the moment I'm on Slam because he's been playing the game for 4 days now and amidst all the waffle there's not a single scumread. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 03 2013 06:38 raynpelikoneet wrote: This: I have never seen town!Hapahauli not reading the thread properly. Nonsense. I made a fake-case in GSL III on Hapa on Day 1 based on the fact he made a terrible case and he hadn't read the thread. Hapa isn't perfect. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Cept me obviously. (shh) | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Sound good? ##Vote: Alakaslam | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 03 2013 06:45 sciberbia wrote: @marv Do you think Alakaslam is more likely to flip scum than both Oats and yamato? Yes or no. Yes. Categorically. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Really? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 03 2013 07:35 Hapahauli wrote: Ok. Does that strike you as mafia-motivated? Yes, everything he's done has been anything but talk about scum. He's wove this stupid web of madness and hilarious soundbites and done everything but hunt scum. I get crazy shit can be town, but usually there is SOME WILL to TRY to solve the game. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
don'tknowwhattodo | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote: Oatsmaster | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 03 2013 08:21 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why the fuck would you lynch Oats? I am not bad at reading Oats. because I think hapa, debears, and scib are all pretty townie. and a last minute panic looking at slam's filter in his scum newbie. so you were right about oats, yes. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 03 2013 08:22 yamato77 wrote: I saw your response. I am not impressed. I don't think you read my posts too deeply if you think that was the only point against you. And I'm not impressed you made a case, afked, and didn't give a single fuck about the lynch. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Kinda sad I know who it is, because now I can't help attaching overall opinions of thrawn to his posts. I would say his posts are much higher quality than I expected (compliment, not an insult) and I'd be pretty surprised if thrawn is mafia. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
This game has been unusually hard to draw any activity tells from, so we'll see. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Anyway, I like this bit of the game because we have some concrete information. Hapa is confirmed because of the water level going down 100 and debears' PM. Unless hapa is some weird as fuck scum doctor (he isn't). Secondly, we know (probably) that debears was roleblocked night 1, and presumably sciberbia night 2 as his shot didn't go through. Thirdly, and most importantly, we have an unaccounted shot from night 1. rayn claimed hit, debears claimed hit. On night 2 as far as I can see only sciberbia got hit. SK theory seems to be out of the window because we already have a 3rd party I guess? Which leaves scum vigi as the only option, although that makes next to no sense to me as every role (barring roleblocker) has been conditional so far. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
the only two options as far as i can see is that there's an unconditional scum vig, or you're lying. yes? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I didn't say it was impossible thrawn was mafia? I said there are, apparently, two shots on night 1 and we've had a third party without KP flip is what i'm saying. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
##Vote: Hapahauli 7 minutes good grace because I'm nice like that | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
![]() | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 12 2013 19:38 raynpelikoneet wrote: On a side note. If there is one person i can read in the game of mafia it is Oats. If i say he is town he is town. You tried to lynch a town cop two days a row, on D2 i could not do anything to save him. :/ out of curiosity, what made you so sure? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 12 2013 19:52 raynpelikoneet wrote: His rant on me and the conclusion without explanation and the tone of the whole thing there with me/you. That's totally town!Oats. So what would have been missing/added for there to be a scum-Oats possibility? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 12 2013 20:01 raynpelikoneet wrote: I don't think he would go on with it in the first place. If he would he would be more willing to explain what he thinks and why instead of just calling me bad first, calling me bad after that, and then suddenly say "you are town so stfu". That's something mafia!Oats does not do, he does not go on calling people who "he does not think are scum" bad for "bad logic". I mean, the thing went on too long for Oats to be scum. I'm worried now you've explained this he may start incorporating this into his mafia play. Oats is kinda tricksy like that :p | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 12 2013 20:42 FirmTofu wrote: Define "properly". Attacking people for not posting? Defending myself from people saying I'm not talking enough? I find it all utterly pointless. I don't enjoy repeating the same Day 1 arguments game after game and being accused of being scum for my opinions that are completely non-alignment indicative. your few posts that you made were pretty laughable. when you get lynched as town, you can either shout at half the town for lynching you, or realise that you made yourself exceedingly lynchable by how you played up to you i always find a good question to ask about playstyle is "if everyone played in a similar style to me, what would happen?" - in this case if the entire town lurked and said shit, then the game would break and nothing would work. Whereas most people will try and produce content, and that's what any town needs to function. You're basically arguing that you should be a special case because you don't like day 1s. No. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
Which is why it's a townie's responsibility to not play badly. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
I mean obviously you weren't a great lynch because you were town, but as Day 1s go it was a pretty standard lynch. Lynch some useless dude saying weird things, maybe he'll flip mafia, maybe he won't. In so many games recently people keep saying "this d1 lynch was terrible" when really they're quite normal to go down like this. A terrible day 1 lynch is when you lynch someone who you can think about and say they had some clear towntells | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 12 2013 21:32 Dandel Ion wrote: I PM'd him after his dead-posts and told him to stfu. And if I say I'll replace/modkill him, I'll replace/modkill him. Have you heard me say anything different? No. Until you do, you should play under the assumption that he's gone. You didn't listen to what I explicitly said, your fault. You plan your all-in on a dead guy, your fault. We were setting up slam/sn0 long before slam decided not to vote on day 2, to be fair. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 12 2013 21:39 Dandel Ion wrote: That's fine, but continuing to set him up after he failed to vote was a poor decision, and I just want to emphasise that it was your guys' fuck up, not mine. Generally speaking (and you obviously have a different philosophy, not gonna comment on right/wrong) I think modkills should be an absolute last resort, especially when it directly affects the gameplay. Given Slam was ready to carry on posting, I think letting him carry on was the best decision for not affecting the game. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 12 2013 21:53 yamato77 wrote: Of course it did. If I accurately figure out those two every game, it's likely that we win the game. It is kinda weird. Because on TL I invariably tend to lynch lurkers who I think are scummy on day 1, sometimes with success, sometimes not. Over on OMGUS where the player pool is smaller, the strongest players have (to me at least) clear tells in their meta. So when I play there and I'm town, I basically spend my time on Day 1 trying to figure out the alignments of the 2-3 strong players in the game. The problem with lynching me on day 1 in general is that people tend to find me more suspicious when I'm town, so the numbers don't add up. Especially lately when I'm lazy/busy, waiting for me to slack off and/or not try to solve the game is when you're gonna get your real tells on me. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 12 2013 22:01 yamato77 wrote: It should have been telling to me that Marv chose to argue that I was wrong about Hapa more than that I was wrong about him, lol. no, that shouldn't be telling. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On September 12 2013 22:35 iamperfection wrote: I'm disappointed. You guys had a very good chance to give marv another scum loss and you failed. You just want there to be one other person who's played mafia with me and lost, don't you? | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
From a gameplay perspective, I chose to shoot debears on night 1 simply because he was mostly on the right track. I could feel his paranoia of me, and he was suspicious of Sylencia and Onegu (iirc). It was a rather large mistake of mine to miss his crumb, wasn't paying enough attention. On day 2, the main task (from my POV) was to bury thrawn's pretty good case on Onegu. Fortunately town was chaotic enough and Onegu played decently enough that the case just kinda went away somehow. Shot sciberbia night 2 because although he was mostly on the wrong track, he was looking very townie. Hapa was under quite a bit of pressure as well, and wasn't suspicious of me, so it was good to leave him alive. Funnily enough, the fact I roleblocked sciberbia and stopped him shooting a townie (yamato) ended up being a significant benefit to mafia. Personally, the game was already tiring me out through day 2, but I was ready to do one last big effort on day 3 to secure one of slam/sn0. When Slam got modkilled, everything changed, and I just couldn't summon up the energy to make another big effort, so I just gave up basically. Probably my next towngames will have quite a bit less posting than what I did here as mafia for the first cycle or two :/ | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36160 Posts
| ||
| ||