EPTPersona 4 Mini Mafia - Page 10
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
Crazometer
Australia45 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On August 20 2013 20:51 yamato77 wrote: Mafia doesn't have to kill the survivor to win, either. It's like you don't understand that they are completely impartial. The point isn't that we're telling them not to claim, it is that they won't claim and asking them to is actually just a waste of time. The name of the game is mafia, because you're trying to find and kill them, not the survivors. That's why i included it in a post that actually said something useful too. Also that's why i do not understand why people jumped on that part of the post so heavily. If it does not provide anything bad, why comment on it at all? | ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
On August 20 2013 20:51 raynpelikoneet wrote: Crazometer how does everyone claiming vanilla town help us in forum mafia? We can judge the sincerity of their type, obviously. | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
On August 20 2013 20:53 raynpelikoneet wrote: That's why i included it in a post that actually said something useful too. Also that's why i do not understand why people jumped on that part of the post so heavily. If it does not provide anything bad, why comment on it at all? Because it's weird that someone mentions the survivor claiming. But obviously you actually thought it was good, so whatever. Let's drop it. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
I am still honestly a bit curious about Oats. He clearly thought survivor is anti-town role as he said so in his post. I understand your thought process but not his. I would also like to hear what makes me scum in his eyes. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On August 20 2013 20:27 raynpelikoneet wrote: Me shooting you makes me scum how? I propose a survivor claim. If there is a dumb enough survivor to claim, it helps town. I have a pro-town proposition and you immediately tell the survivor to not claim. Why? If someone had claim survivor, it would have helped town. If not, so fucking what? It does not change the fact that my proposition is pro-town and your immediate response is anti-town. this pro town shit. Doesnt exist. Also, it doesnt help town a ton if the real survivor were to claim. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Townies try to help town, scum do not. Uh no rayn, chill the fuck out. Also we as town know that there is no SK, how in the world does that help us? Also, I assume you think Im scum rayn, And in your previous game, TOWN players gave advice to the antitown. So why do you think im scum? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On August 20 2013 20:58 raynpelikoneet wrote: yeah. let's drop it. I am still honestly a bit curious about Oats. He clearly thought survivor is anti-town role as he said so in his post. I understand your thought process but not his. I would also like to hear what makes me scum in his eyes. uh no I dont think survivor is anti town. L2english. You think we gave anti town advice. I asked how does that make me and yamato scum. | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
On August 20 2013 21:02 raynpelikoneet wrote: Wait, now you are saying this. Why would you oppose an idea that might possibly help town and has zero downsides? Also how does me proposing that sort of an idea make me mafia? Its not an idea. Its a plan that helps scum. Scum knowing survivor is great. Town doesnt really have any direct benefit from survivor claiming. Also, I didnt say you were scum because you proposed a plan, I said you were scum because you shit on me and yamato for helping 'antitown' when you know its more likely to come from town. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On August 20 2013 20:13 Oatsmaster wrote: uh what? That doesnt make any sense rayn. Survivor doesnt want to help town. Survivor gains no benefit from claiming. Survivor doesnt need to claim rayn. At all. It gains them nothing to claim n0. And probably means they lose the game. I think this is pretty clear way of saying "survivor is anti-town". no? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Therefore survivor is anti-scum. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
this is not an upside They are a survivor. Then we can assume there is probably not a SK in the game. We then judge them later on (are they helping town or not). If they are not, we lynch them, if they are - mafia needs to kill them (not kill a townie). | ||
|
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
Why is this not an upside: "We then judge them later on (are they helping town or not). If they are not, we lynch them, if they are - mafia needs to kill them (not kill a townie)." ? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Onegu
United States9696 Posts
On August 20 2013 21:13 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why is this not an upside: "We then judge them later on (are they helping town or not). If they are not, we lynch them, if they are - mafia needs to kill them (not kill a townie)." ? First mafia doesnt need to kill them, knowing who they are is pro scum as they dont have to kill them as survivor wins with them as well. Makeing it one less person to kill to get to lylo. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
| ||
