|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On August 30 2013 21:21 WaveofShadow wrote: Ooo! Can I help? ##Vote: Koshi
I find Koshi's attempt to use his role to benefit other roles incredibly pro-town. What exactly were you trying to help by making this vote? Did you have a mafia read on him? Do you disagree with my assessment?
|
On August 30 2013 22:32 Oatsmaster wrote: uh no clarity, kita voted for Dandel cause he thought dandel was trying that trolling scum shit. How is dandel not the easiest target in the thread?
Because if you've read the thread, Dandel is clearly not playing to his trolly-scum-inactive meta atm. I could name like 10 easier targets.
That reminds me though, kita, do you still think Dandel is scum?
|
On August 30 2013 22:31 WaveofShadow wrote: Oats, what makes Dandel the easiest target in the thread, and what makes me scum? (The VA thing is believable.) dandel hasnt done jack shit. And his scum meta is trolling the shit out of the thread. How is he not the easiest target. You're scum for not doing shit
|
On August 30 2013 22:34 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On August 30 2013 22:32 Oatsmaster wrote: uh no clarity, kita voted for Dandel cause he thought dandel was trying that trolling scum shit. How is dandel not the easiest target in the thread?
Because if you've read the thread, Dandel is clearly not playing to his trolly-scum-inactive meta atm. I could name like 10 easier targets. That reminds me though, kita, do you still think Dandel is scum? Hey I tried really hard to be the easiest target, take that back
|
|
On August 30 2013 22:34 kitaman27 wrote:I find Koshi's attempt to use his role to benefit other roles incredibly pro-town. What exactly were you trying to help by making this vote? Did you have a mafia read on him? Do you disagree with my assessment? Kita, this tunnel is approaching Rayn territory. You're asking a lot of useless questions you could find out very easily by reading the thread. I thought he might have been scum since he 'agreed' with Clarity thinking I was scum but it turns out what he agreed with was my stance on lurkers.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:34 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 30 2013 22:31 WaveofShadow wrote: Oats, what makes Dandel the easiest target in the thread, and what makes me scum? (The VA thing is believable.) dandel hasnt done jack shit. And his scum meta is trolling the shit out of the thread. How is he not the easiest target. You're scum for not doing shit
Just to be clear, you want to lynch me for pushing Dandel, which you view to be a valid scum suspect?
|
On August 30 2013 22:34 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 30 2013 22:31 WaveofShadow wrote: Oats, what makes Dandel the easiest target in the thread, and what makes me scum? (The VA thing is believable.) dandel hasnt done jack shit. And his scum meta is trolling the shit out of the thread. How is he not the easiest target. You're scum for not doing shit K Oats, nice to have you with us.
|
11589 Posts
On August 30 2013 21:31 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 30 2013 14:19 Dandel Ion wrote: While I have not read the role PM yet (DEAL WITH IT), I will probably have the same role as him (it's likely, but one can never be sure) How original. This was just so fun the first five times someone did this that I can totally understand. Show nested quote +On August 30 2013 19:59 Dandel Ion wrote: Hello and good morning peoples.
In light of the truth and only the truth, I will henceforth play the game as such: 1) lurking 2) trolling 3) spamming 4) blatantly playing anti-town
are nowadays TOWNTELLS. Therefor, people doing these things I will consider confirmed town by sitemeta. snb is automatically confirmed town because he always does 1) 2) and 4) (while attacking people for doing the same thing, which is actually town-point 4.5) btw )
Scumtells are now: 1) playing the game 2) being reasonable and/or calm 3) decent activity 4) being "pro-town" 5) trying to find a lynch (lynching is mean)
As such, ##Vote Koshi
With Regards, Dandel, Master of Meta Mafia podcast thread has an entire discussion about how mafia players will start to take advantage of the troll meta and there is no reason for a town player to play like this. Proceeds to over the top troll. Policy lynch time! ##Dandel Ion oh, this was kita's first post
actually, he is a good lynch.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:35 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On August 30 2013 22:34 kitaman27 wrote:On August 30 2013 21:21 WaveofShadow wrote: Ooo! Can I help? ##Vote: Koshi I find Koshi's attempt to use his role to benefit other roles incredibly pro-town. What exactly were you trying to help by making this vote? Did you have a mafia read on him? Do you disagree with my assessment? Kita, this tunnel is approaching Rayn territory. You're asking a lot of useless questions you could find out very easily by reading the thread. I thought he might have been scum since he 'agreed' with Clarity thinking I was scum but it turns out what he agreed with was my stance on lurkers.
No need to call it a tunnel or call me useless. It's a lot easier just to respond honestly. You made a vote that I disagree with. Your reasoning was weak and now I'm looking to better understand what you are thinking.
Do you disagree with my assessment that his role claim was incredibly pro-town?
|
Dandel town.
Lol........
Hi WoS, do you want to defend yourself?
|
On August 30 2013 22:38 Oatsmaster wrote: Dandel town.
Lol........
Hi WoS, do you want to defend yourself? Nope. GL with that.
Kita, I don't disagree necessarily but it wasn't much of a rolelclaim. It was an item claim and it's very easy to lie about what it is/what it does. You'd know about that, Weeping Angel.
I didn't take that talk into account at the time.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
By the way, I think people need to strongly consider multiple large mafia factions based on the OP and the fact that GreYMisT didn't want to rebalance from 31. A 6 man mafia team and 1-2 third party is really easy to rebalance, but something like 5-4-1 is much more difficult.
|
On August 30 2013 22:46 kitaman27 wrote: By the way, I think people need to strongly consider multiple large mafia factions based on the OP and the fact that GreYMisT didn't want to rebalance from 31. A 6 man mafia team and 1-2 third party is really easy to rebalance, but something like 5-4-1 is much more difficult.
Well that's an odd thing to say. What exactly do you want us to consider? Like, what changes in the way we're playing based on this possibility?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:47 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On August 30 2013 22:46 kitaman27 wrote: By the way, I think people need to strongly consider multiple large mafia factions based on the OP and the fact that GreYMisT didn't want to rebalance from 31. A 6 man mafia team and 1-2 third party is really easy to rebalance, but something like 5-4-1 is much more difficult. Well that's an odd thing to say. What exactly do you want us to consider? Like, what changes in the way we're playing based on this possibility?
The trap of giving too much town cred to a scum player who kills or lynches another scum faction.
|
11589 Posts
On August 30 2013 22:46 kitaman27 wrote: By the way, I think people need to strongly consider multiple large mafia factions based on the OP and the fact that GreYMisT didn't want to rebalance from 31. A 6 man mafia team and 1-2 third party is really easy to rebalance, but something like 5-4-1 is much more difficult. Seems weird that you're thinking about multiple scum teams.
Disappointed by the number of your buddies?
|
hasnt happened yet kita lol....
|
Why exactly do you bring that up kita? I think it's pretty clear from the OP?
|
On August 30 2013 22:48 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 30 2013 22:47 Clarity_nl wrote:On August 30 2013 22:46 kitaman27 wrote: By the way, I think people need to strongly consider multiple large mafia factions based on the OP and the fact that GreYMisT didn't want to rebalance from 31. A 6 man mafia team and 1-2 third party is really easy to rebalance, but something like 5-4-1 is much more difficult. Well that's an odd thing to say. What exactly do you want us to consider? Like, what changes in the way we're playing based on this possibility? The trap of giving too much town cred to a scum player who kills or lynches another scum faction.
Oh that's a fair point I guess. But surely later in the game it'll be revealed to us in the flipped role pms? I've never played in a game with multiple mafia factions before, but they have their own wincons and flavor, right?
Anyway this is all stuff we don't need to concern ourselves with yet.
@Oats please explain why you say kita is going for the easiest target (dandel) when he policy voted him and then went on to other things immediately?
|
what Clarity? How does kita calling it a policy lynch nullify my point? I dont understand.
|
|
|
|