|
On August 11 2013 01:49 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On August 11 2013 01:35 Oatsmaster wrote: town can techinically win on day 2 too.
Show how his meta differs from the start of the game as opposed to now geript? No, different meta from his previous games that I was exceptionally familiar with his games but I think he preferred play style has changed drastically. So meta is not applicable basically. Why/what made you decide that? Any specific posts? Seems like a really weird thing to happen.
|
Because his whole posting style has remained consistent throughout this game while being completely different. I can understand his though processes still in a way that's similarish to before (despite no "moc logic" yet). I just realized that how I previously read him wasn't applicable anymore between following this game and from what Mocsta had told me when we were talking before the game.
|
Ok so what makes mocsta town? Cause that whole paragraph above is way too confusing.
|
I think the 2 anti-town are phaga/hapa... by process of elimination moc is town.
|
|
|
Oats, why in the fuck do you have to be so damn bad? I swear to god that I'm policy lynching you for being fucking awful at this game from now on.
|
On August 11 2013 03:55 geript wrote: Oats, why in the fuck do you have to be so damn bad? I swear to god that I'm policy lynching you for being fucking awful at this game from now on. I am totally and utterly confused at the anger geript. You arent close to dying. No one currently is convinced. Everyone is wrong sometimes. Everyone thinks im town. So convince me you arent scum.
But. Why arent you mentioning that we lose the game if we lynch you?
|
Because you're stupidity isn't going to get me lynched unless you also get Moc to vote for me. Your rampant stupidity is the problem.
|
On August 08 2013 14:58 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 14:40 Blazinghand wrote: Rules clarification re: endgaming the jester
A jester endgamed by town loses. A jester endgamed by scum gets a "partial victory" I suspect scum asked this question as i can't imagine town thinking about this.. I know I certainly didnt Hmmm I imagine this changes the game somewhat as now scum have the option to bandy up day2 and are probably playing the lurking game.. Where are u phagga.... ok so this is the only post in page 1 that makes me think Mocsta is town. Real or Fake...
|
On August 11 2013 04:06 geript wrote: Because you're stupidity isn't going to get me lynched unless you also get Moc to vote for me. Your rampant stupidity is the problem. So why are you so angry? My stupidity makes you angry? You must be angry a lot then. Why do people always get angry when I want to lynch them. Its disturbing and not at all good for convincing people.
|
I gotta go to sleep. So hapa better show up, and mocsta and geript need to show me they are town before im voting for phagga.
|
On August 11 2013 04:09 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On August 11 2013 04:06 geript wrote: Because you're stupidity isn't going to get me lynched unless you also get Moc to vote for me. Your rampant stupidity is the problem. So why are you so angry? My stupidity makes you angry? You must be angry a lot then. Why do people always get angry when I want to lynch them. Its disturbing and not at all good for convincing people. Here's a hint, because you're rampantly obnoxious or stupid. I just got out of a game with you where you intentionally derped for what 3-4 days and got mad because people wanted to lynch you or vig you. And you can't understand this. I'm fucking obv town and you're too dumb to realize it. Why do you think I'm mad?
|
On August 11 2013 04:14 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On August 11 2013 04:09 Oatsmaster wrote:On August 11 2013 04:06 geript wrote: Because you're stupidity isn't going to get me lynched unless you also get Moc to vote for me. Your rampant stupidity is the problem. So why are you so angry? My stupidity makes you angry? You must be angry a lot then. Why do people always get angry when I want to lynch them. Its disturbing and not at all good for convincing people. Here's a hint, because you're rampantly obnoxious or stupid. I just got out of a game with you where you intentionally derped for what 3-4 days and got mad because people wanted to lynch you or vig you. And you can't understand this. I'm fucking obv town and you're too dumb to realize it. Why do you think I'm mad? So bluelightz? I dont recall being mad about that.
Bringing past behavioral history into games to shout at people is NEVER going to end well geript. Each game is different. Dont do it. Also you want to win the game right? So swallow your ego or lose it cause you make me sad and I vote with phagga and hapa.
|
Look, you can choose to be bad and vote with at least one person who you are 100% sold is anti town, or you can vote phagga. your choice.
|
On August 11 2013 04:18 geript wrote: Look, you can choose to be bad and vote with at least one person who you are 100% sold is anti town, or you can vote phagga. your choice. I dunno about that 100% sold part anymore you know.. .
Mocsta jester you scum?
|
So Mocsta is now trying to get lynched?
|
On August 11 2013 04:25 geript wrote: So Mocsta is now trying to get lynched? yes in fact. Ok so for me, Hapa has good posts, Phagga has good posts, both of you DONT.
|
Hapa has good posts? Where? Now you're just being fucking retarded.
|
On August 11 2013 04:28 geript wrote: Hapa has good posts? Where? Now you're just being fucking retarded. good postOn August 08 2013 06:01 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:34 geript wrote: Here's the way I see it. The unlynchable claims and isn't counterclaimed that means that we're lynching in a pool of 4; it narrows the scope of who we need to look at. Assuming a townlynch D1 (scum/jester lynches are moot), if scum chooses to hit the unlynchable, then it's a 50/50 shot of winning for every team essentially.
If the unlynchable is counter claimed once, then things get dicey as it could be either scum or jester. I had a plan for this but it's moot now.
If the unlynchable was counterclaimed twice, then we have no worse than a 50/50 shot of winning.
So the plan on forcing the claim isn't worthless like Hapa said. It actually bothers me that he thought it was. I want him to respond on why he thinks the correct claim for every role would be VT regardless of their actual role. The unlynchable townie should not claim... because he can't be lynched! The only way he can die is if he gets shot, and claiming puts a direct target on his back. You want him/her to claim to make things easier, but we would actually benefit more from having discussion and no-lynching the player rather than having him/her claim and getting insta-shot Night 1. Show nested quote +On August 08 2013 05:41 geript wrote:On phagga. He looks like he's absolutely trying to get lynched. He just keeps on making these obvious non-towny sentiments in the thread. On August 08 2013 02:55 phagga wrote: The reason I objected had to do with the fact hat I tried to figure out geripts intentions and that I think town should be kept on a need to know basis. This is a really big key for me: On August 07 2013 16:31 phagga wrote: Ok, I have my own thoughts on this for later, but I guess it's worth a try.
I'm VT.
Which obviously means that at least one of you two is lying.
You notice that he has no interest in following through on this. He "knows" that one of Oats/me are liars. But his continuation isn't to try and pressure either Oats, myself or Hapa (when he claims). He wants to focus on talking about the plan. Summary: It looks like he's trying to be lynched aka Jester. At worst, scum trying to be the jester. Nothing about either of these posts strike me as off or even "jester like." Him disagreeing with your plan is completely reasonable (since I can't even think of a good reason for it), and him not pursuing you or oats within a couple of pages of the game.
Anyway I think Mocsta is scum. All his posts are completely contentless so far. For example, take this post: Show nested quote +On August 07 2013 22:59 Mocsta wrote: 1. phagga is rubbing me the wrong way majorly. I dont like his response to me calling him a jester, and I don't like his reasonings for withholding "information" regarding claiming.
2. I think oats is dumb for giving geript so much credit for coming up with a plan. a. he claimed vt instantly...which usually happens in any game b. the plan was shite and to me still doesn't make sense even with phagga attempt to expand. ====== What do town want 1. Avoid lynching jester 2. Lynch scum, if too hard then lynch lynchproof
What do mafia want 1. Avoid lynching jester 2. Lynch lynchproof 3. Lynch townie
Why lynchproof first? Because it increases odds of non-jester lynch on day2.
What do jester want? 1. Ask phagga
I guess jester is like SK with balancing act. Want to keep low profile to avoid being shot, but still need to be scummy enough to be lynched. I wouldn't be surprised if jester claimed lynchproof on day2 as a last resort either. ==== The problem with the plan... Whilst its obvious to anyone claiming vt is normal play.... geript thinks it is wise to devise a plan hinging upon identifying lynchproofs...hhmmmmmmmmmm. and who wants to hit the lynchproof on day1.... Mafia does.
He calls Oats "dumb" (which is both unnecessarily inflammatory AND trusting - why is Oat's "dumb" instead of "scum"). And he seems to be calling phagga simultaneously the jester and a scum-suspect without really making it clear why he thinks either. Phagga's reaction to Mocsta calling him Jester seems absurdly irrelevant, especially when Mocsta doesn't clarify anything about it.
|
|
|
|