EPTI am in the other newbie, and it's my 4th game.
Newbie Mini Mafia XLVI
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
I am in the other newbie, and it's my 4th game. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 03 2013 21:53 Onegu wrote: Isnt this your 5th game Alakaslam? NMM XLIII, XLIV, NWM, XLV. So this would be your 5th game correct? Yes. Other newbie is my fourth | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
I am that hard to understand? I am in other newbie right now That game is my fourth game on TL {no wait they weren't all newbies so this is accurate} Therefore Umasi should be able to join. And has been let in, so no need to emphasize this /replace (as I know for a fact it is my fifth here and likely my sixth as when XLV finishes I'm headed to the first to start of Aperture, Noir, or Hydra, in that order) XD Anyway I really had better take a look at composition. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 04 2013 00:50 Onegu wrote: Mod font is bolded good to know. Actually looks pretty cool thin but yes, bolding really helps especially for phone posters like me. Usually we have to zoom in to see anything but if Bold not necessary. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 04 2013 00:54 cDgCorazon wrote: I can count Alakaslam. This would be your 5th game. Don't act like I am an idiot if you want to play at all. I'm not, I'm acknowledging my inability to write. I am agreeing with you. I never tried to in, check it out! I am fully aware that I am ineligible. In fact I also am pointing out I may become ineligible to replace, and therefore not to rely on it, because I plan on joining other games as well. I was just trying to point out Umasi's eligibility by saying I would be ineligible for the game I am currently playing if he was ineligible for this. BTW, if I offended you, we are of one blood, ye and I! For I often have the same perception. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 04 2013 03:28 cDgCorazon wrote: Sorry maybe I can't read either. That's why I suck at mafia. Even if you do sign up for another one I will probably still let you replace. Replacements are so valuable in newbies that when you find one you never let it go. Ok. Besides I'm likely to wait for aperture. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 04 2013 11:33 iVLosK! wrote: Me and alakaslam are well aqcuainted. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 04 2013 11:34 Umasi wrote: hyyyyype slam we still need to hydra sometime When this finishes. Hydras not ok in newbies. Yes we should, somewheres, unlikely in hydra mafia however. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Jaedong FTW Liquid'Hero FTW | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
WhiteRA FTW | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 06 2013 10:08 Blazinghand wrote: Just because there's nobody for me to coach doesn't make me any less of a coach! PS if it turns out you actually are short a coach I can coach scum also If you coach 3p in a game with no 3p Does that mean you can coach anyone who asks regardless of alignment? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 06 2013 17:06 OmniEulogy wrote: /replacement no clue if I played 3 or 4 newbie games it's been a long time either way. If you need another player I have the time though ^^ If it's only 3 I'll /in though  Welcome to the club | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 11 2013 06:49 DeusXmachina wrote: Okay. I must say, despite my misperceptions of my own performance, the game was still very fun. /in Umasi you should stay in. You are uber good. Whats more important? A good education, a bright future, a good job or being UBER AWESOME at mafia? Common, the answer is obvious. Also I want to try and lynch you day one to enact my revenge. Muahahahaha. Fixed. Keep putting up reads, understand though that a newbie requires more caution between seeing bad town vs scummy. Remedy? Coaches. Guys I practically wasted my newbies basically by talking to coaches only when I was in mind-boggling trouble. Don't wait. Mafia is not flying an airplane. You don't learn by flying solo; you learn by BEING TAUGHT or studying. So just pick a random time and piss off your coach before you stop chatting with him/her. (A little hyperbole there). Feel free to quote the thread, ask I something is scummy etc, because this will help you learn how to make reads. I was barely getting by, because of actually all 3 coaches but how Geript helped is a different story (helped depersonalize the game a bit) but basically I would have ceded even faster. If I had sought coaching earlier, I might have avoided a lot of the trouble I created for myself. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
That being said Augh! | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
I see vlosk! I see win such as this On June 06 2013 13:05 iVLosK! wrote: First underline: Ask that other guy from OMGUS who my vote is on. I give literally zero fucks about your FOS's. In my original post where I "excused myself for future scumminess" or whatever, I was simply stating that I'll do what I want regardless of what you think is scummy. If I don't want to vote for a lurker, I won't. And if I feel like voting for a lurker, bet your fine ass that I will. Regardless of what I've said in the past. Second underline: Maybe you should adjust what you think is "scum-like." I would suggest it, actually. If you and I are going to be friends. I would like to be friends. Also "since I feel confused, you are therefore scum." is literally the dumbest thing that I have ever heard in my life. And I actually laughed quietly to myself upon reading it. I can see what Onegu is talking about And, of course, I see the offsite win too. This will be fun to keep up on, even if not replace needed yoda | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 04 2013 11:15 Onegu wrote: If you are unfamilar with iVlosk check out my first game of mafia NMMXLII. I thought he was good times, umasi and xzavier might disagree though. Alakaslam you should like him. Oh- well, herpaskerp Be not offended by that which cometh from the ivlosk!. The great abrasive nature of posting does not mean if thou meetest irl that punchings within the face would ensue. Ingame, many shall pull ahead by chucking manners. I choose not to (although I still do anyway at times), but must be ready for those who does. For the chucking of manners is not personal; if it is, why, how does Like I dunno It maketh less sense than malice without malice | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 12 2013 13:34 Hapahauli wrote: Can /coach town if need be On August 12 2013 12:05 Chromatically wrote: Protip on coaching: make a QT, give it to your coach, and just post whatever you're thinking about there. You never forget to use it, and the coach can comment on whatever he needs to. Was, is, like, this, the, Uh Well. Faugh | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 13 2013 03:38 Chromatically wrote: I thought about posting the QTs after my games but I was a little too embarrassed over some of the things I said... Better than not doing altogether. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 13 2013 23:46 Onegu wrote: When daypost goes up I will send out obs qt, if anyone else wants it PM me Sure give it to me so that when I replace the player goes from nothing to ALL POWERFUL GENIE!!!! | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 14 2013 12:43 Blazinghand wrote: The early cheese gets the bird but the mouse gets the second worm. I raise you a cat to the second power; call APS it's out. Whole city. Can't even get me my McDonalds or my gasoline. WHOOOOOOOOUGH! my... Old... Heh, heh, flaayme? + Show Spoiler + I understand I have posted this. Follow my troll I dare you. None so blind as that which will not see, You do not see this but I SAW THIS EYE! SO I REMOVED THE OTHER EYE! THAT EYE THAT KEPT WINKING AND BLINKING AT OTHER MEN! IT WAS Make, I was ist, irlgh, is, is... Like spike jones from lurkers Chloe. + Show Spoiler + http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/InsaneTrollLogic | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 15 2013 00:04 cDgCorazon wrote: Still have not gotten confirmation from 3 people. I'm giving then 12 more hours to respond and if they do not respond I will kick them out and open sign-ups again. Their attempts at love were only imitations of my old flame. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 15 2013 04:32 LoneMeow wrote: Better this way than having the game ruined by modkills, I suppose. Are the non-newbie games as bad when it comes to signing up and then not actually playing? Far as I can tell no. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 15 2013 06:49 justanothertownie wrote: If you still feel the need to boot someone before starting the game I would gladly step in. Otherwise I leave it up to the guys who are over the newbie limit and waiting for their chance (I will obs in this case). Just / I n my good man. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
I have responded. I am sorry there weren't enough true newbies. . . | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 04:58 LoneMeow wrote: Obviously lynching confirmed town because of a lie would be silly, but what about someone most have a weak scum read (or even null) on who's caught lying? Still prefer a lurker lynch over him? While we're on the topic of lurking, do you think there's any real difference between lurking and posting but being useless? Would you (policy) lynch someone who posts but doesn't have any real content? Rrgh Yes I get it. I will be more concise when unsure and post better cases and stuff. And I know I'm not usually fun to have around at LYLO, so I will try and see if I can change that this game. However+ Show Spoiler + page 35 FTW Hi reps)squishy Sorry about last time This is why please, guys, lynch for info- fine, but when it is clear someone is just playing badly... Lets not hasten to LyLo. (I hate Lylo in case you didn't notice). I think iVLosk! is a great guy to listen to in that case assuming he isn't scum. Doesn't look like scum so far- but skilled scum never do... He has been helpful however, and I like the point about captain obvious-ing around. If someone asks by all means reply. But let us not waste time clearing up stuff like that, that people should know from reading guides or asking coaches. So here I am! I'm here off & on for a bit, any questions? I mean, I know it's early but that is kinda my point. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Is epic, I need an upgrade to mess with you but I can watch you with some energy. I once was a zergling, it was cool. I have been a zealot & stuff This is like I usually do but there it is, remember what happened when I was active all the time... Even worse if you check out NMM XLV I shall improve, nightcat need not be right. How can I be useful at Lylo u know. But what, back to captain obvious bs? Lettuce talk, I wanna see why who is what. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 12:03 Squibbles wrote: Right? Odd. Backtrackin a bit for Policy, even if you wanted to lynch lurkers, liars, and those who post pointless stuff, should there be a level at which the lynch begins. For example yalls version of Lurking could be completely different from each other, where one might thinking lurking is more than 12 hours another might think a day.... We should establish some context, As far as lying, in any sense what if they are lying because they are unsure about you? Wouldnt that make you both the suspects vs just the person that lied, i think depending on the question there should be a level limit there, and those who post pointless stuff, well if you're dodging a question, you're dodging a question, enough said. From what I have seen any longer than 8 hours is definitely pushing it. And I don't think town should lie anyway, truth is easy to remember and getting caught in a lie is tough to explain town or scum- and according to guides, finding scum is a high priority but Priority 1. is stated to be "proving your innocence". Since lying impedes that, no-go IMO. And in the situation where the caught liar implicates his target- no, not really. I say it's WIFOM. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 05:14 DeusXmachina wrote: If you have a weak scum read on someone and they lie, well that might be evidence against them. I would try to understand the intentions behind the lie. Not crazy about the lynch liars policy. I don't know how to define lurking, but people who are being useless are equally as bad as lurkers. In fact, in some situations, I think spammers can be more detrimental to town than lurkers. I equate non-contribution to scum. I am glad you brought this up. I was thinking about this a lot in my last game. Well this is a newb game. Hopefully players can read some of the initial policy and learn what not to do. Lynching people who say stupid stuff got me into a lot of shit my last game. That being said, I am all for aggressive play and doing whatever it takes to weed out scum. Actually it was lynching the spammer- many of the things I said were trying to express my opinions, spamming was me trying to dick around. I promise not to do that anymore except maybe in spoilers if I can't help it. Therefore I am really glad you laid this out. There may be people like me who just get the juices flowing and go nuts, they will disregard you until they are the scummy one tunneling the wrong guy at Lylo- then they will have to fight not to become stimaddict 2.0, (sorry bout that but u know its true  ing one) so like I say- rock and a hard place with "don't spam don't lurk" for me- so gimme a little grace and I will try to help out. For now, I have this:Ivlosk! - town, he is bamcis for lookin so, especially so early, therefore keep an eye out for even more badass scum play later if I am wrong (and I am wrong often...) HolyFlare- kinda early. I'm null, in fact, I'm null on everyone but ivlosk! and myself. It's pretty early guys. "Speak up!" -Seige Tank Driver (selected, Starcraft 2) Fellows, pleeeze!! | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 13:05 DeusXmachina wrote: Okay, sounds good. Biggest scum reads so far, Xzavier and reps. Lol at reps if he becomes a day 1 lynch again. Why am I suspicious? Well, they are lurking, and as I previously mentioned, lurking will not be tolerated. Pretty much neutral on everyone. Although, I am leaning slightly town on JAT. Careful of posting pseudo lurker lists... Look. That is the easies thing for scum to do to try and look town, 1, and 2, if we have vigs, they can shoot into lurkers and we lynch other lurkers till there are none. So it is established that you can't lurk and get by this game. Stating their scumminess other than to explain a vote on them is now irrelevant, lets stick to discussion about actives. Then, before the deadline (close as you can get) vote for a lurker or someone you find scummy- who may have more of a chance turning out to be scum than someone who wanted blue or irl'ed or whatever causes people to do this stuff. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 13:59 LoneMeow wrote: Wow, that's harsh. I guess you don't like sleeping in very much?-) Personally, I think any hard deadline is a bit pointless and likely leads to zero content "I'm still here!" posts. In fact, I don't care so much at all about the post counts, it's the amount of content that really matters. Oh, that's interesting, I'd like to hear your reasoning. Personally, I'm pretty much null on everyone but slightly wary of iVLosK! - while his "policy" about posting obvious stuff indeed makes a bit of sense in late game it felt like he was trying to stifle what little conversation we were trying to get going at that point, which isn't very pro-town. I have a tendency of misreading players like him though, so I have to tread carefully here. THANK YOO For elaborating the hidden point! You win a prize An explanation from me; why did I spam it up all crazy? Because be gone for the first 7 hours of your first game, post photos of your actual dinner in thread to explain, and BAM- scummy lurker reputation and mislynch. Halloooo! So. Now y'all can see. Lurking isn't cool, but give ppl a bit of a break. I'd say 24 hours unacceptable. 18 hours wary. 12 hours, eh, annoying. On iVLosk!- you don't know him, he's like that. He doesn't put up with BS. He is not actually a newb, this is like running into Plexa on some forum he has yet to visit- he looks new but he is an Internet veteran. iVLosk! Is a skilled player and I would hate to lose him as town. That being said keep an eye on him because I'd hate to be one of his targets... And Ace, Chezinu, NWM- how they Svengali me! My reads are worth little... But not nothing | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 14:08 LoneMeow wrote: By the way, we don't have vigs. Read the game setup. Your point is valid though, discussing lurkers (especially this early) is pretty pointless. Oh yeah, this isn't persona 4- herple diddly skerple xD Well then yeah like u said its what, half of one real day in. Give them some moar time. ... Yeah. But also, iVLosk not trying to stifle talk, trying to improve talk. Read deus filter anyone? Deus please elaborate, lurking > lying for scummy? Why should town bother with lies? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 14:49 LoneMeow wrote: I actually do somewhat know his style, we were both in a game with him earlier, and that's why I said I need to be careful on how I read him, since he's a likely misread for me. Since it seems to be just you and me here, let's talk about something. Your thoughts on Squibbles' first post? Can you be a little more specific? I thought I addressed it right after it, above my Chloe post... | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 14:49 LoneMeow wrote: I actually do somewhat know his style, we were both in a game with him earlier, and that's why I said I need to be careful on how I read him, since he's a likely misread for me. Since it seems to be just you and me here, let's talk about something. Your thoughts on Squibbles' first post? Oh, cool. Also that is squibs second post on the entire site, reps has taught me to not know what to expect when 100% fresh. That being said seeing iVLosk and knowing him offsite makes me understand that that could mean little with regard to being new. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 14:56 iVLosK! wrote: There are plenty of reasons to lie as town. Part of this game is misleading scum about what your own abilities and intentions are. A veteran, yes. One in possession of much skill, not quite. Much respect though, Slam. Never even crossed my mind, and I think I see why... Well ok then! That clears a growing FoS I had toward deus for now. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 15:05 cDgCorazon wrote: Another announcement: Voting is done in this thread. There is no separate voting thread. Thank you. Most ppl are probably going to say "no, thank YOU!", last newbie games I almost posted this vid to express my sentiment but direst not wanna be jerk. Now it would not really be jerk of me because I said so. Right off the bat | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 15:10 DeusXmachina wrote: WIFOM = wine in front of me right? FoS = ? Is there a list of this shit I can look at? I kinda got it by osmosis. Finger of Suspicion. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 15:11 LoneMeow wrote: You addressed the content itself, but I was more curious of your thoughts of it as a first post. Did it seem like the way a town player would enter the game? http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=424098 Check my reads. Why? You are suspicious? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 16 2013 20:37 LoneMeow wrote: Ok, I see. What do you think of this game so far, any reads? Well I can answer this. So far, I'm liking iVLosk!. If I were still messed up on the lying thing I would have pushed (perhaps even tunneled) DeusXmachina into the ground based on that. That being said, one rolling scum might implicate the other for the same reason. This is highly unlikely, however, based on iVLosk!'s advice & etc. So like deus, I'm looking for activity from the current "lurkers", if I don't see what I would like to see by the time I wanna see it? Voting into that. Also I'm considering squibbles a bit of a lurker, he may have actually posted, however he only really made one post and seemingly left. Also, that post was called into suspicion by another player- which will always prick my ears up! But by his own logic plus lone, and my reply to lone, he's got about 10 hours I guess. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 01:08 iVLosK! wrote: Slam, I know that you and Coag go way back. Would I be safe in assuming that the 4 newbie games you have on this site (and the couple I've seen on OMGUS) are not your only games? Actually that is all of it. Back when, here upon the vast TL, I noticed certain blog and poll monsters- the author of which was the one to whom we refer. Having recently discovered the private message function, I used it during his comic to say foolish things. Whereupon he told me, "Forsooth, thou shalt attempt the Mafias"- and having not even thought of the games at all recently at the time, thought unto myself, "what is this? For though it seems Starcraft hath a secret society, I need not be tasked with such things as that might be (truly I thought mayhap there were Team Liquid hit men going around) and declined. Took me until shortly before NMM XLIII to wake up and smell the roses xD | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Seems we aren't very active On August 17 2013 03:19 Holyflare wrote: Here's the run down so far, yeh it's early but /care Stuffz going down: + Show Spoiler + On August 16 2013 12:03 Squibbles wrote: Right? Odd. Backtrackin a bit for Policy, even if you wanted to lynch lurkers, liars, and those who post pointless stuff, should there be a level at which the lynch begins. For example yalls version of Lurking could be completely different from each other, where one might thinking lurking is more than 12 hours another might think a day.... We should establish some context, As far as lying, in any sense what if they are lying because they are unsure about you? Wouldnt that make you both the suspects vs just the person that lied, i think depending on the question there should be a level limit there, and those who post pointless stuff, well if you're dodging a question, you're dodging a question, enough said. Here we have squibbles pointing out what I find to be obvious but what many of us failed to say. He didn't need to backtrack but he did because this is an important point, it isn't beating a dead horse and implies that he'd like further discussion if this arises in the future, I like this guy. Also agrees with not posting bs spam. +++++ Would like to hear more when he's back from work. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Deus started a bit wishy washy but I'm assuming he is being more aprehensive over the last game where he started with full on aggression against reps. + Show Spoiler + On August 16 2013 05:14 DeusXmachina wrote: If you have a weak scum read on someone and they lie, well that might be evidence against them. I would try to understand the intentions behind the lie. Not crazy about the lynch liars policy. I don't know how to define lurking, but people who are being useless are equally as bad as lurkers. In fact, in some situations, I think spammers can be more detrimental to town than lurkers. I equate non-contribution to scum. I am glad you brought this up. I was thinking about this a lot in my last game. Well this is a newb game. Hopefully players can read some of the initial policy and learn what not to do. Lynching people who say stupid stuff got me into a lot of shit my last game. That being said, I am all for aggressive play and doing whatever it takes to weed out scum. I'm liking this post, yet, it seems this game he is going all out aggressive on lurkers. Lurkers annoy me yes but he hasn't really added anything yet in terms of proper content other than elaborating his policy when asked which increases my suspicions of people that are rating him as a town player for now ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Not sure about this lonemeow guy, he has the town mentality sure with stuff like this: + Show Spoiler + On August 16 2013 15:26 LoneMeow wrote: Okay, I see your track record on figuring out first posts isn't exactly stellar :D I want to see people talk about each other, because that makes the game much easier to figure out. I consider his first post pretty much null from a completely new player. On that matter, my reads so far: slightly town on DeusXmachina and Alakaslam, null on the rest. however he hasn't had to talk about other people so I cannot give a good read on him whatsoever yet. If you read this lonemeow I want your full impressions on iVLosK! and Slam. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What I am REALLY quizzical about are why people are riding iVLosK!'s dick so fucking hard, he implies he hate's wishy washy bull shit but has provided absolutely 0 content in his posts so far: + Show Spoiler + On August 17 2013 01:20 iVLosK! wrote: No, past iVlosK!. Not yet. But soon... very soon. This is Squibbles only game post but I like the content on multiple points. I spare thee, and await further posts. This is his only thing that has any merit and it's a line about him agreeing with a post.... like seriously I question the people that lean town on this guy... Stupid obvious shit 1: + Show Spoiler + On August 16 2013 07:41 iVLosK! wrote: I would argue that the rap was very aggressive. Krizz Kaliko does not fuck around. Stupid obvious shit 2: + Show Spoiler + Stupid obvious shit 3: + Show Spoiler + On August 17 2013 01:27 iVLosK! wrote: Anyway, if Xzavier and reps haven't done anything meaningful by the time the Chiefs game ends tonight, I will lower the boom on whichever I deem most worthy. For a guy that states he hates people that talk about "stupid obvious shit" he sure is hypocritical. He's also just devolved into talking about lynching lurkers in his last post, again, no content. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slam... is slam, but this game he's seemed to get his shit somewhat together: + Show Spoiler + On August 16 2013 12:56 Alakaslam wrote: Actually it was lynching the spammer- many of the things I said were trying to express my opinions, spamming was me trying to dick around. I promise not to do that anymore except maybe in spoilers if I can't help it. Therefore I am really glad you laid this out. There may be people like me who just get the juices flowing and go nuts, they will disregard you until they are the scummy one tunneling the wrong guy at Lylo- then they will have to fight not to become stimaddict 2.0, (sorry bout that but u know its true ing one) so like I say- rock and a hard place with "don't spam don't lurk" for me- so gimme a little grace and I will try to help out. For now, I have this:Ivlosk! - town, he is bamcis for lookin so, especially so early, therefore keep an eye out for even more badass scum play later if I am wrong (and I am wrong often...) HolyFlare- kinda early. I'm null, in fact, I'm null on everyone but ivlosk! and myself. It's pretty early guys. "Speak up!" -Seige Tank Driver (selected, Starcraft 2) Fellows, pleeeze!! Confused about his town read on iVLosK obviously and mentioning me over everyone else seems a bit quizzical too as I didn't post much. + Show Spoiler + On August 16 2013 14:02 Alakaslam wrote: Careful of posting pseudo lurker lists... Look. That is the easies thing for scum to do to try and look town, 1, and 2, if we have vigs, they can shoot into lurkers and we lynch other lurkers till there are none. So it is established that you can't lurk and get by this game. Stating their scumminess other than to explain a vote on them is now irrelevant, lets stick to discussion about actives. Then, before the deadline (close as you can get) vote for a lurker or someone you find scummy- who may have more of a chance turning out to be scum than someone who wanted blue or irl'ed or whatever causes people to do this stuff. I like this post but by this nature he should also assume that ivlosk is now scummy (after reading my post/his filter), he has a habit of being swayed easily by people who are expressing pro town interests which you all need to watch out for too. Obviously the game is early and you can't read too much into what he is saying so press him lots <3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ JAT hasn't really added anything other than his dislike of fakeclaims, can't read into him at all so would like to hear more from him too, will push him on people when he is around. [spoiler] /spoiler] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I will push people for reads and things if they are around when I post this I can see where you're coming from there. Reason I think iVLosk is town is pretty much gauging his personality, and the fact that fluff actually makes a good pool for Svengali play- scum mislynch pushes. So his putting an end to that I saw as good. But maybe too quick, I didn't expect it to stifle town... Reps, Xzavier? Whassup? Where be ye? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 07:29 Holyflare wrote: So you liked his rap and pointless posts about being a zergling? Ok sounds reasonable....... Oh wait not really, i want you to filter dive like i have done and specifically point out what it is you like and why It is irrelevant for now why i picked these 2 people Slam if you are still here what are your thoughts on deus and JAT? Dues didn't seem himself and I am suspicious a little. But that was cleared up I think, I've been skimming from work and now that I'm home I'm going to go a little more in depth versus my per usual "tossin' it out there" style. But immediately I remember the whole Lying thing. I mean we don't wanna be all like "hey scum wassup so like I'm cop he's mason with him and that guy is our tracker", but otherwise I would think inconsistency is pretty much all we have to go on for scum hunting. But remember I sux at this... Not an excuse so much as saying "take me with a grain of salt". | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
 Look the thread is only actually a few pages long- the game doesn't actually start until page 10. But here is what I notice, and think: iVLoski may be messing around some- I messed around a lot as town as well, so that's not enough for me but yes, I am aware he could be dangerous scum. I'm Watchin' him and Y'all should too. But I think your suspicion of him has brought out something interesting Holyflare; justanothertownie. look at this On August 17 2013 07:02 Holyflare wrote: JAT what is your opinion so far on ivlosk and also I'd like to hear your thoughts on lonemeow On August 17 2013 07:24 justanothertownie wrote: Why do you ask me about those 2 specifically? Ivlosk: I said earlier I liked his first posts. There isn't anything else to say for me right now. No idea about his alignment. LoneMeow: Sounds reasonable to me. He brought up the policy thing but someone has to start discussion somehow. K look at this- What are your reads JAT?!? Holyflare has asked you for your reads, this isn't the clearest thing in the world and seems pretty reserved. I mean, I understand, I can be reserved, but make a stand- if you are wrong, or someone points out it doesn't make sense, admit it and move on- But don't sheep! Make a position and defense it. (<3 WhiteRa) Speaking of which, Yes Holyflare- I will work on my read on Deus in a minute. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
But please clarify LoneMeow? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
However, most of his filter looks too town for the above to be more than early mistakes like we all made. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 08:15 iVLosK! wrote: I'm hurt babe. I've already examined all of your filters earlier today while waiting for a truck to come in to the warehouse. Well what, I mean, I played along- wait a minute. So Holyflare, why didn't I get any fire for playing along with iVLosk? Did you notice that I posted about "Watching him with 75 energy" & stuff? & "Can't touch him without an upgrade"? But then I was all  iVLosK! the professional scum, and look who Holy tries to lynch.Dang it everyone scummy again, Please xplain ppl. Especially you Holyflare? Was that a meta blind eye or ? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 08:38 Holyflare wrote: I have played a game with you and have become pretty clear on your spam and contribution posts, you have actually posted reads and are willing to entertain scenarios, much like i am, that can force information out of people. While yes you have spam you also have useful bits of info. Ivlosk has really nothing in his favour so far, not that I am totally accusing him but I do not like hypocrisy and he has not contributed YET. This is still obviously early and I'd like to hear more from him. A.K.A. yes. Try not to do that too much though, although it is true, more games are available for my meta than most newbies so I guess cheating in that sense regarding me is ok xD. In fact it may be all I have to go on at Lylo. Me too on hear more from iVLosK! | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 09:07 DeusXmachina wrote: Lets entertain a scenario. Reps or Xzavier are completely aware that the game has started and are intentionally not posting. They don't feel any real pressure so they aim to do several things: A) Contribute nothing to increase the chances of a no-lynch day 1 B) Contribute nothing to avoid mistakes or posts that could get them unwanted attention. or the less likely C) Play a lurker roll so their scum buddy can bus them. How easy would it be to drop in and say, "oh sorry guys I couldn't post because.... blah.. blah.. blah...". Some of you are already assuming that they are just afk. Why are we tolerating lurkers? I haven't voted yet, but I agree- however flare pointed out that when the time comes we'll go after them if they are still lurking near deadline. For now, we focus on actives because that's where it's at. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 09:19 reps)squishy wrote: This one liner is pretty funny. It's like I am not a Lurker ahhh!!! I as far as who we lynch always the most obvious person day1. If you don't have a super obvious person day 1 go lurker. And as the games go on Liars over Lurkers. Some people have alot of IRL stuff going on but if they don't contribute they need to go. As far as Alakaslams videos and iVLosK!'s rap + Show Spoiler + Holla-Holla-Loo-Yuh I am Mafia's big swinging ding-a-ling, make 'em sing. Holla-Holla-Loo-Yuh I am everything you ever were afraid of. Holla-Holla-Loo-Yuh I am Mafia's big swinging ding-a-ling, make 'em sing. Holla-Holla Loo-Yuh Yeah, you rappers bore me, I wanna kill you Do it for me and I'll holla-holla. I do mind it very much. But when it gets repetitive I will not tolerate it. Hiya! Glad you're here. Have you listened to Chloe? The most relevant stuff is up to 0:55 and the most relevant part follows immediately. "You DON'T say!" "WHERE ARE YOU YOU OLD BAT" It's my lurker siren. Better than a list post, as it's more personal. A fast way to state my opinion on it. As for page 35 FTW type stuff I promise not to do that unless you seem like you are actually scum this time. Also, the lynch style is different. So we are more encouraged to stick to our guns. And believe me, I am trying hard to tone it down but I get the juices flowing... I mean really I can be nuts like 3 vids one page & stuff. I promise to not do that here. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 09:38 DeusXmachina wrote: I am growing suspicious of iV. The way he handled holy's pressure seems scummy. He seemed more interested in discrediting Holy than actually contributing. + Show Spoiler + On August 17 2013 09:09 iVLosK! wrote: "I noticed it" =/= "this is scummy". It's sorta more like what you're doing. Putting together a case on me without actually voting me. Read D1 of my first game on this site. I don't like that shit and happily lynch people who do it. This is a good example. Attacks holy and contributes nothing to town. Ok. But I say be wary of conclusion jumping, see what does he say that would contribute? Defending is null, not scummy. How do you establish your innocence if you don't defend when attacked? I didn't realize this another game and refused to defend vs. Hurricane sponge on principle and starte attacking people to defend myself... ... I was almost lynched, and I talked to a coach and he basically said why the hell would you ever not defend- and that defense was the only reason I wasn't lynched. PRIORITY 1: ESTABLISH YOUR OWN INNOCENCE hi | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
The butt doctor And discrediting a player's statements can be a good thing to do. (Eg HolyFlare being scum- haven't ruled that out). If the statement hasn't got merit it should be discredited, right? Disclaimer: do I agree with iVLosk? Possibly. I need to weigh it all. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 09:49 reps)squishy wrote: I read all pages so far. I am suspicious of iV. He believes in lynch all liers and also stated town has plenty of reasons to lie. Is it me or does that seem a little scummy. Proof. 1. 2. (Blinks) Reps, thou hast grown That is straight up pretty good, iVLosk what say thou? Must convince me to move my ##Vote: iVLosK! | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Oh rofl ##Unvote First post sarcastic | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 10:01 DeusXmachina wrote: Seems more egotistical than sarcastic. Indeed! But it is both. So it remains sarcasm... Read the context. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 10:23 iVLosK! wrote: Nah man, it's cool. Wait and see what they come up with in the QT. Rofl It can't be us versus a whole town of scum. Or you mean it's deus, reps, & flare? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 10:32 iVLosK! wrote: Mostly a joke. But people attempting to make something of nothing is obvious scum mentality, somebody just trying to find SOMETHING to say and accuse someone. That's why I had to get firm with the two of them (reps and deus) for a second.. ... Very well. I am lost there you reprimanded them somewhere? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
What West coast man My brother still has our local newspaper with Jerry rice on the front page and you seriously prefer the- Oh Sarcasm conga I mean I don't even follow football but, please say you are not happy sf is losing. Wait This is not ok Do not talk about off topic stuff Suffice to say this? You are in good mood or bad? Am lost | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Naway But thou movest in with us khalifornians? To go hang with Hawaii? Crap I said I wouldn't do this | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 11:08 iVLosK! wrote: We in Kansas tend to look at California with a mixture of disdain, pity, and confusion. Even more so outside the city. Seems they know our politics well. /can't saytoomuch online Yeah. County by county it gets nuts, but it's a great state. Gun in the truck? CA; Huge fine, gotta register all over the place etc. unless you have a good reason, and obey tons of statutes to do it legally when you have said reason AZ: dude laughs at me calls me paranoid enough potassium to destroy an office building? CA; "Move along, move along". AZ: "excuse me. What is the load you're carrying?" ... "I see you are with a fertilizer company. I think you had better tell me what you're carrying son." ..." Ok good. What for?" ... "Ok. ID?" ... "Thank you. Go." And AZ gets a bad rap. Hmm. I think it is just different priorities. So back to mafia: what is who is scum and why isn't anyone else talking? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 11:31 iVLosK! wrote: Gun in the truck? Kansas: No reaction because there's a gun in every truck in Kansas. reps looks like shit for: EDITING HIS FUCKING POST "I fucking mind you coming in and WASTING the very first post of the game (which was totally going to be filled with more useful scumhunting) with a bomb-ass rap song... EBWOP: Wait, I don't mind. So this post is just filler now." He's suspicious of me because he caught me contradicting myself. Okay. I, of course, made it clear that the above was plain sarcasm. And he's done. He's made his D1 contribution and wants to know what others think now. Reps, you claim to hate one-liners and lurkers, but if you take away your first real post (and you did, with that EBWOP), that's about all that you've done here. As it is, you just moved a step up on my "To lynch" list and Deus is going up there with you for immediately jumping on the first wagon he could find when he had just been talking about pressuring lurkers 15 minutes earlier. There are border patrol stations in Kansas? ... Why? And oh man iVLosK!, careful there. You may wanna check out the game to which I refer with "page 35 FTW".... These aren't scum tells with reps. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 13:07 iVLosK! wrote: Didn't realize the joke dealt strictly with border patrol. Mine would be WYCO cops. Which game is that, boss? NMM XLV. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 13:36 DeusXmachina wrote: + Show Spoiler + On August 17 2013 01:16 Squibbles wrote: I can see where the suspicion might lie and the implications of me being a lurker. I run PST and do work so my main times where I will be extremely active will be after 4:30, although I am reading up on all the posts throughout the day. If there are any questions of me feel free to ask, I am rather new so I getting use to all the terminology and what not. So far judging by the posts I am leaning town on deus but I cannot be certain and null for everyone else. It's too early for me to make an educated guess when the majority of people have yet to really reveal intentions. I'm thinking the larger players have been talked about a bit more, meaning they will always be under scrutiny, but that only helps them if they are scum. Only making that of note, not implying anything. I went back and read Squibb's posts and one line stuck out to me. This seems overly defensive. Slam passively called him a lurker but did not pursue it. There was not any real suspicion on Squibbs, yet he felt it necessary to defend himself. Squibb's could you elaborate on why you felt it was necessary to preemptively defend yourself, please. Interesting to note. I do want to see his reply, Squibbles also what are you doing of late, are you afk, reading the thread, filter diving? This game is a lot of time investment be aware. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
##Vote: Xzavier As a placeholder. However the squibbles voting is intriguing. It is a policy lynch based on what may be IRL circumstances. Is there actually something wrong with his posting, other than the lack of it? If not, may want to reconsider... ... As according to his own deadlines, he will likely be modkilled. It is 9:15 on the west coast. Any better reasons though? As the same goes for Xzavier... So if squib is preferable guess what | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Haha yes | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 17 2013 16:08 LoneMeow wrote: Why are you softly defending (and buddying up to) another player again? Didn't you learn from what happened in the last game with Umasi? Please keep an open mind, so far anyone in this game could be scum. I still think you're town though. Who's your current best scum read? Yaknow what? I'm gonna answer this soon, but I could vote iVLosk. I just realized my meta has been pretty stupid because one game I was scum and not paying as much attention to him and the other... Dude he was the cohost xD So him looking badass as a cohost helped me think him being badass and bombastic here was townie. Also, he has been invoking House of Chezinu upon me; talked about Kansas and gun in the truck & stuff & Chezinu had me totes swindled with his bank and his Father being Ace and needing psychoanalysis & etc., such as I refused vote him Shall not fall for that mistake again IVLosk what hast thou to say? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 18 2013 01:29 LoneMeow wrote: When I dropped my vote on Squibbles I was fully expecting him to speak up before the deadline as he had said he's reading the thread during EU daytime. Now that it looks like he might be modkilled/replaced just like Xzavier I'm fully prepared to switch. I'm fully prepared to switch to iVLosK! - as I've stated he seems to be suspiciously timid compared to his style in XLII and the point about not bringing much content that Holyflare brings up has merit. Also, now that you're here, can I have a few reads from you? Reps), iVLosk, and Squibbles, in no particular order, are varying ranges of scummy and townie. Reps) may have a hard time contributing more than he has but one thing I thought was cool about being scum was the potential to look stronger town than usual. However, I don't think noticing stuff like that is the particular sort of thing he would be "empowered" to notice, but then if scum it's the perfect play; Points out slight falsehood, but in that false context incredibly scummy thing Gets some attention IVLosk points out falsehood All suspicion cleared Free towncred, profit Of course this would be in tandem with iVLosk, I'm not convinced entirely yet on him but leaning scummier by the minute, and squibbles is the only other one that makes sense that has posted. Fwiw Xzavier could be this game's sc_a.M; game thrower scum. So the above, though felt quite strongly, has that caveat. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
We all make mistakes. Everything reps has said could be said from a town perspective. Indeed he was town last game and was far scummier there. IVLosk may be simply bringing an OMGUS.net playstyle to a TL.net game, and finding that the new batch of TL players doesn't appreciate it. Squibbles might have been dumped last night and just not thinking about mafia. Xzavier got dumped too. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 18 2013 01:48 justanothertownie wrote: What? Is this based on anything or just a (stupid) speculation? No sir. Their grandmothers died, they died, they got fired, they irl'ed out on us basically Day[9] FTW | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 18 2013 02:04 justanothertownie wrote: Why is this town so inactive? What happened to Deus for example? Is it the timezone? Deadline is in one hour if I'm not mistaken so people should start posting! I will definitely second this. If I am right in my suspicions, IVLosk should be first lynch. If I am wrong we really shouldn't lynch any of them ofc. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
##Unvote ##Vote: iVLosK! | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 18 2013 02:48 DeusXmachina wrote: ##Vote: iVLosK! K. We're you around or did you just get back? I had to get ready for stuff btw, have to go soon, won't see flips till later so I understand, I hope | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 18 2013 02:53 justanothertownie wrote: Man I don't like this... Rrrgh 5 minutes people srsly | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 18 2013 02:56 DeusXmachina wrote: Sorry guys. I couldn't be around this morning. Read the thread. Although I don't completely agree with Holy stance against iV, everyone else seems convinced. Not sold on squibbs. I would rather vote Xzavier but that is clearly not going to happen. Fuck I might change my vote. iV seems to aggressive/antagonistic to be scum. Ok fast fast fast why vote modkill | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 18 2013 02:59 justanothertownie wrote: I thought he wasn't as antagonistic as I would expect according to the description of others about his play. He also didn't defend himself at all... He might not have been here | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 18 2013 03:01 justanothertownie wrote: Why didn't you say that earlier? He wasn't ere | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
##Vote Xzavier | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Cake pie FTW, rofl wow a lot while I've been gone. TT koshi, thanks for the compliment. But when the juices get flowing I get emotional. I didn't feel good about the iVLosk wagon, and Chezinu was at work within me via IVLosk himself and Deus- I tunnel much FTL last game. Page 35 FTW. Offsite, iVLosK! Is bamcis epic bamcis awesomes, but yes it is dumb to let chezinuz swindle me. That being said I really should know better... I should have stuck with the iVLosk vote even if I felt bad about it as it was the only lynch that made sense to me at the time. Going to look at stuff, I don't recommend talk at night ( Indio jones)Will answer queries though | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 18 2013 05:59 Koshi wrote: Ok, so seriously. Those 3 people on Xzavier. Why the fuck would you vote on a 0-poster? HolyFlare had reasons, but they were invalid by the time I did. I was feeling like the iVLosk lynch was ominously bad when deus came in last minute. Well, I forgot that last minute voteswitches are inherently scummy... And therefore here is my light FoS on deus. Because I wanted to see why. And he didnt really tell me and then mods said no more. Well... Take or leave... | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 18 2013 08:10 Holyflare wrote: No, it's a plurality lynch system, whoever has the most votes at the end of the day is voted off not majority, I've even stated that before and so did somebody else earlier when you said we needed more people. Hi. Dang it. This game has so been With all that inactivity bs and whatnot. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
... To this? Cherry pick town mistakes and push agenda and what? Why is he trying so hard to make me look bamcis? When did I ever have skill? I mean, I'm trying to pick it up but man, what you prefer, true spam so you know I sux or this somehow "still spammy" reserved style? You gonna push the LS meter to 110% On August 18 2013 08:34 Koshi wrote: guis guis guis. No worries. Just remember. Need to kill Alaksalam,Holyflare, DeusXmachina or iVLosK. Just kill the one that is the most useless day 2. Alaksalam knows better than to create such a shit environment and to do 0 scumhunting the entire game. And I am certain he knows that voting a 0 poster is horrible. His biggest contribution were giving out general advice. It is a newbie game but I don't like it. You need to get rid of scum. Not of guys that can't defend themselves. Especially when they flip town most likely. This guy is trying to WIFOM me and I don't like it. 5 spamposts in the same minute these are 3 of it. He knows he shouldn't vote for a modkill. He votes for the modkill. And then he says it is majority lynch when it is plurality. So bad it hurts my soul. iV and Alaksalam should be lynched next time unless magic happens on day 2. The other 2 follow closely. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Indio jones | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 18 2013 14:45 LoneMeow wrote: I was so happy that Alakaslam wasn't being... Alakaslam earlier, but it seems he devolved back to himself  Do you realize how much I hate it that instead of reading what you want to say in less than half a minute I have to pause my music, watch some shitty video for a few minutes, then try to guess if you actually were trying to say something with it or if it was just spam? I put a translation and also u r ignoring it why | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Therefore I apologize. But you are right... ... I never post videos with no meaning. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Koshi may be right, but I'm not exactly a fan of nighttime confirming towns either DeusXmachina has been looking bad IVLosk, well looks like he is in same boat as me, I say give him a chance- which we will 2morrow (which comes in 5 hours xD) HolyFlare looks o.k. But only o.k. Finally, I would be suspect of justanothertownie. End night gutreads | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 19 2013 01:39 iVLosK! wrote: I didn't receive a confirmation on the NK I sent. Hehehe "Ja, ja, iVLosk totes skumz yo hehehe" | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Deus man, why didn't you answer me. I should have stayed on iVLosk or something. Man I don't know what to make of the game yet, I have those gut reads but I want to back them up. I can't this calendar day but I will be back during this day phase (tomorrow). Stuff hast come up. Man the consternation, watch me go from being a scumread to 100% scum just because I'm gone. That is exactly what happened to vlosk and probably why I felt bad about it- and that may actually go for deus. What, must I be the town voice of caution or are we to go nuts lynching our own. Last couple games scum wins go figure. But yeah srsly vlosk defend even just a little while I'm gone plz. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 19 2013 13:18 iVLosK! wrote: ... And useless fluff used to appear contributory. Also, apparently I'm supposed to respond to something. If you quote it, I might. Hi I'm back Read Holyflare's filter But basically I need to help convince town we aren't scum team because I went and was an idiot and got wishy washy The juices flow Ok so I voted vlosk because he hasn't been explicitly helpful, and then I remembered my meta impression of him was fallacious... Then I get the juices of reservation flowing and lo and behold deus is reserved too and I think to myself "I was reps hammer last time and in the event iVLosk is messing around to later be bamcis town he would be a great loss as a mislynch crap crap what we do now" and he voted Xzavier and I remembered HolyFlare and was like "oh yeah" and I was in hurry like 5 minutes from deadline so I just did it was not thinking straight and boom. So scummy like "ok let's bus vlosk and then not do it lol and since I think he is so bamcis I should just not make sense" or I don't even know what my scum motive for that mistake is. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 19 2013 14:26 LoneMeow wrote: Wow, that's weak. "He's messing around to later be awesome" is your reason for doing that utterly horrible voteswitch? So who would you lynch today? Honestly don't know yet. I want to read what deus has to say, he was giving me mixed up gut reads and I'm tired ant not thinking best but I can think, I will try. I think at the end of the game night I wanted to lynch deus most ironically. I can't remember why | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Well deus is looking a bit better, but I'm not done | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
I am here now gimme a bit to read. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
The conundrum of liking both deus' & jat's dialogue for town. They are voting each other aren't they? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 19 2013 23:04 LoneMeow wrote: While you're here, give me a read on Omni please? Ok. Reading his filter now. Persona just started but I will still be able to check stuff out. That is why I was afg a bit, if not afk. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Still, wish deus answered me at the time. At least he has said why since. I want to see what OE thinks of deus upon his return. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
You give me the chills for my upcoming duties Onegu | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 00:52 LoneMeow wrote: Wait, so your read is "he's either scum or not"? Care to explain what principle was that voteswitch based on? Yeah. Principle was "I refuse to lynch town and we said we would lynch lurkers and also it feels like I am being svengali'd to vote iVLosK! somehow". In other words, I was practically going nuts, is it impossible to read the intense atmosphere at the time? And lol- good point, but yes my read is idunno, leaning town. I am saying if he thinks it's scum it's my fault anyway, so being wrong is not scummy like I wish it was. Then anyone who accused me would be scum and I'd win every town game :D | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
I personally like him shutting down discussion of the Xzav tomfoolery, because no more suspicion of me- Yay! However, as a Town oriented player, I really dislike it. Why should any discussion be stifled? And here he is using bully tactics too; "It is scummy to talk about it anymore"- no it isn't! Although I wish everyone would just forget it, we need to hash out whether or not scum was involved. I really don't like stifling that. That being said, I think Deus could be thinking about "Priority 1: establish your innocence", so this is the best way to do that. However, it could be "Scum priority: stay alive" so not anything better than null from me. I will keep looking into things and talkin | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 00:50 justanothertownie wrote: I expect more of you. In this post you only repeat what has been said earlier (by me). The most important question for me is: Why do you think scum Deus or slam voted like that if you think iVLosk is town? Why should they make themselves look bad if they could just stay on the active townie instead of the completely useless one? Just clarifying, is this FoS on iVLosK!? Or clearing of Deus, Me, Holy? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
I have no thought to "how likely is Xzavier to be scum" because I was thinking "HolyFlare made a good point about lurking last-second posters, I bet Xzavier does last minute" etc etc- the switch was 100% nervous voter's remorse sheep. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
I would lynch either you or deus xD more likely Deus | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 02:00 LoneMeow wrote: Why? Reasons required here. Also, who was "you" in this? You is JAT but y'all are as convinced as deus last game. Both seem like they could be town I do care who I lynch. It is like what happened to vlosk He was gone, I am only AFPC but still, I can't make detailed reads and stuff from my phone. Deus is stifling the very conversation you guys are having and you jump me lololol See I encouraged this very conversation but nooooooooooo man that is scummier than stifling it oh and btw you are all scummy for discussing this Ya seriously ##Vote: DeusXmachina I be the reps this is your page 35 moment "Hermano! Aiuda me!" (K, I switched now tell me why) "El viva rey!' (Silence, Xzavier is town) "HWOAOAH" Nooooooooooooo! | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 02:29 justanothertownie wrote: No said question can absolutely be answered. I did not ask for the alignment of said players I asked for the reason for Omni's scumread on Deus and Alakaslam and why he thinks they would voteswitch as scum. Pfft just read HolyFlare that's probably all the alakasuspicious that can be remotely loosely said in a nutshell That's like just short of all that can be said short of what is pulled from ass | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 02:36 justanothertownie wrote: I guess the message is you didn't like HolyFlares post, yes? Just replace "slamfish" with "justanothertownie" and see how you likes it, preciousssssss | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 02:48 justanothertownie wrote: You are really not helping yourself with this kind of bs trolling. And what would you do? | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
I am trying to say "what the hell am I supposed to say to that- do you beat your wife?" | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
So I you like holy's case vote me, if not what you want me do. I voted deus, and I think this because he stifled discussion mainly coupled with prior gutread.. So if you MUST discuss me, go for it but don't ask for my take. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 03:49 justanothertownie wrote: I feel so alone here... HolyFlare would you do us a favor and post the rest of your information if you have the time? What's with the other people - Lone, any input? Also Deus has gone mia again... Anything you want from be besides am I scum? I am willing to check stuff out | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
##Unvote: DeusXmachina Beback lemme read | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
My phone is crumming up, I can hardly type this Van fuk u no more gifs use YouTube freaking wickenburg data | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
YEEEESSSSSSS | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 03:57 justanothertownie wrote: I don't know if you are scum. But since I absolutely don't trust my ability to read you I am looking for mafia elsewhere at the moment. If you have the time I guess it would be a good idea for you to have a look at Deus if you really want to lynch him. If you have even more time I would like your opinion on Omni and iVLosk. Well you just got my opinion of PAGE 35 FTW omni is not my favorite person here. He keeps pushing me and deus, I'm not gonna like him a whole lot. From captain hindsight I think he is leaning town. Dude tho iVLosk how is lone Wow Like I must read what you said again | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Rofl so fitting Toldyabro | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Y u all Chezinu me You all look town now when only yesterday you were all scummy... What to say, mayhap I am more omgusy than the react-reading folks, if that is possible. Lone, iVLosk has seen my scum game. He and the rest of town saw through within hours. However if you are super interested you can ask him, he is mod over where that went down. Oh, iVLosK- Chezinu rule/House of Chezinu is the philosophy of TL that a few subscribe to that is basically "make friends not get lynched". One of my biggest goals right now, distracting as it may seem, is to hear from all, who has read and who has not. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Past tense because now that I think too many people are town everyone got kicked to null again. So I will shower, prepare for work, read, and try to give reads. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 23:29 LoneMeow wrote: Wait, what the heck. Your read on Deus is changing so fast I can't even keep track of it. Why did your opinion on him change to town after you made your case on him? Didn't see any reasoning with your unvote. I saw his analysis and whatnot. Now I'm back to null because that makes too many town. Other scumread was jat, who has pretty much done the same thing. Y'all will have to convince me what is wrong with deus but your cases may have already said. Lemme go look. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 23:17 Holyflare wrote: I never brought this point up!?!?! lone did, I never said iv thought deus was town either Oh whoops- are you both scv's? XD yeah that was directed at the person who wanted to know | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 23:10 Holyflare wrote: think you are referring to this, good observation skills I see what confused me, you buttz in  Yeah lone or deus, neither looked all that scummy to me! Jat has redeemed himself in my eyes... I trust the bamcis iVLosK, but should I sheep? Yes, if that is how I truly feel. But I feel lone is town... So I will look at others. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 23:07 Holyflare wrote: Who is to say that you could be town and he knew it so wanted to get on your side? There are a myriad of possibilities and I did not draw any conclusions from it other than his inconsistencies, I am pointing out the shit posts for other people to read. Whether you take from it that you are also scum is up to you, I do not give a shit. ... Chezinu. Sees me say iVLosk repeatedlyLynch Wait dangerous looks bad Buddy up Buddy up to the one who knows the bamcis one, one more townie who won't lynch Deus defense thyself to move my vote is what is say but I'm headed to work. Therefore, deus, if you are town convince the rest unless I somehow get enough data reception to check up near deadline. ##Vote: DeusXmachina | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Help me vlosk, what is up. Can check again in a sec. Digging a hole. ##Unvote Salome has goo data today, maybe I am the only one using atm | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 20 2013 23:54 Alakaslam wrote: ... Chezinu. Sees me say iVLosk repeatedlyLynch Wait dangerous looks bad Buddy up Buddy up to the one who knows the bamcis one, one more townie who won't lynch Deus defense thyself to move my vote is what is say but I'm headed to work. Therefore, deus, if you are town convince the rest unless I somehow get enough data reception to check up near deadline. ##Vote: DeusXmachina K deus, vlosk, Do you see where I'm coming from? Find a fallacy and then tell me who is better lynch and why. You'll probably say lonemeow, but WHY. Even if just restating the case putting it here on last page will help me as I am working and in case Salome data isn't this good forever. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 21 2013 01:57 justanothertownie wrote: Ok, I just reread Deus filter. I urge everyone voting him now to do the same. That's the least you can do. I am not convinced he is scum. As I reread I got the feeling everything up to his last post about me could be a townie who made a big mistake under pressure at the deadline Day1. Before he made that big ass bullshit post on me I was about to consider him town again and I now know why again. It's this post that I liked: It doesn't sound like an impossible scenario to me. The only thing that really frustrates me about him is his tunneling against me. I already stated why his case is bullshit and I won't do this again here. I don't understand why he attacks me and not Omni (I know he leans scum on him but he pushes me instead). I would absolutely attack Omni right now if I was him. He even stated several times that Omni is the one who is pushing an agenda with the Day1 lynch but instead he fucking votes me for laughable reasons. I don't get it. But I also don't see why scum Deus would do this - it's just bad/stupid play. Also it weirds me out how everyone apart from iVLosk voted him without a problem. Either they are a very obvious scumteam (I won't call it impossible) or something doesn't add up here. Any thoughts? I will see if I can find a better target for my vote for now. Check out lone for me ya? Now, brb. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 21 2013 02:04 justanothertownie wrote: I will but Lone isn't someone I would vote right now and I highly doubt this will change after reading his filter. You on the other hand did some very fishy vote and opinion switching again today... Lol Yeah first I haven't switched yet. Second, yes because I'm scum I soooo wanna implicate mysel further. Sorry for the WIFOM but seriously. But yes, I greatly admire the prowess of vlosk, so his statement gives me pause though it is WIFOM; but if the WIFOM is scum side it is just an association case. Now to read | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 21 2013 02:24 DeusXmachina wrote: Slam if you are here, vote JAT. He is scum, I know it!. I have never been more sure of anything in a game of mafia. K after this post? Anyone who chezinu's me too hard will earn a vote from me. Especially if deus flips scum at some point. Still reading | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 21 2013 02:29 justanothertownie wrote: *You are either the worst case of misguided town in the history of mafia* or actually scum. EXCUSE ME. I do not appreciate such hyperbole, especially as I feel I am this myself. I have never been correct on a read far as I can remember. I will not vote based on this but hisssss!!! | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
##Vote: LoneMeow | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Sorry for grammar nawtsee | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 21 2013 02:51 Holyflare wrote: Unvote ##Vote Alakaslam Well hello there. Actually I'm glad you are sticking to your guns. I really could use some confirming of town folks. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
GG town for now Hehehe | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
I did have incognito workin but I never achieved Svengali. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On August 22 2013 21:51 justanothertownie wrote: We had 3 modkills Day1. Of 9 players... It's a pity you weren't around that long, Koshi. You joined and were killed the same night He wa too danyerous, as he thought I was better than I did xD He saw through me when no one else did. | ||
| ||
