Newbie Mini Mafia XLVI - Page 2

On August 16 2013 05:13 Holyflare wrote:
Stupid obvious shit in response to a question that asks for a stupid obvious response is not lynch worthy

On August 16 2013 06:43 justanothertownie wrote:
Because he makes it look like is very experienced and after playing one game this seems odd to me. I would like to know if he is just a show off or actually not really a newbie because it might influence my read on him later on.

On August 16 2013 07:16 DeusXmachina wrote:


If I had to guess I would lean slightly townie on iV because of his aggressive first post (not counting the rap). Although, one post is virtually nothing to go on. Especially the first one. Your guess on iV JAT?

On August 16 2013 08:55 Alakaslam wrote:

So here I am! I'm here off & on for a bit, any questions? I mean, I know it's early but that is kinda my point.

On August 16 2013 12:20 Alakaslam wrote:

And I don't think town should lie anyway, truth is easy to remember and getting caught in a lie is tough to explain town or scum- and according to guides, finding scum is a high priority but Priority 1. is stated to be "proving your innocence". Since lying impedes that, no-go IMO. And in the situation where the caught liar implicates his target- no, not really. I say it's WIFOM.

On August 16 2013 14:13 Alakaslam wrote:



On iVLosk!- you don't know him, he's like that. He doesn't put up with BS. He is not actually a newb, this is like running into Plexa on some forum he has yet to visit- he looks new but he is an Internet veteran. iVLosk! Is a skilled player and I would hate to lose him as town.

On August 16 2013 15:04 Alakaslam wrote:

Never even crossed my mind, and I think I see why...

Well ok then! That clears a growing FoS I had toward deus for now.

On August 16 2013 15:10 DeusXmachina wrote:
WIFOM = wine in front of me right?
FoS = ?
Is there a list of this shit I can look at?

On August 12 2013 03:15 iVLosK! wrote:
Has this game started?

Shall I begin the rape?

On August 16 2013 12:03 Squibbles wrote:
Right? Odd. Backtrackin a bit for Policy, even if you wanted to lynch lurkers, liars, and those who post pointless stuff, should there be a level at which the lynch begins. For example yalls version of Lurking could be completely different from each other, where one might thinking lurking is more than 12 hours another might think a day.... We should establish some context, As far as lying, in any sense what if they are lying because they are unsure about you? Wouldnt that make you both the suspects vs just the person that lied, i think depending on the question there should be a level limit there, and those who post pointless stuff, well if you're dodging a question, you're dodging a question, enough said.

On August 17 2013 07:44 justanothertownie wrote:
I'm talking about the posts you labeled stupid obvious btw.

On August 17 2013 08:00 justanothertownie wrote:
Hm? I meant the posts he listed.
Relying on modkills for lurkers is really scummy btw. Good thing you say you would vote them if they keep lurking Holyflare.

On August 17 2013 07:51 Holyflare wrote:
All his posts are pretty much non contributory. I genuinely think reps is afk if he hasn't posted yet, no idea about xzavier but it frustrates me, if they don't talk at all it's a double modkill and therefore we should focus on the people who are talking. I swear to god if another bs lurker happens like last game with a post a day I'm voting them off straight anyway

On August 17 2013 08:08 Alakaslam wrote:

Look the thread is only actually a few pages long- the game doesn't actually start until page 10. But here is what I notice, and think:

iVLoski may be messing around some- I messed around a lot as town as well, so that's not enough for me but yes, I am aware he could be dangerous scum. I'm Watchin' him and Y'all should too.

On August 17 2013 08:42 Holyflare wrote:


I like you drawing attention to this, oh it's scummy to avoid lurkers but then say you want to do the anti lurker thing, seriously? I mean what the hell i don't know if you two are trying to set me up but until the lurkers actually do something talking about them is 100% anti town by way of wasting time. Of course we will lynch lurkers if nobody is under any real suspicion do not be stupid.

On August 17 2013 08:51 Holyflare wrote:


JAT is saying it's scummy and you said "i noticed it too"?