On September 24 2013 05:05 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:Alright so there seems to be a lot of people sheeping this assumption that because I flipped my read on Chairman Ray, I must be scum and must be disposed of. Guess I'll start by refuting that.
So this whole thing starts with yamato calling me scum and then sending out this:
Show nested quote +On September 23 2013 21:47 yamato77 wrote:RE: SentinelHis read on Ray goes from this:
On September 23 2013 07:17 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On September 23 2013 07:11 yamato77 wrote:
I think if you read his posts, he has a clear understanding of what's happening in the game.
I just read his entire filter and he looks exactly like a guy who's playing his second (second? can't be more than fourth since he was previously in a newbie, someone confirm this) game. I don't see what would make him scummy.
To this, 2 hours later:
On September 23 2013 09:39 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
After reviewing Chairman's filter, I have to agree that something is up here. Maybe a little south of neutral in my eyes. Might it be a product of coaching in the newbie game and nothing in this one?
To this, yet one more hour later:
On September 23 2013 10:43 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
I'm reading Ray's filter from newbie, he seems a lot more restricted here than there which is weird. Unless coaches were really on meth (holy shit I was coaching? nobody sent me any questions, I forgot all about it), I can't really say why he would regress in his ability to post substance.
Better than yamato I guess.
##Vote: Chairman Ray
With basically nothing in between except filler posts.
Like I said, he is mafia.
So what happened in those two hours was a realization - during my 07:27 post, I was going off of solely Chairman's current filter in the game, a constricted play that mirrors the attitude I had during my own first game, Hammer Mini.
My mentality was this: He wanted to do something without attracting attention. Yes that's a scum tell under normal conditions, but as someone in his
second third game that's someone who doesn't want to stick out because he doesn't want to get either a) shot, if he is town, or b) lynched, as any role. That's what I see when I look at a post like
this.
You can argue that I'm biased towards townie while yamato is biased towards scum, so we just saw both sides of a different coin. This is also why I voted for him, because I believed that tunneling someone who I believed (correctly, as we later saw) to be town, while having posted several other good reads, is scumworthy - yamato, being biased towards scumreads, was pushing town players and twisting their cases to look scummy.
Then marv comes along and posts this three minutes later:
Show nested quote +On September 23 2013 07:30 marvellosity wrote:
Good grief, Ray's posts looked constructed in his newbie game. That's kinda disappointing.
Now this was the point where I started to question my position on Chairman. I actually ended up discarding my read on Coagulation once I became aware of his meta (I believe marv pointed that one out too), and so I checked out Ray's filter from his other game, Newbie Mafia XLVII.
Much more relaxed and intelligent posting. He pushes a case on LordVelocity which was only stopped by his mislynch. From what I'm able to gather, since I've only read his filter and not the rest of the game, Ray seems to be stirring up discussion, poking at what he believes to be a scumslip and also participating in a discussion pertaining to Umasi, something unrelated to his defense or his immediate target.
His play contracted in style and in Newbie he showed to be capable of doing things (to some extent) that a good townie should - discussing, clarifying, and bringing out things he finds scummy so that others defended them. I actually skimmed Ver's analysis of XXX and remember something in the back of my mind about new blues being very secretive so they don't accidentally get shot or mislynched. I didn't remember it well enough to consider it, but did once I saw Ray flip blue. But at this point I was unaware, so I was beginning to agree with yamato - this guy might have been red after all.
Koshi you never answered my question about the 1/5 lurkersSo here's my mentality at this point, right?
Show nested quote +On September 23 2013 09:39 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
After reviewing Chairman's filter, I have to agree that something is up here. Maybe a little south of neutral in my eyes. Might it be a product of coaching in the newbie game and nothing in this one?
At this point I was also slated to die, but with 3 hours plus I would have some time to contribute to the scumhunt and either push my reads or prolong my own. I was off of yamato, so if I wanted to push, I'd need some time.
Then this happened:
Show nested quote +On September 23 2013 10:38 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:On September 23 2013 10:35 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:
Deadline is in approximately 30 minutes
OP said deadline was at 10 PST?
And this is where I shifted into panic mode. I didn't have 3 hours, I had 30 minutes, and the votecount said I was going to die. I'd rather find a red player to lynch than get mislynched myself. So what do I do? I can't construct a persuasive case in 30 minutes, so might as well sheep someone who I think is scum. Cue me convincing myself through rereads of Chairman's filter that he's playing unusually restrictive, and with my previous defense of him ruled out with the Newbie filter, he must be red.
(##Vote Chairman Ray)
Then he flips blue, I remember Ver's post, and the rest is history.
Show nested quote +On September 23 2013 21:51 marvellosity wrote:
And also, Sentinel has been added to the shitlist. It's not so much that he changed his mind, but the manner is just awful. The same content goes from "nothing looks scummy" to "he is the best chance to flip mafia today" with nothing in between. There's nothing to indicate why the massive change.
Ironic, your post inspired me to do it