EPTTitanic Mini Mafia!
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
| ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On July 27 2013 06:13 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: To make it slightly easier on the Europeans without discomforting the Australasians too much, would anyone have a problem with moving the deadline up 2 hours to 00:00 GMT (+00:00)? This would actually work better for me | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On July 27 2013 06:30 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote: I'll be drunk either way so I don't really care. If you're a Caucasianasian smurf, please don't afk and be drunk all game like you did in NWM. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
 | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
 | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On July 27 2013 07:51 Stutters695 wrote: I might be dead but I still can't get over how hot Kate Winslet was in that movie. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
| ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On July 27 2013 09:01 Vivax wrote: Hi guys, I propose that we lynch the lurkiest guy D1.Obviously if someone looks really scummy then we lynch him first, but if that's not the case then we lynch the guy with the least posts. I think scum really likes to post as few as possible. I know that's gonna look kinda scummy, but I'm going to bed now. Gn! This comes up every game. How scummy does someone have to be for you to want to lynch them over a lurker? You have to consider that lynching lurkers provides very little information whereas lynching scummy people might tell us a lot about how people are related to one another. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On July 27 2013 09:23 Koshi wrote: I was thinking to count to 50. Would have faked it a bit if this wasn't the first post on a page. Can you explain this bit please? | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
Do you think policy lynching a lurker day 1 is a good idea? Why or why not? | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
1) Half the town is lurking or 2) All the active people look genuinely helpful/useful and none of them look like good lynches. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
| ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On July 27 2013 10:56 exarezee wrote: This talk of lurkers is really confusing me. I mean, we SHOULD all know better than to do this. Why is this even being discussed? If someone falls for the "trap" it's mostly due to naivety than anything else. I think we should move the discussion along. As I have not played with you guys before, it is difficult to make tonal reads on Day 1. I already find a few people scummy: koshi and paperscraps. But this is only a slight lean, as i realize some people just post more "scumlike" than others. What? You don't want to discuss it? Are you deliberately trying to stifle discussion? If you don't want to talk about this, then what DO you want to talk about? Also, you are just naming people without saying why you find them scummy. Please explain why. Your suspicions mean nothing unless you elaborate on them. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On July 27 2013 11:26 exarezee wrote: We're obviously not going to lynch a lurker Day 1. To do so would be a terrible play on the collective town's part. If we assume that it's a bad play to lynch a lurker, why are we discussing it? Do you want me to elaborate on why lynching a lurker is bad? I said I have a slight scum read based on gut instinct and feel. I bunch this together into tonal reads. But like I said, it's very slight as I have not played with the players before. There is no need for me to start throwing evidence on people at the beginning of Day 1 (to be exact there is little evidence). My posts have been much better than some of the fluff already being made. I mean, I can go into more detail why I think koshi and paperscraps have posted more scumlike than others who have posted...but that post can wait. I think you should post it now. Why hold back if you are town? You should have nothing to hide from us. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
On July 27 2013 11:35 exarezee wrote: @FirmTofu I'd rather wait until more posts are made. I think only 6 or 7 of the players in the game have posted so far. If you're going to wait, then I'm going to have to vote you until you do. ##Vote: exarezee You can't simply say you have scumreads and not explain them. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
| ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
| ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
I'm not sure that the case on paperscraps has much substance to it, but at least it's something. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
Paperscraps would not be a bad lynch for similar reasons. I'm not as convinced as I am for CJS, but suspicion is still there. Right now, exarezee is looking pretty town. | ||
|
FirmTofu
United States1956 Posts
| ||
| ||
