|
On July 27 2013 12:05 VayneAuthority wrote:
Now that we established that I am confirmed town, clarity_nl is pretty obvious mafia.
He joined teamliquid on Tuesday, 8th of November 2011.
He wants to force a NL.
His posts will provide stunning insight and clarity into the minds of the mafia. Because he is the mafia.
He is even the 3rd person on the list of players and we are looking at a 4 man scum team. That's no coincidence.
Prove me wrong.
##vote: Clarity_nl
Logic tells me that we should all bow down to this idiot. Good thing I don't listen to logic. It annoys me to no end.
|
On July 27 2013 12:00 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:
Scum! I see one!
##Vote: Oatsmaster
My vote still stands, and I believe that it is the correct one for this situation.
Oatsmaster is acting like scum. He is refusing to give us any decent information whatsoever, just mucking up the thread with sarcastic one-liners and not giving us any insight on his opinions or anything.
He is the perfect example of scum trying to blend in and be in the conversation, yet his words hold no meaning and are merely just filler. If you take them out, his filter is left with:
On July 25 2013 21:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
Normal or not man
/in
And that, my friends, is not someone I want to give rum to.
|
On July 27 2013 23:11 Clarity_nl wrote:
Oats isn't blending in, he's sticking out like a sore thumb. Whether that makes it more or less likely that he's scum I'm not sure yet.
But leave your vote where it is, all good, but please give us some opinions other than those on oats.
Let me put it this way:
If I had a gun with one bullet, I would shoot Oatsmaster. For reasons already given.
If I had a gun with two bullets, I would shoot Oatsmaster and VayneAuthority.
"Why VayneAuthority?" you ask? Well, I will tell you.
His first few posts were, in other words, utterly useless shit. He then goes to make a vote post on you, Clarity_nl, which is, in other words, utterly useless shit. The rest of his filter is one liners and, in other words, utterly useless shit.
So VayneAuthority has been playing, in other words, like utterly useless shit.
|
And also, gentlemen,
##Captain: Captain Jack Sparrow
Do it, you know you want to.
|
On July 27 2013 23:19 justanothertownie wrote:
##Captain: Captain Jack Sparrow
You earned it with your last post. I have to agree with you - Oats and Vayne both did not post useful things as of now.
Good man! Take some rum.
|
On July 27 2013 23:21 exarezee wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2013 22:47 hzflank wrote:On July 27 2013 22:25 exarezee wrote:
I think paperscraps and firmtofu are a good 1,2 wagon combo for day 1.
I don't think both are scum, but I think its a high chance one of the two are. Really strange initial votes on me by both of them. I don't understand why I had to be voted because I didn't provide a reason for a tone read I made. Paperscrap's vote is even more bewildering because he states he was "joking in all his posts." So, if they were townies making these votes I would have to assume they are trying to see if anybody jumps on my bandwagon and gain some information from it....but then they really quickly unvote. Just really strange town play IMO. Really can't see this being done as a scum/scum combo. It draws a little too much attention. Again, could be town/town, but I think its really likely a scum/town combo here. How is that post in any way more useful to town than to scum? You think that Paper and Tofu should be the two lynch candidates but do not state which of them is most likely to be scum. If they are both town then having them be the primary lynch candidates would be great for scum. If one of them is actually scum then you posting that without saying which one you think is scum is really not useful, as if one of them flips town you are in a position where you should assume that the other is scum, which give you a really easy excuse to vote for them if you are in fact scum. Basically, telling us which single person you want to lynch is good. Telling us that you want the votes to be between two specific people is really bad. Which of them is most likely to be scum? It's a useful post for those who think I'm town and several people do. it's also useful to have a nice concise argument that one of those two is scum for if/when i die and turn up town.
My question to you is, why are you trying to highlight posts that make you look town! It doesn't help us find scum if you take a post and run around screaming "Guys! I'm town! This is why!".
No. That will earn you a one way ticket into the ocean. Go find us scum, not sit around and proclaim your innocence. It helps no one.
The Kraken is hungry, and I don't think it wants to eat me again. But perhaps it would find you tasty...
|
On July 27 2013 23:33 exarezee wrote:
I forgot to address your other point hzflank.
I think I've stated who is more likely to be scum by the small case I put on paperscraps and the fact that I voted for him.
Why is me advocating the 2 wagons bad? I feel like I will get a lot of useful information regardless of how they turn. My scum lean on paperscraps isn't even that strong...and if he actually was joking then it's a very slight lean. Still, based on their interactions with me and their voting history on Day 1, I firmly believe that one of those two is scum.
Then why do you not vote for FirmTofu?
You just said that you think they are both scum and that you want to vote for them, but you don't think paperscraps is as scummy as FirmTofu. So your vote should be clear. Why is it not clear to you then?
|
On July 27 2013 23:21 exarezee wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2013 22:47 hzflank wrote:On July 27 2013 22:25 exarezee wrote:
I think paperscraps and firmtofu are a good 1,2 wagon combo for day 1.
I don't think both are scum, but I think its a high chance one of the two are. Really strange initial votes on me by both of them. I don't understand why I had to be voted because I didn't provide a reason for a tone read I made. Paperscrap's vote is even more bewildering because he states he was "joking in all his posts." So, if they were townies making these votes I would have to assume they are trying to see if anybody jumps on my bandwagon and gain some information from it....but then they really quickly unvote. Just really strange town play IMO. Really can't see this being done as a scum/scum combo. It draws a little too much attention. Again, could be town/town, but I think its really likely a scum/town combo here. How is that post in any way more useful to town than to scum? You think that Paper and Tofu should be the two lynch candidates but do not state which of them is most likely to be scum. If they are both town then having them be the primary lynch candidates would be great for scum. If one of them is actually scum then you posting that without saying which one you think is scum is really not useful, as if one of them flips town you are in a position where you should assume that the other is scum, which give you a really easy excuse to vote for them if you are in fact scum. Basically, telling us which single person you want to lynch is good. Telling us that you want the votes to be between two specific people is really bad. Which of them is most likely to be scum? It's a useful post for those who think I'm town and several people do. it's also useful to have a nice concise argument that one of those two is scum for if/when i die and turn up town.
|
On July 27 2013 23:39 exarezee wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2013 23:35 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:On July 27 2013 23:33 exarezee wrote:
I forgot to address your other point hzflank.
I think I've stated who is more likely to be scum by the small case I put on paperscraps and the fact that I voted for him.
Why is me advocating the 2 wagons bad? I feel like I will get a lot of useful information regardless of how they turn. My scum lean on paperscraps isn't even that strong...and if he actually was joking then it's a very slight lean. Still, based on their interactions with me and their voting history on Day 1, I firmly believe that one of those two is scum. Then why do you not vote for FirmTofu? You just said that you think they are both scum and that you want to vote for them, but you don't think paperscraps is as scummy as FirmTofu. So your vote should be clear. Why is it not clear to you then? Are you trolling me? I never said that I think they are both scum. If it was voting deadline right now, I'd vote paper first, and tofu 2nd. I don't think paperscraps is as scumy as FirmTofu. WTF? have you been reading my posts or just making things up in your head.
You said that you think at least one of them as scum. So that would mean that you are trying to figure out who is scummier?
I bolded two sentences in your post which contradict each other. You would rather vote paperscraps first, but you think FirmTofu is scummier. Am I missing something?
|
On July 27 2013 23:36 Oatsmaster wrote:
CJS, try harder to give reasoning for your vote other than "ALL YOUR POSTS ARE USELESS"
Yeah, tell me how that makes me scum and which posts in particular that made you think that way.
I will answer your question with a question: If you had to lynch someone right now, who would it be and why?
|
On July 27 2013 23:43 exarezee wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2013 23:42 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:On July 27 2013 23:39 exarezee wrote:On July 27 2013 23:35 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:On July 27 2013 23:33 exarezee wrote:
I forgot to address your other point hzflank.
I think I've stated who is more likely to be scum by the small case I put on paperscraps and the fact that I voted for him.
Why is me advocating the 2 wagons bad? I feel like I will get a lot of useful information regardless of how they turn. My scum lean on paperscraps isn't even that strong...and if he actually was joking then it's a very slight lean. Still, based on their interactions with me and their voting history on Day 1, I firmly believe that one of those two is scum. Then why do you not vote for FirmTofu? You just said that you think they are both scum and that you want to vote for them, but you don't think paperscraps is as scummy as FirmTofu. So your vote should be clear. Why is it not clear to you then? Are you trolling me? I never said that I think they are both scum. If it was voting deadline right now, I'd vote paper first, and tofu 2nd. I don't think paperscraps is as scumy as FirmTofu. WTF? have you been reading my posts or just making things up in your head. You said that you think at least one of them as scum. So that would mean that you are trying to figure out who is scummier? I bolded two sentences in your post which contradict each other. You would rather vote paperscraps first, but you think FirmTofu is scummier. Am I missing something? That statement that you bolded is WHAT YOU WROTE. It's what I'm giving a WTF to.
I did not write that. What are you talking about? You, sir, have not had enough rum.
TL is not letting me post so quickly because this account is new, so I will take a 15 minute break. =(
|
On July 27 2013 23:50 exarezee wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2013 23:35 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:On July 27 2013 23:33 exarezee wrote:
I forgot to address your other point hzflank.
I think I've stated who is more likely to be scum by the small case I put on paperscraps and the fact that I voted for him.
Why is me advocating the 2 wagons bad? I feel like I will get a lot of useful information regardless of how they turn. My scum lean on paperscraps isn't even that strong...and if he actually was joking then it's a very slight lean. Still, based on their interactions with me and their voting history on Day 1, I firmly believe that one of those two is scum. Then why do you not vote for FirmTofu? You just said that you think they are both scum and that you want to vote for them, but you don't think paperscraps is as scummy as FirmTofu. So your vote should be clear. Why is it not clear to you then? "But you don't think paperscraps is as scummy as FirmTofu." Captain Jack. YOU said this! I don't know where you came up with this idea. I never once stated that I don't think paperscraps is as scummy as FirmTofu.
Oh. Looks like I haven't had enough rum.
|
On July 28 2013 00:24 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 00:15 Oatsmaster wrote:
Vayne, try a bit please.
what do you think of justanothertownie? pretty useless I guess? Vig him if we have one. Don't waste a lynch on him.
Would you mind telling us who you think is scum?
|
On July 28 2013 00:31 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 00:29 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:On July 28 2013 00:24 VayneAuthority wrote:On July 28 2013 00:15 Oatsmaster wrote:
Vayne, try a bit please.
what do you think of justanothertownie? pretty useless I guess? Vig him if we have one. Don't waste a lynch on him. Would you mind telling us who you think is scum? Not quite yet. There's no reason to tell, only reason to show in this game as town. No reason to let yourself be manipulated by scum. I only do lists when I think I am about to die at night.
So let me get this straight, you don't want to share your scum reads?
And you are town because...?
|
On July 28 2013 00:22 Vivax wrote:
Jack sparrow is annoying and i would like him to get a more serious tone soon. All this bullshitting only helps scum.it was fine at the start but stop now please.
That said, let's work towards a better atmosphere please. Also consider lookinespeciallyg at people who post only few.n
I will forgive you for saying this misleading statement because you were late to the ship and you are probably tired from having to swim so fast to get on board, but if you look at my filter I have been doing scumhunting. Do not make general statements about my play without looking at my filter. Trust me, I could be a lot more confusing, but I choose not to be. I my words may flow in a different way and my mannerisms may not be completely normal, but I am making my points clear.
|
On July 28 2013 00:33 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 00:31 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:On July 28 2013 00:31 VayneAuthority wrote:On July 28 2013 00:29 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:On July 28 2013 00:24 VayneAuthority wrote:On July 28 2013 00:15 Oatsmaster wrote:
Vayne, try a bit please.
what do you think of justanothertownie? pretty useless I guess? Vig him if we have one. Don't waste a lynch on him. Would you mind telling us who you think is scum? Not quite yet. There's no reason to tell, only reason to show in this game as town. No reason to let yourself be manipulated by scum. I only do lists when I think I am about to die at night. So let me get this straight, you don't want to share your scum reads? And you are town because...? Of course. Why would I share all my scumreads? You only need my vote. I'm town because that's what my role PM said.
I see you are trying to go for the "so bad I couldn't possibly be scum" technique. That's not going to work here, boy.
|
I would like to let everyone know that I think Vayne is looking a lot like lynchbait. Let's lock him in his room. I'll be nice and give him a bottle of rum so he doesn't die immediately.
|
On July 28 2013 00:58 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 00:28 Clarity_nl wrote:
Oats your case makes no sense to me, why do you think JAtownie is scum? Cause he nitpicks peoples post. He suddenly 180s on a read convinced by a really bad post. He never explains how papers is scum cause of that, just points out 'bad' posts without offering any analysis.
Oatsmaster, I think you are being very hasty in calling out JAT because he was simply saying that he agreed with my post (and you even quoted the wrong post, well done). He wasn't sheeping off of me, he was simply stating that he agreed with me. There's nothing truly scummy in that.
The real reason you called him scum was because he said he agreed with me when I said I thought you were scum. You called him out because you are scared, Oatsmaster, and for no other reason. Why are you so scared to get lynched?
|
On July 28 2013 01:08 Oatsmaster wrote:
Also CJS, whos scum then?
Right now, I'm leaning towards you being scum. I'm trying to figure out whether Vayne is stupid or scum, and I'm leaning towards stupid.
I'd also like to point out that a lot of people have not posted to a satisfactory level, and any one of them could be scum lurking in the shadows. We have quite a ways to go before anyone dies, so a lot of things can change.
|
On July 28 2013 01:12 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 01:11 IMCaptainJackSparrow wrote:On July 28 2013 01:08 Oatsmaster wrote:
Also CJS, whos scum then? Right now, I'm leaning towards you being scum. I'm trying to figure out whether Vayne is stupid or scum, and I'm leaning towards stupid. I'd also like to point out that a lot of people have not posted to a satisfactory level, and any one of them could be scum lurking in the shadows. We have quite a ways to go before anyone dies, so a lot of things can change. Why me?
Because your filter is filled with a bunch of nonsense posts. It looks like activity but there's no substance in it. You are also really quick to call JAT scum based off of simply agreeing with my post.
Are you blind, by the way? These are things I've already said. The fact that I have to tell you again proves to me that you are not reading the thread, which makes you even scummier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
