|
On August 04 2013 13:55 Nightcat99 wrote:
Ya i agree that vote on infil was odd too and i try to pressure him a little on it.
but i generally dont think scum wants to start a wagon but gotard try to start a wagon on infil, so i just through it was a rash decision.
Scum can do whatever they want
|
so what you are saying is you are not buying their attack on each other and think this could be a play they are setting up?
I had to make sure i am understand you right :D
|
On August 04 2013 13:53 Nightcat99 wrote:
the two people holy think is a scum team is hitting each other over the face with a bat.
I had so much confident in his reads too , i bet he is rolling over in his obs forum.
(Well he through i was scum too) guess i shallnt have mention that lol
![[image loading]](http://archive.patteroast.net/vis/BatHit.gif)
I swear I couldn't help it
|
On August 04 2013 14:01 Nightcat99 wrote:
so what you are saying is you are not buying their attack on each other and think this could be a play they are setting up?
I had to make sure i am understand you right :D
Yes
SoCal page 35 FTW
|
I dont know why but i was kind of expecting that to happen.
Yet i cant stop laughing here in real life.
|
EBWOP
the picture you posted is what i mean.
|
so slam , assuming only one of them is a scum for umasi and gotard.
And you have to pick two other people to lynch right now, who would you pick.
|
yeah, you can feel free to call me tsunami. Reading usami all the time is like :< do you guys just not spell goods? kind of thing.
who started that anyway? calling me usami, that is.
as for focusing on gotard, the easiest way to prove my innocence is to find and lynch scum, so when I read gotard and was like "he's actually scummy" it was reasonable to state my thoughts on him/make a pseudo case.
Still want scam dead :<
|
On August 04 2013 14:14 Umasi wrote:
yeah, you can feel free to call me tsunami. Reading usami all the time is like :< do you guys just not spell goods? kind of thing.
who started that anyway? calling me usami, that is.
as for focusing on gotard, the easiest way to prove my innocence is to find and lynch scum, so when I read gotard and was like "he's actually scummy" it was reasonable to state my thoughts on him/make a pseudo case.
Still want scam dead :<
sc_am wont making pass the night, justice will be brought down by BH or other source.
|
Gotard scam deus/RDO, would need time
Given can lynch both got scam wave (tsunami{Umasi})
|
so what does umasi mean anyway??
|
On August 04 2013 14:14 Umasi wrote:
yeah, you can feel free to call me tsunami. Reading usami all the time is like :< do you guys just not spell goods? kind of thing.
who started that anyway? calling me usami, that is.
as for focusing on gotard, the easiest way to prove my innocence is to find and lynch scum, so when I read gotard and was like "he's actually scummy" it was reasonable to state my thoughts on him/make a pseudo case.
Still want scam dead :<
Pseudo case?
And heck I don't even remember I think it's been happening since before this game
But hey man I am Sarah palin's sheep according to Day[9]
Alaska's lamb! Yeeeeeesums
Obligatory:  Day[9]
|
last game i only have a few people i through was scummy, ( i was completely wrong but atleast there was only a few people)
This game, i wont be surprise that you are all scums and i am playing alone.
There is so many non talkative people in this game, its so hard to get a read.
|
actually , how long has stim been gone for , over 24 hour?
|
On August 04 2013 14:25 Nightcat99 wrote:
last game i only have a few people i through was scummy, ( i was completely wrong but atleast there was only a few people)
This game, i wont be surprise that you are all scums and i am playing alone.
There is so many non talkative people in this game, its so hard to get a read.
Like Umasi said, have to pray my portrait isn't in the game
Well, there is an unusually high concentration of them
And dark swarm only makes it worse
Hehehe I want to play some broodwar
|
On August 04 2013 14:08 Nightcat99 wrote:
I dont know why but i was kind of expecting that to happen.
Yet i cant stop laughing here in real life.
U see the ##s
35
53
SoCal FTW
|
|
|
|
|
On August 04 2013 14:14 Umasi wrote:
yeah, you can feel free to call me tsunami. Reading usami all the time is like :< do you guys just not spell goods? kind of thing.
who started that anyway? calling me usami, that is.
as for focusing on gotard, the easiest way to prove my innocence is to find and lynch scum, so when I read gotard and was like "he's actually scummy" it was reasonable to state my thoughts on him/make a pseudo case.
Still want scam dead :<
Don't think you will get so easily off the hook tsunami, err mumasmi... masamumi? origami?
Just kidding :D
If gotard flips red you are still under heavy suspicion.
We still need 2 more votes on gotard. I'd like to complete a possible lynch on him as early as possible to get him out of his hole and defend himself.
I will perceive a non-vote on him or switching votes to someone else as a scum read.
|
On August 04 2013 15:48 infii wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2013 14:14 Umasi wrote:
yeah, you can feel free to call me tsunami. Reading usami all the time is like :< do you guys just not spell goods? kind of thing.
who started that anyway? calling me usami, that is.
as for focusing on gotard, the easiest way to prove my innocence is to find and lynch scum, so when I read gotard and was like "he's actually scummy" it was reasonable to state my thoughts on him/make a pseudo case.
Still want scam dead :< Don't think you will get so easily off the hook tsunami, err mumasmi... masamumi? origami? Just kidding :D If gotard flips red you are still under heavy suspicion. We still need 2 more votes on gotard. I'd like to complete a possible lynch on him as early as possible to get him out of his hole and defend himself. I will perceive a non-vote on him or switching votes to someone else as a scum read.
Barring further evidence I hope you mean
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
