|
On August 02 2013 05:10 Zyrre wrote: Since Alakaslam and Umasi probably are not mafia now(or are taking on a mafia playstyle of the joker), can I please ask you to be more succint in your posts and not spam every single one of your thougts. Is this addressed to me?
|
Ok now that we have reach night 1, i would like to stay that i want every one to make a post before then ends about who we shall pressure if in the event they die.
List out names that you feel scummy and people that you trust atm, an hour or so before the dead line so scum cant change their target.
And Uamsi , you need to explain yourself.
|
Well town we got what we wanted. Getting rid of reps is still a victory, just not as big as if he were scum.
On August 02 2013 05:10 Zyrre wrote: Since Alakaslam and Umasi probably are not mafia now(or are taking on a mafia playstyle of the joker), can I please ask you to be more succint in your posts and not spam every single one of your thougts.
I have a hunch that one of them is scum. I plan on spending a lot of time looking into those two.
|
On August 02 2013 04:54 Nightcat99 wrote: it works, and you shall just post now, umasi is not answering .
So its super scummy to me, hes the number 1 target tomorrow.
I am going out to lunch in fifteen ish minutes, going to reread and decide who to vote on
was afk, I made that clear.
On August 02 2013 04:04 Umasi wrote: And yeah, I recognize a no-lynch might occur. That's how hard my opinion of reps has swung, to the point that I'm willing to no lynch over his death.
##VOTE INFII
I'm out of time. I'll explain the vote more later, when I have time.
I've made that clear too. I was pretty much perfectly clear on everything. I agree what I did was scummy, because I'm a proponent of never ever no lynch. THAT is how hard my opinion swayed on him. Since reps flipped town, I'm looking at deus and infii. Infii moreso than deus. Most of what Gotard has posted about infii has had merit, which is why I voted him. He's been noncommittal, has posted excuses for not posting (it's too hard to do(fuck try anyway dammit))
On August 01 2013 14:35 DeusXmachina wrote:Last post before I go to bed. Good to see more people are taking a stance against reps. Reps, don't defend yourself by making a case of your innocence, defend yourself by contributing. Show nested quote +On August 01 2013 13:10 reps)squishy wrote: @infill I want to question you.
Q: You decided to be neutral which is seems like a scum move to not draw attention. Why would you lean towards neutral if you were town? A:
Q: You have not posted very much are you busy whats up with that? A: This is a start. Q1 is good. If you're town you should be able to offer a lot more. You still seem scummy to me. Umasi, this is directed at you: You said that depending on the reps flip you would still consider me as scum. Hhooookayy can we get past my first posts please. Haven't I already said several times that they were shit? That is your grounds for suspicion? I invite everyone to filter my posts and look them over. I am one of the most townie people in this game, and my later posts have definitely proved that. Umasi for this reason you are going on my notes list under suspicions. If reps flips town the most scummy individuals will be the ones who voted against reps last. The ones who vote reps at the end are the ones who vote to fit in. They don't vote someone else because they would be expected to make a case against the person they are voting against. Furthermore, they don't jump in early on and take an active stance because of the fear of unwanted attention. We should be suspicious of anyone who lurks and votes reps after this post, unless they can offer an in depth explanation of why they are voting against him. I am aware that if reps is town there is probably a talented scum that has been able to work there way into this argument in a way that appears pro town. We can work on them later. However, scum play with the fear of being noticed. They play with the fear of attention. Although it may be extremely subtle, the fear shows itself in their posts i.e a late vote like I talked about above.
deus with that post. I've explained my thoughts on it here, posted for your convenience.
On August 01 2013 15:38 Umasi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 01 2013 14:35 DeusXmachina wrote:Last post before I go to bed. Good to see more people are taking a stance against reps. Reps, don't defend yourself by making a case of your innocence, defend yourself by contributing. On August 01 2013 13:10 reps)squishy wrote: @infill I want to question you.
Q: You decided to be neutral which is seems like a scum move to not draw attention. Why would you lean towards neutral if you were town? A:
Q: You have not posted very much are you busy whats up with that? A: This is a start. Q1 is good. If you're town you should be able to offer a lot more. You still seem scummy to me. Umasi, this is directed at you: You said that depending on the reps flip you would still consider me as scum. Hhooookayy can we get past my first posts please. Haven't I already said several times that they were shit? That is your grounds for suspicion? I invite everyone to filter my posts and look them over. I am one of the most townie people in this game, and my later posts have definitely proved that. Umasi for this reason you are going on my notes list under suspicions. If reps flips town the most scummy individuals will be the ones who voted against reps last. The ones who vote reps at the end are the ones who vote to fit in. They don't vote someone else because they would be expected to make a case against the person they are voting against. Furthermore, they don't jump in early on and take an active stance because of the fear of unwanted attention. We should be suspicious of anyone who lurks and votes reps after this post, unless they can offer an in depth explanation of why they are voting against him. I am aware that if reps is town there is probably a talented scum that has been able to work there way into this argument in a way that appears pro town. We can work on them later. However, scum play with the fear of being noticed. They play with the fear of attention. Although it may be extremely subtle, the fear shows itself in their posts i.e a late vote like I talked about above. Why are you preemptively defending yourself? reps hasn't flipped yet, and you think he's scum. Hell, that entire post, ALL of it, is written on the contingency that reps is town. You read as unsure whether to proceed with the lynch because you're worried about the possible aftermath as it concerns you, not because you might be mislynching a townie. I don't want to talk about you too much, because reps is more important to clear up first. Like, you can feel free to keep pushing yourself into the issue, but that's just counterproductive, because if reps flips scum (like we think he will) I'm not voting you ANYWAY.
On August 02 2013 05:10 Zyrre wrote: Since Alakaslam and Umasi probably are not mafia now(or are taking on a mafia playstyle of the joker), can I please ask you to be more succint in your posts and not spam every single one of your thougts.
reps flip as town does not mean we are town. It's just as easy for mafia to be correct about someones alignment as it is towns. In fact, it's easier!
If anyone has questions for me, I'm around for the rest of the day, as far as I know.
|
On August 02 2013 05:20 DeusXmachina wrote:Well town we got what we wanted. Getting rid of reps is still a victory, just not as big as if he were scum. Show nested quote +On August 02 2013 05:10 Zyrre wrote: Since Alakaslam and Umasi probably are not mafia now(or are taking on a mafia playstyle of the joker), can I please ask you to be more succint in your posts and not spam every single one of your thougts. I have a hunch that one of them is scum. I plan on spending a lot of time looking into those two.
Deus, that's FALSE. We got a mislynch on a bad townie, but he'd shown he was willing to try to improve. Although I can definitely see where that line of thinking comes from, mislynching is not a good thing. like, fucking ever. Would have been better to lynch one of our two lurkers, and even then, I'd prefer to vote infii. If they're still lurking by the end of day two then dammit I'll happily vote them because they've had time to get in gear.
|
On August 02 2013 05:10 Zyrre wrote:
reps flip as town does not mean we are town. It's just as easy for mafia to be correct about someones alignment as it is towns. In fact, it's easier!
?? It is guaranteed that mafia is correct on someones alignment. They know who town is lol.
|
On August 02 2013 05:27 DeusXmachina wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2013 05:10 Zyrre wrote:
reps flip as town does not mean we are town. It's just as easy for mafia to be correct about someones alignment as it is towns. In fact, it's easier!
?? It is guaranteed that mafia is correct on someones alignment. They know who town is lol. +1
|
@Umasi: still a dick move to switch vote and afk.
Drop infi, that's all I'm going to say.
|
On August 02 2013 05:24 Umasi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2013 05:20 DeusXmachina wrote:Well town we got what we wanted. Getting rid of reps is still a victory, just not as big as if he were scum. On August 02 2013 05:10 Zyrre wrote: Since Alakaslam and Umasi probably are not mafia now(or are taking on a mafia playstyle of the joker), can I please ask you to be more succint in your posts and not spam every single one of your thougts. I have a hunch that one of them is scum. I plan on spending a lot of time looking into those two. Deus, that's FALSE. We got a mislynch on a bad townie, but he'd shown he was willing to try to improve. Although I can definitely see where that line of thinking comes from, mislynching is not a good thing. like, fucking ever. Would have been better to lynch one of our two lurkers, and even then, I'd prefer to vote infii. If they're still lurking by the end of day two then dammit I'll happily vote them because they've had time to get in gear.
Woah woah woah. I think most of us were in agreement that reps was a bad townie and not helping. Were we just supposed to hope that he would get better? Sorry bro but if he had real motivation to improve we would have seen it by now. Still a good lynch. Are you telling me that you have enough information to lynch someone else. Hardly. Any candidate you throw out would be just as likely to be a miss-lynch.
|
I express my disagreement to Deus. Reps mislynch was not a good lynch. If you guys were fucking around, we could made something happen. And Reps played a terrible game. I understand that he is a noob but jeez, get your shit together when you are under pressure. (Like I'm the one to talk.. )
Like I said before, would have liked to see sc_a.M modkilled.
|
On August 02 2013 05:29 DeusXmachina wrote:Show nested quote +On August 02 2013 05:24 Umasi wrote:On August 02 2013 05:20 DeusXmachina wrote:Well town we got what we wanted. Getting rid of reps is still a victory, just not as big as if he were scum. On August 02 2013 05:10 Zyrre wrote: Since Alakaslam and Umasi probably are not mafia now(or are taking on a mafia playstyle of the joker), can I please ask you to be more succint in your posts and not spam every single one of your thougts. I have a hunch that one of them is scum. I plan on spending a lot of time looking into those two. Deus, that's FALSE. We got a mislynch on a bad townie, but he'd shown he was willing to try to improve. Although I can definitely see where that line of thinking comes from, mislynching is not a good thing. like, fucking ever. Would have been better to lynch one of our two lurkers, and even then, I'd prefer to vote infii. If they're still lurking by the end of day two then dammit I'll happily vote them because they've had time to get in gear. Woah woah woah. I think most of us were in agreement that reps was a bad townie and not helping. Were we just supposed to hope that he would get better? Sorry bro but if he had real motivation to improve we would have seen it by now. Still a good lynch. Are you telling me that you have enough information to lynch someone else. Hardly. Any candidate you throw out would be just as likely to be a miss-lynch.
No matter how you cut it, miss lynching is not a good thing. I don't even know why you CARE what I think about the miss lynch, and calling it a bad thing. The reason I care about what your opinions on it are is because you post a meaningless statement that feels like you're trying to include yourself.
Well town we got what we wanted. Getting rid of reps is still a victory, just not as big as if he were scum. And deus, he did show motivation to improve, you actually responded to it yourself.
On August 01 2013 14:35 DeusXmachina wrote:Last post before I go to bed. Good to see more people are taking a stance against reps. Reps, don't defend yourself by making a case of your innocence, defend yourself by contributing. Show nested quote +On August 01 2013 13:10 reps)squishy wrote: @infill I want to question you.
Q: You decided to be neutral which is seems like a scum move to not draw attention. Why would you lean towards neutral if you were town? A:
Q: You have not posted very much are you busy whats up with that? A: This is a start. Q1 is good. If you're town you should be able to offer a lot more. You still seem scummy to me. Umasi, this is directed at you: You said that depending on the reps flip you would still consider me as scum. Hhooookayy can we get past my first posts please. Haven't I already said several times that they were shit? That is your grounds for suspicion? I invite everyone to filter my posts and look them over. I am one of the most townie people in this game, and my later posts have definitely proved that. Umasi for this reason you are going on my notes list under suspicions. If reps flips town the most scummy individuals will be the ones who voted against reps last. The ones who vote reps at the end are the ones who vote to fit in. They don't vote someone else because they would be expected to make a case against the person they are voting against. Furthermore, they don't jump in early on and take an active stance because of the fear of unwanted attention. We should be suspicious of anyone who lurks and votes reps after this post, unless they can offer an in depth explanation of why they are voting against him. I am aware that if reps is town there is probably a talented scum that has been able to work there way into this argument in a way that appears pro town. We can work on them later. However, scum play with the fear of being noticed. They play with the fear of attention. Although it may be extremely subtle, the fear shows itself in their posts i.e a late vote like I talked about above. "this is a good start" implying he'd started to improve.
The more you respond, the worse a feeling I get about you.
|
I actually kind of want to kill Deus. I feel bad for reps..
|
On August 02 2013 05:41 StiMaDDict wrote: I actually kind of want to kill Deus. I feel bad for reps..
:< like it sucks, but whatever. keep objective.
If you want to kill deus for a reason other than pitying reps, what are your thoughts specifically?
|
Going to be afk, sorry, Umasi.
And for the last time, infi is town.
|
Why are you getting so defensive Umasi? I can't care what you think? I care what a lot of people in this thread think. Why should I just ignore what you are saying. It seems like you are lashing out because I am disagreeing with you. Also are you even reading my entire posts? I introduced a post with a pointless sentence (not in my opinion). Later in that posts I explained my intentions of how I am going to proceed. Holy hell, are you such a saint that you don't say anything pointless?
|
Welp I was Vanilla Town like I claimed. This really was my first game. When I claimed to be newbie it was truthful. Deus you got your way I hope it bites you on the ass. You can consider my death a victory being a "bad townie." But taking out a lurker would of been better. I can see mafia really dominating in this game. GL HF Buh Bye~
|
I don't think I was being defensive. Feel free to push the issue though, but I'll move on from the issue (push it if you want)
You said your plan was to look at me and slam for scum. Who else are you thinking? town reads, scum reads, anything.
|
|
On August 02 2013 06:00 Umasi wrote: I don't think I was being defensive. Feel free to push the issue though, but I'll move on from the issue (push it if you want)
You said your plan was to look at me and slam for scum. Who else are you thinking? town reads, scum reads, anything.
You're right Umasi. Maybe, I am being overly suspicious or you. Ill drop the matter. I would be lying if I said you weren't someone that I would want to look into further. That being said, you are definitely not lurking.
"Who else are you thinking? own reads, scum reads, anything" Good question. I am suspicious of scam, and olivaw. I know a lot of people are suspicious of them atm, and I believe there is merit to that. There is no denying that they are major lurkers. There has been a lot of talk about infii also, so I will look into that. As far as town reads, ill get back to you. Tonight I will post in depth (or do my best) about my scum and town reads. Hopefully if I provide a meaningful analysis it will be in no way discredited by my reps accusation.
|
On another note, scam and daneel, you should start posting, pretty much self explanatory WHY you should start posting.
|
|
|
|