EPTRepeat:
I'm not sure why I sucked out a RB on night 1.
A Bluelightz Mafia "The Attack" - Page 51
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
Repeat: I'm not sure why I sucked out a RB on night 1. | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
| ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
On July 24 2013 05:31 FiveTouch wrote: I buy it. I think TG is town and scum are setting him up with the RB. Think about it. If he's scum, why would he claim RB after claiming VT on D1? That doesn't make any sense from a scum perspective, because he'd have to answer weird questions like "Why would scum roleblock you if you claimed VT?" With that kind of thinking, you could say that a scum player who was almost lynched could think of that and claim RB to have someone else come to that conclusion, giving that person a town read on the scum player. If you want to play the WIFOM game, I'd love to play along too... | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On July 24 2013 05:29 cDgCorazon wrote: I love how your thought about the scum RB'ing you is completely in line with town sentiment, yet your thought about the town RB'ing you is complete setup speculation and WIFOM. There's literally no explanation why anyone would RB you. I really don't buy your RB claim. You're the one trying to WIFOM about why he's lying about the claim Cora don't even. | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
??? You're espousing a theory that doesn't make sense from any fucking perspective Cora. You're saying that he claimed VT on D1, and while scrutiny is ALREADY ON HIM, LIED ABOUT BEING ROLEBLOCKED D2! COORRAAAAA THAT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE COOORRAAAAAAA!!!! ##Unvote ##Vote: cDgCorazon | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 24 2013 05:31 FiveTouch wrote: Still curious about this. Is it purely wrapped up in the RB claim and mention of Onegu? I buy it. I think TG is town and scum are setting him up with the RB. Think about it. If he's scum, why would he claim RB after claiming VT on D1? That doesn't make any sense from a scum perspective, because he'd have to answer weird questions like "Why would scum roleblock you if you claimed VT?" | ||
|
TanGeng
Sanya12364 Posts
Are you still around? Now that you're on Oatsmaster, what happened to your stance on FirmTofu? Has your read changed at all? | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On July 24 2013 05:44 austinmcc wrote: Still curious about this. Is it purely wrapped up in the RB claim and mention of Onegu? I don't need to explain my townreads to you right now austin, unless TG is on the cusp of getting lynched, don't you worry about why I think TG is town. -VE | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
~marv | ||
|
getmoript
1016 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 24 2013 05:47 FiveTouch wrote: No, you don't NEED to. But I realized what I wanted from you last night, when asking why you found TG scummy. I wanted...specifics, I wanted you to reference his vote on JJD, votepost, comment about discussion, the avoidance of talking about those things--the specific posts that led to the scumread that led to the wagon that led to the almost-lynch. You spoke in some general terms about things, but you never referenced the start of the wagon or my read or those posts.I don't need to explain my townreads to you right now austin, unless TG is on the cusp of getting lynched, don't you worry about why I think TG is town. -VE Now, he's become a townread. But for reasons that have to do with setup speculation and WIFOM, not his posts, and you're still not going back to those and incorporating them into anything. Like I noted at night, I was watching for people to call TG/Oats scummy and still want to lynch other folks, but also watching for people who come off of them for little/no reason and onto other people. Right now, you blipped on that radar. It's a thing that could go either way, and you explaining yourself lets me know how to interpret this. Beyond that, AMG CORA SCUM FOR MAKING ASSUMPTIONS AND DRAWING WEIRD CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE RB CLAIM BECAUSE I COME TO DIFFERENT ASSUMPTIONS AND WEIRD CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE RB CLAIM. I think that vote is poop soup. | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
You can't say "why not TAA" without addressing the fundamental concerns that VE brought up. ~marv | ||
|
getmoript
1016 Posts
| ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
-VE | ||
|
getmoript
1016 Posts
On July 24 2013 05:53 FiveTouch wrote: Not sure what bad experiences you're referring to? This is VE's baby, with my blessing. You can't say "why not TAA" without addressing the fundamental concerns that VE brought up. ~marv I'll comment when I get off work. | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
~marv | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
And I don't think it's alignment indicative. It just means whoever the roleblocker is felt like he was possibly scum. | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On July 24 2013 05:52 austinmcc wrote: No, you don't NEED to. But I realized what I wanted from you last night, when asking why you found TG scummy. I wanted...specifics, I wanted you to reference his vote on JJD, votepost, comment about discussion, the avoidance of talking about those things--the specific posts that led to the scumread that led to the wagon that led to the almost-lynch. You spoke in some general terms about things, but you never referenced the start of the wagon or my read or those posts. Now, he's become a townread. But for reasons that have to do with setup speculation and WIFOM, not his posts, and you're still not going back to those and incorporating them into anything. Like I noted at night, I was watching for people to call TG/Oats scummy and still want to lynch other folks, but also watching for people who come off of them for little/no reason and onto other people. Right now, you blipped on that radar. It's a thing that could go either way, and you explaining yourself lets me know how to interpret this. Beyond that, AMG CORA SCUM FOR MAKING ASSUMPTIONS AND DRAWING WEIRD CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE RB CLAIM BECAUSE I COME TO DIFFERENT ASSUMPTIONS AND WEIRD CONCLUSIONS ABOUT THE RB CLAIM. I think that vote is poop soup. I didn't realize TG claimed VT overnight. I didn't notice that until filtering him today. I don't think scum would claim VT on D1 period, and I CERTAINLY don't think scum would claim RB on D2 after claiming VT on D1 austin. Is that specific enough for you? | ||
|
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On July 24 2013 05:46 TanGeng wrote: No it hasn't changed (and how could it? he's barely posted since then). I think Oats is @ least as scummy though. And an Oats lynch is more likely to happen.@ JJD Are you still around? Now that you're on Oatsmaster, what happened to your stance on FirmTofu? Has your read changed at all? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On July 24 2013 05:54 FiveTouch wrote: I still like him for scum, tbh. That one's more troubling than TG currently, but as someone with a fondness for being odd/useless/absent on D1 a decent amount of the time when town, he's doing more than that. He actively contributed little/nothing beyond yelling to lynch rayn. He didn't even vote or get involved in any sort of voting discussion until 6 minutes to go. His magical test didn't prevent him from getting more active during parts of N1.So austin, what's your current Oats opinion? ~marv I have a hard time reading someone who had his D1 as town. Just because he acts differently today does not undo his D1. To some extent, I interpret the different action as D1 "Woe is me I so sad I scum again and qqqqqq" and N1/D2 uptick in action as "HAHAHAHA SUCK IT TOWN, WE TOTALLY GOT A NO LYNCH AND NOW THIS GAME IS MORE ENJOYABLE." It's not the only interpretation, and it's not my whole read on him, but the D1 attitude and play was SO scummy that I don't automatically come around on D2. | ||
| ||
