EPTOn July 25 2013 07:12 cDgCorazon wrote:
If you think TG is town, why are you voting for TAA?
If you think TG is town, why are you voting for TAA?
Can you maybe walk me through where you're coming from with this post? Thanks.
-VE
A Bluelightz Mafia "The Attack" - Page 15
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Can you maybe walk me through where you're coming from with this post? Thanks. -VE | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
~marv | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On July 25 2013 07:18 austinmcc wrote: Yeah, you've come up with reasons. But you've done so while explicitly not reading his actual POSTS. You've done so by relying on things like "scum is dumb so they RBed a VT." I'm not used to you making reads on people without actually bothering to read them. I'm not used to you jumping on wagons without actually knowing why the wagon exists. And I'm not used to you speculating about what happened before flips based on "scum was dumb." If nothing else, you're concluding that "scum is dumb and RBed a guy who claimed VT and who almost got lynched" is more likely than "scum decided to RB a scumbuddy to make it look like he was town." I've seen far more uses of scum powers to make scum look better than I have "scum is dumb and RBed a guy who claimed VT." jrkirby and his alignment are irrelevant to those things. Not irrelevant at all, and I can't really be bothered interacting with you anymore, it's just mindnumbing. Sorry dear. ~marv | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Mind = blown ~marv | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On July 25 2013 07:28 austinmcc wrote: Unless you'd like to explain how jrkirby and his alignment affect TG's posts D1 or whether he was RBed, then yes, jrkirby and his alignment are irrelevant to those things. Didn't say game. I actually would tend to agree with cora here, that if TAA is scum then TG is. I find it far more likely that this is "let's use this non-KP power on ourselves to make it look like one of us is town" than "let's use this RB on a VT." One has potential upside. One doesn't. One I have seen in games before (and done, to an extent). One I haven't. You're forgetting that scum would have to claim VT and then decide to roleblock their VT-claim for your theory to make sense. It makes quite a large difference. Because the roleblock simply does not make TG look good because he already claimed VT, thus making the whole plan stupid. | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
You and Corazon tying TAA and TG together. Fuck this is too easy. | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
*glares at Firm* | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On July 25 2013 07:34 austinmcc wrote: The other point above is legit. This one is sillypants. It works for everything. Then I can just say "Well there's the additional upside to my side of things that by scum claiming VT then other scum roleblocking the claimed VT marv and others will split TAA and TG up." Yes, the above point is very legit and it's been brought up and you're conveniently leaving it out of your theoretical crap. The only reason scum ever fake a roleblock on scum is to make the person they're "roleblocking" look townie, which in this case is totally negated by the prior VT claim. So the one motivation for doing it on TG in particular is gone. there's nothing left. There's no reason to fake a roleblock on a scumbuddy when it doesn't make that person look good. don't try and equate NOT tying two players together with tying two players together. One leaves options open, one doesn't. | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
| ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
| ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
| ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Ok dear. | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
| ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
You think scum faked a roleblock on a scumbuddy who already claimed VT. That would fall pretty heavily under "dumb", but it's what you're basing your argument around. See the problem here? | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Answer me this at least: if TAA had just withered and died without claiming, would that make TG look better or worse? because as far as I can see, you think it makes TG look worse, right? | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
| ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
| ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
| ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
I would say that how you've argued about this has made me feel much better about you though. ~marv | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On July 25 2013 08:18 getmoript wrote: AFAIK neither were. Jkirby went off early IIRC and TAA was like MIA as much D1 as he's been today. Yeah, if that's the case it's where the whole x-1 theory collapses. And in case Corazon is scum, he was totally not there for obvious replacement reason. | ||
| ||
