I promise not to troll and ragequit so town almost loses.
But I will still find all the scum.
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
I promise not to troll and ragequit so town almost loses. But I will still find all the scum. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 06 2013 14:12 StiMaDDict wrote: I haven't played with a majority rule yet, so if we don't have a majority, do we get no lynch? None-majority results in a no-lynch. AKA don't let it happen. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 07 2013 02:40 StiMaDDict wrote: Show nested quote + On July 07 2013 02:00 Nightcat99 wrote: I am completely new to this game and just finished reading most of the guides and would like to try it out so /in I was reading over the roles and notice that the godfather has the ability to appear vanilla to role checks but i dont see anyone with the ability to role check, is this sometime i shall know before the game starts? A cop or a detective in this case will check for alignment and godfather will show up as town or green. He means role-checking, as opposed to alignment checking. OP doesn't indicate any role-checking abilities for town. I assume the description for Godfather is merely a formality. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 12 2013 04:45 jrkirby wrote: Koshi outed into replacements. Now I know you love to make bold claims, but now's not the time. Koshi never did /out. Technically he is still signed up, making there 1 spot left. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
In b4 working closing shifts every day and goofing off on my phone to post / vote. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
If you're a lurker I want to lynch you by default. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
thats my history. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote: I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though. This post is scummy. Gives a reason for jkirbys post and then casts doubt on it. U scum? | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 13 2013 08:33 Chromatically wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote: The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we? Why did you include this? Are you saying you wouldn't have posted this if you were scum? Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 08:20 Rainbows wrote: On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote: I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though. This post is scummy. Gives a reason for jkirbys post and then casts doubt on it. U scum? I'd be very interested in hearing your explanation as to why you honestly think this is scummy. It's scummy because it's renouncing jkirbys jokepost while he gave a reason for it. He never explains why this joking around is suspicious just passively finger points. I want to hear elaboration. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 13 2013 08:41 Umasi wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 08:33 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote: The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we? Why did you include this? Are you saying you wouldn't have posted this if you were scum? On July 13 2013 08:20 Rainbows wrote: On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote: I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though. This post is scummy. Gives a reason for jkirbys post and then casts doubt on it. U scum? I'd be very interested in hearing your explanation as to why you honestly think this is scummy. I certainly wouldn't post that if I were scum, it is nothing but a good thing for town. Why WOULD he want to post that as scum? to look town. Scum love to spew general pro town thingsvto get ez town cred.. but the meta was sexy. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 13 2013 09:12 Chromatically wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 08:41 Rainbows wrote: On July 13 2013 08:33 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote: The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we? Why did you include this? Are you saying you wouldn't have posted this if you were scum? On July 13 2013 08:20 Rainbows wrote: On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote: I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though. This post is scummy. Gives a reason for jkirbys post and then casts doubt on it. U scum? I'd be very interested in hearing your explanation as to why you honestly think this is scummy. It's scummy because it's renouncing jkirbys jokepost while he gave a reason for it. He never explains why this joking around is suspicious just passively finger points. I want to hear elaboration. "It's a pressure vote, but his joking is wierd because he doesn't seem like a joker." Where's the inconsistency? The point is he is finger pointing without actually doing anything like asking a question. I want to hear his response | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
Why the hell are you pointing out things about jkirby if you dont find them suspicious? What was the purpose of your post then? | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 13 2013 09:44 StiMaDDict wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 09:36 Rainbows wrote: Stim. Why the hell are you pointing out things about jkirby if you dont find them suspicious? What was the purpose of your post then? For your entertainment. + Show Spoiler + jk I do not like to post fluff + Show Spoiler + Could someone give me a definition of fluff? Contentless gut feel is what I think means If I had just said, "oh, jkirby's case is terrible and that's why I said such and such." I wouldn't be meaningful in anyway. You established that his vote was pressure. Fact You then said his post was joking but he was not a joking player. it is the latter clause i do not understand simply because it has no purpose or town motivation. It seems to passively finger point at something that is potentially scummy in jkirby but not investigate. but i digress. your reaction suffices and we move on. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 13 2013 09:47 Chromatically wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 09:26 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 09:21 Rainbows wrote: On July 13 2013 09:12 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 08:41 Rainbows wrote: On July 13 2013 08:33 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote: The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we? Why did you include this? Are you saying you wouldn't have posted this if you were scum? On July 13 2013 08:20 Rainbows wrote: On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote: I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though. This post is scummy. Gives a reason for jkirbys post and then casts doubt on it. U scum? I'd be very interested in hearing your explanation as to why you honestly think this is scummy. It's scummy because it's renouncing jkirbys jokepost while he gave a reason for it. He never explains why this joking around is suspicious just passively finger points. I want to hear elaboration. "It's a pressure vote, but his joking is wierd because he doesn't seem like a joker." Where's the inconsistency? The point is he is finger pointing without actually doing anything like asking a question. I want to hear his response It sounded like you had two points. 1) "It's scummy because it's renouncing jkirbys jokepost while he gave a reason for it." (inconsistency) 2) "He never explains why this joking around is suspicious just passively finger points." (finger pointing) Maybe I wasn't explicit enough. Is this untrue? I assume pressure vote = town move and then he says jkirby is joking which is unlike him = scummy? two separate feels imo. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 13 2013 09:58 Chromatically wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 09:25 StiMaDDict wrote: Another thing that is annoying the fuck out of me is that how Rainbow "interpreted" my post. This is what I wrote. On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote: I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though. Explanation: I find a pressure vote to be a strategy for some people. It works sometimes but not all the times. jrkirby's "case" really is not something of content to be honest. I assumed that it was pressure vote to get some discussions going. So that is what I said. As for the second sentence, his "case" is really fucking bullshit, so there are two possibilities. Either he is joking around or he suck at scumhunting. So you posted it because you wanted to point out that he's either a townie joking or a bad townie? Why would you post the second sentence at all? And then someone else words it better than I can. Bravo. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 13 2013 10:01 Chromatically wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 09:52 Rainbows wrote: On July 13 2013 09:47 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 09:26 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 09:21 Rainbows wrote: On July 13 2013 09:12 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 08:41 Rainbows wrote: On July 13 2013 08:33 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote: The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we? Why did you include this? Are you saying you wouldn't have posted this if you were scum? On July 13 2013 08:20 Rainbows wrote: On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote: I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though. This post is scummy. Gives a reason for jkirbys post and then casts doubt on it. U scum? I'd be very interested in hearing your explanation as to why you honestly think this is scummy. It's scummy because it's renouncing jkirbys jokepost while he gave a reason for it. He never explains why this joking around is suspicious just passively finger points. I want to hear elaboration. "It's a pressure vote, but his joking is wierd because he doesn't seem like a joker." Where's the inconsistency? The point is he is finger pointing without actually doing anything like asking a question. I want to hear his response It sounded like you had two points. 1) "It's scummy because it's renouncing jkirbys jokepost while he gave a reason for it." (inconsistency) 2) "He never explains why this joking around is suspicious just passively finger points." (finger pointing) Maybe I wasn't explicit enough. Is this untrue? I assume pressure vote = town move and then he says jkirby is joking which is unlike him = scummy? two separate feels imo. Are you asking me..? Or is that a reason why you thought it was scummy? The reason I thought it scummy. It's hard to say how I thought about it, but then again I post rather sporadically with random thoughts. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
They're all the same reason juat articulated differently. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
We're flirting too much with subtext atm. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
Last game was just me being frustrated and correct :p lol. You should fear the Rainbows. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
Will elaborate when I get home to a computer. Hint: Not stim. More town reads than scum but thats normal. Ill converse with you if it doesnt involve too much backtracking atm. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 13 2013 10:47 jrkirby wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 10:42 Rainbows wrote: I play exactly the same as scum and town imo. Last game was just me being frustrated and correct :p lol. You should fear the Rainbows. Anyone think this could be a scumslip? He seems the kind that might want to subtly brag about it if he were scum. Nope it's a scumslip im the Godfather. Srsly that made me lol jkirby :p | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 13 2013 13:14 StiMaDDict wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 13:08 Umasi wrote: Nightcat, the best way to establish innocence is to scum hunt, it's always time to scumhunt. Apparently I'm the scummiest fucking bastard in this game. Jump on board the StiM wagon and earn easy town cred! You know, I'm done. Contribute? Yeah fucking right. Sit in front of the computer for 6 fucking hours refreshing and trying to god damn contribute and what I get is "so you weren't angry but you pretended to be angry?" Town shouldn't lie about that. I wasn't fucking lying. Jesus. w/e. You're assuming the dude accusing you is town. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
But listen. Rejoice in the fact that you know they are either wrong or scum and pwn them in the face. If you're scum, then well I'm sorry -- gg wp | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 13 2013 14:04 Chromatically wrote: Rainbows still hasn't given an opinion on Stim... He's a crash-and-burn scenario and really could flip either way. His actions were reckless and didn't make much sense to me but -- scum don't want to attract that much attention to themselves. I suppose he has that going for him. On July 13 2013 15:25 Umasi wrote: Is anyone around to chat it up with? Sup? | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 13 2013 15:38 Umasi wrote: nothing much. Thread was stagnant because nighttime, but w.e. So I remember reading the mafia you were in (you were vig, tunneled ravens) but don't remember much about the specific scenario that played out with your rage quit. How much of this is reminiscant of what you did? Do you think there's a comparison at all to be made? It's reminiscent and not much else. I trolled early on then made cases on a few people (who turned out to be scum). People didn't like my cases and told me i trolled to much and that having fun was bad. So i said fuck you guys, roleclaimed, and tunneled obv scum the entire game. Stim is just being stupid =\ | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
1) Hzflank 2) StiMaDDict 3) Chromatically 4) Jrkirby 5) Koshi 6) Xzavier 7) Rainbows 8) Nightcat99 9) Umasi 10) Gotard 11) Hurricane Sponge 12) Superfluous 13) Cloud-9 | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
From what I can tell, my involvement in it aside, there seems to be two forces at work here. Chromatically and Umasi, Chrom specifically, want to lynch the ever-living crap out of Stim. Then, there seems to be the counter-movement of dudes after the fact, that are screaming not to lynch Stim and that he's just a baddie. Useful to see the two sides cropping up, because if Stim is town, you'd think all 3 scum would be like "sup son, lynch the dude". Rule #1: Never lynch the most outspoken, emotional guy on D1. If he doesn't pick up his game and give reads, etc., I'm fine with hanging him at this point because he could be scum, but is otherwise useless and we gain information from the flip. Until the remainder second half of day 1 gets rolling into full force, I'll consider his lynch. A meh lynch at this point. What the fuck is this? On July 13 2013 21:54 Koshi wrote: I am from Belgium guys, This game started at 12PM and I was tired after a working week. I read the thread once now and my initial (this is without using filters, just reading all the posts) is that H.Sponge build enough town kred to not get lynched day 1 no matter what. I loved his opening post, and I loved his defense on that post. Even if he is scum, he has been very helpful to town, and every town should go and read that opening post. Scum reads are on Umasi and Chroma. Umasi because his entire early posts were just sucking up to H.Sponge, which is just not useful at all, H. Sponge clearly doesn't need to be defended like this. Another thing I dont like about Umasi is him trying to redirect the thread twice for a Superfluous train on a rather useless moment. Superfluous entered the thread with a bad post, but went afk after, which is not a clear scumread. Not enough the get a train going, and make the rest of the day useless. Chroma is currently tunneling so heavily on StiMaDDict. The guy is afk, treat him as an afk bad town till he comes back. It is a good thing to spark some conversation around StiMaDDict, but at this point I feel that Chroma is derailing more than necessarily. It's just tunneling into oblivion. I start filtering now: Reading Chroma his filter I get a serious scum vibe. Post like this: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 11:39 Chromatically wrote: Also just noticed that Sponge hasn't given a single opinion on anyone all game after saying that he wanted people to judge him on his scumhunting, interesting. This is just being a jack-ass, at least it would be if you say things like this in real life. In mafia it is trying to put suspicion onto somebody without saying anything. I haven't crosschecked this message with the referring Sponge message but it feels dirty. What was your intention while typing this down Chromo? @ Chromo, Do you agree that this is a very suspicious post? And explain to me why it is "interesting" that Sponge likes to have interaction on his scumreads while playing this game? Reading Umasi his filter after the Chroma filter makes me want to lynch one of these 2 guys. Umasi and Chroma are either bromancing it up on the stimaddict lynch, or they are both scum. Here is Umasi his game till now: --> Defend Sponge while pushing lynch on Superfluous. --> Argue with Sponge about Chroma while pusing a lynch on StiMaDDict. What is this clause trying to achieve? You say If sponge is Scum, his posts are helping town and we should listen to him. Lulwut? | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 14 2013 01:51 StiMaDDict wrote: *sigh I fucked up. @Chromatically: You let me down and I let you down. I don't really know. I had a shitty day. I was pissed off at other things and I tried to let my stresses go away by posting on here. Then you blew it. Your nitpicking on whether I was angry or not and whether I was lying or not was really under my expectation. I think I gave you WAY TOO much credit from last game. Also you keep saying that I can't explain my so-called lie, but I did, god damn it. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 12:19 StiMaDDict wrote: Show nested quote + This. Pretty much repeating what Xzavier did in the last game, calling everyone retard, was from me being genuinely mad.Note to all: + Show Spoiler + btw, I'm really trying to stay active. Sometimes I write really slow and I might be answering something that is couple of pages back. Sometimes I write one liners. My bad. + Show Spoiler + If you don't like it, well fuck you Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 09:34 StiMaDDict wrote: My bad, guys. Got pissed for no reason. Spoilers and quotes kept getting messed up. Overall attitude in my posts and impolite words in them were for the purpose I have stated. Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 11:55 StiMaDDict wrote: I did respond quite aggressively and in an angry manner, even though I was not really angry at all. There were 2 purposes: 1) To see if Rainbow would 'flinch' 2) To establish myself to others as capable of defending myself. Conclusion: He didn't flinch and I did clear my name somewhat. I could have counter pressured to get some sort of read from Rainbow, however I didn't, because it IS early in the game and without proving myself as an active town, it would have a less of impact and leave a bad impression of me. Do note: I'm not a good actor and I am not sure whether there was a clear boundary between me being mad because of quotes and spoilers and pretending to be mad at Rainbow. I was not bothered by Rainbow's pressure to put it simply and it is not in my best interest to lie about this. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 12:24 StiMaDDict wrote: My previous post looks confusing. 1) I was mad at messing up posts but not at Rainbow 2) My anger reflected on my posts 3) Later when I realized that my posts were angry sounding I gave them purposes and maintain similar style. I hope this explains it better. Not sure if this is a relevant topic though. First one wasn't clear enough so I wrote the second. I had a shitty day, alright, so I wrote some cuss words on the Internet. It wasn't something that I was proud of but it happened. So I tried to cover it up as if it was intentional with purposes and purposes they did accomplished. If you want to argue about when I came up with the idea, well, why don't dissect my brain and see. Gosh, you pissed me off. @jkirby: What you doing? + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 07:41 jrkirby wrote: Ok. I've been studying this long and hard, and I think I have enough evidence to make a clear case. hzflank is scum Show nested quote + On July 09 2013 04:04 hzflank wrote: On July 09 2013 03:22 WaveofShadow wrote: On July 09 2013 03:20 hzflank wrote: On July 09 2013 02:13 Stutters695 wrote: Obligatory USE YOUR COACHES We're great guys and here to help ![]() With WoS as the scum coach, I do not think that town will need your assistance. Uh, ouch? Need I remind you that you won a game with Ace as the scum coach too? I meant it as a compliment. Sometimes the greatest players are the worst coaches because you just cannot teach pure brilliance. Clearly, hzflank is lying about this compliment. Liars are always scum. And look who he's talking to: the scum coach. Obviously he's in league with them. He goes on, still talking to the scum: Show nested quote + On July 09 2013 04:22 hzflank wrote: On July 09 2013 04:09 Hurricane Sponge wrote: If you vote for an hzflank lynch based on pregame meta, I will fall instantly in love with you. Then scum should night kill the first person to vote for me, because as their lover you will also die. This is an obvious admission that he wants town to die. Anyone who wants town to die is scum, end of story. Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 04:19 hzflank wrote: On July 13 2013 04:09 Chromatically wrote: I won't be here for two hours after start. Then who will call my first post scummy? ![]() I will. Right here, right now. And for his first post: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 07:11 hzflank wrote: So we are using a majority vote system. As we all know there is much more chance of a No Lynch with this system than with plurality voting. I think it is in our best interest to try to lynch someone every day. This may seem a bit odd at first, because a mis-lynch is obviously better for scum than for town. However, the only way that town will win is by lynching scum, and we will never be sure if we are lynching town or scum unless the lynch actually goes through. If we narrowly fail to lynch then we end up spending the next day discussing it and do not move forward as much. Also, scum already know who they are. When someone is lynched the alignment information from their flip benefits town, but not scum. Therefore, I suggest we work together as much as possible to actually get lynches through, if they are in doubt. He's trying to get us to sheep together and follow a Bandwagon instead of looking for evidence and finding scum. Finally: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 07:31 hzflank wrote: On July 13 2013 07:26 Koshi wrote: Are there experienced players here? People that played a decent amount of games. Everyone here has played 3 or less games. On July 13 2013 07:24 Koshi wrote: Hi all. I played 1 newbie game in the TL+ forums and I am atm also playing in the nuclear mafia game. I am with Rainbows on the lynching of lurkers. The tl+ game got RUINED because nobody posted. So if you are town, I want you to make around 10 posts a day. Try to make posts that are aggressive and confront people with your thought. Don't be afraid to be wrong. If you are town, please consider doing this to help town and force scum to make posts. I think it is a bit early to be thinking about policy lynches on lurkers. Policy lynching can stifle discussion and we need discussion today. Once we get 24-36 hours in then we can consider it. Also, sometimes RL just happens for a day or two. Also, I think that there will be enough activity here. There are several players who I know will post a lot and we (the active players) cannot all die really early. Trying to defend one of the scum who is planning to lurk. You can't ignore all this evidence guys. hzflank is scum. ##Vote: hzflank He makes a pressure vote on hzflank and he never followed up on it at all. Yes, it did create a discussion between Rainbow and I, but not much from hzflank. He never provided his motive, explanation, or response after he made that one post. We know he was around when Rainbow and I were duking it out. Am I the only crazy one here and it's a normal thing to do with a pressure vote? If the purpose of the pressure vote is create a discussion why didn't he take a part? He takes it down couple of pages later basic saying that it didn't do much except getting some discussion. jkirby on Hurricane is basically this in my eyes: Your first post makes you look town. I think you post this AS A SCUM. If you are not, then show us your other post. Darn, it's too late now. I follow the thought process but it doesn't do much. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 09:35 jrkirby wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 09:30 StiMaDDict wrote: On July 13 2013 09:22 jrkirby wrote: On July 13 2013 09:14 Hurricane Sponge wrote: On July 13 2013 09:10 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 08:57 Hurricane Sponge wrote: On July 13 2013 08:54 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 08:42 Hurricane Sponge wrote: On July 13 2013 08:33 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote: The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we? Why did you include this? Are you saying you wouldn't have posted this if you were scum? Correct. I would not have posted this particular post as scum. On July 13 2013 08:46 Hurricane Sponge wrote: On July 13 2013 08:43 Rainbows wrote: On July 13 2013 08:41 Umasi wrote: [quote] I certainly wouldn't post that if I were scum, it is nothing but a good thing for town. Why WOULD he want to post that as scum? to look town. Scum love to spew general pro town thingsvto get ez town cred.. This is correct. In general, these sorts of posts should result in a null read in a veteran game. But Early Day 1, when it's generally assumed nothing interesting is happening, seemed like a good time to get PSA's out of the way for a newbie crowd. The info is valuable, but it should not get me town cred. It's more important to me that there's a town consensus on the actual content of the post, not my alignment. (Plenty of time for that later.) You obviously think that your post was pro town, right? That's why you shouldn't have posted it as scum. But then you say that you shouldn't get town cred from it, indicating that you don't think it's pro town. ? Pro town in a newbie game, yes. Probably wouldn't have posted it in a Veteran game unless I really felt the Day 1 conversation stagnating early. I think all my posts are pro-town. Otherwise, why would I post them? (That should apply to everyone but those with a severe inferiority complex.) That doesn't answer the point. The point is that your logic is inconsistant. You say that you wouldn't have posted this as scum. Why? You think that the post is valuable enough to town that scum wouldn't want to post it. You think that only a townie would post it. However, you say that you shouldn't get a town read for it, even though you think that only town would post it. I'm not in the business of telling people I'm town. I'm going to scumhunt and try to win this game, and a byproduct of that should be that people will view me as town. Put another way: I don't believe posting specifically with the goal of acquiring towncred is particularly helpful in anything but circumstances where I could be mislynched. I'm prioritizing getting the Town ducks in a row here in the early going so we can move on to the scumhunt, not establishing my Townie-ness. Interestingly, people (Chrom and jrkirby) have seemed more interested in analyzing why I posted rather than what I posted. Can I infer by this that we largely agree with what I have said? Pretty much what you said was: meta is bad, this is the meta that I might accidentally do. That's fine, neither particularly good nor bad imo. But you claimed that you would only post it on the condition that you were town. You admit to having a post that you would post on the condition that you're scum (which I think is foolish), but you won't show it to us, and that's just a tiny bit suspicious. Seriously man.. this is the best you can do? If he has scum post, big deal. For all we know THIS could be his scum post. Who knows. Is this your first game jrkirby? "For all we know, THIS could be his scum post." That's exactly what I was trying to get information on. Here was my reasoning: if this is his scum post, then he won't HAVE a real scum post. But it's been long enough that he could've written another one by now, so no point in pushing it anymore. No, this is my second game, kinda. This starts jkirby's trend of hedging. He drops the pressure as soon as he feels as it has been too long and Sponge could've written a copy. He doesn't say Sponge is a town or scum because of this, which I find disturbing. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 09:46 jrkirby wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 09:41 Umasi wrote: On July 13 2013 09:35 jrkirby wrote: On July 13 2013 09:30 StiMaDDict wrote: On July 13 2013 09:22 jrkirby wrote: On July 13 2013 09:14 Hurricane Sponge wrote: On July 13 2013 09:10 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 08:57 Hurricane Sponge wrote: On July 13 2013 08:54 Chromatically wrote: On July 13 2013 08:42 Hurricane Sponge wrote: [quote] Correct. I would not have posted this particular post as scum. On July 13 2013 08:46 Hurricane Sponge wrote: [quote] This is correct. In general, these sorts of posts should result in a null read in a veteran game. But Early Day 1, when it's generally assumed nothing interesting is happening, seemed like a good time to get PSA's out of the way for a newbie crowd. The info is valuable, but it should not get me town cred. It's more important to me that there's a town consensus on the actual content of the post, not my alignment. (Plenty of time for that later.) You obviously think that your post was pro town, right? That's why you shouldn't have posted it as scum. But then you say that you shouldn't get town cred from it, indicating that you don't think it's pro town. ? Pro town in a newbie game, yes. Probably wouldn't have posted it in a Veteran game unless I really felt the Day 1 conversation stagnating early. I think all my posts are pro-town. Otherwise, why would I post them? (That should apply to everyone but those with a severe inferiority complex.) That doesn't answer the point. The point is that your logic is inconsistant. You say that you wouldn't have posted this as scum. Why? You think that the post is valuable enough to town that scum wouldn't want to post it. You think that only a townie would post it. However, you say that you shouldn't get a town read for it, even though you think that only town would post it. I'm not in the business of telling people I'm town. I'm going to scumhunt and try to win this game, and a byproduct of that should be that people will view me as town. Put another way: I don't believe posting specifically with the goal of acquiring towncred is particularly helpful in anything but circumstances where I could be mislynched. I'm prioritizing getting the Town ducks in a row here in the early going so we can move on to the scumhunt, not establishing my Townie-ness. Interestingly, people (Chrom and jrkirby) have seemed more interested in analyzing why I posted rather than what I posted. Can I infer by this that we largely agree with what I have said? Pretty much what you said was: meta is bad, this is the meta that I might accidentally do. That's fine, neither particularly good nor bad imo. But you claimed that you would only post it on the condition that you were town. You admit to having a post that you would post on the condition that you're scum (which I think is foolish), but you won't show it to us, and that's just a tiny bit suspicious. Seriously man.. this is the best you can do? If he has scum post, big deal. For all we know THIS could be his scum post. Who knows. Is this your first game jrkirby? "For all we know, THIS could be his scum post." That's exactly what I was trying to get information on. Here was my reasoning: if this is his scum post, then he won't HAVE a real scum post. But it's been long enough that he could've written another one by now, so no point in pushing it anymore. No, this is my second game, kinda. Why is there no point in pushing it? There's no reason to not push it if you think it was scummy, and if you were pushing it for the sake of having something to do, just go do something else. Still, more people, what do you think of Superfluous post and then disappearance? Me - "It's been long enough that he could've written another one by now." If he had posted one immediately after I had asked it means something different than if he posts one an hour or two after I asked. Superfluous's post & lurk is bad, but give him a bit, he might show back up. Umasi feels the same way it seems. Another excuse and nothing to indicate how he feels about Sponge as a result. The bold part is another hedging. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 09:58 jrkirby wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 09:53 Superfluous wrote: To address some things, especially umasi I guess. I apologize for not answering sooner, the other forums I have played on move much slower and there arent 2 and a half pages of posts after being gone for just 3-4 hours. I would be annoyed at your pushing but I think in general its a good town move as it forces information out of people. All I was saying is that, to me, we have a higher chance of lynching town than mafia. We may also end up outing a role prematurely by pushing for a day one lynch. The games that I've played/followed where mafia has 1 kp it's standard to not lynch day one. Here there is no guarantee of cop so it's different, that's why I was asking about others' opinions and not saying we 100% should do it. Sorry if you felt my post was irrelevant but no one else had even pointed it out as an option. I feel like I'm just re stating what I already said in my previous post, not sure what else you want. I think it's foolish to PLAN to not lynch day one. But if I have a choice of lynching someone that I townread, and lynching no one, I will try to lynch no one. I hope other people would follow suit. This is his opinion. I don't agree with persay but it isn't really alignment indicative. It isn't a strong expression of opinion to be honest, just a "wish" (I added this because I didn't want to only pick out scummy things jkirby said and ignore rest of his filter) + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 10:13 jrkirby wrote: Koshi Xzavier Nightcat99 Gotard cloud-9 These players haven't posted anything/enough in my opinion. It's only been a couple hours, so you might be asleep/ at work. But just a PSA, these are currently "lurkers". Doesn't reveal his view on lurkers but just "throw" the topic of lurkers out on the table. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 10:22 jrkirby wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 10:18 Umasi wrote: Does it really matter if we haven't seen things from other players at this point? It's been two hours since the game began, some people could still be working, etc. The way you popped in, said one thing kinda suspicious, then popped out is what really irks me. Don't apologize and talk about other forums as an excuse, excuses are bad. Reasons are fine, but that didn't feel like a reason to me. We don't need to point out no lynching as an option, because it's BAD No lynching is something that scum would LIKE. I think I said it in the last game I played (too lazy to dig it up,) but the only tool a townie has is their vote, so don't waste it on something like a no lynch. There should always be someone who is objectively "scummiest" that you'd rather vote for than no lynch, have a little confidence. Well, this game is majority lynch, so voting for the "scummiest" person could be what causes a lynch not to happen. I'm pretty sure scum wouldn't mind lynching town either. General common sense. It's just me but I don't like this semi-joking statement. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 10:32 jrkirby wrote: Honestly? I have real trouble seeing scum until I see voting patterns. I'm slightly more suspicious of Sponge, Umasi, and Rainbows than the rest. Sponge I've stated my reasons for. I don't really trust my read on Rainbows because [meta here] I thought he was scum last time I played with him and he wasn't. Umasi just reads a bit ornery, so that could be the reason for my weak read. My vote on hzflank was kinda a combo of joke/pressure as you guys pointed out. It got a bit of discussion, but didn't get much of a rise out of hzflank, who I currently have null read on. I guess I should unvote him now, since the pressure obviously didn't do too much. ##unvote: hzflank A list of suspicion list that doesn't have "legitimate" reasons or evidence. So he does feel suspicious about Sponge afterall about him not sharing his opening post in time, I'm assuming. About Rainbow, I am not sure. He words in a confusing way. In last game, jkirby thought Rainbow was scum but he was a town. So in this game he thinks Rainbow is a town but he could be a scum or vise versa? Concerning Umasi, his reasoning it not satisfying either. Also he doubts his ability to read other people. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 11:03 Chromatically wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 10:32 jrkirby wrote: On July 13 2013 10:23 Chromatically wrote: Kirby, who do you think is scum? Honestly? I have real trouble seeing scum until I see voting patterns. I'm slightly more suspicious of Sponge, Umasi, and Rainbows than the rest. Sponge I've stated my reasons for. I don't really trust my read on Rainbows because [meta here] I thought he was scum last time I played with him and he wasn't. Umasi just reads a bit ornery, so that could be the reason for my weak read. My vote on hzflank was kinda a combo of joke/pressure as you guys pointed out. It got a bit of discussion, but didn't get much of a rise out of hzflank, who I currently have null read on. I guess I should unvote him now, since the pressure obviously didn't do too much. ##unvote: hzflank Why are you suspicious of Rainbows? What do you think about Super? Chromatically followed up asking why jkirby is suspicious of Rainbow and what he thinks of Super. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 11:56 StiMaDDict wrote: Waiting on jkirby's response to Chromatically's question. I had same question as Chromatically and brought it back up. At the end, he still hasn't answered it at the time of me posting this. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 10:47 jrkirby wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 10:42 Rainbows wrote: I play exactly the same as scum and town imo. Last game was just me being frustrated and correct :p lol. You should fear the Rainbows. Anyone think this could be a scumslip? He seems the kind that might want to subtly brag about it if he were scum. I can never figure out when people are joking and not. This is just really fucking weak and gets on my nerve. If it is a joke, then fuck me. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 10:58 jrkirby wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 10:56 Umasi wrote: He came in, emphasized his newness to the game, and it felt like he was giving excuses for not posting, not reasons. (I realize that they're extremely similar, but I think it's a matter of tone) the timing he came in at (right when we brought up lurkers) to be like "I'm trying not to lurk" is just kind of......weird? I think it's out of place and scummy. He said he couldn't be in here at the beginning before the game started, right? No real reason to have suspicion on the lurkers yet, just note that they're lurking. This is pretty fucking bad. Protecting a lurker when he was the one to bring up the topic at all. I don't know what he is trying to do, but then again, I'm fucked up pretty hard with my playstyle.. Anyway, protecting not just one lurker but pretty much all of them and making an excuse for them makes me think he is a scum. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 13:21 jrkirby wrote: Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 13:14 StiMaDDict wrote: On July 13 2013 13:08 Umasi wrote: Nightcat, the best way to establish innocence is to scum hunt, it's always time to scumhunt. Apparently I'm the scummiest fucking bastard in this game. Jump on board the StiM wagon and earn easy town cred! You know, I'm done. Contribute? Yeah fucking right. Sit in front of the computer for 6 fucking hours refreshing and trying to god damn contribute and what I get is "so you weren't angry but you pretended to be angry?" Town shouldn't lie about that. I wasn't fucking lying. Jesus. w/e. Cool it dude. For all you know, the people voting for you could be scum trying to get you riled up. Just calm down, post reads, question things, and have a good game. You won't play your best when you're tilting. You're in no way doomed right now. I guess I should thanks for his kind words (?) but as Chromatically has pointed out, he is trying to pat me on the head as if he is saying, "Chromatically and Umasi could scum you know. Come here, you poor baby." + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 13:31 jrkirby wrote: 2 votes land on a guy is quick succession, I'd be stupid if I weren't at least a BIT suspicious. As far as I can tell, stim is just acting like a bit of an idiot, is flustered, and frustrated. Doesn't seem like scumtell to me. You're free to have your vote, and I don't have a solid scumread on either of you, but I will be looking a bit more closely at your filters. No stand or point whatsoever. I'm not a scum. Chromatically and Umasi are not scum, but they are "bit" suspicious. What is your stance man? Stop hedging. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 13:38 jrkirby wrote: I don't think he's town. I think he's stupid, and have a nullread. Well thanks, I think I'm stupid too. I'm not a town but you have a nullread on me? What was the purpose of writing above two posts then? Confused and scummy. I am not liking how he is dealing with me blowing up. He seems to be neither or both defending and pressuring in this situation. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 13:42 jrkirby wrote: I don't think he's thinking through what he's saying. His actions don't seem town because they're foolish from every way you look at them. But that doesn't make him clearly scum. Hedging. Period. Conclusion: jkirby is my biggest scumread atm. He seems to be Onegue from XLII. Acting as if he is contributing but without actual content. He is not really expressing his reads and tend much more to hedge. He has not established a strong stance as a town and hasn't given clear reasons for his suspicion. ##Vote: jkirby Mmmm greetings stranger. I'm not surprised to see your kind around here... I like the case, esp the hedging point. +1 | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 14 2013 02:42 Koshi wrote: Show nested quote + On July 14 2013 02:09 Rainbows wrote: Why are Chrom and Umasi super scummy to you? They just seem to be scumhunting to me, and the only reason you have for them being scum, is you don't like their choice of scum candidates. Super scummy is putting words in my mouth. I don't like that. Somebody asked me to give my 2 scum reads and my 2 town reads. I replied. Well you obviously think they are scummy, sans the super. Don't avoid the question. Why are chrom/umasi scummier than other dudes like superfluous / lurkers? | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
His first post is a giant list that accomplishes next to nothing and provides little original. Lists are generally an easy way to feign contribution while doing jack. + Show Spoiler + On July 13 2013 19:53 Gotard wrote: Hello! After some lurking (jk I was sleeping) i'd like to share my thoughts: 1) hzflank - cold, calculated. Null read. 2) StiMaDDict - bad town. It would be too easy if he's mafia. 3) Chromatically - I think he's pushing stim too hard (he's agressive in general) but at the same time it's good for town to see some bandwagons going 4) jrkirby - confuses me a little.But he has a similar view on StiMaDDict as i do. Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 13:38 jrkirby wrote: I don't think he's town. I think he's stupid, and have a nullread. 5) Koshi - inexperienced or lurking hard. 6) Xzavier - one good post Show nested quote + On July 13 2013 04:58 Xzavier wrote: its fine, all i have to do is show supporting evidence and never try to make my own case on gotard. No wait, that one was good. Need to see some more activity from him to have a read. I don't agree that lynching lurker is better than no lynch (9v3 > 8v3) 7) Rainbows - A lot of posts with minimum impact seems more townie than mafia. Show nested quote + wtf?On July 13 2013 10:42 Rainbows wrote: I play exactly the same as scum and town imo. 8) Nightcat99 - lurking newbie. 9) Umasi - Very aggressive same as last game I played with him (He was town). 11) Hurricane Sponge - biggest town read. Really liked this post. 12) Superfluous - Town vibe. 13) cloud-9 - US timezone and 0 posts. He also seems apprehensive about making decisions. In the following he notes that he is "confused. . . not sure of anything", as if he doesn't want to take responsibility for his scum reads. His jokes (see below and above) are also punctuated with (jk) like he really doesn't want to be taken seriously. "Just incase you guys were wondering, that's a joke post" -MLuneth, scum. On July 13 2013 20:12 Gotard wrote: Easy question. Umasi and Xzavier!!! (jk) I'm really confused because my biggest (biggest doesn't mean that i'm really sure of anything) scum reads don't think that Stim is mafia. Maybe they don't want to vote on him because they know that this is too easy and don't want to jump on him that early. He looks like a bad town not like mafia. The rest of Gotard's filter is calling Stim not mafia. He's obviously bad town guise and not mafia.. he knows? Anyway, Gotard has a low post count, does lists, and seems nervous about things when he really shouldn't be if town. I think he's scum. Discuss. ##Vote: Gotard | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
In either case we do need 7 votes to lynch today. if its a nl, imma be pissed. We need to consolidate a few candidates that we can choose from. I say Gotard Jlirby and super | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
![]() .. whenever i get home ill revote cus u guys dont wanna kill him. im feeling jrkirby is the better lynch, I'll case it later. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
That strikes me as odd. Scum would do it to stay alive. Town would do it to stay alive. Anyone have some insight as to motivation (with the exception of 'he thinks Gotard is scum and not Super') because I can't justify it from either alignments perspective. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 15 2013 03:15 StiMaDDict wrote: @Rainbow: Explain your unvote on Gotard please. Has your scumread on him changed or do you feel as if you need to change your vote due to majority voting system. I think he's scum. Just not the scum we're lynching today. Since he's voting JrKirby, I feel like Super is the better lynch. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 15 2013 03:19 Chromatically wrote: Show nested quote + On July 15 2013 03:16 Rainbows wrote: On July 15 2013 03:15 StiMaDDict wrote: @Rainbow: Explain your unvote on Gotard please. Has your scumread on him changed or do you feel as if you need to change your vote due to majority voting system. I think he's scum. Just not the scum we're lynching today. Since he's voting JrKirby, I feel like Super is the better lynch. You're voting purely based on preflip associations, which you just said were bad? Both dudes on the block are scummy, Super just has less redeeming qualities.Pre-flip associations are bad. Very bad. Though as a mortal, I do bad things all the time. The problem I'm facing is figuring out which wagon is scum. My town reads are all over these two guys (and if my town reads are scum, GJ dudes, fuck these bad townies). Super just makes big paragraphs and has a ton of excuses blah blah blah. I have no qualms with lynching either of these guys, I may as well spin around and play pin-the-tail-on-the-scum at this point. Hurray for Day 1's, the only reason I'm rather 'meh' as town is because I have no information from the start. As scum I know all the things and am never wrong because my objective is to kill town. Fun Fact: I love playing scum :p | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
Who is most suspect in this case? | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
I feel like either of them could be scum. Super just toqnreads everyone when as town you should be suspect of everyone | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 15 2013 05:07 Rainbows wrote: Not really. I phone post 90% of the time so it's hard to sit down and make a case of it. I feel like either of them could be scum. Super just toqnreads everyone when as town you should be suspect of everyone I lied this describes Gotard better. My votes on super but I really dont care who's lynched between the two. #Scummylogic | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
kirby and super could be anything. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
Lol. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
vote: jrkirby cus chrom said so | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
kirby if you're blue, claim now. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
And i love to bang my head on concrete | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
Although i have next 3 days off to kill scum so :D | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
Im prolly going to change my mind again anyway. I never really read all of what chrom was saying because i dont have time. Patience. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
maybe both of these guys are town. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
Kirby is town. His list post and recent activity feels townie. Super might be scum. Lynch him. But I think both might be town here. If I'm right I believe Koshi/Gotard/plus one lurker are scumteam. Id love to explain but again, working atm. Im trying to shoot off what im thinking as we go but it sucks i cant quote here. Will probably be voting super again later. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
5-6 | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
Both might be town. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
Lynch Gotard last hour of game :o | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
On July 15 2013 07:50 Superfluous wrote: ALSO IMPORTANT NOTE If there is a cop, I feel an obligation to point out that it is more important to check active people who are pushing hard than it is to check lurkers. It is generally a better policy to lynch lurkers and check actives than to lynch actives and and check lurkers. Also, the Mafia WANT people who are difficult to read in the end game to cause confusion amongst the town, and having a cop check on these people can win the game for town. It is also dangerous if someone like Umasi or Chroma are mafia and go unchecked, because they are controlling the conversation and pushing hard on people. Whyvdo you care so much about cops. fuck cops. framers and millers good roles. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
That could be fun. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
July 14 2013 23:56 GMT
#1003
| ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
July 15 2013 18:58 GMT
#1281
By the end of Day 1 I thought both super and Kirby were probably town and wanted to lynch one because nobody wanted to lynch Gotard. Just because I think they might be town doesn't mean they shouldn't be lynched. I don't know their alignment, nor does any other townie. I'd have preferred to lynch somebody else but even with the Tribunal shit going down it didn't look like It'd happen. So, I gave very little shits who was lynched. It's day 1. Tomorrow shit gets real. If I were scum I'd know the alignments of both these guys and have a strong stance and just never really waver from it. Hz, I'm blatantly thinking about the game and trying to figure out who was town/scum. I thought Kirby was prolly town, yes, but i don't know he's town. Super was scummier objectively imo, but it seemed a lot like he just played 'follow the cop' a lot on epicmafia or something. I jumped around terribly. It doesn't mean I'm mafia -- it means I don't know wtf anyone is in this game. It would have been hell of a lot less suspicious to just jump on either candidate (provided super is town as well) and just sit there. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
July 15 2013 20:23 GMT
#1290
Chrom, your case on me is bad. It boils down to me lynching the guy you wanted, and not really caring. Nobody wanted to lynch Gotard so I lynched the other dude. I can't really oppose the lynch when all I can do is watch and write little snippets from my phone at work. | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
July 16 2013 00:35 GMT
#1359
I just got home and was about to unleash the mother of all posts on the thread. GL town | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
July 18 2013 00:20 GMT
#1918
![]() | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
July 21 2013 00:24 GMT
#2172
The irony. ![]() | ||
Rainbows
Germany1217 Posts
July 21 2013 20:30 GMT
#2210
| ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games tarik_tv48458 summit1g17049 FrodaN4578 sgares1057 Beastyqt658 JimRising ![]() ViBE118 Maynarde115 JuggernautJason48 Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • RyuSc2 StarCraft: Brood War![]() • davetesta73 • IndyKCrew ![]() • Migwel ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • sooper7s • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
SOOP
PiG Sty Festival
Clem vs SKillous
Rogue vs Zoun
Afreeca Starleague
Queen vs BeSt
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Monday
PiG Sty Festival
Serral vs MaNa
ByuN vs Classic
Afreeca Starleague
Jaedong vs Light
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Creator
Cure vs ShoWTimE
[ Show More ] Replay Cast
SpeCial vs Cham
The PondCast
PiG Sty Festival
Reynor vs Bunny
Dark vs Astrea
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
Hatchery Cup
PassionCraft
Circuito Brasileiro de…
Sparkling Tuna Cup
PiG Sty Festival
Circuito Brasileiro de…
|
|