Basterd Mini Mafia - Page 101

On July 05 2013 08:54 marvellosity wrote:
Seems reasonably likely to me scum got their fakeclaims at the start to be honest.

"But marv!" I hear you say. "You have no basis for saying that! Why scum and not survivor?"

Well I have first-hand experience as a host with mucking up giving claims slightly. Newbie XXX I think. In any case, I gave scum the VT role PM at the start, but forgot to give it to the blues until halfway through Day 1 (sound familiar? xD). Precedent for scum getting things in a timely manner and other people not :p

On July 05 2013 08:59 WaveofShadow wrote:
iGrok should be counted as a player in this game for the amount he gets referenced.
##Vote: iGrok

On July 05 2013 08:58 gumshoe wrote:


Fine then, that still doesn't change Jar Jar's situation. Judge him based on his actions, not the claim, sadly I'm not gonna be the one to make the case. Scum will just scream confirmation bias and Wifom from the hills. I'll pick someone else(more than one scum after all) and present my findings before night ends. Though I doubt scum will waste role block and shot on me.

On July 05 2013 08:51 gumshoe wrote:


................I took my vote off you because you claimed before we knew they're were fake claims in the game........................

On July 05 2013 09:08 marvellosity wrote:


This is the silliest thing you've written so far this game, gumshoe. There's currently 2 scum and 7 not-scum, for starters. If you have a good case to make, then make it.

On July 04 2013 13:10 WaveofShadow wrote:
Oh and a random question for Vivax whenever he gets back, if he happens to read this.
How do you know that scum don't have Hitler, hmmm?

On July 05 2013 08:00 Vivax wrote:


I'll trust you if you roleblock someone tonight.

The only sporting chance you can give scum is to roleblock the DT.
Scum Lazer can claim RB "Sorry bro no check". If he's town then you did scum a favour.
We should ask him what he thinks of it hehehe...

The thing is, whatever you do, you will have to conceal your real intentions.
Let's assume for a moment you will jail me and stop the next attempted shot from scum.

Scum will shoot you if they know you do that.

Needless to say that if you help scum and not town, you'll be on the lynching list tomorrow.

On July 05 2013 09:20 JarJarDrinks wrote:
how do you know there are fake claims in the game now?

On July 05 2013 09:22 marvellosity wrote:
Seems pretty damn likely it's how I described it earlier, given what fuba claimed.

On July 05 2013 09:24 marvellosity wrote:
oh, unless you're going for the argument that WoS is scum and lying about that stuff, right?

On July 05 2013 08:45 gumshoe wrote:
Also WOS is probably lying to cover his own ass, the dude doesn't want to help us. Above all take away the fake claims, just judge Jar Jar on his own merit. Do not rely on a flip flopping scum teasing survivor.

On July 05 2013 11:11 Oatsmaster wrote:
JJD, im nullish to scum.

On July 05 2013 00:22 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Do you think WoS had a role to fakeclaim when the subject of mass claiming came up?

On July 05 2013 00:23 Oatsmaster wrote:
What?
No I dont.
Which is why he felt fucked.

:>????

On July 05 2013 12:39 JarJarDrinks wrote:
Wrong. You have a town read on me. See here:

Unless for some reason you think that I had a fakeclaim while WoS didn't.

On July 05 2013 12:40 Oatsmaster wrote:

Im currently going with the theory that scum had fakeclaims at the start, survivor maybe, and the pause was not due to anything regarding claims.

On July 05 2013 12:45 JarJarDrinks wrote:

And so you think WoS was lying about feeling fucked? If so then why didn't you vote for him. Or did you only start to believe he was lying after the lynch?