[T] Nuclear Winter Mafia

On July 05 2013 02:20 WaveofShadow wrote:
Why kanopy whyyyyyyy
I'm already gonna have like 5 people in this game gunning for me right off the bat, you gotta contribute to this delinquency?

On July 05 2013 02:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote:

I invented Insane Mafia. Caller ain't got shit on me.

On July 05 2013 08:57 Dandel Ion wrote:
Or you'll find about the cross-game space/time-bending nukes my role has.

On July 07 2013 07:18 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

Yolo

On July 07 2013 07:22 gumshoe wrote:


I would consider yolo to act like technology in LOTR, is it inherently evil? Course not, is it used predominately BY evil? Sadly yes ) : so null leaning scum.

On July 07 2013 09:06 raynpelikoneet wrote:

Bah, you are asking questions too straightforward.
You never catch scum with that on D1, use your imagination. :D

On July 07 2013 09:13 Ace wrote:
Pretty sure rayne's nuke isn't real.

On July 07 2013 09:16 raynpelikoneet wrote:

What's the point of this question as i asked basically the same thing (without revealing my intentions) than Xatalos did from JW?

On July 07 2013 09:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Chez if you really had a nuke and launched it that was a fucking bad target.

On July 07 2013 09:24 OriginalName wrote:


He's insane, not stupid.

On July 07 2013 09:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:
vayne try to make some sense if you are town. This is the fucking worst nuke of the century.

On July 07 2013 09:48 WaveofShadow wrote:

I've already stated this, but he did it in mafia LX as mafia dayvig and he was scum.
Now, it's entirely possible that (as stated earlier by somebody) Chez was faking it and scum used it as cover to nuke Xat themselves. I'm willing to bet there was no need for Chez to actually type it in thread if it was his. Either way if people CAN stop this I'm not entirely sure it should be.

Also hai guise I back.
Did I miss anything important other than what is likely a whole bunch of town players all shitting on each other?

On July 07 2013 09:52 WaveofShadow wrote:
Kanopy I thought you were gonna nuke me wuts heppened?
Also don't tell anyone, but my nuke was fake. Vayne isn't actually going to die.

On July 08 2013 00:09 johnnywup wrote:
Shitty gutread? Maybe. But at least I'm voting scum. You're trying to start a bandwagon on an obvious townie.

On July 08 2013 00:18 WaveofShadow wrote:
Kanopy how many scum do you think have jumped aboard the Whoops Wagon thus far?

On July 08 2013 01:02 Xatalos wrote:
Maybe johnnywup should be allowed to live another day. Certainly Onegu, MajuGarzett, TanGeng and Abenson are looking bad, possibly worse than johnnywup, at the moment.

But why is WoS scum?

On July 08 2013 06:30 austinmcc wrote:
There isn't a reason not to lynch him eventually, based on his play so far.

I think that his filter is full of junk. His playful posts in the beginning add nothing. He's very, very ... accusatory/bristly, when I don't see a need for him to be. That's a characteristic to compare to past games. Early post towards you, later post towards johnny, just really being antagonistic when there's no reason. Beyond those, he's chimed in on a couple things but either after others have said the same thing, or with chiming that doesn't actually do anything/go anywhere. He don't look groovy.


Yes. Xat fakenuked Chez.

On July 07 2013 07:12 Dandel Ion wrote:
Also, in an concentrated effort to prepare for sicilian mafia (for which I'm not actually signed up for, but you can never know), I'll stop posting for the dayphase, and only vote from now on.

On July 08 2013 09:02 Ace wrote:
[


Explain the reasons why a Chezinu lynch is stupid (it may not be optimal, but stupid it isn't). Are you only going to support his lynch if Xatalos dies and flips Town? After the nuke was fired Chezinu disappeared and offered no explanation. If that nuke is real based on the mod's post then he knew what he was doing.

On July 07 2013 11:09 Chezinu wrote:
I think this is a cool video. http://www.wimp.com/unmannedrocket/

I cannot confirm nor deny anything about my nukes. I am following the rules rest assured.

On July 09 2013 01:36 Xatalos wrote:


What do you mean with this?

On July 09 2013 01:47 Xatalos wrote:



Wtf? We play to win, that's playing not to lose. Most likely it'd be the same as no-lynch.

On July 09 2013 01:55 WaveofShadow wrote:
##Vote: Dandel Ion
As a starting point.
If consolidation is necessary I'll move around as needed.

On July 09 2013 05:28 Xatalos wrote:
Hmmmmm. Okay, we shouldn't lynch austinmcc atm. I haven't even really noticed ON so far but I agree that he isn't looking too good. Especially that he doesn't seem to care who we lynch in the end.

On July 09 2013 05:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hey ON, you just happened to get back RIGHT when there is a case on you. Seems legit. :D

On July 09 2013 05:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay, first of all, you don't "forget" how to play mafia.
Second, i just read ON's D1 posts from LoTR. That's like a 100% difference.
My vote is staying.

On July 09 2013 05:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Okay, first of all, you don't "forget" how to play mafia.
Second, i just read ON's D1 posts from LoTR. That's like a 100% difference.
My vote is staying.

On July 09 2013 05:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:

If you are town this is 10000x worse performance than LoTR was.

On July 09 2013 05:45 geript wrote:
That's a pretty fucking stupid roleclaim Original. Why don't you either actually claim or not claim at all.

On July 09 2013 05:10 austinmcc wrote:
The person I want to lynch most actually isn't one of the super super lurky players, but OriginalName.

In this game specifically, out of all the people who have some posts but not bunches, he sticks out to me because I did not feel that his posts did anything/went anywhere. Please to open filter and follow along:

(1) ON posts a good number of trolly posts at the start of the game - + Show Spoiler +. He's around, but he's not actually affecting the game at all.

And so were about 10 other people yet you seem to like to single me out for this

(2) When he does post things that are relevant to the thread/engage someone in discussion, it's only on a one-post level. He doesn't actually follow up with conversations/questions, only chimes in about things. Here is early stuff, and really the only thing that comes to mind when I think of ON's play this D1 was him targeting JW:+ Show Spoiler +

(3) ON and JW:+ Show Spoiler +

(4) Okay! You're saying. That doesn't make him scum. Nope, it doesn't. But follow ON and JW down the road a ways:+ Show Spoiler +

I dont have to explcitly call him scum, my vote said that for me, I left for work and he posted a defense I was satisfied with he gave and outlined reasoning for his actions, others saw exactly what I did and converted to a different target, I advocated a lurker lynch and when we eventually moved towards DI I put my vote on him. This is nothing to do with uncaring about my vote.

(5) ON doesn't care about his vote, you say? Then why would he make posts such as these! + Show Spoiler +

---

---

---

---

(6) Fine austinmcc, but why is he scummy?

Ah. That's the question (unless you already find him scummy).

(A) He looks like he's interacting with the thread, but he's not really. Most of his posts are throwaways. Most of the ones that LOOK like they have analysis or votes or scumhunting or something are just air. He doesn't care about scumhunting, he doesn't seem to care at all about the game at all.

(B) I brought up his bristliness earlier, and he responded:
So what makes me different from Ace who "keeps his opinions close to his chest" am I not allowed the same luxury when I can't tell who is town or scum at all, almost everyone is a null tell due to the sheer amount of lurkers in this game. We could have the entire scum team lurking while we all point fingers around at each other as town and mislynch each other.

---

---

---

---

Please also note that he's not a newbie. It's not as if he's never scumhunted, never pressured anyone, etc. In terms of semi-recent filters, you can look at: Looney Lynching, Caller Game, Game of Thrones

While he sometimes posts in all caps or in an accusatory manner, he has a LOT of reasoned out posts in those games, posts that are entirely lacking from this game: + Show Spoiler +

On July 09 2013 05:53 austinmcc wrote:
You're being overly aggressive with this.

Yes, I'd like to hear a response. But good lord people need to give reasons for their votes. Something that they specifically agree with, something that resonates with them, ... a ghost told them to vote. All this voting for nothing more than "Case = vote" is butt.

---

---

ON, what two players would you nuke if you had 2 nukes and why? If you'd already made 2 nukes, who would you give them to?

Beyond that, are there other limitations? Can't give to the same person more than once? Can't stockpile them and have to give out each cycle?

On July 09 2013 06:04 geript wrote:
@rayn. lets just lynch alakaslam. this claim has been pretty sloppy.

On July 09 2013 06:08 geript wrote:
Eh. The last time a group was disatisfied with a lynch and moved things a bunch in the last couple hours AFAIK was Hydra 2 and we ended up lynching scum. Kinda odd that this game has had a bit of similar situations only with like a bajillion more roles.

On July 09 2013 06:10 Xatalos wrote:


Any role is "possible", what matters is how he roleclaimed. It happened immediately after he had been "away" for hours and austinmcc had just made a case on him. That's the kind of panic roleclaim a scum would do after staying in the shadows before that.

On July 09 2013 06:27 johnnywup wrote:
Someone please catch me on the past 8 pages?