I Swear This Is Normal Mini Mafia - Page 49

On June 13 2013 02:48 Blazinghand wrote:
Look even oats knows I'm town.

On June 13 2013 02:48 Oatsmaster wrote:

DP was 3p in les. Doesnt count.

On June 13 2013 02:50 Oatsmaster wrote:

I guess my read on you is a ringing endorsement huh.

On June 13 2013 02:51 Blazinghand wrote:


I'll take what i can get :3

seriously though if you guys decide to push a policy lynch me because you don't like my style (or in this case, pretend to don't like my style) then that does nothing to help town

On June 13 2013 02:50 GravityMan wrote:

DP wasn't the only one to vote BH in Les, was he?

Note BH already refusing. This feels EXACTLY like Carnival Cruise. Oats you were there. Remember how BH and I fought? Explain to me how this is different.

On June 13 2013 02:51 Oatsmaster wrote:
I dont actually remember.
Refresh my memory please.

On June 13 2013 02:52 Blazinghand wrote:


oh what's this, a meta case with no comparison to a town game, quotes, or links, despite my super well documented play history? kk

On June 13 2013 02:55 GravityMan wrote:

No. I've already relied on meta too much; it is not how I wanted to play this game. You can have a look yourself if you actually think BH might be scum; if he's already convinced you then don't bother. Your call.
I think at this point I'd honestly be content to be shot by VA if people are unclear about me by the end of the day, if it means that you guys will believe what I have said and lynch BH.

Going to go have some lunch. I'll be around later.

On June 13 2013 02:57 GravityMan wrote:

Final thing I will say before I go.
He is relying on the fact now that I have actively stated I will not dive through meta to form a case. I have seen town BH bring up his OWN examples of meta to prove other people wrong in cases like this. He would rather use his own self-confidence and bluffing tactics to get himself through this than very simply prove me wrong, were it possible to do so. He has no desire to display any useful information for the town to read.

Burn him with cleansing fire.

This also means you should condense your posts when possible. 15 one-liners in 30 minutes is unacceptable.

On June 13 2013 02:56 Oatsmaster wrote:
Um what, I wanna know your view because it affects my read on you.

Also martyring not cool yo.

On June 13 2013 02:57 Blazinghand wrote:


the point isn't that oats thinks you're lying (though perhaps he does), but rather, even if your ideas are genuine that doesn't mean you're RIGHT. there's no meta case to make against me. you can't just say the word "meta" and have that be a case. As a guy who writes a lot of meta cases, let me tell you: it's hard work. it requires effort to show what a player's meta is like both as scum and as town and compare that to the current game. you have not done this. If you're wondering why the only player you've "convinced" is VA it's because you haven't put in the work to actually convince anyone.

And honestly, if you are in fact town I'd like it if you DID check out my meta. You'd realize I'm town this game and stop pushing me.

I believe the man with Blazing hands to be scum.

He is far too content to take on those who are unlikely to be able to accuse him in return.

The displays of his ego given so far would seemingly belie that the mayoral campaign should have been perfect for him yet he is quick to back down. His reasoning is the same 'survival instinct' that this VayneAuthority seems to give yet different. I believe that Blazinghand is in actuality worried here about a power grab being seen as a scum trait, much as I was worried about you in the early game.

His relentless attack of the master of Oats seems to ebb and flow with the tide of the thread; that is, he only attempts to waste the town's time by attacking him and causing chaos (as he knows the Oats will react) when it is convenient for scum. Any time a clear mislynch target is not in the crosshairs of the town, jampidampi as example, he is content with thread direction; the exception to this being his quick flip in opinion as jampidampi returned to the thread.

He has had zero useful contribution to the thread beyond what I have outlined above. If he has other suspects in this game I am not sure as to whom they might be. On this he promised more activity tomorrow, however.
I would like to make it known that initially I thought he might be a member of the town until he continued to post and I realized how his perception of himself (or at the very least, the mask he wears so that people perceive as an egotistical being) affects his play.

Some things to note:
I am unconvinced in this Blazinghand's act while seemingly at death's door. I feel I am able to read this Hapahauli quite well at this point in the game, and to shoot someone without any warning whatsoever is not a very mayorly thing to do. The false shot was extremely obvious to me, though admittedly an interesting gambit. However, if the false shot was obvious to me, could it not also have been obvious to a player such as this Blazinghand who could then act in the most town-aligned way possible before his death? He has nothing to lose at this point even if the shot were real because were he actually shot and his aligned were revealed to be red, the players in this game would be likely to ignore his final posts as they could be likened to poisoned wine in two goblets. He still gives no reasoning for his reads even when asked yet people conveniently ignore this.

Blazinghand is content to have me destroyed, of course, but an interesting fact to point out is this Blazinghand's mention that he would rather have me hang from a tree than simply be shot with a bullet, thus wasting one of any town's strongest tools, and an entire day on the wrong target. Yes, the mayor bullet is a strong tool as well, and any member of the mafia would enjoying obtaining it, though perhaps the mafia are content to have it wasted here instead? I am unsure.

On June 12 2013 10:39 GravityMan wrote:

Let me rephrase it then.
You fail to offer sufficient reasoning to a great deal of strong stances that you take until badgered endlessly. I believe you promised reasoning as to why I should be shot or at the very least you told this Hapahauli that you'd be looking into my filter.

Lack of a better shot is not a reason to shoot me, and once again, I have shown how Hapahauli's reasoning as to why I appear scummy is false. If you do not like the questions I was asking you in order to divine your alignment, then, I believe the colloquial phrase is: "tough shit?" It certainly made it easier for me to determine how it is you play and how your perceived view of yourself influences your playstyle.

There is yet to be postulated one concrete objective reason as to why I am scummy. By anyone. Saying that I have not contributed is purely subjective as I believe I have and again, I have shown as such in previous posts.