FUCKIN OATSMASTEr

did he not post in the voting thread? jesus christ working with you people (zephirdd excluded) is like herding freakin cats

yeah fferyllt is my top choice today

mkfuba07

United States1151 Posts

May 18 2013 18:45 GMT

#724

Again, I'm willing to switch, but a fferyllt lynch feels really empty to me... It feels like I'm voting for someone I can't get a read on instead of someone who I think is likely to flip scum. I'll be around until the deadline (which I believe is in 1 hour, 15 minutes), and will switch to fferyllt to avoid a no-lynch, but would really prefer to lynch oats or sharrant.

Blazinghand

United States25563 Posts

May 18 2013 18:46 GMT

#725

mkfuba here's waht i'll say and this may sway you

fferyllt hasn't posted anything all game, and will not do so for the rest of the game. We gotta deal with her now, or at LYLO. your call.

fferyllt

United States317 Posts

May 18 2013 18:50 GMT

#726

1. Oatsmaster - null
2. Sharrant - null
4. deconduo - no counterclaim, tentative town
5. Zephirdd - town
7. ghost_403 - null
8. [UoN]Sentinel - leaning scum
9. Blazinghand - town
11. mkfuba07 - null
12. phagga - town

I doubt that all my town reads are accurate. But I bet there is at least one scum in my nulls. Possibly Sharrant. mkfuba07 has really not made any impression at all on me and that's probably a bad sign.

Blazinghand

United States25563 Posts

May 18 2013 18:50 GMT

#727

god I hope scum shoots me today and frees me from this agony

Blazinghand

United States25563 Posts

May 18 2013 18:52 GMT

#728

You have one scum read, it's "leaning scum", and it's on sentinel entirely because he defended you and nothing else in possibly the least interesting post of his filter

fferyllt

United States317 Posts

May 18 2013 18:52 GMT

#729

On May 19 2013 03:44 Blazinghand wrote:
ugh, whatever, i'll be checking in via phone if we need to do shenannies. everyone vote fferyllt.

I don't see any point in maintaining the uncertainty I obviously represent another game day, unless somebody has a strong argument for another player being scum.

[UoN]Sentinel

United States11320 Posts

May 18 2013 19:03 GMT

#730

On May 19 2013 03:50 fferyllt wrote:
1. Oatsmaster - null
2. Sharrant - null
4. deconduo - no counterclaim, tentative town
5. Zephirdd - town
7. ghost_403 - null
8. [UoN]Sentinel - leaning scum
9. Blazinghand - town
11. mkfuba07 - null
12. phagga - town

I doubt that all my town reads are accurate. But I bet there is at least one scum in my nulls. Possibly Sharrant. mkfuba07 has really not made any impression at all on me and that's probably a bad sign.

Of all the suspicious posts in the thread, only my whiteknighting is enough to give you a scum read? What kind of weed have you been smoking

##unvote
##vote fferyllt

Post actual reads pls

fferyllt

United States317 Posts

May 18 2013 19:04 GMT

#731

On May 19 2013 03:52 Blazinghand wrote:
You have one scum read, it's "leaning scum", and it's on sentinel entirely because he defended you and nothing else in possibly the least interesting post of his filter

He hasn't made a positive impression in most of his posts IMO. I'm not going to produce a wall of defense or a lengthy case on him. The interface is just too cumbersome to make that an easy task right now. I should have spent some time prior to the game getting more comfortable with this format.

deconduo

Ireland4122 Posts

May 18 2013 19:06 GMT

#732

I think I would prefer a ghost lynch, but I can get behind one on ffer. She has been a total non-entity this game, and while that may be due to this being her first TL game, its still no excuse.

##Vote fferyllt

Barbiero

Brazil5259 Posts

May 18 2013 19:07 GMT

#733

2 to go

fferyllt

United States317 Posts

May 18 2013 19:07 GMT

#734

Is that L-1?

Barbiero

Brazil5259 Posts

May 18 2013 19:09 GMT

#735

it takes 6 to lynch, we are at 4 votes.

Oatsmaster never actually voted.

fferyllt

United States317 Posts

May 18 2013 19:10 GMT

#736

I'll vote myself to prevent a nolynch if it comes to that.

Blazinghand

United States25563 Posts

May 18 2013 19:12 GMT

#737

well at least oats and decon moving together should shine some light on that situation

mkfuba07

United States1151 Posts

May 18 2013 19:14 GMT

#738

##Vote: fferyllt

phagga

Switzerland2194 Posts

May 18 2013 19:16 GMT

#739

hai guis

On May 17 2013 02:02 fferyllt wrote:
I'm seriously considering sheeping you, marvellosity. Want to reread some thread sections first, though.

On May 18 2013 03:20 fferyllt wrote:

Show nested quote +

On May 18 2013 01:00 phagga wrote:

On May 18 2013 00:56 fferyllt wrote:

On May 18 2013 00:35 phagga wrote:

On May 18 2013 00:29 fferyllt wrote:

On May 17 2013 23:37 Sharrant wrote:
Good morning everyone, glad to see I was wrong about Vivax.

I don't buy into the whole "hosts let him get away with using cardinal directions because he is scum", that could've been an honest mistake, I don't particularly buy into the host WIFOM. What I believe makes it a scum slip is that he said "I wanted to move here". A townie would have no idea who they are, so how could they have a specific destination in mind?

On the board I am most certainly L, all I did was an about face, didn't figure anyone else would do anything similar, and I didn't want to potentially move myself into a worse position by blindly moving. (about 70-30 chance of picking the right direction versus not)

It seems to me that the optimal movement for town is as follows: Form into large groups as quickly as possible, and gather up stragglers as we move around the board. The trick here, is that once we are into a group, we do not want our specific move patterns known. It's been revealed to us through Vivax's PM that the angels have a "leap" mechanic, where they match a players movement within a certain range. We can use this to our advantage in the following way: Once we are in groups of 3-4 people, the group will set a direction of up to 3 spaces. The players in the group will all keep their moves hidden but will do their best to follow the assigned direction and distance. (optimal distance is probably 1 or 2) The people on the outside of the group always move inwards, and the people on the insides always move outwards. I believe this would make the leaps ineffective in the clutter because of bodyblocking. It also means if an angel does get inside the group, we can pretty much guarantee at least someone will have their flashlight on the angel, after that it's just coordination.

[green]If an angel encounters an obstacle, say a town character, that is not their intended target during a leap what will happen?
If a player ends the night beside an Angel, does that Angel feed automatically, or does the Angel have to specify the target in advance and then get close to them?[green]

##Vote: Oatsmaster

The host wifom has made me leery of the Oatsmaster wagon. I think your paragraph 2 makes sense, though.

Can you expound on the bolded part?

I'm talking about the questions swirling over whether the host would accept and process a messed up move depending on the alignment of the player, and the fact that at least some of the votes on that wagon appear to be predicated on an answer of "yes, they would if the player were an Angel".

Ok, I understand that I asked the question wrong, because that's not what I wanted to know.

Is there anyone specific on the Oats wagon that you are leery of?

Also, quite generally, who would you like to lynch currently? Who looks like scum to you and why?

Gut says Ghost is the most questionable on the Oats wagon. I need to find time to figure out what my gut is worried about. Zeph freaked my out when he said my sole day 2 post (pretty sure it was one post at that point, where I said which letter I think is mine) looked better than my day 1 body of work.

I want to dig some more before answering your last questions. Probably in an hour or so.

Besides the lack of stances, we have two occasions of promised content that never came.

I'm on the wagon of justice, let's do this.

##Unvote
##Vote: fferyllt

choo choo