EPTCarnival Cruise Mafia - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
shirokami
Finland107 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On May 13 2013 04:14 prplhz wrote: @HiroPro Self-aware millers should generally always claim as first thing d1 (n0) so we don't have Cops checking into people we know will show scum and so we don't allow scum the excuse of "Oh, but I'm a miller" if we get a guilty check on them. @ObviousOne Are you serious? No this is just wrong. It only allows mafia to get away with claiming it right in the beginning. | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
But I did not actually offer you any bacon. Sorry. All mine. | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
if I had shown to you that his role wasn't possible then it would be mechanics. but this is simply behavior. there is no reason to claim as town. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On May 13 2013 04:18 HiroPro wrote: No this is just wrong. It only allows mafia to get away with claiming it right in the beginning. Naw, self-aware millers claim and then we kill them to confirm they aren't lying! I'm thinking there is at least one third party based on the wording of things. With instant majority lynches, I think the best way to run things is only allow a hammer within the last four hours of the cycle. Town benefits from an extended day as long as we have enough people around at the end of the cycle to achieve a majority. There is nothing more annoying than to see a bunch of random bandwagon votes without the opportunity to comment about it. Also, WoS scum. | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
On May 13 2013 04:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: It's not optimal. It's stupid or mafia. So you're saying mafia then. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
And at this point yes, best lynch. | ||
|
Vivax
22084 Posts
| ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
Miller and will show up red Mafia and will show up red Or Godfather or gaming with a framer role as mafia to bait a check So potential cop(s) has one less person to check and a potential parity cop(s) knows to steer clear. Ergo, as I said, analysis will be your salvation. | ||
|
shirokami
Finland107 Posts
| ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On May 13 2013 04:40 Vivax wrote: And you think the Wall-street investor thing is made up? And you think Wall-street investor has to be a town role? I don't even know where are you going with your question. | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
##summon VisceraEyes | ||
|
Vivax
22084 Posts
On May 13 2013 04:47 raynpelikoneet wrote: And you think Wall-street investor has to be a town role? I don't even know where are you going with your question. You're calling him mafia, I wanted to see if you thought through every parameter, and him using a fake name for miller is one of them. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10857 Posts
I understand that there are different schools of thought about claiming miller. But I am of the school that believes it is optimal to claim miller straight away and then get vigged or something worst case scenario rather than getting checked, wasting that check, going 'oh yeah I'm a miller guise don't lynch me' and then wasting a mislynch. Also it is incredibly unlikely that I as scum decided to fake claim immediately N0 for literally no reason. I am good at playing scum and frankly don't need to resort to cheesy shit like that. They only way I would claim miller like this was if I was, in fact, a miller and therefore town. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On May 13 2013 03:30 DarthPunk wrote: Ok. Cool. I am a Wall street Investor. Which is a self aware miller. darth, can you give me the reasoning behind you claiming this? also, what does WoS acronym mean? | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
| ||
