EPTHydra Mini Mafia II - Extra Nuke Edition - Page 18
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
| ||
|
John Matrix
163 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:28 VIVAX420 wrote: Come on, some people didn't even post and I'm not guaranteeing for anyone but early tunnels for stupid reasons are something we don't need. Hapa attacks VE cause he thinks he said anti-town stuff, yamato attacks Hapa cause he says it's not anti-town from VE. → not-so-good reasons from both sides. But Hapa's argument could fit into a policy against anti-town play, yamato's possible motives for defending VE and keeping up the comfy tunnel..I find scummy. All I saw of relevance was Yamato defending FT and then denying that he's defending him, coupled with an early tunnel and excessive aggression. I like this post. -DP | ||
|
ShotgunBiceps
171 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:32 VIVAX420 wrote: Shotgun, VE being openly lazy and careless doesn't make him scum, I have to say that keeping to push that as only reason for thinking he's scum doesn't look good, why don't you inquire further if you have a suspicion instead of defending your argument? Well I'm waiting for VE to respond. Hard to pursue my suspicion when several people are sheidling him. In fact I'd love nothing more htan to have a 1v1 conversation with VE right now so I can sort out if my read has more basis or not. Unfortunately people aren't letting me do so. But it's creating discussion, so I suppose that's fine. | ||
|
InsertSmurfHere
288 Posts
| ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
| ||
|
John Matrix
163 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:27 InsertSmurfHere wrote: It does make you someone worth looking at if you're spouting pure lies, lol. Now show me some VE wuotes after that one where he's not being serious and I'll retract my threat to lynch you. On April 13 2013 08:51 FiveTouch wrote: You monologued too much Hapa. Haven't you ever seen Incredibles? If you want to lynch me you are bad. Go away. -DP | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:35 InsertSmurfHere wrote: This whole thing reminds me of RTP, Hapa, only you're me with the terrible case that ignores meta, and I'm you calling bullshit. What's the comparison to RTP? Also on the subject of meta, to what scum-games of mine does my behavior so far compare to? | ||
|
InsertSmurfHere
288 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:40 John Matrix wrote: If you want to lynch me you are bad. Go away. -DP No, let's talk about this, because you're all on the sidelines snidely remarking about things while Hapa, Marv, VE and I are arguing this out. Defend your stance more explicitly, because I GUARANTEE that I can find a serious VE quote when you explicitly said he wasn't being serious. | ||
|
VIVAX420
556 Posts
| ||
|
InsertSmurfHere
288 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:41 Hapahauli wrote: Flood Control is annoying and I can't reply as rapidly as I'd like to everyone. Just goign to post on my main account and quote-block everything to my filter What's the comparison to RTP? Also on the subject of meta, to what scum-games of mine does my behavior so far compare to? None, but I do know that you're more than capable of being aware of why I caught you as scum in Duel and how to play differently. | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:39 FiveTouch wrote: I'm right here. You're the one not talking to me Hapa. Too many people talking at once - kinda hard to focus. Anyway, my suspicions stand that your quote was completely negative and anti-discussion. But you can't really contest that, since that's just my interpretation of it. So let's move on to other things: You were so eager to start discussion of actual things and "serious business." Well clearly things are more serious now, yet you've been making random troll-remarks during the course of this conversation. What gives? | ||
|
John Matrix
163 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:43 InsertSmurfHere wrote: No, let's talk about this, because you're all on the sidelines snidely remarking about things while Hapa, Marv, VE and I are arguing this out. Defend your stance more explicitly, because I GUARANTEE that I can find a serious VE quote when you explicitly said he wasn't being serious. I didn't mean he was EXCLUSIVELY not being serious. I found it odd that he would state that he was as an excuse and then proceed not to be. Odd. that is my stance. -DP | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:43 InsertSmurfHere wrote: None, but I do know that you're more than capable of being aware of why I caught you as scum in Duel and how to play differently. Well the reason you caught me in Duel is because I can't play differently. I simply can't replicate my activity in my town games in my scum-games. If you think I'm capable of my current posting as scum, it's rather flattering, but unfortunately it's wrong. | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
| ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:45 Hapahauli wrote: Too many people talking at once - kinda hard to focus. Anyway, my suspicions stand that your quote was completely negative and anti-discussion. But you can't really contest that, since that's just my interpretation of it. So let's move on to other things: You were so eager to start discussion of actual things and "serious business." Well clearly things are more serious now, yet you've been making random troll-remarks during the course of this conversation. What gives? I don't think I've been making random troll-remarks during this conversation. I think I've been stating my mind and being honest with the thread. If you can point out which remarks you're referring to I might be able to help you further. | ||
|
John Matrix
163 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:47 Hapahauli wrote: Oh heya DP - was that vote on me by you or Palmar? If it's you, just gimme the reasoning and whatnot. All my posts have been signed. So it was palmar. | ||
|
InsertSmurfHere
288 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:46 Hapahauli wrote: Well the reason you caught me in Duel is because I can't play differently. I simply can't replicate my activity in my town games in my scum-games. If you think I'm capable of my current posting as scum, it's rather flattering, but unfortunately it's wrong. I do doubt that you're mafia, but I find the likelihood high. I genuinely don't think you're bad enough to make that case. | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:50 InsertSmurfHere wrote: I do doubt that you're mafia, but I find the likelihood high. I genuinely don't think you're bad enough to make that case. Actually DP can tell you a thing or two about my bad cases on Day 1 as town. Anyway I'm going to finish with VE and then we can have a chat. Toodles for now. | ||
|
John Matrix
163 Posts
On April 13 2013 09:50 InsertSmurfHere wrote: I do doubt that you're mafia, but I find the likelihood high. I genuinely don't think you're bad enough to make that case. Just saying, this is bad reasoning. I used to say the same thing about marv, and then thought he was scum several times for being 'bad' when he was not. I think we can agree that marv is probably a better player than hapa (no offense) and if marv can be wrong/bad a whole hell of a lot so can hapa. | ||
|
FiveTouch
Marshall Islands1474 Posts
Oh and I bolded the statement that invalidates your entire stance. You've been arguing that your read is good because my post is objectively scummy, yet you state yourself that there's NO DEFENSE TO BE MADE because it's based on your interpretation of my post, or in other words, not objective at all, rather subjective. | ||
| ||
