|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 08 2013 06:56 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2013 06:48 marvellosity wrote:On April 08 2013 06:47 DarthPunk wrote:On April 08 2013 06:38 marvellosity wrote:
so the dude who passively shifts suspicion by following others and passively flings suspicion at Palmar without accusing him and the way he wanted to kill Oats for being a 'distraction' screams townie?
Oki doki. Ace had suspicions upon you before I did. So either quit lying or read the thread. maybe he did, but only passive little attacks. He only truly attacked me and voted for me after you started sustaining an attack on me. Go read the thread yourself, you little shit. So he only attacked you after me by your definition of attack? But you didn't say at all that you were applying your own definition as to what constitutes a real attack. you stated that he hadn't until I did. Which is not true. And doing so at all, even a little, totally changes the value of that argument.
No, actually it completely adds to the argument. Ace was happy to just ping silly little attacks at me, but would never take it anywhere.
Then you come in with an attack on me, and suddenly Ace is happy to go on a full frontal attack on me, safe behind you.
Same deal with Palmar, in numerous posts he flings suspicion at him but will never outright attack him.
Oh by the way, let me destroy your Oats case quickly and easily:
On March 26 2013 23:48 Oatsmaster wrote:*Insert dramatic music*
I 180.
(so scummy bla bla bla)SnB is a soft town read because after rereading and thinking about it, it seems like he is trying to push prp into posting productively and not spammily, as opposed to actually wanting to lynch him. Therefore my suspicions on him were unwarrented. Insert is soft scum because he seems to act like an authority on DI's meta with his case, but then states that he is not familiar with DI's opening town meta. He also states that Show nested quote +On March 26 2013 13:17 InsertSmurfHere wrote:
I didn't ignore all of Dandel's town games.
which means that he ignored some to make the scum favored argument. Your turn ray.
On March 27 2013 22:43 Oatsmaster wrote:I dont know. Hmm. Like nisani is scummy, but there are players that are scummy as town too. SO IM WISHYWASHY AS FUCK AND CANT MAKE A DECISION. Or find scum. Hmm.I kinda want Palmar to die though.
Oh look, Oats with "inherent guilt" or whatever you babbled about. Except he was town. It means nothing.
|
DP I'm not one to make a big deal of meta cases but even a simple comparison between Ace this game and last game.
When this game has Ace shown any real amount of passion or interest in who we SHOULD be lynching today in comparison to the way he acted when we were flip-flopping back and forth on VE last game?
|
On April 08 2013 06:50 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2013 06:49 Palmar wrote:
DP I don't think any lynch that isn't Ace is going to fly tonight. So your options are literally "Ace or No-Lynch". Why won't you lynch oats? also we have four hours. And in no way am I content with what i believe will be a mislynch.
Because I had (for some reason I can't recall now) a pretty good "this guy's probably town" hunch on him.
I do promise you, in case Ace flips town (I'm giving this lynch about 50% chance of success), Marv and Oats will be the first people I'm looking to, for multiple reasons. I can't promise you I'd lynch either as i'd have to rethink, but a serious look would be taken.
I hope you are aware that I put both marv and oats in the "7 players where I think 2-3 scum are" list.
|
We need three votes in the next few hours.
Kill sonofabitch.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
rayn - I know you're about. Get your sorry ass in here and play the game.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 08 2013 07:00 DarthPunk wrote:
(As an aside, the name of this game is quite appropriate. I love it. LOL)
As an also friendly aside, I may be playing up to this a little.
|
On April 08 2013 07:03 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2013 06:50 DarthPunk wrote:On April 08 2013 06:49 Palmar wrote:
DP I don't think any lynch that isn't Ace is going to fly tonight. So your options are literally "Ace or No-Lynch". Why won't you lynch oats? also we have four hours. And in no way am I content with what i believe will be a mislynch. Because I had (for some reason I can't recall now) a pretty good "this guy's probably town" hunch on him. I do promise you, in case Ace flips town (I'm giving this lynch about 50% chance of success), Marv and Oats will be the first people I'm looking to, for multiple reasons. I can't promise you I'd lynch either as i'd have to rethink, but a serious look would be taken. I hope you are aware that I put both marv and oats in the "7 players where I think 2-3 scum are" list.
Yes. I am aware that they were on that list. I was just hoping I could save someone I think has a good chance of flipping town.
But I could be wrong and it seems that I can't sway the thread. You have to be realistic about these things.
I won't vote however in the hopes that ace appears to defend himself.
|
I will vote him to prevent no lynch.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
DarthPunk, what say you to the fact that I demonstrated that what Oats has done this game that you find horrendously scummy, he does freely in his town games (and funnily enough, not in his mafia games)?
|
On April 08 2013 07:14 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2013 07:03 Palmar wrote:On April 08 2013 06:50 DarthPunk wrote:On April 08 2013 06:49 Palmar wrote:
DP I don't think any lynch that isn't Ace is going to fly tonight. So your options are literally "Ace or No-Lynch". Why won't you lynch oats? also we have four hours. And in no way am I content with what i believe will be a mislynch. Because I had (for some reason I can't recall now) a pretty good "this guy's probably town" hunch on him. I do promise you, in case Ace flips town (I'm giving this lynch about 50% chance of success), Marv and Oats will be the first people I'm looking to, for multiple reasons. I can't promise you I'd lynch either as i'd have to rethink, but a serious look would be taken. I hope you are aware that I put both marv and oats in the "7 players where I think 2-3 scum are" list. Yes. I am aware that they were on that list. I was just hoping I could save someone I think has a good chance of flipping town. But I could be wrong and it seems that I can't sway the thread. You have to be realistic about these things. I won't vote however in the hopes that ace appears to defend himself.
Not sure that's a good way to go about it either since he went down without a fight in The Game.
|
On April 08 2013 07:15 marvellosity wrote:
DarthPunk, what say you to the fact that I demonstrated that what Oats has done this game that you find horrendously scummy, he does freely in his town games (and funnily enough, not in his mafia games)?
I would say that I was probably wrong on those two posts. He is still sheeping, useless and without a good case to his name.
|
I have seen this post.
On April 08 2013 04:05 Dandel Ion wrote:
If no majority is reached by 02:00 GMT (+00:00) (~7 hours from now), we'll end the day in a no-lynch.
I am comfortable with my vote where it is on WoS.
I will be here for bit then nap then come back.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 08 2013 07:17 AxleGreaser wrote:I have seen this post. Show nested quote +On April 08 2013 04:05 Dandel Ion wrote:
If no majority is reached by 02:00 GMT (+00:00) (~7 hours from now), we'll end the day in a no-lynch. I am comfortable with my vote where it is on WoS. I will be here for bit then nap then come back.
You'd rather no-lynch than kill Ace? That's what you're saying, right?
|
On April 08 2013 07:17 AxleGreaser wrote:I have seen this post. Show nested quote +On April 08 2013 04:05 Dandel Ion wrote:
If no majority is reached by 02:00 GMT (+00:00) (~7 hours from now), we'll end the day in a no-lynch. I am comfortable with my vote where it is on WoS. I will be here for bit then nap then come back.
So what you're saying, is you'd rather let the scum have their way and force a no-lynch, just like fucking Tunkeg. I don't give a fuck WHO you vote for at this point, at least DO something. This is so dumb.
|
On April 08 2013 07:08 Palmar wrote:
We need three votes in the next few hours.
Kill sonofabitch.
Unless Ace makes me think more townie of him by the deadline, I'll be willing to vote him to avoid a no lynch.
Can you elaborate on your town read of Axle? You haven't explained it at all. Here are some of my grievances on him for reference:
On April 08 2013 06:41 sciberbia wrote:
[*] hopped onto my wagon with some meh reasoning
[*] he hopped off as a result of some small explanation I gave, and I got the feeling he only backed off because my wagon was no longer the 'in' thing
[*] he has almost exclusively talked to and about only myself and WoS, and on top of that, it's all been about just 1 post from WoS early in the game. He hasn't been partaking in the discussion of other big issues in the thread.
[*] he is supposedly more active as town
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 08 2013 07:16 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On April 08 2013 07:15 marvellosity wrote:
DarthPunk, what say you to the fact that I demonstrated that what Oats has done this game that you find horrendously scummy, he does freely in his town games (and funnily enough, not in his mafia games)? I would say that I was probably wrong on those two posts. He is still sheeping, useless and without a good case to his name.
I would agree. But that's town Oats for you. And it's why I basically have to defend him in every game we play together (unless he's mafia, naturally. Or unless I'm mafia and let him die to the lynch. The one time we played together where he was town and I wasn't town, he got lynched because I wasn't there to protect him)
|
On April 08 2013 07:17 AxleGreaser wrote:I have seen this post. Show nested quote +On April 08 2013 04:05 Dandel Ion wrote:
If no majority is reached by 02:00 GMT (+00:00) (~7 hours from now), we'll end the day in a no-lynch. I am comfortable with my vote where it is on WoS. I will be here for bit then nap then come back.
So you are comfortable with having your vote uselessly on someone and then not pushing it at all to the thread so there is no realistic way for you to actually get the lynch you seem to want?
You know we could just lynch axle for not being as active as he was in every town game of his I have seen. DESPITE saying that he had arranged his sleeping schedule around the game.
|
Am I in some sort of Twilight Zone Mafia where it's considered good play to tunnel a vote into oblivion? In Axle's case this just makes him look scummier to me since he's put barely any effort into it, unlike Tunkeg.
|
##unvote:
##Vote:Axlemaster
|
just skimmed and see I'm on the lynch wagon. 2 things quickly:
@WoS - in The Game I got lynched 6 hours before deadline when I was asleep 
Also I was watching basketball so no time to read the thread.
For the people voting for me, can you point out exactly what I need to respond to to convince you of my innocence? I'm not 100% sure what's going on here since I thought I made everything I did explicitly clear but I'll try again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
