|
On April 12 2013 15:30 nobodywonder wrote:
oh darn it, I didn't finish my last sentence.
Lastly, I really hope we can get the mafia roleblocker. Since Ravens is quite eager is to bus Warents, it is unlikely that Warents is the mafia roleblocker then, because then Rainbow would be confirmed for sure. Thus Ravens has a higher chance of being the mafia roleblocker, if so then Rainbows may be able to get his shot off.
Rainbows started the vote, I wanted someone to post SOMETHING about War and no one did so I jumped off, plus I liked Wars response to my questions. How is that a bus, and why would a bus make sense with what point in the game we are at?
And what makes you think Rainbow's claim is real still? Me and War have given you ALOT about Rainbows and why his claim is likely to be a lie and how it makes a lot of sense Explain to me how his play is indicative of town. He hasn't pushed anything except for me (And now Warant, making literally everyone he has voted for someone who posted a case against him), and outside of his first case and he hasn't added anything to his reasons. People keep saying how his claim makes no sense as scum, but he has been able to get away with no analysis, pushing no real case (Somewhat funny since he has the longest filter in the game (Excluding the dead guy formerly known as Obzy). He hasn't even responsed serriously to the last few cases or points brought against him, despite reading them and making a comment or two. And hell, he was acting like he cared when Obzy died, showing how scared he suddenly became, and then decided to go back to being I don't care Rainbows when called out on it.
|
On April 13 2013 00:57 Rainbows wrote:Show nested quote +On April 13 2013 00:50 Warent wrote:On April 13 2013 00:44 Rainbows wrote:
Yes, bring up all the dead people that voted for JarJar. You killed them, after all. That's a lie. Lynch from day one and day two in spoilers. + Show Spoiler +Day one lynch:
TheRavensname (1) Rainbows
Rainbows (2) Warent, TheRavensName
jrkirby (2) JarJarDrinks, nobodywonder
jampidampi (4) Smancer, Obzy, Fishgle, Moloch
JarJarDrinks (3) Saraf, jrkirby, jampidampi
Day two lynch:
TheRavensname (2) Rainbows, Moloch
Rainbows (2) TheRavensName, Warent
jrkirby (5) JarJarDrinks, nobodywonder, Fishgle, Obzy, Smancer
JarJarDrinks (1) jrkirby I did not Lynch them. And why the hell would I get rid of Saraf if I wanted to lynch you day2? You did not lynch them. Yet you did nothing to prevent their lynch, instead put your vote on me uselessly. I just said you wanted to avoid taking responsibility for your actions, and here you are.
Oh, so the exact same thing you did?
|
On April 13 2013 00:50 JarJarDrinks wrote:Show nested quote +On April 13 2013 00:37 Warent wrote:
The only thing against me seems to be: I don't trust Rain. When reading the above posts - is NOT trusting Rain a reason to be lynched for? Yes because he HAS TO BE the vigilante. That's the same point against Raven. Please answer me: how terrible would scum have to be to make that fake claim on day 1? It just would never happen. So you've been focusing on a blue role the entire game. And then who is the other person you focused on? Obzy, another blue.
How terrible would scum have to be to claim cop last day with no reasoning other than trolling? Rainbows terrible
|
On April 13 2013 01:47 Rainbows wrote:
b and c wouldnt happen.
Either way fakeclaiming day 1 is too risky and dumb as scum. I don't think my teamates would allow it haha.
Just to pour gas on the fire your pissing on to put out: ray and the coach didn't want you to do it last game. You can't claim its different cause you were just teolling when most of day 1 sans rage
quit was trolling for you
|
On April 13 2013 05:28 phagga wrote:
Man, even our host is getting lazy.
|
On April 13 2013 05:42 Rainbows wrote:
smancer fishgle moloch.. get on warent.
i need at least 3 other townies onbhim
Fact: If you don't vote for Rainbows, the communist will win. (Also hes not a real Vigi.)
|
On April 13 2013 06:06 Moloch wrote:
I still think no lynch is the best way to go today. The only reasonable argument against it that I've seen is JJD's about the chance we'll hit the roleblockers.
What about the fact that theres only one person who cast the deciding vote as opposed to two?
|
##Jnvote
##Vote:Warent
No, its pretty easy to get it right. Fish is right.
|
##Unvote
##Vote:Warent
No, its pretty easy to get it right. Fish is right.
|
On April 13 2013 08:59 Warent wrote:
Lol TRN, wtf. hm
I just want this game to end.
|
On April 13 2013 08:57 Rainbows wrote:
##unvote
vote: no-lynch
Rainbows never formatted his vote right, warrant hsould be lynched by tie.
|
On April 13 2013 09:54 Rainbows wrote:
lol raven im on my phone its hard to vote :p... u so desparate tho
Not desperate, I'm just dissapointed (And quite a bit annoyed) that people want to waste more time on this game when no one seems to want to take the time to even do any real analysis this close to the end (The only thing that was really discussed by more then 3 people was the no lynch, and most people at least agreed it was a dumb idea and then just did it anyways without analyzing anything else that lead to anything. Smancer may be the exception to this rule.). Me, You, and Warrent have basically made up most of this thread really: And still no one else has bothered to make any real analysis into it. Town just doen't care, they would rather just follow out a really really crappy case and mislynch all day everyday in a way that tells them nothing because they all jumped on a bad case for a bad reason posted by some green townie who doesn't know any better about how to play (and there are obviously people here who at least read up on other mafia games or have played before; these people should get guidance from you and not just the coaches, and then the town ends up with nothing to show for it. Its going to take at least another week to lynch all of the scum with no mislynches, I'd rather people just moved on and hoped they joined a game with a town that doesn't seem quite so... lazy (How appropriate given the theme). The only person who fostered much talk at all was Obzy, and you should have too but you decided to troll and then not care while also trolling all game rainbows. Even the Cop who was lynched day 1 had 3 pages of filter that contained more analysis; then most of the people here that only have 4-5 pages. Everyone just wants everyone else to do the thinking for them and win the game for em, and thats not what Mafia is about. if you don't want to participate, do a lot of reading, or try to do any analysis don't freaken sign up.
I understand real life happens and it should always come first, but in all of those votes that got just tossed around and times people just sat around complaining about why no one was here they could have done something.
No matter who wins or how they win, this was a bad game.It was the opposite of last game where town couldn't have done anything despite really wanting to; it just seems like town doesn't want to this time.
|
Why the fuck did you guys have to kill the cop? I drew literally my favoritist role in all of Mafia, and you guys make it useless day 1.....
|
On April 17 2013 10:03 Rainbows wrote:
I in no way endorse my early behavior, but it was certainly amplified by the amounts of derp in the thread.
Rainbows.. you got to be me and nw for a game... its g
oing to happen get over it. You made it too easy for me to tunnel you and then potentially push it off on warrent. I got impatient xD but thems the breaks when the only people you wanted to best stop playing and your team does too lol.
|
On April 17 2013 09:48 Rainbows wrote:
All I have to say is that I rage quit, which was bad. Still had good reads D1 tho, but after you rage quit and stop reading the game, people tend not to believe you anymore.
I have no clue how people thought the claim was fake, though. The mislynches were terribly directed, personally i thought jkirby was town I just didnt care enough to stop you guys. I knew Raven was scum 100% day 1, especially after he voted me in response... its funny because most of the town called it bad logic, and yet went off to lynch town. It's one reason i was so damn frustrated even during d2 when i didnt post.
I hope you change your reasoings by the way; this is not how I usually play scum, unless I rolled framer and even then its not to this degree time consteaints and the way you played forced me into it. Plus if the town voted off of omgus cases. You'd have been lynched for every single vote except mine.
|
And saraf if you still haven't read the scum QT it was to wifom rainbows, though personally I really hate how we spent the entire game killing people I could have freaken used.
|
On April 18 2013 01:11 Rainbows wrote:
The only reason my votes were considered omgus was because literally the entire thread wanted me dead. I was actually hunting scum d1 while people derped over nothing and "ahmigerd you spammed that one time". I knew you were scum for more than what i actually posted Raven. Like that serial killer comment early game, but nobody would have understood it so i just shut up about that.
As I said, town should have lynched you d1 and sorted out all of the mess.
Eh.I did my job. Got you to lynch the cop, planted suspicion against you, and had the obz thread pointing fingers at warent over me. Thats a good days work. And I always answer Serial Killer or Arsonist, saying VT is too much of a cop out even if thats what I am.
|
And no Rainbows, your votes were OMGUS because ltierally your logic each time you voted was "Voting for me is scummy, you are therefore scum." I will point you to Jampi for the prime example of that one.
|
Whatever, games over doesn't matter. Lets move on: EVERYONE GO SIGN UP FOR TL MAFIA LXI! ESPECIALYL YOU NW, I Know you used all your newbie games up.
|
On April 18 2013 02:55 Smancer wrote:
I am probably going to skip the LXI and do the one after that. This game took a lot out of me. I spent more time than I would like to admit on it. This shit is exhausting and stressful when the deadlines come.
Sill waiting for more analysis then someone between me rainbows and War were scum lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
