EPTYou also have Warent listed as not voting and Voting for Rainbows.
Newbie Mafia XL - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
You also have Warent listed as not voting and Voting for Rainbows. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On April 10 2013 08:36 Rainbows wrote: Lie 2 isnt a lie. bad town i dont consider a read because its noncomittal as fuck. Everyone in the thread has called me scum, of course all of my votes will seem Please lynch Raven. You didn't vote for the two people you said you actually had scum reads on... | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
And yea I'm going to agree with Warent: all Rainbows just successfully did was blue fish; yet I'm the one who gets a random switch at the end of the lynch (The hell is that guys? Don't even have a reason behind it. Just Fuck it why not?) Now I woke up late and have to head to school so, I'll be back later. (I dislike posting at night and have nothing to add against Rainbows that hasn't already been stated, and I get called scum when looking for other leads so I don't see the point.) | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On April 11 2013 00:48 Obzy wrote: + Show Spoiler + I really, really hope I get shot tonight. If I don't, I might land a protect on somebody and the scumteam will require an additional mislynch to win, so they had better gift me this. Warent, entirely hypothetically, what if in my -imaginary- -luck shot- -guess- scumteam prediction you were replaced with Rainbows? And the number of blue roles, yes, is unknown to all players, but I feel it's a safe assumption that it's either 2 or 3, and we could all have safely assumed that at the beginning of the game. This post has me curious enough to go against my opinion of night posts: Why would you want to? I mean its cool that you want to join me and War with going against Rainbows... but why? I mean...Look at his filter, its only two tabs long, making it the second shortest besides Jarjar's and Sarafs (Who is dead.). All he has done is (No offense, just stating something) is attack rainbows with almost no retaliation from people, at least compared to the amount I seem to be getting. Doesn't that seem, just a little bit odd to you? | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On April 11 2013 02:47 Obzy wrote: So then, to start things off tomorrow since I don't expect to be here, I'd like to propose a Jarjar lynch. The primary thing he did this game was push kirby. Other than that, he gave me and Rainbows townreads (okay), and Warent and Ravens scumreads (okay w/e). He's basically still lurking and hasn't pitched in to the major conversations. And nobody else is talking so fuck it I'll just quietly go insane for the next 6 hours before I ideally get executed and then can stop worrying about town I see Ravens just posted - It definitely does, but really, I have no idea who's who. I could say "I think it's these 3" and then afk until I die, or I could at least TRY to promote thought. If he says his scum reads are similar to mine then (or vice-versa), it implies that he is accepting of Jarjar and Smancer lynches. Who would you remove from that equation to lynch Rain with, or would you change it up entirely? Not too sure. I got basically two combinations in my head: Both involve Warance and Smancer, simply because Someone has to be pushing the lynch. The only flaw with this is the way Rainbows has been playing, i'm more inclined to believe that hes with Warance and just ignoring him and focusing on me; with the way the kills and lynches have gone down Its easily pushable towards me. Plus I mean, Warant and Rainbows have gotten away with basically wasting their votes both lynches. So the team would be Warant, Smancer, Rainbows. If Rainbows isn't with warant, then I would say Warant, Smancer, and Jarjar... but i find it hard to just drop all my opinions on rainbows like that. Maybe thats the confirmation bias I seem to have written up. But it would give a reason to get rid of people supporting rainbows, making him look guilty, or killing people to make rainbows look right by WIFOM. I find the idea of Warant, Rainbows, and Jarjar unlikely to be together, because then they are managing to do so much with no one pushing a lynch, and I think there has to be atleast one somewhere... right? | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On April 11 2013 02:53 Obzy wrote: Ravens, you posting at night would be a godsend for the game, + Show Spoiler + not for me specifically because I rather want to die, but Up until this point, you've seemed to be agreeing with Warent because he wants to kill Rain - and now you mention that his filter's short and he's been tunneling Rain only. Why has this not been a problem until I bring up questioning how he would react to killing Rain instead of himself? I didn't even realize he voted for Rain day one actually. Maybe because no one seems to be jumping at it like they are jumping on me? It wasn't until you mentioned it mixed with the vote switch I started to think about it, basically everyones case against me is I'm tunneling rainbows, but warant hasn't done much else either when you look at it. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On April 11 2013 02:53 Obzy wrote: [+ Show Spoiler + not for me specifically because I rather want to die, but You know as well as I do that killing anything that makes it simpler for the town is not going to happen. + Show Spoiler + Especially not when you pulled a Rainbows. WHY DIDN'T YOU WAIT TILL TOMORROW DAMN IT?! | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On April 11 2013 03:13 Obzy wrote: Jarjar? No fucking clue. Hes only a few post behind Warant and at least he did someting thattook a risk yesterday I guess? Best I can come up with, but I'm not trying very had.Interesting. How would you to propose to defend Jarjar, then? If Warent, Smancer, and Rain are scum, that is. Jarjar basically tunneled Kirby with a few extra reads; if he had been tunneling Rain futilely instead, I'd think they'd occupy a similar niche. And I did some work for a bit and then re-imagined Rain winning as scum and my vision went red so despite my post yesterday I'm open to lynching Rain largely out of potential spite. Do you think that Smancer looks objectively scummy, or is it just that he has been pushing incorrect lynches? I'd identified him through process of elimination, he has been a very difficult read for me. Well, when it come to Smancer, I guess I rushed when I just tossed him in, largely based off that last mnute vote switch and then actually swithcing back unlike Moloch.. Everything I said could apply to Moloch too, as they both distanced a little bit, but Smancer cared enough about his image to swich back. Fish, I don't have this extra piece of evidence so I have a more null read on him as opposed to the other two. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
Also, how can an opinion be guaranteed? | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On April 11 2013 04:44 Obzy wrote: Picky, picky, picky. It will be guaranteed when I die tonight, then. If you have been legitimately reading me as non-town to a point that you think my opinions are not town opinions, you are mafia, horrible, or insane. Warent, I like that piece of information quite a bit - that JarJar's voters are dead. I don't really know why you'd specifically point out that JarJar and nobodywonder have voted on mislynches twice in a row - I mean, so did Smancer, Fish, and myself. Assuming your assumption is correct; Smancer obviously is my pick for the scum on jampi's wagon. Eh, me throw this in as impossibiltiy hes on a scum team with rainbows and jarjar, but not that hes with smancer and rainbows. Makes Jarjar and NW look bad while forgetting about smancers. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On April 11 2013 14:01 Warent wrote: Obzy claim did not make sense from a town perspective. Why? He just gave up the doctor. How the hell is that town motivated? I provided reason why it wasn't a terrible move from a scum perspective. Simple as that. Then this whole day so far is very out of character for you. Quick question since your the guy here who analyzes EVERYTHING from a scum perspective... want to analyze the No lynch vote with no real debate first motivations by rainbows or should I just do that for you? | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On April 11 2013 21:20 Warent wrote: Analyzing things from different perspectives can be useful. I think Rainbow did it as a joke (?), not sure though. Molochs reasoning made sense. If you have an analyzis you are obviously welcome to provide it. Well put it this way, sense I'll take your job from you the downside of a no lynch is if we pass it, we went from being up 2 votes, to only being up one vote. This would make a quick last minute mass switch tomorrow far too easy. For this reason, I think we should at least discuss it. As to why Rainbows would want to all of a sudden play: He lost Obzy, and out of the 7 people left (Not counting himself or scumbuddies) The only person who has publically stated a favorable opinion of him is Smancer and maybe Moloch (I don't remember seeing it, but I don't not either). Combined with the earlier mentioning of how a no vote today COULD hurt town, and you have motivation for Rainbows to purpose the No lynch from a scum perspective. He would only have to convince at most one person of his claim as opposed to two. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
On April 12 2013 01:25 Rainbows wrote: Because Obzy led the horses to water. Someone has to make them drink. Hmmm, Thats certianly food for thought, one would argue you should have been helping round them up so they could be led. We all know you are capable of that. Well this is probably my last post for today, I got mandatory school functions ontop of classes I have to attend before I take a quiz, draw up a resume, and salvage some kind of grade out of my paper,so...I will see you all tomorrow after my classes around about noon EST. Please do not say mean things behind my back, or I will be very sad. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
##Vote: Warent Good hunting Gentlemen. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
##vote:Rainbows I'm not posting a case; it would be a repeat of everything I said so far.. I will only add that rainbows basically bluefished our medic, started the no lynch thing then hopped off it without trying to defend it, and only decided to care when the one person who liked him died. Now my chinese food is done, I may post again while I eat if anyone is around but then I got to go for a bit like I said earlier. | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
Smancer, you said you had three main things you wanted to focus on, and only really came up with the voting patern of jarjar and NW: Did you come up with anything else fun to discuss? | ||
| ||
