|
On April 06 2013 12:12 Rainbows wrote:TheRavensName is a fantastic lynch for today! He didn't do anything of use early game. He was around, but chose to do nothing useful. He barely even talked to me, and pretty much ignored events in the thread. His real 'entrance' post to the thread is here: Show nested quote +On April 05 2013 19:29 TheRavensName wrote:
God I must be feeling poorly when my first thought of waking up at 5:30 AM is to read the entire thread and try to figure it all out half awake. But, lets see where it goes.
Rainbows I have a question for you because I know you hate talking about policy.... why did you bring up a situation in vague enough terms that it had to be answered with policy and not answer it yourself? Its rather unlike your past games (I also know you hate Meta analysis.).. PS:Saraf called you an idiot and an asshole, who just MIGHT be a townie too but think its unlikely. Not really the best lynch reason.
Jampi: Why are you calling Rainbows out for policy lynching? He seems to have made it pretty clear he hates policy discussion in general, and he has yet to really use it in any of his previous games.
Jrk: Postig at random people is actually how rainbows plays. Look at the previous two newbie mini games for proof of that. Do you have another scum read? Or is the phrase other guy just referring to the lurkers?
Obzy: DO not go down the road of assuming everyone is town because no one is objecting to them being town. We made that mistake with rainbows last game and it cost us so badly. ALWAYS assume everyone is scum until they give you a really really good reason, which you should only share if your confident enough in your read to help defend them, and even then.. you need to hold them to the same degree of suspicion as your scum reads. You need to compare them to the results and look at who they are going after and make sure your not getting fooled.
Alot of people are calling Rainbows out for spammyness, but it seems quite a few other people are spamming pretty hard themselves, see the discussion on lurkers killing all of the drones and bio before people have even had 24 hours to get into the thread (I think jarjar still the only person who hasn't posted sense he /ined, so I would say theres only one real lurker.) and mentions of Rainbow's role claim last game by Obzy for examples. Just going to toss this out there: Come up with more then just spammyness by the end of day 1, sense he did get the discussion ball rolling at least.
Now back to sleep before I have to go to class. Notice the complete lack of any sort of read or pressure in the post. Does Raven care about current events, does he look like he's hunting scum? He tells people to not vote me for spammyness, but does nothing to pressure those attacking me for that reason alone. He simply affords people the opportunity to lynch me by coming up with alternate reasons by the end of D1. Where's the scumreads? Vote? Nothing. Show nested quote +On April 06 2013 03:06 TheRavensName wrote:On April 05 2013 23:37 Rainbows wrote:NobodywonderOn April 05 2013 16:03 nobodywonder wrote:Well I can't say scum for sure, but I definitely don't like it. Rainbow votes Smancer. Then Rainbow unvotes, then talks about his policy that there should be no policy and that everyone has their own policy. Rainbow then brings up a policy scenario. Well, he states it isn't policy based. Well to me, it sounds like it is, since a policy defines a set of actions in response to certain behavior. I don't know that Rainbow would bring a policy question and call it not policy, seems like he's cautiously gauging townie response and the town meta. Honestly, I want a response from not only Rainbow but also Smancer, since to me, it's interesting that Rainbow voted Smancer, unvoted Smancer and then voted Smancer again. In response Smancer had voted Rainbows and then unvoted Rainbow. I just a lil' weirded out by the voting trend. + Show Spoiler +As a little meta thing, Rainbows seems to deviate a lot more from previous games, he did troll vote, but not to extent of this game. He also spams a lot more. NW gives a huge summary. and throws some shit. He meditates on the policy thing, which I told everyone wasn't policy. THERE'S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HOW PEOPLE THINK AND POLICY JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE. Had to get out of the way. This post, and subsequently the spoiler, show no effort on NW's part to come to a conrete read on me. He simply says that I'm doing things. He seems really apprehensive about giving an actual read and just flops around. I want peoples opinions of NW. Saraf might just be a banality-spewing town; and I'm unsure if his lolpolicy was serious or not. But NW - that guy. He's scummy. Seeing as how this is the third game now where NW has been a scummy read day one... have we ever wondered if NW just isn't that bright/isn't that good? I think NW just isn't that great and just makes mistakes and poor judgements that never seem to go well for him. Just curious rainbows: Do you think Saraf or Nobodywonder has a higher chance of being scum, seeing as how right now the way I read it based off that wording is that you yourself are now voting for a guy you think might be town compared to a guy you think is scummy. I hate this defense of NW. "Oh he's just bad townie, we shouldn't lynch him even if he's really scummy" Spare me, Raven. That's bullshit reasoning and you know it. Town has no reason to defend NW right now; Scum does. Scum looks good if he's town and gets lynched, or if they're both scum it's protecting his buddy. Note how he also never gives a read on NW, just calls him bad. Show nested quote +On April 06 2013 11:46 TheRavensName wrote:On April 06 2013 07:18 Obzy wrote:I don't know what to think of Raven. He hasn't really posted enough - only his last two posts have content I care about;
Why does he think Saraf called Rain an asshole and an idiot? "even if the spammiest asshole is just some poor well-meaning fattie" - how is that implying Rain, unless it's taken for granted that Rain is a spammy asshole? >_>;;; Also, how did Rain interpret it to be calling him out? - -; w/e. I would like to see Raven post more. Raven, are you implying that nobodywonder is town (haven't read him yet, will form an opinion momentarily) with this post? On April 06 2013 03:06 TheRavensName wrote:
Seeing as how this is the third game now where NW has been a scummy read day one... have we ever wondered if NW just isn't that bright/isn't that good? I think NW just isn't that great and just makes mistakes and poor judgements that never seem to go well for him.
Just curious rainbows: Do you think Saraf or Nobodywonder has a higher chance of being scum, seeing as how right now the way I read it based off that wording is that you yourself are now voting for a guy you think might be town compared to a guy you think is scummy. You seem like you're trying to point out that Rain's vote on Saraf is suspect, but that Nobodywonder is just a newb and not scum, but _also_ that he should be looking towards Nobodywonder instead of Saraf, who you think is town? I don't like it :x Please post more hehe. - -; I'm not following your reasoning, and that's all you've got atm. (Continuing to read.) To answer the first part: Rainbows brought it up I went off what he said. Onto the next question: I think, at this moment, Nobodywonder is a sort of dumb town. What he says tseems to lack thought at times, and hes been scummy person on the first two days two games in a row acting exactly the same way as he has done so now, and he was VT both those times. So unless he makes a move that pushes me otherwise, I'm going to read dumb town on him. Third part: I do think Rain's vote on Saraf is suspect. I'm stating that in that last part of rainbow's post that was a response to, which I think was poorly worded and was asking for clarification, that it looked like he had made the decision Saraf was at least maybe town and that Nobodywonder was just flat out scummy. If thats how he feels, why is he voting for Saraf still? Thats his whole reason for going after Safaf anyways (In that rainbows disliked that Sarif is voting for someone he said may have been scummy.) Last post, pretty void of any reads whatsoever. The only thing he's pointed out is my vote on Saraf, which the entire thread has already said many times. I hate to meta people, but TRN in previous games was active, scumhunting, and voted early Day 1. He's reserving his vote right now which irks me. He has done no scumhunting this game and is teetering on the edge of null on everybody.
##Unvote
##Vote: TheRavensNameP.S. Raven, it's SINCE, not SENSE ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
Since when? If you want to discard my reasons for being here, thats fine. I feel like shit, I do have school things I had to do today, and they are done now. But you do not lie to me. Most of my post in the early game either were talking to you, or were about you, theres not many so its not that hard, but do not lie about that. Theres plenty of people trying to get you to answer questions, and I've posted a few for you myself you've neglected to answer.
Onto your next section of the case: How did I call Nobodywonder a newbie town and not give a read on him at all? Town has plenty of reason to defend people who they think could be stupid townies, because in a newbie game not only are they usually, they also are pretty easy to band wagon when they are so scummie seeming. I'm trying to keep a mislynch from happening like a good townie, and I gave out a read, sue me.
Third part: You read that, its a clarification response to a request from a post I made. You could have taken this time to address why you think NW is scummy but not vote worthy, like I expressed interest in knowing,and your not which is suspicious. Its a read, which makes it twice your accusing me of not making a read in the same post where I did. And if your going to bring meta into it you know that I am terrible at making cases up on my own, and I do the best by adding onto other peoples.
I'm going to make this last point, I don't like that your spreading half truths and coming after me for alot of the same shit some people are going after you for without explaining much of anything about any of the problems people have with you. Heres a vote for you:
##Vote: Rainbows
I'm going back to sleep now.
|
On April 06 2013 14:07 Obzy wrote:##Vote TheRavensNameLastly, I'm not very happy with how he disappeared in the ten minutes between his last post today and Rainbow's case without a response for multiple hours. + Show Spoiler +If you're sick, hope you feel better soon. :0 Doesn't make you any less scummy though ^^
+ Show Spoiler +I don't make excuses that arn't at least real truth excuses.
|
On April 06 2013 14:15 Rainbows wrote:Show nested quote +On April 06 2013 14:11 TheRavensName wrote:On April 06 2013 12:12 Rainbows wrote:TheRavensName is a fantastic lynch for today! He didn't do anything of use early game. He was around, but chose to do nothing useful. He barely even talked to me, and pretty much ignored events in the thread. His real 'entrance' post to the thread is here: On April 05 2013 19:29 TheRavensName wrote:
God I must be feeling poorly when my first thought of waking up at 5:30 AM is to read the entire thread and try to figure it all out half awake. But, lets see where it goes.
Rainbows I have a question for you because I know you hate talking about policy.... why did you bring up a situation in vague enough terms that it had to be answered with policy and not answer it yourself? Its rather unlike your past games (I also know you hate Meta analysis.).. PS:Saraf called you an idiot and an asshole, who just MIGHT be a townie too but think its unlikely. Not really the best lynch reason.
Jampi: Why are you calling Rainbows out for policy lynching? He seems to have made it pretty clear he hates policy discussion in general, and he has yet to really use it in any of his previous games.
Jrk: Postig at random people is actually how rainbows plays. Look at the previous two newbie mini games for proof of that. Do you have another scum read? Or is the phrase other guy just referring to the lurkers?
Obzy: DO not go down the road of assuming everyone is town because no one is objecting to them being town. We made that mistake with rainbows last game and it cost us so badly. ALWAYS assume everyone is scum until they give you a really really good reason, which you should only share if your confident enough in your read to help defend them, and even then.. you need to hold them to the same degree of suspicion as your scum reads. You need to compare them to the results and look at who they are going after and make sure your not getting fooled.
Alot of people are calling Rainbows out for spammyness, but it seems quite a few other people are spamming pretty hard themselves, see the discussion on lurkers killing all of the drones and bio before people have even had 24 hours to get into the thread (I think jarjar still the only person who hasn't posted sense he /ined, so I would say theres only one real lurker.) and mentions of Rainbow's role claim last game by Obzy for examples. Just going to toss this out there: Come up with more then just spammyness by the end of day 1, sense he did get the discussion ball rolling at least.
Now back to sleep before I have to go to class. Notice the complete lack of any sort of read or pressure in the post. Does Raven care about current events, does he look like he's hunting scum? He tells people to not vote me for spammyness, but does nothing to pressure those attacking me for that reason alone. He simply affords people the opportunity to lynch me by coming up with alternate reasons by the end of D1. Where's the scumreads? Vote? Nothing. On April 06 2013 03:06 TheRavensName wrote:On April 05 2013 23:37 Rainbows wrote:NobodywonderOn April 05 2013 16:03 nobodywonder wrote:Well I can't say scum for sure, but I definitely don't like it. Rainbow votes Smancer. Then Rainbow unvotes, then talks about his policy that there should be no policy and that everyone has their own policy. Rainbow then brings up a policy scenario. Well, he states it isn't policy based. Well to me, it sounds like it is, since a policy defines a set of actions in response to certain behavior. I don't know that Rainbow would bring a policy question and call it not policy, seems like he's cautiously gauging townie response and the town meta. Honestly, I want a response from not only Rainbow but also Smancer, since to me, it's interesting that Rainbow voted Smancer, unvoted Smancer and then voted Smancer again. In response Smancer had voted Rainbows and then unvoted Rainbow. I just a lil' weirded out by the voting trend. + Show Spoiler +As a little meta thing, Rainbows seems to deviate a lot more from previous games, he did troll vote, but not to extent of this game. He also spams a lot more. NW gives a huge summary. and throws some shit. He meditates on the policy thing, which I told everyone wasn't policy. THERE'S A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HOW PEOPLE THINK AND POLICY JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE. Had to get out of the way. This post, and subsequently the spoiler, show no effort on NW's part to come to a conrete read on me. He simply says that I'm doing things. He seems really apprehensive about giving an actual read and just flops around. I want peoples opinions of NW. Saraf might just be a banality-spewing town; and I'm unsure if his lolpolicy was serious or not. But NW - that guy. He's scummy. Seeing as how this is the third game now where NW has been a scummy read day one... have we ever wondered if NW just isn't that bright/isn't that good? I think NW just isn't that great and just makes mistakes and poor judgements that never seem to go well for him. Just curious rainbows: Do you think Saraf or Nobodywonder has a higher chance of being scum, seeing as how right now the way I read it based off that wording is that you yourself are now voting for a guy you think might be town compared to a guy you think is scummy. I hate this defense of NW. "Oh he's just bad townie, we shouldn't lynch him even if he's really scummy" Spare me, Raven. That's bullshit reasoning and you know it. Town has no reason to defend NW right now; Scum does. Scum looks good if he's town and gets lynched, or if they're both scum it's protecting his buddy. Note how he also never gives a read on NW, just calls him bad. On April 06 2013 11:46 TheRavensName wrote:On April 06 2013 07:18 Obzy wrote:I don't know what to think of Raven. He hasn't really posted enough - only his last two posts have content I care about;
Why does he think Saraf called Rain an asshole and an idiot? "even if the spammiest asshole is just some poor well-meaning fattie" - how is that implying Rain, unless it's taken for granted that Rain is a spammy asshole? >_>;;; Also, how did Rain interpret it to be calling him out? - -; w/e. I would like to see Raven post more. Raven, are you implying that nobodywonder is town (haven't read him yet, will form an opinion momentarily) with this post? On April 06 2013 03:06 TheRavensName wrote:
Seeing as how this is the third game now where NW has been a scummy read day one... have we ever wondered if NW just isn't that bright/isn't that good? I think NW just isn't that great and just makes mistakes and poor judgements that never seem to go well for him.
Just curious rainbows: Do you think Saraf or Nobodywonder has a higher chance of being scum, seeing as how right now the way I read it based off that wording is that you yourself are now voting for a guy you think might be town compared to a guy you think is scummy. You seem like you're trying to point out that Rain's vote on Saraf is suspect, but that Nobodywonder is just a newb and not scum, but _also_ that he should be looking towards Nobodywonder instead of Saraf, who you think is town? I don't like it :x Please post more hehe. - -; I'm not following your reasoning, and that's all you've got atm. (Continuing to read.) To answer the first part: Rainbows brought it up I went off what he said. Onto the next question: I think, at this moment, Nobodywonder is a sort of dumb town. What he says tseems to lack thought at times, and hes been scummy person on the first two days two games in a row acting exactly the same way as he has done so now, and he was VT both those times. So unless he makes a move that pushes me otherwise, I'm going to read dumb town on him. Third part: I do think Rain's vote on Saraf is suspect. I'm stating that in that last part of rainbow's post that was a response to, which I think was poorly worded and was asking for clarification, that it looked like he had made the decision Saraf was at least maybe town and that Nobodywonder was just flat out scummy. If thats how he feels, why is he voting for Saraf still? Thats his whole reason for going after Safaf anyways (In that rainbows disliked that Sarif is voting for someone he said may have been scummy.) Last post, pretty void of any reads whatsoever. The only thing he's pointed out is my vote on Saraf, which the entire thread has already said many times. I hate to meta people, but TRN in previous games was active, scumhunting, and voted early Day 1. He's reserving his vote right now which irks me. He has done no scumhunting this game and is teetering on the edge of null on everybody.
##Unvote
##Vote: TheRavensNameP.S. Raven, it's SINCE, not SENSE ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Since when? If you want to discard my reasons for being here, thats fine. I feel like shit, I do have school things I had to do today, and they are done now. But you do not lie to me. Most of my post in the early game either were talking to you, or were about you, theres not many so its not that hard, but do not lie about that. Theres plenty of people trying to get you to answer questions, and I've posted a few for you myself you've neglected to answer. Onto your next section of the case: How did I call Nobodywonder a newbie town and not give a read on him at all? Town has plenty of reason to defend people who they think could be stupid townies, because in a newbie game not only are they usually, they also are pretty easy to band wagon when they are so scummie seeming. I'm trying to keep a mislynch from happening like a good townie, and I gave out a read, sue me. Third part: You read that, its a clarification response to a request from a post I made. You could have taken this time to address why you think NW is scummy but not vote worthy, like I expressed interest in knowing,and your not which is suspicious. Its a read, which makes it twice your accusing me of not making a read in the same post where I did. And if your going to bring meta into it you know that I am terrible at making cases up on my own, and I do the best by adding onto other peoples. I'm going to make this last point, I don't like that your spreading half truths and coming after me for alot of the same shit some people are going after you for without explaining much of anything about any of the problems people have with you. Heres a vote for you: ##Vote: RainbowsI'm going back to sleep now. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand the obligatory OMGUS.
My first vote is almost always an OMGUS, because I'm almost always called scum day 1.
|
On April 06 2013 15:18 Rainbows wrote:
SCUM DON'T WANT TO BE THE CENTER OF ATTENTION YOU RETARD
You and Ray were the center of attention last game... worked pretty well for you guys then.
|
So... I'm going to bring up something I think some people may have forgotten, something that maybe should be look at over say Rainbow's rage quitting. though I really want to lynch him just for that if nothing else because it sets a bad precident that if you just give up you will win by being a baby, what um... what happened to saraf? Hes only made 4 post sense the start of the game... which is a little odd given hes been under pressure by rainbows, as well as quite a few others for clarifiication if nothing else. I would like to see his updatted opinion of rainbows after the recent dramafest and maybe hear some of his reads sense his last post was about policy.
|
On April 06 2013 21:40 Smancer wrote:
Rainbows why are you sticking to your TRN vote and not voting for jampidampi after you saw how bad his case was.
Probaly same reason he was voting Saraf over NW when he thought Saraf could be town and NW was just scummy: Because he doesn't feel like it. For someone who is upset over a lack of logic in this game, hes being pretty illogical.
|
On April 06 2013 22:42 Saraf wrote:
TRN: I was looking over the thread trying to put cases together last night when Rainbows blew up and decided "fuck it, I'm just gonna go to bed". Now that I'm well-rested I'll be going through everyone's filter and dropping a vote. But I do appreciate you noticing the lurk, I just didn't have patience for the shitfest at midnight.
Fair enough.
|
On April 06 2013 22:26 jampidampi wrote:
Rainbows giving Obzy a townread based on Obzys first three posts doesn't matter?
And like half of Rainbows cases were really bad. Look at his case on Saraf. A bunch of missinterpretings and lies. His case on nobodywonder? Picks up one post, says that nobodywonder doesn't have a read on Rainbows, when wonder gave his read on him in the post Rainbows bought up. Rainbows calls out Ravens for not giving his opinion on nobodywonder, even though Ravens called him dump town.
And do you think Rainbows reacted to my case in a townie way?
I really dislike the fact that Rainbows didn't seem to care even before his explosion. Go and look at his cases, theres not just misinterpretations, there are flat out ignorings of things that are being stated in the same post as the ones he uses as evidence.
|
On April 07 2013 02:49 Fishgle wrote:holy shit. things are happening. First off - fuck you rainbows, for being such an arrogant emotional mess. Here's a tip: it's less about what you say, and more about how you depict it. You didn't make any friends because of your abrasive behavior. I understand you were forced to reveal so you wouldn't get lynched, but it was your own damn fault that everyone suspected you. second - fuck you rainbows, if you're actually abandoning the game. third - THERAVENSNAME, WARENT, JAMPIDAMPI why are your votes still on rainbows? Are you guys implying that rainbows' reveal was a fake? If it were fake, there's a huge chance someone would counter-reveal, making it a terrible move for scum. it just doesn't make any sense for him to be scum, no matter how badly he plays. 4th - i think obzy has done a good job explaining further reasons as to why it's unlikely that rainbows is scum. 5th - someone asked about a comment i made about a read on Moloch. disregard it. we have bigger fish to fry now. plus, it was an early-game hunch. Moloch's posts have gotten a lot more substantive and level-headed from since i got the read. 6th - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=405359¤tpage=18#345 - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=405359¤tpage=12#231I really think this is the best lead we have so far, coupled with the fact that he's still pushing a lynch on rainbows, who just revealed as the vigilante. ##Vote:jampidampi
To be quite honest? Yes I think its a fake claim. his way of play does not make sense for a vigi. He talks about not wanting to draw attention as scum, but you don't do it as a Vigi either because then you'll never get your shot off. Your playing off the assumption that there is either vigi, and that if there s one he wouldn't just shoot Rainbows and then claim the hit after so he can still actually shoot while still being able to push a lynch.
|
how do you know rainbows won't get back here till tomorrow?
|
On April 07 2013 08:35 Smancer wrote:
TRN are you going to stick with Rainbows as your vote?
Yes. Yes I am. I feel like his reaction was inappropriate and I feel as though the vigi claim was a fake. Most of his cases ignore facts that are written right in the middle of the same sentances hes using. Its just a way for him to try and cloud peoples heads that arn't really paying attention. I think the fact hes not even going to vote, unless apaprently he has to in which case he will OMGUS, is pretty scatchy. Jarjar hasn't posted enough for me to want ot lynch him when there is enough people being read as scum, feels like too much of an easy out.Saraf has very few posts too but were not going after him. Jrk and Jampdi give me town readings, especially Jrk. I think his last readings is on the right track, even if I'm not sold on the Jarjar thing yet. Jampdi is pushing rainbows pretty well and has been looking for scum quite a few times, enough to get rainbows to rage out.
|
On April 07 2013 08:55 jrkirby wrote:
Well only a couple minutes left, I think. Oh, well, we're gonna lynch town...
But I would have to vote for you to save him. And I like you more then him. Sorry.
|
Well, I guess Jampi read the Ace guide to playing town: Never claim. Toobad, might have saved him.Guess its time to spend a bit reading filtersand waiting for people to show up.
|
On April 07 2013 09:58 Saraf wrote:
jrkirby: From the OP -- "There are no hit notifications in this game."
Also, is there a Swede in the audience who can translate that?
Hit notificaiton means if you had a doctor or jailer protect someone, it doesn't tell you that someone was saved. We would see two deaths tomorrow if there is a mafia kill and a vigi kill.
|
On April 07 2013 10:40 jrkirby wrote:
So TRN, what are you thinking now? What are your reads? Mine haven't changed, and probably won't until morning.
I didn't you or Jampi as a lynch before, my thought has changed on that so far. If jar jar doesn't show up soon he needs to be looked at but I still just dislike Rainbows. I hope he comes back and gives me a reason to change my mind about it.
|
|
|
On April 07 2013 18:35 Warent wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 15:45 Obzy wrote:On April 07 2013 08:59 TheRavensName wrote:On April 07 2013 08:55 jrkirby wrote:
Well only a couple minutes left, I think. Oh, well, we're gonna lynch town... But I would have to vote for you to save him. And I like you more then him. Sorry. Ravens, what did you mean by this? You are implying that you like Kirby more than Jampi - sure, w/e - but why would you have to vote for Kirby =l You'd be voting for Jarjar. Am I getting confused over nothing? I think the way you acted pre-lynch was reasonably townie, it's just this post that confuses me. I'm curious about this as well? And did we forget about Nobody?
I thought that Jampi was the second highest votes, not Jarjar. My bad. But still, I want to give Jarjar a chance to show up and contribute. Now if he doesn't show back up well enough, or just looks bad, I see no reason not to lynch him after that.
|
On April 07 2013 23:03 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 18:35 Warent wrote:On April 07 2013 15:45 Obzy wrote:On April 07 2013 08:59 TheRavensName wrote:On April 07 2013 08:55 jrkirby wrote:
Well only a couple minutes left, I think. Oh, well, we're gonna lynch town... But I would have to vote for you to save him. And I like you more then him. Sorry. Ravens, what did you mean by this? You are implying that you like Kirby more than Jampi - sure, w/e - but why would you have to vote for Kirby =l You'd be voting for Jarjar. Am I getting confused over nothing? I think the way you acted pre-lynch was reasonably townie, it's just this post that confuses me. I'm curious about this as well? And did we forget about Nobody? I thought that Jampi was the second highest votes, not Jarjar. My bad. But still, I want to give Jarjar a chance to show up and contribute. Now if he doesn't show back up well enough, or just looks bad, I see no reason not to lynch him after that.
EBWOP: I mean Jarjar as the second, not Jampi.
|
On April 07 2013 23:04 TheRavensName wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 23:03 TheRavensName wrote:On April 07 2013 18:35 Warent wrote:On April 07 2013 15:45 Obzy wrote:On April 07 2013 08:59 TheRavensName wrote:On April 07 2013 08:55 jrkirby wrote:
Well only a couple minutes left, I think. Oh, well, we're gonna lynch town... But I would have to vote for you to save him. And I like you more then him. Sorry. Ravens, what did you mean by this? You are implying that you like Kirby more than Jampi - sure, w/e - but why would you have to vote for Kirby =l You'd be voting for Jarjar. Am I getting confused over nothing? I think the way you acted pre-lynch was reasonably townie, it's just this post that confuses me. I'm curious about this as well? And did we forget about Nobody? I thought that Jampi was the second highest votes, not Jarjar. My bad. But still, I want to give Jarjar a chance to show up and contribute. Now if he doesn't show back up well enough, or just looks bad, I see no reason not to lynch him after that. EBWOP: I mean Jarjar as the second, not Jampi.
EBWOPx2: I need to stop posting when I just woke up.
I thought I would have to vote for JRK to save Jampdi. Because when I looked at the vote count [g]Can we get a final one anyways?[/g] I thought JRK had three and Jarjar had 2.
|
On April 07 2013 05:12 Moloch wrote:Show nested quote +On April 07 2013 05:10 jampidampi wrote:
Moloch, your forgetting the possibility that isn't a vigilante in the game. That's possible? Well, then. I'm going to have to rethink this.
You've had some time to relook at Rainbow's blue claim as well as the lynch, do you have any thoughts or feelings you would like to share sense you were one of the ones who did vote for him?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
