• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:00
CEST 17:00
KST 00:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Soulkey Muta Micro Map? [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 760 users

Noir Mini Mafia: Chapter 1 - Page 2

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 02 2013 21:49 GMT
#281
here`s my question, considering people accuse me of being a hypocrite. Do you think I`m just trying to be disruptive or that I`m trying to save sylencia? It should be a minimum of one of those, right?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 02 2013 21:59 GMT
#286
On April 03 2013 06:51 VisceraEyes wrote:
I feel like he got caught with his pants down trying to tiptoe around a risk.nuke lynch. He was indirectly supporting the risk.nuke wagon without adding his vote. Regardless of risk.nuke's alignment, that's a suspicious action out of Hopeless. If at the time he felt like risk.nuke was scum (which his whole association BS is supposing) then there's no reason for him to be indirectly supporting the wagon while trying to start a counter-wagon on someone else.

Furthermore he lied about it in the thread. Observe.

Show nested quote +
On April 03 2013 01:32 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 03 2013 01:14 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
Hopeless...

On April 02 2013 10:49 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 02 2013 10:44 risk.nuke wrote:
On April 02 2013 10:29 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
##unvote: VE
##Vote: Risk.nuke

It's like you brought up the Kenpachi rule just to see if someone else was willing to run with it and kill me. Wanting townies to do your work for you?

Why would I fake a perfectly legit argument?

On April 02 2013 09:50 risk.nuke wrote:
On April 02 2013 09:47 VisceraEyes wrote:
On April 02 2013 09:45 risk.nuke wrote:
VE, RoL. If you're going to tunnel-bitch-argue in the thread atleast argue about something remotely relevant.

If you're going to criticize me for anything, you should answer questions posed of you first. Do you think RoL is scum for "contesting" my "claim" a la Kenpachi Rule?

No I don't.

Doesn't seem all that legit to me.



On April 02 2013 08:44 risk.nuke wrote:
On April 02 2013 08:39 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
On April 02 2013 08:37 risk.nuke wrote:
Worst vote ever.


On the contrary, best vote ever.

I would argue that putting your vote on a townie is greatly suboptimal.

Also, scumslip in that he knows CC is town.


At this point in time risk had 3 votes on him. You kinda threw some shit at him and called him scummy. What was your intention with this post?

I think risk is scummy but didn't want the day to end that soon. Also wanted to see if anyone agreed with my assessment of the supposed scumslip.

Ghor is annoying as all hell and his intentions behind voting sylencia do not match with his scum read on risk.nuke. He wants sylencia to commit to some type of a read on risk and when he refuses to do so, calls him scum for it. No where does he validate why this is scummy. Combine that with what appears to be a trolling smurf hellbent on behaving like a caveman, and I think he's a good choice for lynch.


Show nested quote +
On April 03 2013 01:48 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 03 2013 01:46 VisceraEyes wrote:
Hopeless if you really felt that way your vote would be on risk.nuke. You're accusing Ghor of being risk's "scumbuddy" because he's not voting for risk. What the hell are you doing? Not voting for risk. You say Ghor is attacking Sylencia in lieu of pushing risk.nuke. What are you doing? Attacking Ghor in lieu of pushing risk.nuke. Your play is wholly and completely contradictory and scummy as sin. Do you have anything to say for yourself?

My vote on ghor was to get him to answer my bloody question about his stance on risk instead of directing me to his filter.

##Unvote: Ghor
##Vote: risk.nuke


When confronted about his vote on Ghor he says it was to get him to answer his question, but as you can see from the first post, he clearly says that he feels like Ghor should be considered for lynch today. Inconsistent. Scummy.

I believe the scumteam is both ghor and risk.nuke. My vote came down as follows:

+ Show Spoiler +
On April 03 2013 00:11 Hopeless1der wrote:
ghor, do you think risk is scum?

On April 03 2013 00:18 Ghor wrote:
Ghor not understand why people ask questions about risk, people not read properly ghor posts?read thread then come back with good question please.

only update is ghor not think RoL that scummy any more, but not like initial play. now better.

risk talk about fluff after he say he not like doing content of his fluff (policy).
his defense, bad, he contradict.

On April 03 2013 00:25 Hopeless1der wrote:
##Vote: Ghor
Do you think risk.nuke is scum?


My vote was for the explicit purpose to get him to [answer the question, not because I thought he was scum (I thought he was scum but that was not the reason for voting him). Since then I've become more confident in my read.

You didn't catch me tiptoeing around anything. I directly supported a risk.nuke lynch, but neglected to vote in for him at the time. This was to ensure people didn't flip out and say OMG UNVOTE BEFORE HAMMER. Since then, I've developed a scum read on Ghor as well. I'm perfectly willing to swap back and forth between the two of them all day.
##Unvote: risk.nuke
##Vote: Ghor


Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 02 2013 22:01 GMT
#287
On April 03 2013 06:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
Hopeless who even said anything about you saving Sylencia? What are you talking about?

What do you believe my motive to be? Trying to put myself in your shoes, I'd suspect (Scum-Hopeless) of being disruptive and/or trying to save (Scum-Sylencia).

by the way, inherent in reading two people as scum is everyone else is town.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 10:27 GMT
#321
just woke up, skimmed what I've missed:
On April 03 2013 18:18 Lazermonkey wrote:
Also, don't hammer yet...


This. Today has a self imposed deadline, take every second of it that you can get. It is way more scum motivated to want to end the day early. I could understand if you're that confident I'm scum but nevertheless, don't hammer me, I want to get something meaningful into the thread.
Is day 1 a plurality lynch or do we still have to reach a majority before the 48 hours is up?

I don't have time to reread who's voting me and why etc right this minute, so give me a couple hours to get back please.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 12:53 GMT
#329
On April 03 2013 21:48 iamperfection wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 02 2013 07:11 Hapahauli wrote:
On April 02 2013 07:06 Lazermonkey wrote:
Hi everyone!

I want to start things off by saying that this is my first time playing an instant majority lynch. While the first 48 hours obviously aren't instant majority, I still think we can start discuss some policy to get things going.

1.If we are about to kill someone, we should at least give the person 24 hours to be able to put up a solid defense.
2.Throw votes around all you want but if you hammer someone, you and everyone else on that wagon better provide good reasoning for that.

Everyone who fails at these stuff should get policy lynched right away imo.


For clarification, Day 1 is instant majority. There is just a 48 hour time-limit on the day. So you could lynch someone before that time-limit.

as a reminder as there appears to be some confusion

I meant what happens if the deadline passes and a majority is not reached? Is that a no-lynch or a plurality lynch?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 12:54 GMT
#330
Axle, if you're around, do you seriously believe I think there are 3 scum? You devoted a decent section of your case against me to something that literally cannot be true, unless Hapa is bastard modding
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 13:09 GMT
#334
On April 03 2013 22:08 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2013 21:54 Hopeless1der wrote:
Axle, if you're around, do you seriously believe I think there are 3 scum? You devoted a decent section of your case against me to something that literally cannot be true, unless Hapa is bastard modding


No I don't seriously believe you think there are 3 scum in 9 player game.

Who is your top scum read?

risk > ghor at the moment, but I haven't re-read ghor yet. working on a risk case now.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 13:15 GMT
#336
On April 03 2013 22:09 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2013 22:09 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 03 2013 22:08 AxleGreaser wrote:
On April 03 2013 21:54 Hopeless1der wrote:
Axle, if you're around, do you seriously believe I think there are 3 scum? You devoted a decent section of your case against me to something that literally cannot be true, unless Hapa is bastard modding


No I don't seriously believe you think there are 3 scum in 9 player game.

Who is your top scum read?

risk > ghor at the moment, but I haven't re-read ghor yet. working on a risk case now.


How did your case on Ghor get started?

Hes a trolly jerkface who insulted my literacy skills. Also, relatively insistent that risk.nuke is scum, but wont hammer in order to find the "other scum". Upon finding said scum (sylencia), doesn't want to hammer risk.nuke anymore. Granted, I'm sailing the same boat but whatever..
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 13:30 GMT
#339
On April 03 2013 22:24 Lazermonkey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2013 22:15 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 03 2013 22:09 AxleGreaser wrote:
On April 03 2013 22:09 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 03 2013 22:08 AxleGreaser wrote:
On April 03 2013 21:54 Hopeless1der wrote:
Axle, if you're around, do you seriously believe I think there are 3 scum? You devoted a decent section of your case against me to something that literally cannot be true, unless Hapa is bastard modding


No I don't seriously believe you think there are 3 scum in 9 player game.

Who is your top scum read?

risk > ghor at the moment, but I haven't re-read ghor yet. working on a risk case now.


How did your case on Ghor get started?

Hes a trolly jerkface who insulted my literacy skills. Also, relatively insistent that risk.nuke is scum, but wont hammer in order to find the "other scum". Upon finding said scum (sylencia), doesn't want to hammer risk.nuke anymore. Granted, I'm sailing the same boat but whatever..
So you confess that you are looking scummy or what?

I always look scummy, you're the one who's been defending me on that concept.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 13:34 GMT
#340
Okay, back to why risk.nuke is scum:

Let me try again and actually explain why this shows a scum mentality.
On April 02 2013 08:44 risk.nuke wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 02 2013 08:39 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
On April 02 2013 08:37 risk.nuke wrote:
Worst vote ever.


On the contrary, best vote ever.

I would argue that putting your vote on a townie is greatly suboptimal.


1) Soft-claim town. He didn't say "I'M TOWN", he said voting a townie is bad.
2) Now, I'm making some pretty blanket statements here, but I would expect:
- Scum want to kill townies.
- Townies want to kill scum.
- Townies do not want to kill townies.

The assumption of this post is that CC is town and should not want other townies to die. <---This is what I am calling as the slip, risk knows CC is town.

+ Show Spoiler +

[CONFIRMATION BIAS]
On April 02 2013 08:48 risk.nuke wrote:
You want me to spoil the ending and hand you the key to the test?

He has the answer key *hint hint*
[/CONFIRMATION BIAS]


risk.nuke is the original proponent of the Kenpachi rule in this game. He did this for no other reason than an errant observation. No alignment indicative thoughts on it. VE made his point about it already:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 02 2013 10:15 VisceraEyes wrote:
I had a similar thought regarding risk.nuke. Why bring up the Kenpachi Rule at all if he had no intention of following it? My thoughts brought me to "He's scummy". He's either:

1) Scum trying to incriminate RoL innocuously by "joking" about Kenpachi Rule.
2) Town trying to trap someone into agreeing with his assessment and voting RoL.

I ruled out 2 by asking him if he thought RoL was scum because of it, and he doesn't, which leaves 1).

##Vote: risk.nuke

Conversely I'm very null on RoL. Abhorring my play-style is very NOT alignment indicative for that guy.


Something I notice reading risk's filter is he keeps trying to defend himself regarding his handling of the Kenpachi Rule, saying that people have different opinions and that he doesn't use methods like that to find scum.
However, when initially called out by VE, he insists that he was scumhunting

Its not so much a backpedal as it is him trying to "say the right things" to me.



Over the course of an hour, risk twice tells VE/RoL to stop tunneling
On April 02 2013 09:45 risk.nuke wrote:
VE, RoL. If you're going to tunnel-bitch-argue in the thread atleast argue about something remotely relevant.

On April 02 2013 10:46 risk.nuke wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 02 2013 10:43 VisceraEyes wrote:
Can you point out where I've been talking about "the dangers of voting"? I'm pretty sure all I've talked about was how Lazer's and RoL's policies were retarded and unfair respectively.

Will you please god damn stop tunneling? The thread have talked about it, I assume you read the thread?

But does nothing to steer the direction himself, just has a voice to tell them to stop whatever it is that they are doing (later on this was ganging up on him).

risk.nuke moves on to accuse me of not really being interested in finding scum, while at the same time calling EVERY NON-POSTING PERSON SCUMMY.
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 02 2013 11:07 risk.nuke wrote:
Viscera. Tunneling isn't about time, it's about not having an open mind. You lashed out at me instantly and agressively for the smallest thing so clearly you're looking at me as if I am scum and are trying to find things things that are scummy about me to confirm that belief. Aka tunneling.

You want REAL scummy shit. Everyone that's not posting are scummier then those who are posting.
For 2, I personally think Hopeless1der look very uninterested in finding scum.


He goes to bed shortly after this, and upon waking up promises his "case" on meHAPA????. I mean, I guess that could happen if you'd just woken up, but still, that just irks me that he confuses his Scumread with the Host of the game. Nevertheless, he gets together his case on me:


On April 02 2013 20:58 risk.nuke wrote:
Hopeless1der
it started with this post.
Show nested quote +
On April 02 2013 10:07 Hopeless1der wrote:
ghor, are we going to be fighting a language barrier with you or are you just trolling?

He's pretty much around but doesn't do anything or comments on anything of worth. His three posts tells us he was around and this is what he choose to comment on?
Compare to other filters,
dessert
fruity

His other two posts one is a sheep-post where he talks briefly about hammers, which is fine but it doesn't really add anything.
The second and last one is some cheap shots which mostly just serve to tell us he's not reading the thread and if he is he's just skimming through it without caring when we're 1½ pages.


Really, it started with my second post in the game? Bro, I had 3 posts at the time of this "case". Read my first 3 posts of both of those filters and compare them to my first 3 posts here. If you can honestly tell me I look 100% scummier in this game than those 2, then fuck it, hammer me right goddamn now.

On April 03 2013 14:27 risk.nuke wrote:
We're not lynching anyone other then hopeless. RoL you got to be joking if you think that we're going to lynch cheesecake first. While I agree with your posts and I had some thoughts in simmilar direction last night. It's still a weaker case then on hopeless. I don't like how you haven't talked about me since your vote and I would like you to comment further on me and hopeless.

Hopeless is obvious scum and has pretty much given up by now. This is not how he plays as town.

And Ghor's post are not hard to read. If you disregard the fact that he speaks in third person and often don't use capital letters they're actually very simple to read and even efficiently phrased.

Sylencia. Who do you want to kill?

I want to know how I play as town, risk. Please show me.

risk.nuke's scumread on me is very weak imo, and he cites my meta as his main argument without demonstrating how I've deviated from my town meta or adhered to my scum meta. He's just made the statement that I'm not playing my town game and that I'm obvious scum. This is an incredibly lazy stance to take, and I want to see it substantiated before I die if possible. Alternatively, I'd like to see risk.nuke swing.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 13:36 GMT
#342
DOUBLE POST due to bottom of page:



Okay, back to why risk.nuke is scum:

Let me try again and actually explain why this shows a scum mentality.
On April 02 2013 08:44 risk.nuke wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 02 2013 08:39 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
On April 02 2013 08:37 risk.nuke wrote:
Worst vote ever.


On the contrary, best vote ever.

I would argue that putting your vote on a townie is greatly suboptimal.


1) Soft-claim town. He didn't say "I'M TOWN", he said voting a townie is bad.
2) Now, I'm making some pretty blanket statements here, but I would expect:
- Scum want to kill townies.
- Townies want to kill scum.
- Townies do not want to kill townies.

The assumption of this post is that CC is town and should not want other townies to die. <---This is what I am calling as the slip, risk knows CC is town.

+ Show Spoiler +

[CONFIRMATION BIAS]
On April 02 2013 08:48 risk.nuke wrote:
You want me to spoil the ending and hand you the key to the test?

He has the answer key *hint hint*
[/CONFIRMATION BIAS]


risk.nuke is the original proponent of the Kenpachi rule in this game. He did this for no other reason than an errant observation. No alignment indicative thoughts on it. VE made his point about it already:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 02 2013 10:15 VisceraEyes wrote:
I had a similar thought regarding risk.nuke. Why bring up the Kenpachi Rule at all if he had no intention of following it? My thoughts brought me to "He's scummy". He's either:

1) Scum trying to incriminate RoL innocuously by "joking" about Kenpachi Rule.
2) Town trying to trap someone into agreeing with his assessment and voting RoL.

I ruled out 2 by asking him if he thought RoL was scum because of it, and he doesn't, which leaves 1).

##Vote: risk.nuke

Conversely I'm very null on RoL. Abhorring my play-style is very NOT alignment indicative for that guy.


Something I notice reading risk's filter is he keeps trying to defend himself regarding his handling of the Kenpachi Rule, saying that people have different opinions and that he doesn't use methods like that to find scum.
However, when initially called out by VE, he insists that he was scumhunting

Its not so much a backpedal as it is him trying to "say the right things" to me.



Over the course of an hour, risk twice tells VE/RoL to stop tunneling
On April 02 2013 09:45 risk.nuke wrote:
VE, RoL. If you're going to tunnel-bitch-argue in the thread atleast argue about something remotely relevant.

On April 02 2013 10:46 risk.nuke wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 02 2013 10:43 VisceraEyes wrote:
Can you point out where I've been talking about "the dangers of voting"? I'm pretty sure all I've talked about was how Lazer's and RoL's policies were retarded and unfair respectively.

Will you please god damn stop tunneling? The thread have talked about it, I assume you read the thread?

But does nothing to steer the direction himself, just has a voice to tell them to stop whatever it is that they are doing (later on this was ganging up on him).

risk.nuke moves on to accuse me of not really being interested in finding scum, while at the same time calling EVERY NON-POSTING PERSON SCUMMY.
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 02 2013 11:07 risk.nuke wrote:
Viscera. Tunneling isn't about time, it's about not having an open mind. You lashed out at me instantly and agressively for the smallest thing so clearly you're looking at me as if I am scum and are trying to find things things that are scummy about me to confirm that belief. Aka tunneling.

You want REAL scummy shit. Everyone that's not posting are scummier then those who are posting.
For 2, I personally think Hopeless1der look very uninterested in finding scum.


He goes to bed shortly after this, and upon waking up promises his "case" on meHAPA????. I mean, I guess that could happen if you'd just woken up, but still, that just irks me that he confuses his Scumread with the Host of the game. Nevertheless, he gets together his case on me:


On April 02 2013 20:58 risk.nuke wrote:
Hopeless1der
it started with this post.
Show nested quote +
On April 02 2013 10:07 Hopeless1der wrote:
ghor, are we going to be fighting a language barrier with you or are you just trolling?

He's pretty much around but doesn't do anything or comments on anything of worth. His three posts tells us he was around and this is what he choose to comment on?
Compare to other filters,
dessert
fruity

His other two posts one is a sheep-post where he talks briefly about hammers, which is fine but it doesn't really add anything.
The second and last one is some cheap shots which mostly just serve to tell us he's not reading the thread and if he is he's just skimming through it without caring when we're 1½ pages.


Really, it started with my second post in the game? Bro, I had 3 posts at the time of this "case". Read my first 3 posts of both of those filters and compare them to my first 3 posts here. If you can honestly tell me I look 100% scummier in this game than those 2, then fuck it, hammer me right goddamn now.

On April 03 2013 14:27 risk.nuke wrote:
We're not lynching anyone other then hopeless. RoL you got to be joking if you think that we're going to lynch cheesecake first. While I agree with your posts and I had some thoughts in simmilar direction last night. It's still a weaker case then on hopeless. I don't like how you haven't talked about me since your vote and I would like you to comment further on me and hopeless.

Hopeless is obvious scum and has pretty much given up by now. This is not how he plays as town.

And Ghor's post are not hard to read. If you disregard the fact that he speaks in third person and often don't use capital letters they're actually very simple to read and even efficiently phrased.

Sylencia. Who do you want to kill?

I want to know how I play as town, risk. Please show me.

risk.nuke's scumread on me is very weak imo, and he cites my meta as his main argument without demonstrating how I've deviated from my town meta or adhered to my scum meta. He's just made the statement that I'm not playing my town game and that I'm obvious scum. This is an incredibly lazy stance to take, and I want to see it substantiated before I die if possible. Alternatively, I'd like to see risk.nuke swing.

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 13:38 GMT
#344
On April 03 2013 22:34 Lazermonkey wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2013 22:30 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 03 2013 22:24 Lazermonkey wrote:
On April 03 2013 22:15 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 03 2013 22:09 AxleGreaser wrote:
On April 03 2013 22:09 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 03 2013 22:08 AxleGreaser wrote:
On April 03 2013 21:54 Hopeless1der wrote:
Axle, if you're around, do you seriously believe I think there are 3 scum? You devoted a decent section of your case against me to something that literally cannot be true, unless Hapa is bastard modding


No I don't seriously believe you think there are 3 scum in 9 player game.

Who is your top scum read?

risk > ghor at the moment, but I haven't re-read ghor yet. working on a risk case now.


How did your case on Ghor get started?

Hes a trolly jerkface who insulted my literacy skills. Also, relatively insistent that risk.nuke is scum, but wont hammer in order to find the "other scum". Upon finding said scum (sylencia), doesn't want to hammer risk.nuke anymore. Granted, I'm sailing the same boat but whatever..
So you confess that you are looking scummy or what?

I always look scummy, you're the one who's been defending me on that concept.
Yes, I was just slightly suprised to see you defend yourself in that matter...

Wouldn't be the first time. (Looney Lynching)
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 13:41 GMT
#345
On April 03 2013 22:36 AxleGreaser wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2013 22:15 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 03 2013 22:09 AxleGreaser wrote:
On April 03 2013 22:09 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 03 2013 22:08 AxleGreaser wrote:
On April 03 2013 21:54 Hopeless1der wrote:
Axle, if you're around, do you seriously believe I think there are 3 scum? You devoted a decent section of your case against me to something that literally cannot be true, unless Hapa is bastard modding


No I don't seriously believe you think there are 3 scum in 9 player game.

Who is your top scum read?

risk > ghor at the moment, but I haven't re-read ghor yet. working on a risk case now.


How did your case on Ghor get started?

Hes a trolly jerkface who insulted my literacy skills. Also, relatively insistent that risk.nuke is scum, but wont hammer in order to find the "other scum". Upon finding said scum (sylencia), doesn't want to hammer risk.nuke anymore. Granted, I'm sailing the same boat but whatever..


That's strange... while that is where in your filter you first started mentioning Ghor...
I did indeed find the argument over the scum slip interesting.
In this post
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2013 01:59 Hopeless1der wrote:
On April 03 2013 01:56 Ghor wrote:
ghor think hopeless braindead if he thinks ghor teammate with risk. ghor pointed out fallacies with risk early, try get proper opinion on him from sylencia.

All reasoning laid out, hopeless not absorb it.

Hopeless, question:
Ghor saw the scumslip you pointed out that was none. Ghor answered to your assessment, what do you deduce from it?

(Ghor deduces it another example of hopeless amazing reading comprehension)

it was what initially put me onto you as scum, so thank you for the compliment.


You indicate that it was him not agreeing with your assessment of the scumslip.

Now that is important to me in assessing the genuine nature of your scum hunting.
it strike me that if you are reacting emotively to "a trolly jerkface who insulted my literacy skills"
and when you find out that what you claimed was what originally put you onto him
then at best you are seriously tunnel visioned...

Wine that is easier to drink is that, you are scum, and not interested in whether or not your read started from false premise. (the false premise is Ghor not liking your scum slip indicated to you, he was scum)

Its true that is not strong indicator, its true if I had better candidate id vote lynch them.
Its not the only thing I said in that post by rather long shot.

As you have noted its not possible that all the people who don't think that was scum slip are scum, there
are just too many of us.

So yes I regard that you do not seem to go back and actually critically evaluate your reads as scum indicative.
it simply doesn't feel like genuine searching for the truth, just a glove that does or does not fit.


BTW. I got a bad feeling the trolly jerk face probably fell off his chair when he read your last post.



He insulted my literacy skills regarding the scumslip:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 02 2013 11:13 Ghor wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On April 02 2013 10:49 Hopeless1der wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 02 2013 10:44 risk.nuke wrote:
On April 02 2013 10:29 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
##unvote: VE
##Vote: Risk.nuke

It's like you brought up the Kenpachi rule just to see if someone else was willing to run with it and kill me. Wanting townies to do your work for you?

Why would I fake a perfectly legit argument?

Show nested quote +
On April 02 2013 09:50 risk.nuke wrote:
On April 02 2013 09:47 VisceraEyes wrote:
On April 02 2013 09:45 risk.nuke wrote:
VE, RoL. If you're going to tunnel-bitch-argue in the thread atleast argue about something remotely relevant.

If you're going to criticize me for anything, you should answer questions posed of you first. Do you think RoL is scum for "contesting" my "claim" a la Kenpachi Rule?

No I don't.

Doesn't seem all that legit to me.



Show nested quote +
On April 02 2013 08:44 risk.nuke wrote:
On April 02 2013 08:39 Mr. Cheesecake wrote:
On April 02 2013 08:37 risk.nuke wrote:
Worst vote ever.


On the contrary, best vote ever.

I would argue that putting your vote on a townie is greatly suboptimal.

Also, scumslip in that he knows CC is town.


ghor think contradiction also very strong point.but ghor want long day. risk ok, risk on chopping block but no axe soon, axe later. wait for other information, milk day, find other scum.
but that no scumslip, that was cc voting risk and risk saying he town and vote bad, you read thread pls hopeless.no offense.

For low probability that risk do stupid mistake as town, 3 vote on risk mean scum can kill risk together.
if risk town he can play harder than everyone else now and know if he does not, he dead.
but need other opinion from not posting people first.

no go quick with axe. Ploha.

Oh wait he said "No offense". Clearly he has no malicious intent.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 15:34 GMT
#351
On April 03 2013 07:18 VisceraEyes wrote:
Noted.

I'm rereading right now. I totally missed that Ghor had made a case on Sylencia. I'm gonna go read that part of the day in context and see what I see.

@VE for when you return, what came of this?



@axle
what in the actual fuck, i dont even?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 15:58 GMT
#356
On April 04 2013 00:52 Ghor wrote:
Ghor very curious why hopeless never ask scummy sylencia why he want vote him. scummy sylencia only skating by hopeless lynch. and hopeless hardly mention sylencia or comment on what ghor said.look like not exist for each other in thread, maybe only in qt.

sylencia not ask scumread CC question.sylencia not ask hopeless question. sylencia fake scumhunt. no hunt for information. he only try discredit ghor cause ghor close scumteam.

Look in filter, what ghor say true. sylencia not interested in scumread, only passive say he lynch people. goes for ghor cause ghor look like troll, that initial reason. now only give other reason to stay on easy target. but ghor can stop troll if he want and sylencia very likely not stop tunnel. that cause sylencia scum.


Indulge us, please.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 16:13 GMT
#361
According to STRONGCOUNT I'm at L-2. Here, how's this?


##Unvote: Ghor
##Vote: Hopeless1der

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 16:18 GMT
#362
Axle do you still think I lied or was contradictory about why I started after Ghor in the first place?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 16:20 GMT
#364
On April 04 2013 01:19 Ghor wrote:
Hopeless say what you think of sylencia instead of derping? Your reading mistakes made you look terrible, but not only, and I'm trying to get a scummier dude than you lynched, so stop martyring and start cooperating if you're town.

HOLY SHIT HE STOPPED 3RD PERSON

##Unvote
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 16:27 GMT
#366
tell you what, make the case on sylencia you said you might and I'll comment on that. At present Sylencia is third in line to 1-risk.nuke and 2-Ghor.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
April 03 2013 16:31 GMT
#368
@risk, you barely made a case on me in the first place. You accuse me of not scumhunting based on 3 posts just hours into the game. Your follow-up is that I'm obvious scum and that this isn't town hopeless. My OMGUS is literally to replace "hopeless" with "risk", and my argument is as strong as the one you'd presented.

Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 56186
Barracks 1869
Shuttle 1787
EffOrt 1466
Mini 856
firebathero 801
BeSt 648
actioN 555
Larva 333
Soma 272
[ Show more ]
Hyun 121
Mind 63
sorry 55
Sharp 54
Dewaltoss 43
Shinee 40
JulyZerg 31
Backho 24
Sacsri 18
ajuk12(nOOB) 18
Shine 17
Yoon 16
Terrorterran 12
ivOry 11
Dota 2
syndereN758
XcaliburYe623
canceldota151
Counter-Strike
kRYSTAL_50
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor357
Other Games
B2W.Neo1793
Hui .317
KnowMe116
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3087
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 86
• poizon28 11
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 27
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV704
• Ler116
League of Legends
• Jankos1468
Upcoming Events
Online Event
1h
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
3h
Esports World Cup
1d 19h
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
2 days
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
6 days
[ Show More ]
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.