Noir Mini Mafia: Chapter 1 - Page 15
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Furthermore he lied about it in the thread. Observe. On April 03 2013 01:32 Hopeless1der wrote: I think risk is scummy but didn't want the day to end that soon. Also wanted to see if anyone agreed with my assessment of the supposed scumslip. Ghor is annoying as all hell and his intentions behind voting sylencia do not match with his scum read on risk.nuke. He wants sylencia to commit to some type of a read on risk and when he refuses to do so, calls him scum for it. No where does he validate why this is scummy. Combine that with what appears to be a trolling smurf hellbent on behaving like a caveman, and I think he's a good choice for lynch. On April 03 2013 01:48 Hopeless1der wrote: My vote on ghor was to get him to answer my bloody question about his stance on risk instead of directing me to his filter. ##Unvote: Ghor ##Vote: risk.nuke When confronted about his vote on Ghor he says it was to get him to answer his question, but as you can see from the first post, he clearly says that he feels like Ghor should be considered for lynch today. Inconsistent. Scummy. | ||
strongandbig
United States4858 Posts
STRONG COUNT risk.nuke ( 2 ): VisceraEyes ( 0 ): Sylencia ( 2 ): Mr. Cheesecake ( 0 ): Ghor ( 0 ): Hopeless1der ( 2 ): VisceraEyes, risk.nuke Not Voting ( 3 ): AxleGreaser, Mr. Cheesecake, Sylencia With 9 alive it takes 5 to lynch. This is instant majority lynch. If you see a mistake please notify us. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
On April 03 2013 06:49 Hopeless1der wrote: I don't know. You being a hypocrite is actually not alignment indicative imo. What I do know is that you are calling out Ghor for stuff that you are doing yourself. So stop that.here`s my question, considering people accuse me of being a hypocrite. Do you think I`m just trying to be disruptive or that I`m trying to save sylencia? It should be a minimum of one of those, right? | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On April 03 2013 06:51 VisceraEyes wrote: I feel like he got caught with his pants down trying to tiptoe around a risk.nuke lynch. He was indirectly supporting the risk.nuke wagon without adding his vote. Regardless of risk.nuke's alignment, that's a suspicious action out of Hopeless. If at the time he felt like risk.nuke was scum (which his whole association BS is supposing) then there's no reason for him to be indirectly supporting the wagon while trying to start a counter-wagon on someone else. Furthermore he lied about it in the thread. Observe. When confronted about his vote on Ghor he says it was to get him to answer his question, but as you can see from the first post, he clearly says that he feels like Ghor should be considered for lynch today. Inconsistent. Scummy. I believe the scumteam is both ghor and risk.nuke. My vote came down as follows: + Show Spoiler + On April 03 2013 00:11 Hopeless1der wrote: ghor, do you think risk is scum? On April 03 2013 00:18 Ghor wrote: Ghor not understand why people ask questions about risk, people not read properly ghor posts?read thread then come back with good question please. only update is ghor not think RoL that scummy any more, but not like initial play. now better. risk talk about fluff after he say he not like doing content of his fluff (policy). his defense, bad, he contradict. On April 03 2013 00:25 Hopeless1der wrote: ##Vote: Ghor Do you think risk.nuke is scum? My vote was for the explicit purpose to get him to [answer the question, not because I thought he was scum (I thought he was scum but that was not the reason for voting him). Since then I've become more confident in my read. You didn't catch me tiptoeing around anything. I directly supported a risk.nuke lynch, but neglected to vote in for him at the time. This was to ensure people didn't flip out and say OMG UNVOTE BEFORE HAMMER. Since then, I've developed a scum read on Ghor as well. I'm perfectly willing to swap back and forth between the two of them all day. ##Unvote: risk.nuke ##Vote: Ghor | ||
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On April 03 2013 06:55 VisceraEyes wrote: Hopeless who even said anything about you saving Sylencia? What are you talking about? What do you believe my motive to be? Trying to put myself in your shoes, I'd suspect (Scum-Hopeless) of being disruptive and/or trying to save (Scum-Sylencia). by the way, inherent in reading two people as scum is everyone else is town. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
RebirthOfLegend When I wake up tomorrow you better have posted. | ||
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
On April 03 2013 06:51 VisceraEyes wrote: isn't this like exactly what Ghor did? or am I missing something? You don't seem to think that he is scummy. I feel like he got caught with his pants down trying to tiptoe around a risk.nuke lynch. He was indirectly supporting the risk.nuke wagon without adding his vote. Regardless of risk.nuke's alignment, that's a suspicious action out of Hopeless. If at the time he felt like risk.nuke was scum (which his whole association BS is supposing) then there's no reason for him to be indirectly supporting the wagon while trying to start a counter-wagon on someone else. Your other point is quite good though,I must admit. But Syl looks far worse still. | ||
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I'm rereading right now. I totally missed that Ghor had made a case on Sylencia. I'm gonna go read that part of the day in context and see what I see. | ||
Mr. Cheesecake
United States3756 Posts
First impressions are that i dont like the syl case atm. Peace out till after work. | ||
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Further, I'd like your thoughts on Lazermonkey. | ||
| ||