Personality Mafia 2 - Page 4

On March 12 2013 16:05 Mocsta wrote:

hmm.. well you can only have one lynch a cycle.

With the information currently, do you prefer foolishness or vivax?

On March 12 2013 16:13 Foolishness wrote:

I was gone and made an accusation based on what I skimmed through the thread at the time. Then when I came back to push the case further I realized I was wrong when I analyzed him. Which should be obvious given that I gave the proof.

On March 12 2013 18:33 Promethelax wrote:





so you are sure Viv is scum
why then attack the other bum?
Votes were almost tied
it was six to five
but your vote was on Bugs the dumb.

On March 12 2013 19:32 Vivax wrote:
If anything it can't be explained how marv and Hiro were so sure that the announcement made Kurumi confirmed town. They couldn't know where it came from, but they could know that Kurumi was indeed town.

On March 12 2013 22:13 Acrofales wrote:
Read back up to page 25, this time taking notes. Will be catching up today and you'll have all my thoughts by the end of the day.

For now I can say that Vivax entered the thread in an extremely wishy washy manner. Seemed like he wanted to lynch lurkers, but was afraid of saying so. This seems completely out of wack with his town meta, where he ALWAYS says whatever he wants.

Supersoft also tried his hardest to not step on anybody's toes. He "agreed" with Iamp's post, but when questioned about it, disagreed with calling VE scum. Effectively that means he disagreed with Iamp's post.

Also, a little bit about the lynch: if Vivax is scum, then there is almost guaranteed to be scum who refused to leave the WBG wagon. If he's town, then it's completely up in the air where scum ended up. Given what I think of Vivax's entry into the thread, I like the Vivax=scum theory. I will pay special attention to this list: Oatsmaster, Mocsta, austinmcc, iamperfection and prplhz.

Heading to the office. Will continue reading and analysing there.

On March 12 2013 22:21 Vivax wrote:


Oh it's cool you know I'm town

On March 12 2013 22:27 Vivax wrote:


You scumslipped you don't have me as town in your reads.


Shoot Oats or lynch him tomorrow

On March 12 2013 22:42 Vivax wrote:


Well let's put the scumslip aside for now then and affront your argument: I think Foolishness is town and your argument is not going to change anything about it, if you think I'm scum then why are you trying to dissuade me from saying Foolishness is town?

On March 12 2013 23:10 Vivax wrote:
There is another option I didn't think through and it's that I read crossfire as slight town early, Foolishness repeatedly said that he didn't analyse him yet as he did me and yamato so if crossfire is scum then it would kinda make sense for scum Foolish to want to keep me around since if crossfire flips then I'd be a logical next step.

On the other hand after I flip town cause of that Foolish would look better for defending me early.

So yeah maybe I'm a bit too fast on the Foolish read but I found his defense of me townie since I would have been a good mislynch candidate as well, if he kept pushing me together with marv and VE he could have gotten me killed but he didn't.

I'll stick with town though cause there are scummier people than Foolish and losing him as town early is too big of a risk, if he's scum we will find out later anyway he's not the guy who can allow himself to make too many mistakes as town without being at danger of lynch.

On March 12 2013 23:19 austinmcc wrote:
marv, let's argue.

It seems like every time you think someone who is well-respected for scumhunting is out to get you, you decide they're scum. I decide you're being an idiot and overreacting. Then palmar flips scum in ... Rock Band? And Foolishness flips scum in Parallel.

So, you've got the track record here. Do you actually think this is a strategy that would be continued? I don't see why, especially as it didn't work well for Foolishness before, he would do the same thing 2 months later.

On March 13 2013 01:57 marvellosity wrote:


Acro your best point you hid in the spoiler!

This from a player who I distinctly recall saying all meta cases are terrible in Duel mafia

I'd completely forgotten this. Witness:



This game, witness (spoilered for length)

+ Show Spoiler +

On March 13 2013 02:08 VisceraEyes wrote:
Oats what are your thoughts on the hyperveterans? I'm referring here to BC, Ver and Foolishness. Just your objective, gut response is all I'm after here, I'm not asking you to reread them and give me full reads.

On March 13 2013 02:11 VisceraEyes wrote:
What do you make of the fact that Ver is claiming he hasn't read his role PM? And how does this affect your assessment that "he'd give more of a fuck"?

On March 12 2013 09:40 Foolishness wrote:
I'm sold.

##Unvote: Vivax
##Vote: Yamato77

On March 12 2013 09:44 Foolishness wrote:

Actually, yamato makes a lot of sense. He's more trolly and abrasive when he's mafia. When I say that, I mean he's direct about his insults: "you're an asshat", etc. Refer to Fruity Mini Mafia to see this in action (when he's mafia). In Town Ain't Big Enough Mafia, he was town, and while his posting rate was the same, he wasn't as abrasive and didn't swear as much. More importantly, in that game he was actually helpful and contributing.

On March 12 2013 18:20 Foolishness wrote:
Mafia don't need to create multiple wagons if none of them are under pressure. From what I see bugs was always top candidate and not many people were hard against his lynch. I don't really think there's much to gather from the lynch. If there were last minute swings and people sheeping on bandwagons sure, but meh from yesterday's lynch.

I still 100% support a yamato lynch. I am also on board a crossfire lynch. I was skeptical of him at first, but after seeing his reactions right before and after the lynch I will gladly kill him (I haven't thoroughly analyzed him like I have yamato or Vivax though).