|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 04:23 Oatsmaster wrote:Sloosh, relying on other people to figure out your extremely weird plan is never a good idea. NEVER. So please dont do it.  Ok. Back to lynching foolishness. People who played a lot with Iamp, is this activity normal? Or bad/scummy?
or roleplay-ee
he still made me giggle earlier which i like. plus he was the one who really made me stop and think about vivax. i have the horrible feeling vivax is town, which means iamp is preventing me from mislynching someone when he had no reason to. i think.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 04:39 austinmcc wrote:
Working on figuring out what to make of Foolishness's response to the this. If he's scum and marv isn't, Foolishness should have nuked marv, imo (Or someone more threatening to scum than Yamato right now). However, because his play leading up to this has been scummy, and because his post-nuke conduct is just to afk out again after dropping a comment about risk.nuke, I don't think it paints him as town. If he nuked marv, he'd be 10000000% scum and have no chance of avoiding lynch today. Nuking non-marv was really his only option as scum. So I'm reading his actions as an attempt to look townie, because the lead-up and the follow-up to the nuke target don't mesh with town Foolishness.
So, a full thought and a partial thought. You just tangled a bit with acro, thoughts on him?
It's interesting how he justified it as well, isn't it?
"well i was 100% on yamato, only 95% on marv"
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 04:52 Foolishness wrote:
I'm actually 100% on you now.
hahahaha your posts make me laugh, you really need to read my posts more thoroughly.
Care to refute your own analysis of your play which heavily paints you as mafia?
I'm all ears broski.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 04:57 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 04:53 marvellosity wrote:On March 14 2013 04:52 Foolishness wrote:
I'm actually 100% on you now.
hahahaha your posts make me laugh, you really need to read my posts more thoroughly. Care to refute your own analysis of your play which heavily paints you as mafia? I'm all ears broski. If you write a nice long post detailing when and where I did that I will gladly respond to it. But it is obvious you are picking at straws when it comes to everything about me. It's been that way since day 1. I mean lol that one post where you're like "omg he's never been lynched as town do you think he plays this way as town with that statistic" I mean loooool that's the most hilarious argument I've ever seen. That's almost as good as Tunkeg's "we should lynch jackal cause statistically he has the lowest win percentage". It's definitely clear that crossfire has revealed his true intentions now. Please lynch him immediately. It's going to be hard for me to post cause I have a long research paper due tomorrow, but I will at least give you your nice long post on how I caught you as mafia. Hopefully that nuke is going to kill you as well.
ahahahahahaha. ahahahahahahaha. Let me repeat
AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH. you're not fucking reading the thread.
I don't need to write a big long post detailing it, I POSTED IT EARLIER. IT IS AGAIN IN THE THREAD. oh my god.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'm hanging tight, darling.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 05:00 Foolishness wrote:
Well if you want to be conceited about it then that's fine too. I mean I could care less about you, I'm here to win.
nothing to do with being conceited. you're just not reading the thread at all.
you made 2 statements in that post which demonstrably showed you're not reading the thread.
a) the nukes are fake. This has been discussed over MANY PAGES NOW
b) I posted that quote from you earlier from XXX discussing your play. You can't miss it. It's really long and i put bold in it and everything.
your opinion is worthless. submit to me, your master.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 05:03 Foolishness wrote:
Oh well I hope the nukes are fake cause my role is such that I can't get lynched.
Oops.
well, we'll just have to test that theory out, won't we
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 04:52 Foolishness wrote:
I'm actually 100% on you now.
hahahaha your posts make me laugh, you really need to read my posts more thoroughly.
On March 14 2013 05:05 Foolishness wrote:
##Vote: yamato77
cool story bro
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 05:10 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On March 14 2013 04:52 Foolishness wrote:
I'm actually 100% on you now.
hahahaha your posts make me laugh, you really need to read my posts more thoroughly. cool story bro
[image blocked]
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 05:21 prplhz wrote:
how did plexa know prior to the first nuke launching what sloosh had done?
The message came after the nukes were launched?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
... pay attention, prplhz. No it came 4 or 5 hours ago. something like that.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
you don't know who compelled you to vote, do you prplhz?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
New question prplhz: how do you even know Plexa sent a message when you don't even know when and where it was posted? How is that possible?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 05:39 Foolishness wrote:
And now marvellosity is acting like wherebugsgo when he's mafia. Yawn too predictable.
I want my case. I want you to go through the large effort of making it so I can laugh at you as you die. Please go ahead and make the case. I implore you.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Corazon, why are you saying that yamato is going to die from the nuke, when it's been confirmed by the maker and giver of the nuke that they are fake?
Why aren't you reading the thread?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
One other thing Corazon.
When there are a lot of players a lot better than you telling you we're not lynching yamato, and it's very clear that we're not lynching yamato, why don't you listen?
why aren't you commenting on Foolishness?
why are you so inattentive to all thread events when normally you like to comment on everything?
why do you keep saying your flip with "confirm" yamato when it does nothing of the sort?
why are you martyring? what good do you think that will do?
hmm. that's more than one thing.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I am paranoid as shit about yamato's disappearance though
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Foolishness, in all seriousness, if you can make a serious case on yamato I'm all ears. Gogo.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 06:53 Vivax wrote:2. Is more of a speculation/gamble to see if I was right later I'm not going to base my reads on that yet. Consider it a loud thought with no relevance for the objectives. We're back to scratch thanks to SlOosh's stuff. Ver hasn't shown himself. Super good Ver hasn't show himself. Marv didn't post his statistics about "lynched as town=0%" for Ver but wants to lynch Foolish who is writing about 3000 % more than super good townie Ver. on weak reasons arguing that Foolish would post more and would not be under suspicion if he was town. Marv defends yamato who doesn't play like town yamato, shot a townie roleplaying a fake Chezinu and has to have been defended by scum by virtue of numbers when he could have been an awesome target for scum given his actions with Kurumi. 2 of the people on his wagon were townie, + everything I already posted about him earlier: + Show Spoiler +On March 13 2013 00:49 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 00:45 yamato77 wrote:On March 13 2013 00:38 Vivax wrote:On March 13 2013 00:33 yamato77 wrote:On March 13 2013 00:30 Vivax wrote:On March 13 2013 00:27 Mocsta wrote:On March 13 2013 00:25 Vivax wrote:yamato is a better lynch actually Now this I disagree with outright. Anonymous vig claim holds for this cycle. Your whole town read on yamato is based onto his vig-claim? As said by me and S & B him claiming the shot beforehand was probably a requisite for his shot to work but he doesn't mention it as part of his role so people go around and say he's town for claiming it. It wasn't. If you could fucking read, it is an automatic function of my alignment check that I shoot town-aligned players. I don't know beforehand, and mafia roles don't get revealed or shot, I just get a PM saying they're mafia or third party. Stop misrepresenting what I've said about my role. Well that's even worse you used your role on a guy in the crossfire without asking him to stop trolling like I did or waiting some more to find out if he's actually scum. You actually justified your shot by saying that he martyred and had to die afterwards and not by saying that you wanted to check him while risking his death, meaning you justified afterwards that he died for trolling, not that he died cause you thought he was mafia and wanted to check him at the risk of him dying. So your whole motivation behind that shot doesn't add up in light of your role. It was one of the factors that I considered when I thought of the possibility of him being town, yes. I didn't know his alignment, and thought that even if he was town for this, it was not a great loss because of how he was playing. You should stop posting because I've said all this before. Fucking read. Your role is more anti-town than anything. Already using it so early in the day on a player looking so bad at the time is scummy and only convenient for you. You were willing to bet a townie life against a check that no one would believe cause it would have been a D1 check. If you were town you'd be seriously stupid, but I know you aren't. Neither of both. On March 13 2013 00:59 Vivax wrote:Had VE as scumread before the shot, but didn't shoot him.Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 03:00 yamato77 wrote:On March 11 2013 02:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
LOL this game. Vivax maybe you can explain what about that post you didn't like? Maybe explain why it's scummy and why you want to lynch me? Yamato is just butthurt that I found him so fast, but what's your excuse? VE not reading, just lurking. Speak and he shall appear. Proof that yamato is scumShow nested quote +On March 11 2013 06:59 yamato77 wrote:On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote:
Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro...
##Vote: Yamato
Gonna start scumhunting? i'm at work you asshat it's in my filter What I will do is solve this Kurumi problem right now. Yamato announces that the problem will be solved when he doesn't know if he gets a check back or Kurumi dies.
Yamato knew Kurumi would die and says he doesn't have to announce the shot in the thread but claimed it on his own - despite not knowing if he'll get a check back he says that "The problem will be solved".The actual announcement comes laterHis reaction after knowing Kurumi would die as town: On March 13 2013 01:08 Vivax wrote:
Now, aside from the fact that yamato didn't shoot his "scumread", he didn't play as if he expected to get a check back on Kurumi no, he posted as if he knew he would get shot.
What if he had the chance to get a check back from Kurumi (like he should believe), why announce something beforehand when you don't know the outcome?
Let's assume he expected to get a red check back on Kurumi, would he announce it in the thread or wait for the outcome and only claim the shot if he hit green? In case he hit red he could simply push Kurumi or claim the check afterwards. In case of green he could have stayed silent or claimed it or whatever he wanted to, but he chose the stupid way, why? Explanation: For his role to work he had to play the shot like MZ played it.
He had to announce that he would shoot someone in the thread for his role to work, but refuses to admit it. Every other explanation doesn't make sense unless he's a massive derp. On March 13 2013 01:29 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On March 13 2013 01:19 marvellosity wrote:On March 13 2013 01:18 Vivax wrote:On March 13 2013 01:17 marvellosity wrote:
The Kurumi problem wouldn't be there, which is the problem yamato said he would solve.
yamato would still be there, yes, but that's a different kettle of fish. The problem he said he would "solve" before knowing from the host if Kurumi was scum or town? if he's scum we lynch him, if he's a martyring town, he gets shot. Problem solved in both scenarios? ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 06:46 Kurumi wrote:
okay so it seems I got a scum role and I am town
burn me because if I ever fucking turn mole I will throw something heavy out of my room
##vote Kurumi Show nested quote +On March 11 2013 06:59 yamato77 wrote:On March 11 2013 05:59 cDgCorazon wrote:
Hmmm...guess who has decided to lurk now that other targets are being hunted? Yamato and Acro...
##Vote: Yamato
Gonna start scumhunting? i'm at work you asshat it's in my filter What I will do is solve this Kurumi problem right now.
He chose to shoot Kurumi for martyring over his "scumread" VE in the arc of 13 minutes.
Show nested quote +On March 12 2013 11:31 yamato77 wrote:
I consent to any of Vivax, Super, Bugs, Foolish or Ver hanging
My vote will stay where it is because I only have time to type this post at work.
If I die, so be it, but I highly doubt you guys will be happy when you find out I lied about nothing Bugs was martyring, too but he pumps out a 5 guy list instead of going for Bugs who does the same as Kurumi. Kurumi martyring is a good enough reason to shoot him but Bugs doing that isn't a good enough reason to lynch him over 4 others? Inconsistent reasons, terrible role usage, indications of him knowing Kurumi's flip beforehand ( + general subjective scumminess). ##Vote yamato77
posting more != townie, as you revelled in pointing out to me 
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On March 14 2013 06:36 Vivax wrote:1. Cora's latest posts look townie as fuck.2. I think that SlOosh's role works this way: He has to give three nukes to townies, but can only pick one shot to go through, this involves him being scum. If he lets the shot against yamato go through in consistency with his earlier case, this possibility is dismissed and we can finally go on without that WIFOMY dude around who has been obviously defended by mafia. 3. I laughed frantically at this. Show nested quote +Again, this is really important. Someone stole his vote. HIS VOTE. There's that stupid line in some of the OPs or the PMs when you'e a VT about how all you have is your voice and your vote. His vote is gone.
if you're town, you seem to be playing the Opposite Game. It's kinda hilarious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://www.heart-valve-surgery.com/Images/announcement.jpg)
