Personality Mafia 2 - Page 14

On March 13 2013 02:43 HiroPro wrote:


He played in Aperture 2, it was kind of a weird game and he was a member of a hidden 2nd scum team.

On March 13 2013 02:47 Vivax wrote:


He didn't spam up the thread asking for a yamato lynch, that would be accurate. But you initially said he didn't push anything, now you admit he did, so you should know that part of your argument for him being scum doesn't hold, don't you?

On March 13 2013 02:49 Acrofales wrote:

I thought you were pretty levelheaded and townie at the time, but this post is not making sense to me.

WBG's role was survivor, not scum aligned. His powers were meh. Unless you are talking about Kurumi, in which case he was town aligned, not scum aligned at all.

The impression I got from Yamato is that he knew all along what his power would do. Now, why would scum get a DT check? It makes no sense. Even if it is combined with a dayvig. Either Yamato is lying about how his power works, or he is town. The role makes NO sense for scum.

On March 13 2013 02:51 VisceraEyes wrote:

This describes my feelings too. I've had lingering doubts about Crossfire based on how he was roleplaying early on - then he came back and it looked like he was going to contribute, but then roleplayed some more. Then he came back and was suprsrsmode - and he was on the block.

Like, everyone has a vested interest in not getting lynched, but it just seems to me that we wouldn't have been in a position where Xfire was up for lynch if he'd played the way he was playing at lynch time like, all day.

I'm gonna go peruse those games, let me know your thoughts on his meta (since you seem to be familiar already) while I'm gone.

On March 13 2013 02:56 Vivax wrote:

You were willing to bet a townie life against a check that no one would believe cause it would have been a D1 check.

On March 13 2013 03:15 austinmcc wrote:
Was away for a moment, noticed slOosh talk.

I checked Personality 1 because I thought there'd been a role that had to tunnel someone and only post on them. Didn't find it, but maybe skipped over. Is there anyone known for just fighting with MZ every game they're in? I agree with slOosh being a futureproblem, but his activity being ONLY to tunnel made me think that perhaps it's a personality limitation, despite most personalities in this game not coming with the same extreme limitations that they came with in 1.

Couldn't find a particular role, but if there's a player known for fighting with MZ, or a player known just for tunneling, it's a possible explanation (that doesn't say anything about his alignment )

On March 12 2013 13:53 slOosh wrote:
My scum read on yamato is even stronger now. Take out the Kurumi shot out of his filter and what you are left with is a bunch of one liners throwing doubt and pointing fingers at everyone. Not only that, there is absolutely no consistency with his reads at all. Multiple times he calls slOosh and Cora scum and they get left out of his final reads, he bothers to put in a post detailing people he would liked lynched yet doesn't move his vote on WBG, indicating he doesn't really care if crossfire were to die (does yam think he is town? scum? who knows?). That plus the problems I have concerning his role usage => this dude is scum.

People think otherwise about the role usage: I invite those people to look into his filter (aside from the role stuff) and tell me what they think. Marv I think you mentioned his meta - I'm most familiar with town yamato from Nomination, where he carried town at the end. Dunno his scum meta, but clearly he can play decent town (posting wise and whatnot).

I'll be taking this night to review stuff I missed during the day. Still gonna tunnel yamato though unless people can provide more than "yam's balls too small for that". If you want opinions on specific things ask and I'll address them when I can.

On March 13 2013 04:12 Vivax wrote:
Look at what marv said, he seems to have been forced by the hosts to say that he's a parity cop and not just a cop so apparently he initially lied about his role O_o

On March 13 2013 04:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
I've never claimed like that. /indignant

On March 13 2013 04:31 austinmcc wrote:
Perhaps you don't have to claim to be checking only your targets?

On March 13 2013 04:31 VisceraEyes wrote:
No way you are demanding RB or Framer. Just like I'm demanding KP tonight. I think it's adorable. <3

On March 13 2013 04:32 Vivax wrote:


And why did you think it would be better for you to claim cop over parity cop? How did you think would it be better if scum though this?

On March 13 2013 04:38 Vivax wrote:


It's in your interest to answer me before I leave.

You are confirmed liar (: . Nice that you call Foolishness scum over a lie that is arguably not as bad as yours.

For some reason you wanted to appear as cop over parity cop which would appear more dangerous for scum, so it doesn't make sense for you to lie about it this way if you're town.

Scummarv claims cop → I can claim to have gotten any check back I wanted.
Scummarv claims parity cop → My checks are limited and if one guy is of one alignment the other must be of the opposite

Townmarv claims cop → I look more dangerous for scum and am at risk of getting RBd/killed. Also I won't actually know if someone is really scum after N1 even though I claimed I would.
Townmarv claims parity cop → Honest answer, town will know what it has to expect.

Summary: Townmarv wouldn't lie about being a cop over a parity cop.

On March 13 2013 04:48 Vivax wrote:


Oh we're back to this Foolish didn't lie to call you mafia he allegedly lied to say he's not sure about you.
Marvybaby so mad , ragequit like in LVIII please instead of spamming your one-liners

On March 13 2013 04:55 Vivax wrote:
Anyway marv lied about his role and refuses to give reasons, there are no good reasons for him to lie about the role as town so likely scum.

When confronted with it he tries to draw a comparison with Foolish's lie instead of trying to explain how it would be more beneficial for him to lie about it as town with the excuse of it being night.

Bad excuse, scum knows his role his targets and the role is modconfirmed so marv is being scummarv and also very provocative. Kill it with fire.

On March 13 2013 04:55 Vivax wrote:
Anyway marv lied about his role and refuses to give reasons, there are no good reasons for him to lie about the role as town so likely scum.

When confronted with it he tries to draw a comparison with Foolish's lie instead of trying to explain how it would be more beneficial for him to lie about it as town with the excuse of it being night.

Bad excuse, scum knows his role his targets and the role is modconfirmed so marv is being scummarv and also very provocative. Kill it with fire.

On March 13 2013 04:38 Vivax wrote:


It's in your interest to answer me before I leave.

You are confirmed liar (: . Nice that you call Foolishness scum over a lie that is arguably not as bad as yours.